2,641
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Review Articles

A comprehensive review of shared mobility for sustainable transportation systems

, , , &
Pages 527-551 | Received 24 May 2021, Accepted 05 Mar 2022, Published online: 28 Mar 2022

References

  • Aarhaug, J., & Olsen, S. (2018). Implications of ride-sourcing and self-driving vehicles on the need for regulation in unscheduled passenger transport. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 573–582. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.07.026
  • Acheampong, R. A., Siiba, A., Okyere, D. K., & Tuffour, J. P. (2020). Mobility-on-demand: An empirical study of internet-based ride-hailing adoption factors, travel characteristics and mode substitution effects. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 115, 102638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102638
  • Agatz, N., Erera, A. L., Savelsbergh, M. W., & Wang, X. (2011). Dynamic ridesharing: A simulation study in metro Atlanta. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 45(9), 1450–1464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2011.05.017
  • Ahn, Y., & Yeo, H. (2015). An analytical planning model to estimate the optimal density of charging stations for electric vehicles. PLoS One, 10(11), e0141307. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0141307
  • Aïvodji, U. M., Gambs, S., Huguet, M. J., & Killijian, M. O. (2016). Meeting points in ridesharing: A privacy-preserving approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 72, 239–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.017
  • Alemi, F., Circella, G., Mokhtarian, P., & Handy, S. (2019). What drives the use of ridehailing in California? Ordered probit models of the usage frequency of Uber and Lyft. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 102, 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.12.016
  • Alonso-Mora, J., Samaranayake, S., Wallar, A., Frazzoli, E., & Rus, D. (2017). On-demand high-capacity ride-sharing via dynamic trip-vehicle assignment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(3), 462–467. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1611675114
  • Asgari, H., Jin, X., & Corkery, T. (2018). A stated preference survey approach to understanding mobility choices in light of shared mobility services and automated vehicle technologies in the U.S. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(47), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118790124
  • Asghari, M., & Shahabi, C. (2018). Adapt-pricing: A dynamic and predictive technique for pricing to maximize revenue in ridesharing platforms. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM SIGSPATIAL international conference on advances in geographic information systems (pp. 189–198).
  • Bai, L., Yao, L., Kanhere, S. S., Wang, X., Liu, W., & Yang, Z. (2019). Spatio-temporal graph convolutional and recurrent networks for citywide passenger demand prediction [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management (pp. 2293–2296). https://doi.org/10.1145/3357384.3358097
  • Bai, J., So, K. C., Tang, C. S., Chen, X., & Wang, H. (2019). Coordinating supply and demand on an on-demand service platform with impatient customers. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 21(3), 556–570. https://doi.org/10.1287/msom.2018.0707
  • Balac, M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2017). Modeling the impact of parking price policy on free-floating carsharing: Case study for Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 77, 207–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.01.022
  • Banerjee, S., Johari, R., & Riquelme, C. (2015). Pricing in ride-sharing platforms: A queueing-theoretic approach [Paper presentation]. In Proceedings of the Sixteenth ACM Conference on Economics and Computation (pp. 639–639).
  • Baptista, P., Melo, S., & Rolim, C. (2014). Energy, environmental and mobility impacts of car-sharing systems. Empirical results from Lisbon, Portugal. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 111, 28–37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.035
  • Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., & Mannering, F. (2019). A statistical analysis of bike sharing usage and its potential as an auto-trip substitute. Journal of Transport & Health, 12, 253–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2019.02.004
  • Barrios, J. A., & Godier, J. D. (2014). Fleet sizing for flexible carsharing systems: Simulation-based approach. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2416(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3141/2416-01
  • Bauer, G. S., Phadke, A., Greenblatt, J. B., & Rajagopal, D. (2019). Electrifying urban ridesourcing fleets at no added cost through efficient use of charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 105, 385–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.05.041
  • Beojone, C. V., & Geroliminis, N. (2021). On the inefficiency of ride-sourcing services towards urban congestion. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 124, 102890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102890
  • Bhatti, A. R., Salam, Z., Abdul, M. J. B., & Yee, K. P. (2016). A comprehensive overview of electric vehicle charging using renewable energy. International Journal of Power Electronics and Drive Systems, 7(1), 114.
  • Bimpikis, K., Candogan, O., & Saban, D. (2019). Spatial pricing in ride-sharing networks. Operations Research, 67(3), 744–769. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2018.1800
  • Bösch, P. M., Ciari, F., & Axhausen, K. W. (2018). Transport policy optimization with autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2672(8), 698–707. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198118791391
  • Bruck, B. P., Incerti, V., Iori, M., & Vignoli, M. (2017). Minimizing CO2 emissions in a practical daily carpooling problem. Computers & Operations Research, 81, 40–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2016.12.003
  • Bryan, K. A., & Gans, J. S. (2019). A theory of multihoming in rideshare competition. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 28(1), 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/jems.12306
  • Buck, D., Buehler, R., Happ, P., Rawls, B., Chung, P., & Borecki, N. (2013). Are Bikeshare users different from regular cyclists? A first look at short-term users, annual members, and area cyclists in the Washington, DC, region. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2387(1), 112–119. https://doi.org/10.3141/2387-13
  • Buliung, R. N., Soltys, K., Bui, R., Habel, C., & Lanyon, R. (2010). Catching a ride on the information super-high-way: Toward an understanding of internet-based carpool formation and use. Transportation, 37(6), 849–873. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-010-9266-0
  • Caspi, O., Smart, M. J., & Noland, R. B. (2020). Spatial associations of dockless shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102396
  • Chan, N. D., & Shaheen, S. A. (2012). Ridesharing in North America: Past, present, and future. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.621557
  • Chen, M., Wang, D., Sun, Y., Liu, C., & Bai, Z. (2017). Service evaluation of public bicycle scheme from a user perspective: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2634(1), 28–34. https://doi.org/10.3141/2634-04
  • Chen, T. D., & Kockelman, K. M. (2016). Carsharing's life-cycle impacts on energy use and greenhouse gas emissions. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 276–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.012
  • Chen, T. D., Kockelman, K. M., & Hanna, J. P. (2016). Operations of a shared, autonomous, electric vehicle fleet: Implications of vehicle & charging infrastructure decisions. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 94, 243–254.
  • Chen, X. M., Chen, C., Ni, L., & Li, L. (2018). Spatial visitation prediction of on-demand ride services using the scaling law. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 508, 84–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2018.05.005
  • Chen, X. M., Zahiri, M., & Zhang, S. (2017). Understanding ridesplitting behavior of on-demand ride services: An ensemble learning approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 76, 51–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.12.018
  • Chen, X. M., Zheng, H., Ke, J., & Yang, H. (2020). Dynamic optimization strategies for on-demand ride services platform: Surge pricing, commission rate, and incentives. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 138, 23–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.05.005
  • Clewlow, R. R. (2016). Carsharing and sustainable travel behavior: Results from the San Francisco Bay Area. Transport Policy, 51, 158–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.013
  • Cohen, B., & Kietzmann, J. (2014). Ride on! Mobility business models for the sharing economy. Organization & Environment, 27(3), 279–296. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026614546199
  • Cohen, T., & Cavoli, C. (2019). Automated vehicles: exploring possible consequences of government (non)intervention for congestion and accessibility. Transport Reviews, 39(1), 129–151. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1524401
  • Concas, S., Winters, P. L., & Wambalaba, F. W. (2005). Fare pricing elasticity, subsidies, and demand for vanpool services. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1924(1), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105192400127
  • Costain, C., Ardron, C., & Habib, K. N. (2012). Synopsis of users' behaviour of a carsharing program: A case study in Toronto. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(3), 421–434.
  • De Lorimier, A., & El-Geneidy, A. M. (2013). Understanding the factors affecting vehicle usage and availability in carsharing networks: A case study of Communauto carsharing system from Montréal. Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.660104
  • De Luca, S., & Di Pace, R. (2015). Modelling users’ behaviour in inter-urban carsharing program: A stated preference approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 71, 59–76.
  • Deb, S., Tammi, K., Kalita, K., & Mahanta, P. (2018). Review of recent trends in charging infrastructure planning for electric vehicles. WIREs Energy and Environment, 7(6), e306. https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.306
  • Delhomme, P., & Gheorghiu, A. (2016). Comparing French carpoolers and non-carpoolers: Which factors contribute the most to carpooling? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 42, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.10.014
  • Ding, Z. J., Dai, Z., Chen, X. M., & Jiang, R. (2020). Simulating on-demand ride services in a Manhattan-like urban network considering traffic dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and Its Applications, 545, 123621. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physa.2019.123621
  • Dong, J., & Ibrahim, R. (2020). Managing supply in the on-demand economy: Flexible workers, full-time employees, or both? Operations Research, 68(4), 1238–1264. https://doi.org/10.1287/opre.2019.1916
  • Dong, T., Xu, Z., Luo, Q., Yin, Y., Wang, J., & Ye, J. (2021). Optimal contract design for ride-sourcing services under dual sourcing. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 146, 289–313. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2021.01.014
  • Dong, Z., & Leng, M. (2021). Managing on-demand ridesharing operations: Optimal pricing decisions for a ridesharing platform. International Journal of Production Economics, 232, 107958. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2020.107958
  • Dowling, R., & Kent, J. (2015). Practice and public-private partnerships in sustainable transport governance: The case of car sharing in Sydney, Australia. Transport Policy, 40, 58–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2015.02.007
  • Eren, E., & Uz, V. E. (2020). A review on bike-sharing: The factors affecting bike-sharing demand. Sustainable Cities and Society, 54, 101882. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101882
  • Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2014). The travel and environmental implications of shared autonomous vehicles, using agent-based model scenarios. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 40, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.12.001
  • Fagnant, D. J., & Kockelman, K. (2015). Preparing a nation for autonomous vehicles: Opportunities, barriers and policy recommendations. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 77, 167–181.
  • Fagnant, D. J., Kockelman, K. M., & Bansal, P. (2015). Operations of shared autonomous vehicle fleet for Austin, Texas, market. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2563(1), 98–106. https://doi.org/10.3141/2536-12
  • Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2013). Bike share: A synthesis of the literature. Transport Reviews, 33(2), 148–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2013.775612
  • Fishman, E., Washington, S., & Haworth, N. (2014). Bike share's impact on car use: Evidence from the United States, Great Britain, and Australia. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 31, 13–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2014.05.013
  • Frade, I., & Ribeiro, A. (2015). Bike-sharing stations: A maximal covering location approach. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 82, 216–227.
  • Gawron, J. H., Keoleian, G. A., De Kleine, R. D., Wallington, T. J., & Kim, H. C. (2019). Deep decarbonization from electrified autonomous taxi fleets: Life cycle assessment and case study in Austin, TX. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 73, 130–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.06.007
  • Global e-Sustainability Initiative. (2008). SMART 2020: Enabling the low carbon economy in the information age. United States Report Addendum. Retreived June 6, 2011 frpm http://www.smart2020.org/_assets/files/Smart2020UnitedStatesReportAddendum.pdf.
  • Greenblatt, J. B., & Saxena, S. (2015). Autonomous taxis could greatly reduce greenhouse-gas emissions of US light-duty vehicles. Nature Climate Change, 5(9), 860–863. https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2685
  • Gu, T., Kim, I., & Currie, G. (2019). To be or not to be dockless: Empirical analysis of dockless bikeshare development in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 119, 122–147.
  • Habib, K. M. N., Tian, Y., & Zaman, H. (2011). Modeling commuting mode choice with explicit consideration of carpool in the choice set formation. Transportation, 38(4), 587–604. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-011-9333-1
  • Hampshire, R., & Gaites, C. (2011). Peer-to-peer car-sharing: Market analysis and potential growth. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2217(1), 119–126. https://doi.org/10.3141/2217-15
  • He, F., Wu, D., Yin, Y., & Guan, Y. (2013). Optimal deployment of public charging stations for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 47, 87–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2012.09.007
  • Hollingsworth, J., Copeland, B., & Johnson, J. X. (2019). Are e-scooters polluters? The environmental impacts of shared dockless electric scooters. Environmental Research Letters, 14(8), 084031. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab2da8
  • Hong, Z., Chen, Y., Mahmassani, H. S., & Xu, S. (2017). Commuter ride-sharing using topology-based vehicle trajectory clustering: Methodology, application and impact evaluation. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 85, 573–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.020
  • Hu, J.-W., Javaid, A., & Creutzig, F. (2021). Leverage points for accelerating adoption of shared electric cars: Perceived benefits and environmental impact of NEVs. Energy Policy, 155, 112349. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112349
  • Hu, L., & Liu, Y. (2016). Joint design of parking capacities and fleet size for one-way station-based carsharing systems with road congestion constraints. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 93, 268–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2016.07.021
  • Huang, K., An, K., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2020). Planning station capacity and fleet size of one-way electric carsharing systems with continuous state of charge functions. European Journal of Operational Research, 287(3), 1075–1091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2020.05.001
  • Hyland, M., & Mahmassani, H. S. (2018). Dynamic autonomous vehicle fleet operations: Optimization-based strategies to assign AVs to immediate traveler demand requests. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 92, 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2018.05.003
  • Javanshour, F., Dia, H., & Duncan, G. (2019). Exploring the performance of autonomous mobility on-demand systems under demand uncertainty. Transportmetrica A: Transport Science, 15(2), 698–721. https://doi.org/10.1080/23249935.2018.1528485
  • Jian, S., Liu, W., Wang, X., Yang, H., & Waller, S. T. (2020). On integrating carsharing and parking sharing services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 142, 19–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.09.013
  • Jian, S., Rashidi, T. H., & Dixit, V. (2017). An analysis of carsharing vehicle choice and utilization patterns using multiple discrete-continuous extreme value (MDCEV) models. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 103, 362–376.
  • Jian, S., Rashidi, T. H., Wijayaratna, K. P., & Dixit, V. V. (2016). A spatial hazard-based analysis for modelling vehicle selection in station-based carsharing systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 72, 130–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.09.008
  • Johnson, R. E. (2005). Doubling personal rapid transit capacity with ridesharing. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 1930(1), 107–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198105193000113
  • Jorge, D., Correia, G. H., & Barnhart, C. (2014). Comparing optimal relocation operations with simulated relocation policies in one-way carsharing systems. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 15(4), 1667–1675. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2304358
  • Jorge, D., Molnar, G., & de Almeida Correia, G. H. (2015). Trip pricing of one-way station-based carsharing networks with zone and time of day price variations. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 81, 461–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2015.06.003
  • Kaddoura, I., Bischoff, J., & Nagel, K. (2020). Towards welfare optimal operation of innovative mobility concepts: External cost pricing in a world of shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 136, 48–63.
  • Ke, J., Cen, X., Yang, H., Chen, X., & Ye, J. (2019). Modelling drivers’ working and recharging schedules in a ride-sourcing market with electric vehicles and gasoline vehicles. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 125, 160–180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2019.03.010
  • Ke, J., Qin, X., Yang, H., Zheng, Z., Zhu, Z., & Ye, J. (2021a). Predicting origin-destination ride-sourcing demand with a spatio-temporal encoder-decoder residual multi-graph convolutional network. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 122, 102858. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102858
  • Ke, J., Yang, H., Zheng, H., Chen, X., Jia, Y., Gong, P., & Ye, J. (2018). Hexagon-based convolutional neural network for supply-demand forecasting of ride-sourcing services. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 20(11), 4160–4173. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2018.2882861
  • Ke, J., Zheng, H., Yang, H., & Chen, X. (2017). Short-term forecasting of passenger demand under on-demand ride services: A spatio-temporal deep learning approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 85, 591–608. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.10.016
  • Ke, J., Zhu, Z., Yang, H., & He, Q. (2021b). Equilibrium analyses and operational designs of a coupled market with substitutive and complementary ride-sourcing services to public transits. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 148, 102236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102236
  • Kong, H., Jin, S. T., & Sui, D. Z. (2020a). Deciphering the relationship between bikesharing and public transit: Modal substitution, integration, and complementation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 85, 102392. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102392
  • Kong, H., Zhang, X., & Zhao, J. (2020b). How does ridesourcing substitute for public transit? A geospatial perspective in Chengdu, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 102769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102769
  • Konishi, H., & Mun, S. (2010). Carpooling and congestion pricing: HOV and HOT lanes. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 40(4), 173–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2010.03.009
  • Kontou, E., Garikapati, V., & Hou, Y. (2020). Reducing ridesourcing empty vehicle travel with future travel demand prediction. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 121, 102826. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102826
  • Kou, Z., Wang, X., Chiu, S. F. A., & Cai, H. (2020). Quantifying greenhouse gas emissions reduction from bike share systems: a model considering real-world trips and transportation mode choice patterns. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 153, 104534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.104534
  • Kramer, S., Hoffmann, C., Kuttler, T., & Hendzlik, M. (2014). Electric car sharing as an integrated part of public transport: Customers' needs and experience. In Evolutionary paths towards the mobility patterns of the future (pp. 101–112). Springer.
  • Krishnaprasad, S., & Tripathi, R. R. (2020). A pricing mechanism to improve capacity utilisation in ridesharing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, in press. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2020.1860660
  • Krueger, R., Rashidi, T. H., & Rose, J. M. (2016). Preferences for shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 69, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.06.015
  • Kumar, R. R., Chakraborty, A., & Mandal, P. (2021). Promoting electric vehicle adoption: Who should invest in charging infrastructure? Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 149, 102295. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102295
  • Lavieri, P. S., Garikapati, V. M., Bhat, C. R., Pendyala, R. M., Astroza, S., & Dias, F. F. (2017). Modeling individual preferences for ownership and sharing of autonomous vehicle technologies. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2665(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3141/2665-01
  • Lazarus, J., Pourquier, J., Feng, F., Hammel, H., & Shaheen, S. (2020). Micromobility evolution and expansion: Understanding how docked and dockless bikesharing models complement and compete – A case study of San Francisco. Journal of Transport Geography, 84, 102620. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.102620
  • Lee, D., Mulrow, J., Haboucha, C. J., Derrible, S., & Shiftan, Y. (2019). Attitudes on autonomous vehicle adoption using interpretable gradient boosting machine. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(11), 865–878. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119857953
  • Lee, J. B., Byun, W., Lee, S. H., & Do, M. (2014). Correlation between optimal carsharing locations and carbon dioxide emissions in urban areas. International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology, 11(8), 2319–2328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-014-0640-x
  • Lei, C., Jiang, Z., & Ouyang, Y. (2020). Path-based dynamic pricing for vehicle allocation in ridesharing systems with fully compliant drivers. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 132, 60–75. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.01.017
  • Levin, M. W. (2017). Congestion-aware system optimal route choice for shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 82, 229–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.06.020
  • Levin, M. W., Odell, M., Samarasena, S., & Schwartz, A. (2019). A linear program for optimal integration of shared autonomous vehicles with public transit. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 109, 267–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.10.007
  • Li, S., Poolla, K., & Varaiya, P. (2021). Impact of congestion charge and minimum wage on TNCs: A case study for San Francisco. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 148, 237–261.
  • Li, S., Tavafoghi, H., Poolla, K., & Varaiya, P. (2019). Regulating TNCs: Should Uber and Lyft set their own rules? Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 129, 193–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.09.008
  • Li, X., Zhang, Y., Du, M., & Yang, J. (2020). The forecasting of passenger demand under hybrid ridesharing service modes: A combined model based on WT-FCBF-LSTM. Sustainable Cities and Society, 62, 102419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102419
  • Li, Y., Taeihagh, A., & De Jong, M. (2018). The governance of risks in ridesharing: A revelatory case from Singapore. Energies, 11(5), 1277. https://doi.org/10.3390/en11051277
  • Liang, X., Correia, G. H., de, A., & van Arem, B. (2016). Optimizing the service area and trip selection of an electric automated taxi system used for the last mile of train trips. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 93, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2016.05.006
  • Liu, J., & Wei, Q. (2018). Risk evaluation of electric vehicle charging infrastructure public-private partnership projects in China using fuzzy TOPSIS. Journal of Cleaner Production, 189, 211–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.103
  • Liu, J., Kockelman, K. M., Boesch, P. M., & Ciari, F. (2017). Tracking a system of shared autonomous vehicles across the Austin, Texas network using agent-based simulation. Transportation, 44(6), 1261–1278. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-017-9811-1
  • Liu, X., Yan, X., Liu, F., Wang, R., & Leng, Y. (2019). A trip-specific model for fuel saving estimation and subsidy policy making of carpooling based on empirical data. Applied Energy, 240, 295–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2019.02.003
  • Liu, Y., & Li, Y. (2017). Pricing scheme design of ridesharing program in morning commute problem. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 79, 156–177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.02.020
  • Loeb, B., & Kockelman, K. M. (2019). Fleet performance and cost evaluation of a shared autonomous electric vehicle (SAEV) fleet: A case study for Austin, Texas. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 374–385.
  • Lu, M., Hsu, S.-C., Chen, P.-C., & Lee, W.-Y. (2018). Improving the sustainability of integrated transportation system with bike-sharing: A spatial agent-based approach. Sustainable Cities and Society, 41, 44–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.05.023
  • Luna, T. F., Uriona-Maldonado, M., Silva, M. E., & Vaz, C. R. (2020). The influence of e-carsharing schemes on electric vehicle adoption and carbon emissions: An emerging economy study. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102226
  • Ma, H., Fang, F., & Parkes, D. C. (2020). Spatio-temporal pricing for ridesharing platforms. ACM SIGecom Exchanges, 18(2), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1145/3440968.3440975
  • Ma, J., Li, X., Zhou, F., & Hao, W. (2017). Designing optimal autonomous vehicle sharing and reservation systems: A linear programming approach. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 84, 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2017.08.022
  • Ma, J., Xu, M., Meng, Q., & Cheng, L. (2020). Ridesharing user equilibrium problem under OD-based surge pricing strategy. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 134, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.02.001
  • Malokin, A., Circella, G., & Mokhtarian, P. L. (2019). How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 82–114.
  • Martin, E., Shaheen, S., & Lidicker, J. (2010). Carsharing's impact on household vehicle holdings: Results from a North American shared-use vehicle survey. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 150–158. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-19
  • Masoud, M.,Elhenawy, M.,Almannaa, M. H.,Liu, S. Q.,Glaser, S., &Rakotonirainy, A. (2019). Heuristic approaches to solve e-scooter assignment problem. IEEE Access, 7, 175093–175105.
  • McKenzie, G. (2019). Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C. Journal of Transport Geography, 78, 19–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.007
  • McKenzie, G. (2020). Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 79, 101418. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2019.101418
  • Menon, N., Barbour, N., Zhang, Y., Pinjari, A. R., & Mannering, F. (2019). Shared autonomous vehicles and their potential impacts on household vehicle ownership: An exploratory empirical assessment. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 13(2), 111–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1443178
  • Mo, B., Cao, Z., Zhang, H., Shen, Y., & Zhao, J. (2021). Competition between shared autonomous vehicles and public transit: A case study in Singapore. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 127, 103058. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2021.103058
  • Mo, D., Yu, J., & Chen, X. (2020). Modeling and managing heterogeneous ride-sourcing platforms with government subsidies on electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 139, 447–472. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.07.006
  • Mohamed, M. J., Rye, T., & Fonzone, A. (2019). Operational and policy implications of ridesourcing services: A case of Uber in London, UK. Case Studies on Transport Policy, 7(4), 823–836. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cstp.2019.07.013
  • Moody, J., Middleton, S., & Zhao, J. (2019). Rider-to-rider discriminatory attitudes and ridesharing behavior. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 62, 258–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.01.003
  • Münzel, K., Piscicelli, L., Boon, W., & Frenken, K. (2019). Different business models – different users? Uncovering the motives and characteristics of business-to-consumer and peer-to-peer carsharing adopters in The Netherlands. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 73, 276–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.07.001
  • Nair, G. S., Astroza, S., Bhat, C. R., Khoeini, S., & Pendyala, R. M. (2018). An application of a rank ordered probit modeling approach to understanding level of interest in autonomous vehicles. Transportation, 45(6), 1623–1637. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-018-9945-9
  • Nakanishi, W., Yamashita, Y., & Asakura, Y. (2021). Empirical analysis on long-distance peer-to-peer ridesharing service in Japan. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 15(8), 653-658.
  • Namazu, M., & Dowlatabadi, H. (2015). Characterizing the GHG emission impacts of carsharing: A case of Vancouver. Environmental Research Letters, 10(12), 124017. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/12/124017
  • Narayanan, S.,Chaniotakis, E., &Antoniou, C. (2020). Shared autonomous vehicle services: A comprehensive review. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 111, 255–293.
  • Nijland, H., & van Meerkerk, J. (2017). Mobility and environmental impacts of car sharing in the Netherlands. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 84–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.02.001
  • Nourinejad, M., & Roorda, M. J. (2014). A dynamic carsharing decision support system. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 66, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2014.03.003
  • Nourinejad, M., & Roorda, M. J. (2015). Car-sharing operations policies: a comparison between one-way and two-way systems. Transportation, 42(3), 497–518. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-015-9604-3
  • Pandey, V., Monteil, J., Gambella, C., & Simonetto, A. (2019). On the needs for MaaS platforms to handle competition in ridesharing mobility. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 108, 269–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.09.021
  • Pelzer, D., Xiao, J., Zehe, D., Lees, M. H., Knoll, A. C., & Aydt, H. (2015). A partition-based match making algorithm for dynamic ridesharing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 16(5), 2587–2598. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2413453
  • Peters, L., & MacKenzie, D. (2019). The death and rebirth of bikesharing in Seattle: Implications for policy and system design. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130, 208–226.
  • Pinto, G. A., Vieira, K. C., Carvalho, E. G., & Sugano, J. Y. (2019). Applying the lazy user theory to understand the motivations for choosing carpooling over public transport. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 20, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2019.07.002
  • Rahimi, A., Azimi, G., & Jin, X. (2020). Examining human attitudes toward shared mobility options and autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 72, 133–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.001
  • Rahman, I., Vasant, P. M., Singh, B. S. M., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., & Adnan, N. (2016). Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 58, 1039–1047. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.353
  • Rodier, C., Alemi, F., & Smith, D. (2016). Dynamic ridesharing: Exploration of potential for reduction in vehicle miles traveled. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2542(1), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.3141/2542-15
  • Rotaris, L., Danielis, R., & Maltese, I. (2019). Carsharing use by college students: The case of Milan and Rome. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 120, 239–251.
  • Sánchez, D., Martínez, S., & Domingo-Ferrer, J. (2016). Co-utile P2P ridesharing via decentralization and reputation management. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 73, 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.10.017
  • Santos, G. (2017). Incentives to encourage shared mobility. Centre Regulation Eur.
  • Shaheen, S.,Cohen, A.,Chan, N., &Bansal, A. (2020). Sharing strategies: carsharing, shared micromobility (bikesharing and scooter sharing), transportation network companies, microtransit, and other innovative mobility modes. In Transportation, land use, and environmental planning (pp. 237-262). Elsevier.
  • Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., Zohdy, I. (2016a). Shared mobility: current practices and guiding principles. Federal Highway Administration.
  • Shaheen, S., Chan, N., Bansal, A., Cohen, A. (2015) Shared Mobility: A Sustainability & Technologies Workshop: Definitions, Industry Developments, and Early Understanding. UC Berkeley.
  • Shaheen, S., Bell, C., Cohen, A., Yelchuru, B.(2017). Travel Behavior: Shared Mobility and Transportation Equity. Federal Highway Administration.
  • Shaheen, S. A., & Cohen, A. P. (2013). Carsharing and personal vehicle services: worldwide market developments and emerging trends. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.660103
  • Shaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D., & Gaynor, T. (2016b). Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transport Policy, 51, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003
  • Shaheen, S. A., Cohen, A. P., & Martin, E. (2010). Carsharing parking policy: Review of North American practices and San Francisco, California, Bay Area Case Study. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2187(1), 146–156. https://doi.org/10.3141/2187-19
  • Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2019). Shared micromoblity policy toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing. UC Berkeley Transportation Sustainability Research Center. Retrieved from https://escholarship.org/uc/item/00k897b5.
  • Shaheen, S., Guzman, S., & Zhang, H. (2010). Bikesharing in Europe, the Americas, and Asia: Past, present, and future. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 159–167. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-20
  • Shen, Y., Zhang, H., & Zhao, J. (2018). Integrating shared autonomous vehicle in public transportation system: A supply-side simulation of the first-mile service in Singapore. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 113, 125–136.
  • Sheppard, C. J., Bauer, G. S., Gerke, B. F., Greenblatt, J. B., Jenn, A. T., & Gopal, A. R. (2019). Joint optimization scheme for the planning and operations of shared autonomous electric vehicle fleets serving mobility on demand. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(6), 579–597. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119838270
  • Sioui, L., Morency, C., & Trepanier, M. (2013). How carsharing affects the travel behavior of households: A case study of Montréal. Canada. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 7(1), 52–69. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2012.660109
  • Song, J., Cho, Y. J., Kang, M. H., & Hwang, K. Y. (2020). An application of reinforced learning-based dynamic pricing for improvement of ridesharing platform service in Seoul. Electronics, 9(11), 1818. https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9111818
  • Soria, J., Chen, Y., & Stathopoulos, A. (2020). K-Prototypes segmentation analysis on large-scale ridesourcing trip data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(9), 383–394. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120929338
  • Stasko, T. H., Buck, A. B., & Gao, H. O. (2013). Carsharing in a university setting: Impacts on vehicle ownership, parking demand, and mobility in Ithaca. NY. Transport Policy, 30, 262–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.09.018
  • Stiglic, M., Agatz, N., Savelsbergh, M., & Gradisar, M. (2018). Enhancing urban mobility: Integrating ride-sharing and public transit. Computers & Operations Research, 90, 12–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cor.2017.08.016
  • Sui, Y., Zhang, H., Song, X., Shao, F., Yu, X., Shibasaki, R., Sun, R., Yuan, M., Wang, C., Li, S., & Li, Y. (2019). GPS data in urban online ride-hailing: A comparative analysis on fuel consumption and emissions. Journal of Cleaner Production, 227, 495–505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.04.159
  • Sun, D., & Ding, X. (2018). Spatiotemporal evolution of ridesourcing markets under the new restriction policy: A case study in Shanghai. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 130, 227–239.
  • Tafreshian, A., & Masoud, N. (2020). Using subsidies to stabilize peer-to-peer ridesharing markets with role assignment. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 120, 102770. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102770
  • Tan, R., & Lin, B. (2020). Are people willing to support the construction of charging facilities in China? Energy Policy, 143, 111604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111604
  • Ter Schure, J., Napolitan, F., & Hutchinson, R. (2012). Cumulative impacts of carsharing and unbundled parking on vehicle ownership and mode choice. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2319(1), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.3141/2319-11
  • Thaithatkul, P., Seo, T., Kusakabe, T., & Asakura, Y. (2019). Adoption of dynamic ridesharing system under influence of information on social network. Transportation Research Procedia, 37, 401–408. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2018.12.209
  • Tian, L. J., Sheu, J. B., & Huang, H. J. (2019). The morning commute problem with endogenous shared autonomous vehicle penetration and parking space constraint. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 123, 258–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2019.04.001
  • Tirachini, A., & del Río, M. (2019). Ride-hailing in Santiago de Chile: Users' characterisation and effects on travel behavior. Transport Policy, 82, 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.07.008
  • Tirachini, A., & Gomez-Lobo, A. (2020). Does ride-hailing increase or decrease vehicle kilometers traveled (VKT)? A simulation approach for Santiago de Chile. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(3), 187–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1539146
  • Turan, B., Pedarsani, R., & Alizadeh, M. (2020). Dynamic pricing and fleet management for electric autonomous mobility on demand systems. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 121, 102829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102829
  • Uteng, T. P., Julsrud, T. E., & George, C. (2019). The role of life events and context in type of car share uptake: Comparing users of peer-to-peer and cooperative programs in Oslo, Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 71, 186–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.01.009
  • Vanoutrive, T., Van De Vijver, E., Van Malderen, L., Jourquin, B., Thomas, I., Verhetsel, A., & Witlox, F. (2012). What determines carpooling to workplaces in Belgium: location, organisation, or promotion? Journal of Transport Geography, 22, 77–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2011.11.006
  • Vosooghi, R., Puchinger, J., Jankovic, M., & Vouillon, A. (2019). Shared autonomous vehicle simulation and service design. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 107, 15–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.08.006
  • Wang, H., &Yang, H. (2019). Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 129, 122–155.
  • Wang, L., Zhong, H., Ma, W., Zhong, Y., & Wang, L. (2020). Multi-source data-driven prediction for the dynamic pickup demand of one-way carsharing systems. Transportmetrica B: Transport Dynamics, 8(1), 90–107.
  • Wang, L., Zhong, Y., & Ma, W. (2018). GPS-data-driven dynamic destination prediction for on-demand one-way carsharing system. IET Intelligent Transport Systems, 12(10), 1291–1299. https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-its.2018.5250
  • Wang, M., & Zhou, X. (2017). Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 147–154. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.10.022
  • Wang, N., Guo, J., Liu, X., & Fang, T. (2020). A service demand forecasting model for one-way electric car-sharing systems combining long short-term memory networks with Granger causality test. Journal of Cleaner Production, 244, 118812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.118812
  • Wang, S., Jiang, Z., Noland, R. B., & Mondschein, A. S. (2020). Attitudes towards privately-owned and shared autonomous vehicles. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 72, 297–306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2020.05.014
  • Wang, T., & Chen, C. (2012). Attitudes, mode switching behavior, and the built environment: A longitudinal study in the Puget Sound Region. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(10), 1594–1607.
  • Wang, Z., Chen, X., & Chen, X. M. (2019). Ridesplitting is shaping young people’s travel behavior: Evidence from comparative survey via ride-sourcing platform. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 75, 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.08.017
  • Ward, J. W., Michalek, J. J., Azevedo, I. L., Samaras, C., & Ferreira, P. (2019). Effects of on-demand ridesourcing on vehicle ownership, fuel consumption, vehicle miles traveled, and emissions per capita in US States. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 108, 289–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2019.07.026
  • Xie, X. F., & Wang, Z. J. (2018). Examining travel patterns and characteristics in a bikesharing network and implications for data-driven decision supports: Case study in the Washington DC area. Journal of Transport Geography, 71, 84–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.07.010
  • Xiong, Y., Gan, J., An, B., Miao, C., & Bazzan, A. L. C. (2018). Optimal electric vehicle fast charging station placement based on game theoretical framework. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 19(8), 2493–2504. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2017.2754382
  • Xu, H., Ordóñez, F., & Dessouky, M. (2015). A traffic assignment model for a ridesharing transportation market. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 49(7), 793–816. https://doi.org/10.1002/atr.1300
  • Xu, M., Meng, Q., & Liu, Z. (2018). Electric vehicle fleet size and trip pricing for one-way carsharing services considering vehicle relocation and personnel assignment. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 111, 60–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2018.03.001
  • Xu, Z., Yin, Y., & Zha, L. (2017). Optimal parking provision for ride-sourcing services. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 105, 559–578. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.10.003
  • Yang, H., Shao, C., Wang, H., & Ye, J. (2020). Integrated reward scheme and surge pricing in a ridesourcing market. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 134, 126–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2020.01.008
  • Yao, F., Zhu, J., Yu, J., Chen, C., & Chen, X. (2020). Hybrid operations of human driving vehicles and automated vehicles with data-driven agent-based simulation. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 86, 102469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102469
  • Yu, B., Ma, Y., Xue, M., Tang, B., Wang, B., Yan, J., & Wei, Y. M. (2017). Environmental benefits from ridesharing: A case of Beijing. Applied Energy, 191, 141–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2017.01.052
  • Yu, J. J., Tang, C. S., Shen, Z. J. M., & Chen, X. (2020). A balancing act of regulating on-demand ride services. Management Science, 66(7), 2975–2992. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2019.3351
  • Zha, L., Yin, Y., & Du, Y. (2018). Surge pricing and labor supply in the ride-sourcing market. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, 117, 708–722. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trb.2017.09.010
  • Zha, L., Yin, Y., & Yang, H. (2016). Economic analysis of ride-sourcing markets. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 71, 249–266. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.07.010
  • Zhai, Y., Liu, J., Du, J., & Wu, H. (2019). Fleet size and rebalancing analysis of dockless bike-sharing stations based on Markov chain. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 8(8), 334.
  • Zhang, J., Wen, D., & Zeng, S. (2015). A discounted trade reduction mechanism for dynamic ridesharing pricing. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 17(6), 1586–1595. https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2015.2506660
  • Zhang, L., Zhao, Z., & Kan, Z. (2019). Private-sector partner selection for public-private partnership projects of electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Energy Science & Engineering, 7(5), 1469–1484. https://doi.org/10.1002/ese3.367
  • Zhang, W., & Guhathakurta, S. (2017). Parking spaces in the age of shared autonomous vehicles: How much parking will we need and where? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2651(1), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.3141/2651-09
  • Zhang, Y., & Mi, Z. (2018). Environmental benefits of bike sharing: A big data-based analysis. Applied Energy, 220, 296–301. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.03.101
  • Zhang, Y., Lin, D., & Mi, Z. (2019). Electric fence planning for dockless bike-sharing services. Journal of Cleaner Production, 206, 383–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.09.215
  • Zheng, H., Chen, X., & Chen, X. M. (2019). How does on-demand ridesplitting influence vehicle use and purchase willingness? A case study in Hangzhou, China. IEEE Intelligent Transportation Systems Magazine, 11(3), 143–157. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITS.2019.2919503
  • Zhong, Y., Lin, Z., Zhou, Y. W., Cheng, T. C. E., & Lin, X. (2019). Matching supply and demand on ride-sharing platforms with permanent agents and competition. International Journal of Production Economics, 218, 363–374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.07.009
  • Zhou, Y., Yang, H., Ke, J., Wang, H., & Li, X. (2020). Competitive ride-sourcing market with a third-party integrator. Working Paper.
  • Zhu, R., Zhang, X., Kondor, D., Santi, P., & Ratti, C. (2020a). Understanding spatio-temporal heterogeneity of bike-sharing and scooter-sharing mobility. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 81, 101483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2020.101483
  • Zhu, Z., Qin, X., Ke, J., Zheng, Z., & Yang, H. (2020b). Analysis of multi-modal commute behavior with feeding and competing ridesplitting services. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 713–727. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.12.018
  • Zhu, Z., Xu, A., He, Q. C., & Yang, H. (2021c). Competition between the transportation network company and the government with subsidies to public transit riders. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 152, 102426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2021.102426
  • Zou, Z., Younes, H., Erdoğan, S., & Wu, J. (2020). Exploratory analysis of real-time e-scooter trip data in Washington, DC. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(8), 285–299. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120919760

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.