The politics of velomobility: Analysis of the vote to include cycling in the Swiss Constitution

References

• Aldred, R. (2010). ‘On the outside’: Constructing cycling citizenship. Social & Cultural Geography, 11(1), 35–52. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649360903414593
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baehler, D., & Rérat, P. (2020). Between ecological convictions and practical considerations – profiles and motivations of residents in car-free housing developments in Germany and Switzerland. Geographica Helvetica, 75(2), 169–181. https://doi.org/10.5194/gh-75-169-2020
   Google Scholar
• Balkmar, D., & Summerton, J. (2017). Contested mobilities: Politics, strategies and visions in Swedish bicycle activism. Applied Mobilities, 2(2), 151–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/23800127.2017.1293910
   Google Scholar
• Böhm, S., Jones, C., Land, C., & Paterson, M. (Eds.). (2006). Against automobility. Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Castillo-Manzano, J. I., & Sánchez-Braza, A. (2013). Can anyone hate the bicycle? The hunt for an optimal local transportation policy to encourage bicycle usage. Environmental Politics, 22(6), 1010–1028. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2012.740936
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christiansen, P. (2020). The effects of transportation priority congruence for political legitimacy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 132, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.11.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eurostat. (2020). Eurostat regional yearbook Publications Office. https://doi.org/10.2785/98733
   Google Scholar
• Ferster, C., Laberee, K., Nelson, T., Thigpen, C., Simeone, M., & Winters, M. (2021). From advocacy to acceptance: Social media discussions of protected bike lane installations. Urban Studies, (5), 941–958. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098020938252
   Google Scholar
• FORS. (2020). VOTO studies: Standardized post-vote surveys, 2016–2020 [Dataset]. FORS. forsbase.unil.ch.
   Google Scholar
• Furness, Z. M. (2010). One less car: Bicycling and the politics of automobility. Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Garrard, J., Handy, S., & Dill, J. (2012). Women and cycling. In J. Pucher & R. Buehler (Eds.), City cycling (pp. 211–234). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Goodyear, S. (2014). Why bike lovers should be happy about ‘bikelash’. Bloomberg CityLab. https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2014-09-15/why-bike-lovers-should-be-happy-about-bikelash
   Google Scholar
• Hansla, A., Hysing, E., Nilsson, A., & Martinsson, J. (2017). Explaining voting behavior in the Gothenburg congestion tax referendum. Transport Policy, 53, 98–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.10.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Henderson, J. (2013). Street fight: The politics of mobility in San Francisco. University of Massachusetts Press.
   Google Scholar
• Henderson, J., & Gulsrud, N. M. (2019). Street fights in Copenhagen: Bicycle and car politics in a green mobility city. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffmann, M. L. (2016). Bike lanes are white lanes: Bicycle advocacy and urban planning. University of Nebraska Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ibsen, M. E., & Olesen, K. (2018). Bicycle urbanism as a competitive advantage in the neoliberal age: The case of bicycle promotion in Portland. International Planning Studies, 23(2), 210–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/13563475.2017.1402675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., & Kinder, D. R. (2010). News that matters: Television and American opinion (Updated ed.). University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Koglin, T., & Rye, T. (2014). The marginalisation of bicycling in Modernist urban transport planning. Journal of Transport & Health, 1(4), 214–222. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jth.2014.09.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kriesi, H., & Trechsel, A. H. (2008). The politics of Switzerland: Continuity and change in a consensus democracy. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511790676
   Google Scholar
• Krizek, K. J., Barnes, G., & Thompson, K. (2009). Analyzing the effect of bicycle facilities on commute mode share over time. Journal of Urban Planning and Development, 135(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2009)135:2(66)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linder, W., & Mueller, S. (2017). Schweizerische Demokratie: Institutionen–Prozesse–Perspektiven (4., vollständig überarbeitete und aktualisierte Auflage). Haupt Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Manville, M., & Cummins, B. (2015). Why do voters support public transportation? Public choices and private behavior. Transportation, 42(2), 303–332. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-014-9545-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manville, M., & Levine, A. S. (2018). What motivates public support for public transit? Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 118, 567–580. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mattioli, G., Roberts, C., Steinberger, J. K., & Brown, A. (2020). The political economy of car dependence: A systems of provision approach. Energy Research & Social Science, 66, 101486. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2020.101486
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newman, P., & Thornley, A. (1996). Urban planning in Europe: International competition, national systems and planning projects. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Nilsson, A., von Borgstede, C., & Biel, A. (2004). Willingness to accept climate change strategies: The effect of values and norms. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(3), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.06.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OFS & ARE. (2017). Comportement de la population en matière de transports: Résultats de microrecensement mobilité et transports 2015 (Office fédéral de la statistique et Office fédéral du développement territorial). OFS.
   Google Scholar
• Palm, M., & Handy, S. (2018). Sustainable transportation at the ballot box: A disaggregate analysis of the relative importance of user travel mode, attitudes and self-interest. Transportation, 45(1), 121–141. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11116-016-9728-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rérat, P. (2021a). Cycling to work. An analysis of the practice of utility cycling. Springer Nature.
   Google Scholar
• Rérat, P. (2021b). The rise of the e-bike: Towards an extension of the practice of cycling? Mobilities, 16(3), 423–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2021.1897236
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherriff, G. (2015). Voting on sustainable transport: Communication and governance challenges in Greater Manchester’s ‘congestion charge’ referendum. Local Environment, 20(12), 1507–1530. https://doi.org/10.1080/13549839.2014.911267
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Siemiatycki, M., Smith, M., & Walks, A. (2016). The politics of bicycle lane implementation: The case of Vancouver’s Burrard Street Bridge. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 10(3), 225–235. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2014.890767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stehlin, J. (2015). Cycles of investment: Bicycle infrastructure, gentrification, and the restructuring of the San Francisco Bay Area. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 47(1), 121–137. https://doi.org/10.1068/a130098p
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tamedia. (2018). Tamedia Abstimmungsfrage. Eidgenössische Volksabtimmung vom 23. September 2018. Tamedia.
   Google Scholar
• Tapp, A., Davis, A., Nancarrow, C., & Jones, S. (2016). Great Britain adults’ opinions on cycling: Implications for policy. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 89, 14–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2016.05.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tresch, A., Bernhard, L., Lauener, L., & Scaperrotta, L. (2018). Enquête VOTO relative à la votation populaire fédérale du 23 septembre 2018. FORS/ZDA/LINK.
   Google Scholar
• Urry, J. (2004). The ‘system’ of automobility. Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4–5), 25–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/0263276404046059
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vigar, G. (2017). The four knowledges of transport planning: Enacting a more communicative, trans-disciplinary policy and decision-making. Transport Policy, 58, 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.04.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walks, A. (2015a). Driving the vote? Automobility, ideology, and political partisanship. In The urban political economy and ecology of automobility (pp. 199–220). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. (Ed.). (2015b). Urban political economy and ecology of automobility: Driving cities, driving inequality, driving politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walks, A. (2015c). Stopping the ‘War on the car’: Neoliberalism, Fordism, and the politics of automobility in Toronto. Mobilities, 10(3), 402–422. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2014.880563
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wild, K., Woodward, A., Field, A., & Macmillan, A. (2018). Beyond ‘bikelash’: Engaging with community opposition to cycle lanes. Mobilities, 13(4), 505–519. https://doi.org/10.1080/17450101.2017.1408950
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., & Mitra, R. (2020). Implementing cycling infrastructure in a politicized space: Lessons from Toronto, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, 86, 102760. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar