Analyzing the spatial determinants of dockless e-scooter & e-bike trips across four U.S. cities

References

• American Community Survey, 5-Year Estimates. (2017). Bureau, U. S. C. FactFinder.
   Google Scholar
• Arredondo, V. (2019). Electric scooter companies offer discounts for low-income riders. NBC4.
   Google Scholar
• Austin.Gov. (2021). Shared micromobility. City of Austin Transportation Department. https://data.mobility.austin.gov/micromobility-data/
   Google Scholar
• Bai, S. H., & Jiao, J. F. (2020). Dockless E-scooter usage patterns and urban built environments: A comparison study of Austin, TX, and Minneapolis, MN. Travel Behaviour and Society, 20, 264–272. ISSN 2214-367X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.04.005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barajas, J. M. (2021). Where Black: Connecting transportation planning and infrastructure to disproportionate policing. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 99, 103027. ISSN 1361-9209. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920921003254 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.103027
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (1990). Regression-based tests for overdispersion in the Poisson model. Journal of Econometrics, 46(3), 347–364. ISSN 0304-4076. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(90)90014-K
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, O., & Noland, R. B. (2019). Bikesharing in Philadelphia: Do lower-income areas generate trips? Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 143–152. ISSN 2214-367X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caspi, O., Smart, M. J., & Noland, R. B. (2020). Spatial associations of dockless shared e-scooter usage. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 86, 15. ISSN 1361–9209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chapman, J., Fox, E.H., Bachman, W., & Frank, L.D. (2021). Smart Location Database Version 3.0. EPA.
   Google Scholar
• Colleges and Universities. (2010). USGS: ScienceBase-Catalog.
   Google Scholar
• Government of the District of Columbia and Department of Transportation Washington, D. C. (2020). Terms and conditions for the public right-of-way occupancy permit for vendors (p. 22).
   Google Scholar
• Creutzig, F., Fernandez, B., Haberl, H., Khosla, R., Mulugetta, Y., & Seto, K. C. (2016). Beyond technology: Demand-side solutions for climate change mitigation. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 41(1), 173–198. ISBN 978-0-8243-2341-7. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-110615-085428
   Google Scholar
• Dill, J., & McNeil, N. (2020). Are shared vehicles shared by all? A review of equity and vehicle sharing. Journal of Planning Literature, 36(1), 5–30. ISSN 0885-4122. https://doi.org/10.1177/0885412220966732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dillahunt, T. R., & Malone, A. R. (2015). The promise of the sharing economy among disadvantaged communities. Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM. p. 2285–2294.
   Google Scholar
• Dillahunt, T. R., & Veinot, T. C. (2018). Getting there: Barriers and facilitators to transportation access in underserved communities. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 25(5), 1–39. ISSN 1073-0516. https://doi.org/10.1145/3233985
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson, J., & Mattsson, L.-G. (2006). Equity effects of congestion pricing: Quantitative methodology and a case study for Stockholm. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 40(7), 602–620. ISSN 0965-8564. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856405001618.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ESRI. (2019). USA Parks. https://www.arcgis.com/home/item.html?id=578968f975774d3fab79fe56c8c90941
   Google Scholar
• Fan, A. H., Chen, X. M., & Wan, T. (2019). How have travelers changed mode choices for first/last mile trips after the introduction of bicycle-sharing systems: An empirical study in Beijing, China. Journal of Advanced Transportation, 2019, 16. ISSN 0197–6729.
   Google Scholar
• Ferenchak, N. N., & Marshall, W. E. (2021). Bicycling facility inequalities and the causality dilemma with socioeconomic/sociodemographic change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 97, 102920. ISSN 1361-9209. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920921002194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102920
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fishman, E. (2016). A review of recent literature. Transport Reviews, 36(1), 92–113. ISSN 0144-1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2015.1033036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokianos, K. (2012). Count time series models. In T. S. Rao, S. S. Rao (Ed.) Time Series Analysis: Methods and Applications (Handbook of Statistics), vol. 30, p. 315–347. Elsevier Science. ISBN 978-0-44-453863-5; 978-0-44-453858-1.
   Google Scholar
• Fonseca, R. (2019). Scooters, scooters everywhere. Here’s how LA's grand experiment is going. LAist.
   Google Scholar
• GBFS. https://github.com/NABSA/gbfs/blob/master/systems.csv
   Google Scholar
• Getis, A., & Ord, J. K. (2010). The analysis of spatial association by use of distance statistics. Geographical Analysis, 24(3), 189–206. ISSN 0016-7363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1538-4632.1992.tb00261.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gu, T. Q., Kim, I., & Currie, G. (2019). Measuring immediate impacts of a new mass transit system on an existing bike-share system in China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 124, 20–39. ISSN 0965-8564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guidon, S., Becker, H., Dediu, H., & Axhausen, K. W. (2019). Electric bicycle-sharing: A new competitor in the urban transportation market? An empirical analysis of transaction data. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(4), 15–26. ISSN 0361-1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119836762
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gössling, S. (2020). Integrating e-scooters in urban transportation: Problems, policies, and the prospect of system change. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 79, 102230. ISSN 1361-9209. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920919312829. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102230
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinen, E., Van Wee, B., & Maat, K. (2010). Commuting by bicycle: An overview of the literature. Transport Reviews, 30(1), 59–96. ISSN 0144-1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441640903187001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hosseinzadeh, A., Algomaiah, M., Kluger, R., & Li, Z. (2021). E-scooters and sustainability: Investigating the relationship between the density of E-scooter trips and characteristics of sustainable urban development. Sustainable Cities and Society, 66, 102624. ISSN 2210-6707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2020.102624
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huo, J., Yang, H., Li, C., Zheng, R., Yang, L., & Wen, Y. (2021). Influence of the built environment on E-scooter sharing ridership: A tale of five cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 93, 103084. ISSN 0966-6923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, M. R., Haworth, J., Christie, N., Cheng, T., & Hailes, S. (2021). Cycling near misses: A review of the current methods, challenges and the potential of an AI-embedded system. Transport Reviews, 41(3), 304–328. ISSN 0144-1647. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1840456
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPCC. (2021). Climate change 2021: The physical science basis—Frequently asked questions. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FAQ_Chapter_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• James, C. (2019). District proposal would cut the number of dockless scooter operators in half. DCist.
   Google Scholar
• Jia, Y. N., & Fu, H. (2019). Association between innovative dockless bicycle sharing programs and adopting cycling in commuting and non-commuting trips. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 121, 12–21. ISSN 0965-8564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.12.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jin, H. T., Jin, F., Wang, J., & Wei, S. (2019). Competition and cooperation between shared bicycles and public transit: A case study of Beijing. Sustainability, 11(5). ISSN 2071–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larson, C. (2019). Scooter company is about to nearly double its fleet in Louisville. Louisville Business First.
   Google Scholar
• Lazo, L. (2019). That scooter ride is going to cost you a lot more. Washington Post.
   Google Scholar
• Li, A., Zhao, P., Huang, Y., Gao, K., & Axhausen, K. W. (2020). An empirical analysis of dockless bike-sharing utilization and its explanatory factors: Case study from Shanghai, China. Journal of Transport Geography, 88, 102828. ISSN 0966-6923. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692320302623 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102828
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, A. Y., Zhao, P., Liu, X., Mansourian, A., Axhausen, K. V., & Qu, X. (2022). Comprehensive comparison of e-scooter sharing mobility: Evidence from 30 European cities. Transportation Research Part D-Transport and Environment, 105. ISSN 1361–9209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, M. F., Lucas, H. C., & Shmueli, G. (2013). Too big to fail: Large samples and the p-value problem. Information Systems Research, 24(4), 906–917. ISSN 1047-7047. https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, H., Kou, Z., Zhao, F., & Cai, H. (2019). Comparative life cycle assessment of station-based and dock-less bike sharing systems. Resources Conservation and Recycling, 146, 180–189. ISSN 0921-3449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.03.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, Q. Dou, X., Di, X., & Hampshire, R. C. (2018). Multimodal Connections between Dockless Bikesharing and Ride-Hailing: An Empirical Study in New York City [Paper presentation]. 2018 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, New York. IEEE International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems-ITSC, pp. 2256–2261. ISBN 978-1-7281-0323-5.
   Google Scholar
• Ma, T., & Knaap, G. J. (2019). Estimating the impacts of capital bikeshare on metrorail ridership in the Washington Metropolitan Area. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2673(7), 371–379. ISSN 0361-1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198119849407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, T., Liu, C., & Erdoğan, S. (2015). Bicycle sharing and public transit does capital bikeshare affect metrorail ridership in Washington, DC? Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2534(1), 1–9. ISSN 0361-1981. https://doi.org/10.3141/2534-01
   Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Zhang, X., Li, X., Wang, X., & Zhao, X. (2019). Impacts of free-floating bikesharing system on public transit ridership. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 76, 100–110. ISSN 1361-9209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.09.014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, X., Ji, Y., Yuan, Y., Van Oort, N., Jin, Y., & Hoogendoorn, S. (2020). A comparison in travel patterns and determinants of user demand between docked and dockless bike-sharing systems using multi-sourced data. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 139, 148–173. ISSN 0965-8564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2020.06.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manson, S., Schroeder, J., Riper, D. V., Kugler, T., & Ruggles, S. (2020). IPUMS National Historical Geographic Information System: Version 15.0. IPUMS.
   Google Scholar
• Mayne, S. L., Auchincloss, A. H., & Michael, Y. L. (2015). Impact of policy and built environment changes on obesity-related outcomes: A systematic review of naturally occurring experiments. Obesity Reviews: An Official Journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity, 16(5), 362–375. ISSN 1467-7881. https://doi.org/10.1111/obr.12269
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, G. (2019). Spatiotemporal comparative analysis of scooter-share and bike-share usage patterns in Washington, D.C. Journal of Transport Geography, 78, 19–28. ISSN 0966-6923. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0966692319302741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKenzie, G. (2020). Urban mobility in the sharing economy: A spatiotemporal comparison of shared mobility services. Computers Environment and Urban Systems, 79, 101418. ISSN 0198–9715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNeil, N., MacArthur, J., Dill, J., & Broach, J. (2017). Evaluating efforts to improve the equity of bike share systems. Portland State University.
   Google Scholar
• Measuring Equitable Access to New Mobility, A Populus Report. (2018). https://research.populus.ai/reports/Populus_MeasuringAccess_2018-Nov.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MapIT Minneapolis. (2019). Scooter availability 2019. City of MINNEAPOLIS. https://opendata.minneapolismn.gov/search?groupIds=9bc71a032e984a22a5e94312d9d9bf7f
   Google Scholar
• Mobile Fact Sheet. (2021). Washington, D.C. https://report.ipcc.ch/ar6wg3/pdf/IPCC_AR6_WGIII_FAQ_Chapter_10.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mooney, S. J., Hosford, K., Howe, B., Yan, A., Winters, M., Bassok, A., & Hirsch, J. A. (2019). Freedom from the station: Spatial equity in access to dockless bike share. Journal of Transport Geography, 74, 91–96. ISSN 0966-6923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.11.009
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NACTO. (2019a). NACTO guidelines for regulating shared micromobility. National Association of City Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• NACTO. (2019b). Shared micromobility in the U.S.: 2018 (p. 16). National Association of City Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• NACTO. (2020). Shared micromobility in the U.S.: 2019. National Association of City Transportation Officials.
   Google Scholar
• Nagl, K. (2019). As winter approaches, electric scooters still hot in Detroit a year after launch. Detroit: Crains.
   Google Scholar
• Nasri, A., Younes, H., & Zhang, L. (2020). Analysis of the effect of multi-level urban form on bikeshare demand: Evidence from seven large metropolitan areas in the United States. Journal of Transport and Land Use, 13(1), 389–408. ISSN 1938-7849. https://doi.org/10.5198/jtlu.2020.1615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neckerman, K. M., Lovasi, G. S., Davies, S., Purciel, M., Quinn, J., Feder, E., Raghunath, N., Wasserman, B., & Rundle, A. (2009). Disparities in urban neighborhood conditions: Evidence from GIS measures and field observation in New York City. Journal of Public Health Policy, 30(S1), S264–S285. ISSN 0197-5897. https://doi.org/10.1057/jphp.2008.47
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Orr, B., MacArthur, J., & Dill, J. (2019). The Portland e-scooter experience. TREC Friday Seminar Series.
   Google Scholar
• Pike, E. (2010). Congestion charging: Challenges and opportunities. International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT). https://trid.trb.org/view/1112958
   Google Scholar
• Reck, D. J., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Who uses shared micro-mobility services? Empirical evidence from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 94, 102803. ISSN 1361-9209. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1361920921001073 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2021.102803
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reck, D. J., Haitao, H., Guidon, S., & Axhausen, K. W. (2021). Explaining shared micromobility usage, competition and mode choice by modelling empirical data from Zurich, Switzerland. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 124, 102947. ISSN 0968-090X. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0968090X20308445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2020.102947
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryerson, M. S., Long, C. S., Fichman, M., Davidson, J. H., Scudder, K. N., Kim, M., Katti, R., Poon, G., & Harris, M. D. (2021). Evaluating cyclist biometrics to develop urban transportation safety metrics. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 159(11), 106287. ISSN 0001–4575.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Saberi, M., Ghamami, M., Gu, Y., Shojaei, M. H. (S)., & Fishman, E. (2018). Understanding the impacts of a public transit disruption on bicycle sharing mobility patterns: A case of Tube strike in London. Journal of Transport Geography, 66, 154–166. ISSN 0966-6923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.11.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Park Services (NPS). (2020). NPS Boundaries. United States.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2019). Shared micromobility policy toolkit: Docked and dockless bike and scooter sharing. Transportation Sustainability Research Center.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A. (2016). Mobility and the sharing economy. Transport Policy, 51, 141–142. v. ISSN 0967-070X. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen, Y., Zhang, X. H., & Zhao, J. H. (2018). Understanding the usage of dockless bike sharing in Singapore. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 12(9), 686–700. ISSN 1556–8318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TOD Database. (2020). Development, C. F. T.-O. Center for Neighborhood Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Vittinghoff, E., Glidden, D. V., Shiboski, S. C., & McCulloch, C. E. (2005). Regression methods in biostatistics: Linear, logistic, survival, and repeated measures models preface (Statistics for Biology and Health). Regression methods in biostatistics (p. VII). Springer. ISBN 978-0-387-20275-4.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, D. (2019). Fourth scooter company, Boaz Bikes, to launch in Detroit. Detroit: Crains
   Google Scholar
• Wang, M. S., & Zhou, X. L. (2017). Bike-sharing systems and congestion: Evidence from US cities. Journal of Transport Geography, 65, 147–154. ISSN 0966–6923.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Washington, S., Karlaftis, M. G., & Mannering, F. L. (2010). Statistical and econometric methods for transportation data analysis (2nd ed., p. 544). Chapman & Hall/CRC.
   Google Scholar
• Wodinsky, S. (2018). Lime expands its discount program for low-income bike and scooter riders. The Verge.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, D., Bain, Y., Rong, J., Wang, J., & Yin, B. (2019). Study on clustering of free-floating bike-sharing parking time series in Beijing subway stations. Sustainability, 11(19), 20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younes, H., Nasri, A., Baiocchi, G., & Zhang, L. (2019). How transit service closures influence bikesharing demand; lessons learned from SafeTrack project in Washington, DC metropolitan area. Journal of Transport Geography, 76, 83–92. ISSN 0966-6923. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2019.03.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younes, H., Zou, Z., Wu, J., & Baiocchi, G. (2020). Comparing the temporal determinants of dockless scooter-share and station-based bike-share in Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 134, 308–320. ISSN 0965-8564. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856419311553.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. Y., & Zhang, Y. M. (2018). Associations between public transit usage and bikesharing behaviors in The United States. Sustainability, 10(6), 20. ISSN 2071–1050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhao, D., Ong, G. P., Wang, W., & Hu, X. J. (2019). Effect of built environment on shared bicycle reallocation: A case study on Nanjing, China. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 128, 73–88. ISSN 0965-8564. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2019.07.018
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zou, Z., Younes, H., Erdoğan, S., & Wu, J. (2020). Exploratory analysis of real-time e-scooter trip data in Washington, D.C. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2674(8), 285–299. ISSN 0361-1981. https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198120919760
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar