From individuals to a community of purpose: A methodical exploration of self-organized ridesharing initiative

References

• Amey, A. M. (2010). Real-time ridesharing: Exploring the opportunities and challenges of designing a technology-based rideshare trial for the MIT community. Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Amirkiaee, S. Y., & Evangelopoulos, N. (2018). Why do people rideshare? An experimental study. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 55, 9–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2018.02.025
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• APTA (2015). Recommended practice: Transit parking 101. APTA SUDS-UD-RP-008-15. American Public Transportation Association.
   Google Scholar
• Aydinli, A., Bender, M., & Chasiotis, A. (2013). Helping and volunteering across cultures: Determinants of prosocial behavior. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 5(3). https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1118
   Google Scholar
• Beroldo, S. (1999). Casual carpooling 1998 update. RIDES for Bay Area Commuters, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bialski, P. (2012). Becoming intimately mobile. Peter Lang.
   Google Scholar
• Böcker, L., & Meelen, T. (2017). Sharing for people, planet or profit? Analysing motivations for intended sharing economy participation. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botsman, R., & Rogers, R. (2010). Whats mine is yours: The rise of collaborative consumption. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Burris, M., Christopher, E., DeCorla-Souza, P., Greenberg, A., Heinrich, S., Morris, J., Oliphant, M., Schreffler, E., Valk, P., & Winters, P. (2012). Casual carpooling scan report. FHWA-HRT-12-053. FHWA.
   Google Scholar
• Cairns, S., Sloman, L., Newson, C., Anable, J., Kirkbride, A., & Goodwin, P. (2004). Smarter choices: Changing the way we travel. Department for Transport.
   Google Scholar
• CBS. (2016). Transportation use statistics. CBS - Israel Central Bureau of Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, N. D., & Shaheen, S. A. (2012). Ridesharing in North America: Past, present and future. Transport Reviews, 32(1), 93–112. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2011.621557
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clabburn, A., & Lane, K. (2009). Using existing European road capacity efficiently. European Transport Conference, 2009 Proceedings. Association for European Transport.
   Google Scholar
• de Haan, J., & Rotmans, J. (2011). Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 78(1), 90–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eskelinen, T., & Venäläinen, J. (2021). Economic moralities in self-organised alternative economies: The Finnish cases of ridesharing and timebanking. International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, 41(5/6), 657–672. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSSP-11-2019-0241
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frenken, K., & Schor, J. (2017). Putting the sharing economy into perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. (2004). From sectoral systems of innovation to socio-technical systems: Insights about dynamics and change from sociology and institutional theory. Research Policy, 33(6–7), 897–920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2004.01.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geels, F. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: Introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.01.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabher, G., & Ibert, O. (2014). Distance as asset? Knowledge collaboration in hybrid virtual communities. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(1), 97–123. https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt014
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hine, C. (2008). Virtual ethnography: Modes, varieties, affordances. The Sage Handbook of Online Research Methods.
   Google Scholar
• Hoffman, T. (2013). Globes. http://www.globes.co.il/news/article.aspx?did=1000893814
   Google Scholar
• Israel Rail. (2013). Binyamina Station: Kav Ratzif (Continuous service). MOT. http://www.transportation.org.il/he/node/3762
   Google Scholar
• Jacobs, K. (n.d.). Israeli communication style and boundaries: Understanding culture part two. World Zionist Organization. https://www.wzo.org.il/index.php?dir=site&page=articles&op=item&cs=3202
   Google Scholar
• Jamal, S., & Habib, M. A. (2020). Smartphone and daily travel: How the use of smartphone applications affect travel decisions. Sustainable Cities and Society, 53, 101939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2019.101939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keinan, T., & Alon, R. (2017). Carpool users’ survey. Transportation Today and Tomorrow.
   Google Scholar
• Köhler, J., Geels, F. W., Kern, F., Markard, J., Onsongo, E., Wieczorek, A., Alkemade, F., Avelino, F., Bergek, A., Boons, F., Fünfschilling, L., Hess, D., Holtz, G., Hyysalo, S., Jenkins, K., Kivimaa, P., Martiskainen, M., McMeekin, A., Mühlemeier, M. S., … Wells, P. (2019). An agenda for sustainability transitions research: State of the art and future directions. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 31, 1–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2019.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozinets, R. V. (2015). Netnography: Doing ethnographic research online. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Kristal, A. S., &Whillans, A. V. (2020). What we can learn from five naturalistic field experiments that failed to shift commuter behaviour. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(2), 169–176. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0795-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin, E., Cohen, A., Yassine, Z., Brown, L., & Shaheen, S. (2020). Mobility on demand (MOD) sandbox demonstration: Bay area rapid transit integrated carpool to transit access program evaluation report. FTA.
   Google Scholar
• Minett, P., & Pearce, J. (2011). Estimating the energy consumption impact of casual carpooling. Energies, 4(1), 126–139. https://doi.org/10.3390/en4010126
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mirisaee, S. H., Brereton, M., Roe, P., & Redhead, F. (2013). Understanding the fabric of social interactions for ridesharing through mining social networking sites [Paper presentation].OzCHI’13, Adelaide, Australia. https://doi.org/10.1145/2541016.2541071
   Google Scholar
• Morais, G. M., Santos, V. F., & Gonçalves, C. A. (2020). Netnography: Origins, foundations, evolution and axiological and methodological developments and trends. The Qualitative Report, 25(2), 441–455.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naess, P., & Vogel, N. (2012). Sustainable urban development and the multi-level transition perspective. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 4, 36–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2012.07.001
   Google Scholar
• Oliphant, M. (2008). The native slugs of Northern Virginia: A profile of slugging in the Washington D.C. region [Master thesis]. Virginia Tech Department of Urban Affairs and Planning.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, É. M., Bergstad, C. J., & Nässén, J. (2020). Understanding daily car use: Driving habits, motives, attitudes, and norms across trip purposes. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 68, 306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.11.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raney, S. (2010). San Francisco to Silicon Valley, California: Instant ridesharing with transfer hub. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2143(1), 134–141. https://doi.org/10.3141/2143-17
   Google Scholar
• Rip, R., & Kemp, A. (1998). Technological change. In S. Rayner & E. L. Malone (Eds.), Human choices and climate change (pp. 327–399). Battelle Press.
   Google Scholar
• Rivera, J., Gordo, Á., Cassidy, P., & Apesteguía, A. (2017). A netnographic study of P2P collaborative consumption platforms’ user interface and design. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 23, 11–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.09.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotmans, J., Kemp, R., & Van Asselt, M. (2001, February). More evolution than revolution: Transition management in public policy. Foresight, 3(1), 15–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/14636680110803003
   Google Scholar
• Seyfang, G., & Longhurst, N. (2016). What influences the diffusion of grassroots innovations for sustainability? Investigating community currency niches. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 28(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2015.1063603
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., & Cohen, A. (2019). Shared ride services in North America: Definitions, impacts, and the future of pooling. Transport Reviews, 39(4), 427–442. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2018.1497728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., Cohen, A., & Bayen, A. (2018). The benefits of carpooling. Transportation Sustainability Research Center. https://doi.org/10.7922/G2DZ06GF
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S., Stocker, A., & Mundler, M. (2017). Online and app-based carpooling in France: Analyzing users and practices - A study of BlaBlaCar. In G. Meyer & S. Shaheen (Eds.), Disrupting mobility: Impacts of sharing economy and innovative transportation on cities (pp. 181–196). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Shaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D., & Gaynor, T. (2016). Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transport Policy, 51, 165–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.01.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoshany-Tavory, S., Trop, T., & Shiftan, Y. (2020). Self-organized ridesharing: Multi-perspective annotated review. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 14(4), 270–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2018.1542758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shove, E., Pantzar, M., & Watson, M. (2012). The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Sage.
   Google Scholar
• The Partnership for Regional sustainablity. (2017). Periodic update.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275112457914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau. (2019). United States. Commuting at a glance: American Community Survey 1-Year Estimates.
   Google Scholar
• Venäläinen, J. (2020). Self-organised online ridesharing as a " transport commons. In T. H. T. Eskelinen (Ed.), Enacting community economies within a welfare. Mayfly Books.
   Google Scholar
• Watson, M. (2012). How theories of practice can inform transition to a decarbonised transport system. Journal of Transport Geography, 24, 488–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.04.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2009). Case study research: Design and methods (4th ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zarabi, Z., Manaugh, K., & Lord, S. (2019). The impacts of residential relocation on commute habits: A qualitative perspective on households’ mobility behaviors and strategies. Travel Behaviour and Society, 16, 131–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2019.05.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zmud, M., & Rojo, C. (2013). Casual carpooling focus group study. FHWA-HRT-13-053.
   Google Scholar