5,252
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Decreasing the share of travel by car. Strategies for implementing ‘push’ or ‘pull’ measures in a traditionally car-centric transport and land use planning

ORCID Icon &
Pages 446-458 | Received 25 Mar 2021, Accepted 27 Feb 2022, Published online: 22 Mar 2022

References

  • Attard, M., & Ison, S. (2010). The implementation of road user charging and the lessons learnt: The case of Valletta, Malta. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(1), 14–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2009.05.009
  • Banister, D. (2008). The sustainable mobility paradigm. Transport Policy, 15(2), 73–80. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2007.10.005
  • Banister, D. (2003). Critical pragmatism and congestion charging in London. International Social Science Journal, 55(176), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2451.5502006
  • Bratzel, S. (1999). Conditions of success in sustainable urban transport policyPolicy change in ‘relatively successful’ European cities. Transport Reviews, 19(2), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1080/014416499295600
  • Buehler, R., & Pucher, J. (2011). Sustainable transport in Freiburg. Lessons from Germany’s environmental capital. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 5(1), 43–70. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568311003650531
  • Buehler, R., Pucher, J., & Altshuler, A. (2017). Vienna’s path to sustainable transport. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 11(4), 257–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2016.1251997
  • Buehler, R., Pucher, J., Gerike, R., & Götschi, T. (2017). Reducing car dependence in the heart of Europe: Lessons from Germany, Austria, and Switzerland. Transport Reviews, 37(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1177799
  • Eskilstuna Municipality. (2012). Trafikplan för Eskilstuna Municipality 2012. Strategidel.
  • Eskilstuna Municipality. (2013). Översiktsplan.
  • Eskilstuna Municipality. (2016). Parkeringstal för ett Eskilstuna i förändring.
  • Eskilstuna Municipality. (2016). Resvanor i Eskilstuna. Resvaneundersökning 2015.
  • Fenton, P. (2016). Sustainable mobility as Swiss cheese? Exploring influences on urban transport strategy in Basel. Natural Resources Forum, 40(4), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/1477-8947.12093
  • Fischler, R. (2000). Case studies of planners at work. Journal of Planning Literature, 15(2), 184–195. https://doi.org/10.1177/08854120022092980
  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363
  • George, A. L., & Bennett, A. (2005). Case studies and theory development in the social sciences. MIT Press.
  • Granås Bardal, K. G., Gjertsen, A., & Brynildsen Reinar, M. (2020). Sustainable mobility. Policy design and implementation in three Norwegian cities. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 82, 102330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102330
  • Hensley, M., Mateo‐Babiano, D., & Minnery, J. (2014). Healthy places, active transport and path dependence: A review of the literature. Health Promotion Journal of Australia: official Journal of Australian Association of Health Promotion Professionals, 25(3), 196–201. https://doi.org/10.1071/HE14042
  • Hrelja, R. (2015). Integrating transport and land-use planning? How steering cultures in local authorities affect implementation of integrated public transport and land use planning. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 74, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2015.01.003
  • Hrelja, R. (2019). Cars. Problematisations, measures and blind spots in local transport and land use policy. Land Use Policy, 87, 104014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.05.033
  • Hrelja, R., Isaksson, K., & Richardson, T. (2013). Choosing conflict on the road to sustainable mobility: A risky strategy for breaking path dependency in urban policy making. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 49, 195–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.01.029
  • Hysing, E. (2009). Greening transport—Explaining urban transport policy change. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 11(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1080/15239080903056417
  • Isaksson, K., & Richardson, T. (2009). Building legitimacy for risky policies: The cost of avoiding conflict in Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 43(3), 251–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2008.09.002
  • Low, N., & Astle, R. (2009). Path dependence in urban transport: An institutional analysis of urban passenger transport in Melbourne, Australia, 1956–2006. Transport Policy, 16(2), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.02.010
  • Low, N., Gleeson, B., & Rush, E. (2005). A multivalent conception of path dependence. The case of transport planning in metropolitan Melbourne. Environmental Sciences, 2(4), 391–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/15693430500405146
  • Low, N., Gleeson, B., & Rush, E. (2003). Making believe. Institutional and discursive barriers to sustainable transport in two Australian cities. International Planning Studies, 8(2), 93–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563470305158
  • Lund Municipality. (2014). LundaMaTs III Strategy for a sustainable transport system in Lund Municipality.
  • Lund Municipality. (2018a). Så reser vi i Lunds kommun. Resvaneundersökningen 2018.
  • Lund Municipality (2018b). Översiktsplan.
  • Marsden, G., & Reardon, L. (2017). Questions of governance: Rethinking the study of transportation policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 101, 238–251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2017.05.008
  • Marshall, S., & Banister, D. (2000). Travel reduction strategies. Intentions and outcomes. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 34(5), 321–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(99)00034-8
  • Marshall, S. (1999). Introduction. Travel reduction – Means and ends. Built Environment, 25(2), 89–93.
  • Naess, P., Hansson, L., Richardson, T., & Tennøy, A. (2013). Knowledge-based land use and transport planning? Consistency and gap between ‘state-of the-art’ knowledge and knowledge claims in planning documents in three Scandinavian city regions. Planning Theory & Practice, 14(4), 470–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2013.845682
  • Nash, C., & Whitelegg, J. (2016). Key research themes on regulation, pricing, and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 33–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.821006
  • Nikulina, V., Simon, D., Ny, H., & Baumann, H. (2019). Context-adapted urban planning for rapid transitioning of personal mobility towards sustainability: A systematic literature review. Sustainability, 11(4), 1007. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11041007
  • Owens, S. (1995). From ‘predict and provide’ to ‘predict and prevent’? Pricing and planning in transport policy. Transport Policy, 2(1), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/0967-070X(95)93245-T
  • Pflieger, G., Kaufmann, V., Pattaroni, L., & Jemelin, C. (2009). How does urban public transport change cities? Correlations between past and present transport and urban planning policies. Urban Studies, 46(7), 1421–1437. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098009104572
  • Poku-Boansi, M. (2020). Path dependency in transport: A historical analysis of transport service delivery in Ghana. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 8(4), 1137–1147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2020.07.003
  • Richardson, T. (2001). The pendulum swings again: In search of new transport rationalities. Town Planning Review, 72(3), 299–320. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2001.72.3.299
  • Ryan, G. W., & Russel Bernard, H. (2003). Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods, 15(1), 85–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X02239569
  • Rye, T., & Hrelja, R. (2020). Policies for reducing car traffic and their problematisation. Lessons from the mobility strategies of British, Dutch, German and Swedish cities. Sustainability, 12(19), 8170. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12198170
  • SALAR (Swedish Association of Local Authorities and Regions). (2017). Kommungruppsindelning 2017. Omarbetning av Sveriges kommuner och landstings kommungruppsindelning. Stockholm.
  • Sorensen, A. (2015). Taking path dependence seriously: an historical institutionalist research agenda in planning history. Planning Perspectives, 30(1), 17–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/02665433.2013.874299
  • Sørensen, C. H., Isaksson, K., Macmillen, J., Åkerman, J., & Kressler, F. (2014). Strategies to manage barriers in policy formation and implementation of road pricing packages. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 60, 40–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.10.013
  • Thaller, A., Posch, A., Dugan, A., & Steininger, K. (2021). How to design policy packages for sustainable transport: Balancing disruptiveness and implementability. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 91, 102714. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102714
  • Van Wee, B., & Handy, S. (2016). Key research themes on urban space, scale, and sustainable urban mobility. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(1), 18–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2013.820998
  • Yin, R. (2009). Case study research, design and methods. Sage.