627
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Powering the transition: Public charging stations and electric vehicle adoption in Montreal, Canada

, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1097-1112 | Received 05 Aug 2021, Accepted 22 Nov 2022, Published online: 09 Dec 2022

References

  • Achtnicht, M., Bühler, G., & Hermeling, C. (2012). The impact of fuel availability on demand for alternative-fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17(3), 262–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.12.005
  • Axsen, J., Bailey, J., & Castro, M. A. (2015). Preference and lifestyle heterogeneity among potential plug-in electric vehicle buyers. Energy Economics, 50, 190–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.05.003
  • Axsen, J., Cairns, J., Dusyk, N., & Goldberg, S. (2018). What drives the Pioneers? Applying lifestyle theory to early electric vehicle buyers in Canada. Energy Research & Social Science, 44, 17–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2018.04.015
  • Axsen, J., Goldberg, S., & Bailey, J. (2016). How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 47, 357–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.05.015
  • Axsen, J., & Kurani, K. S. (2013). Hybrid, plug-in hybrid, or electric—What do car buyers want? Energy Policy, 61, 532–543. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.05.122
  • Bailey, J., Miele, A., & Axsen, J. (2015). Is awareness of public charging associated with consumer interest in plug-in electric vehicles? Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 36, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2015.02.001
  • Bakker, J. J. (2011). Contesting range anxiety: The role of electric vehicle charging infrastructure in the transportation transition [Master thesis]. Eindhoven University of Technology. https://pure.tue.nl/ws/portalfiles/portal/47015026/716302-1.pdf
  • Bernard, M. R., & Hall, D. (2022). Assessing charging infrastructure needs in Québec. International Council on Clean Transportation.
  • Boisjoly, G., & El-Geneidy, A. (2016). Daily fluctuations in transit and job availability: A comparative assessment of time-sensitive accessibility measures. Journal of Transport Geography, 52, 73–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.03.004
  • Bubeck, S., Tomaschek, J., & Fahl, U. (2016). Perspectives of electric mobility: Total cost of ownership of electric vehicles in Germany. Transport Policy, 50, 63–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.05.012
  • Bunce, L., Harris, M., & Burgess, M. (2014). Charge up then charge out? Drivers’ perceptions and experiences of electric vehicles in the UK. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 59, 278–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2013.12.001
  • Canada Energy Regulator. (2018). Provincial and territorial energy profiles. https://www.cer-rec.gc.ca/nrg/ntgrtd/mrkt/nrgsstmprfls/qc-eng.html#s1
  • Carley, S., Lane, B., Krause, R., & Graham, J. (2013). Intent to purchase a plug-in electric vehicle: A survey of early impressions in large US cites. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 18(1), 39–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2012.09.007
  • Carroll, S. (2011). The smart move case studies. Cenex.
  • CCMM & Propulsion Québec. (2019). Positionner le Québec et sa métropole comme leaders des transports électriques et intelligents. https://www.ccmm.ca/fr/publications/memoires/positionner-le-quebec-et-sa-metropole-comme-leaders-des-transports-electriques-et-intelligents/
  • Curl, A., Nelson, J., & Anable, J. (2011). Does accessibility planning address what matters? A review of current practice and practitioner perspectives. Research in Transportation Business & Management, 2, 3–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rtbm.2011.07.001
  • Dong, J., Liu, C., & Lin, Z. (2014). Charging infrastructure planning for promoting battery electric vehicles: An activity-based approach using multiday travel data. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 38, 44–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2013.11.001
  • Dumortier, J., Siddiki, S., Carley, S., Cisney, J., Krause, R. M., Lane, B. W., Rupp, J. A., & Graham, J. D. (2015). Effects of providing total cost of ownership information on consumers’ intent to purchase a hybrid or plug-in electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 72, 71–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.12.005
  • Egnér, F., & Trosvik, L. (2018). Electric vehicle adoption in Sweden and the impact of local policy instruments. Energy Policy, 121, 584–596. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2018.06.040
  • El-Geneidy, A. M., & Levinson, D. M. (2006). Access to destinations: Development of accessibility measures. https://www.lrrb.org/pdf/200616.pdf
  • Ferguson, M., Mohamed, M., Higgins, C., Abotalebi, E., & Kanaroglou, P. (2018). How open are Canadian households to electric vehicles? A national latent class choice analysis with willingness-to-pay and metropolitain characterization. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 58, 208–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.12.006
  • Franke, T., & Krems, J. (2013). What drives range preferences in electric vehicle users? Transport Policy, 30, 56–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2013.07.005
  • Funke, S. Á., Sprei, F., Gnann, T., & Plötz, P. (2019). How much charging infrastructure do electric vehicles need? A review of the evidence and international comparison. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 77, 224–242. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2019.10.024
  • Geurs, K., & van Wee, B. (2004). Accessibility evaluation of land-use and transport strategies: Review and research directions. Journal of Transport Geography, 12(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2003.10.005
  • Globisch, J., Plötz, P., Dütschke, E., & Wietschel, M. (2019). Consumer preferences for public charging infrastructure for electric vehicles. Transport Policy, 81, 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2019.05.017
  • Gouvernement du Québec. (2020). Plan de mise en oeuvre 2021-2026 du Plan pour une économie verte 2030. p. 42.
  • Hackbarth, A., & Madlener, R. (2013). Consumer preferences for alternative fuel vehicles: A discrete choice analysis. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.002
  • Haidar, B., & Aguilar Rojas, M. T. (2022). The relationship between public charging infrastructure deployment and other socio-economic factors and electric vehicle adoption in France. Research in Transportation Economics, 95, 101208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2022.101208
  • Hardman, S., Jenn, A., Tal, G., Axsen, J., Beard, G., Daina, N., Figenbaum, E., Jakobsson, N., Jochem, P., Kinnear, N., Plötz, P., Pontes, J., Refa, N., Sprei, F., Turrentine, T., & Witkamp, B. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 62, 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.04.002
  • Hasan, S., & Simsekoglu, Ö. (2020). The role of psychological factors on vehicle kilometer travelled (VKT) for battery electric vehicle (BEV) users. Research in Transportation Economics, 82, 100880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2020.100880
  • He, S. Y., Kuo, Y.-H., & Sun, K. K. (2022). The spatial planning of public electric vehicle charging infrastructure in a high-density city using a contextualised location-allocation model. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 160, 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2022.02.012
  • He, S. Y., Kuo, Y.-H., & Wu, D. (2016). Incorporating institutional and spatial factors in the selection of the optimal locations of public electric vehicle charging facilities: A case study of Beijing, China. Transportation Research Part C: Emerging Technologies, 67, 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trc.2016.02.003
  • He, S. Y., Luo, S., & Sun, K. K. (2020). Factors affecting the adoption intention of electric vehicles: The roles of objective, perceived and prospective accessibility. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3660754
  • He, Z., Zhou, Y., Chen, X., Wang, J., Shen, W., Wang, M., & Li, W. (2022). Examining the spatial mode in the early market for electric vehicles adoption: evidence from 41 cities in China. Transportation Letters, 14(6), 640–650. https://doi.org/10.1080/19427867.2021.1917217
  • Hydro-Quebec. (2021). See how much you could save with an electric vehicle. https://www.hydroquebec.com/transportation-electrification/electric-vehicles/calculate-your-savings.html
  • Institut de la statistique Québec. (2020). 06 - Montréal. https://www.stat.gouv.qc.ca/statistiques/profils/region_06/region_06_00.htm
  • International Energy Agency. (2022). Global EV Outlook 2022. https://www.iea.org/reports/global-ev-outlook-2022
  • Jensen, A., Cherchi, E., & Mabit, S. (2013). On the stability of preferences and attitudes before and after experiencing an electric vehicle. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 25, 24–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2013.07.006
  • Kormos, C., Axsen, J., Long, Z., & Goldberg, S. (2019). Latent demand for zero-emissions vehicles in Canada (Part 2): Insights from a stated choice experiment. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 67, 685–702. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2018.10.010
  • Langbroek, J., Franklin, J., & Susilo, Y. (2016). The effect of policy incentives on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 94, 94–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.03.050
  • Lättman, K., Olsson, L., & Friman, M. (2016). Development and test of the Perceived Accessibility Scale (PAC) in public transport. Journal of Transport Geography, 54, 257–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.015
  • Lättman, K., Olsson, L., & Friman, M. (2018). A new approach to accessibility – Examining perceived accessibility in contrast to objectively measured accessibility in daily travel. Research in Transportation Economics, 69, 501–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.retrec.2018.06.002
  • Lavieri, P., & Domenech, C. B. (2021). Electric vehicle uptake and charging: A consumer-focused review. University of Melbourne.
  • Li, X., Chen, P., & Wang, X. (2017). Impacts of renewables and socioeconomic factors on electric vehicle demands – Panel data studies across 14 countries. Energy Policy, 109, 473–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.021
  • Lieven, T., Mühlmeier, S., Henkel, S., & Waller, J. (2011). Who will buy electric cars? An empirical study in Germany. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(3), 236–243. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2010.12.001
  • Li, W., Long, R., Chen, H., & Geng, J. (2017). A review of factors influencing consumer intentions to adopt battery electric vehicles. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 78, 318–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2017.04.076
  • Lin, Z., & Greene, D. L. (2011). Promoting the market for plug-in hybrid and battery electric vehicles. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2252(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.3141/2252-07
  • Lin, B., & Wu, W. (2018). Why people want to buy electric vehicles: An empirical study in first-tier cities of China. Energy Policy, 112, 233–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.10.026
  • Mersky, A., Sprei, F., Samaras, C., & Qian, S. (2016). Effectiveness of incentives on electric vehicle adoption in Norway. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 46, 56–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2016.03.011
  • Miele, A., Axsen, J., Wolinetz, M., Maine, E., & Long, Z. (2020). The role of charging and refuelling infrastructure in supporting zero-emission vehicle sales. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 81, 102275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2020.102275
  • Mohamed, M., Higgins, C., Ferguson, M., & Kanaroglou, P. (2016). Identifying and characterizing potention electric vehicle adopters in Canada: A two-stage modelling approach. Transport Policy, 52, 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2016.07.006
  • Mohamed, M., Higgins, C. D., Ferguson, M., & Réquia, W. J. (2018). The influence of body type in shaping behavioural intention to acquire electric vehicles: A multi-group structural equation approach. Transportation Research Part A, 116, 54–72.
  • Moons, I., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2012). Emotions as determinants of electric car usage intention. Journal of Marketing Management, 28(3–4), 195–237. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.659007
  • Neubauer, J., & Wood, E. (2014). The impact of range anxiety and home, workplace, and public charging infrastructure on simulated battery electric vehicle lifetime utility. Journal of Power Sources, 257, 12–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpowsour.2014.01.075
  • Newman, D., Wells, P., Donovan, C., Nieuwenhuis, P., & Davies, H. (2014). Urban, sub-urban or rural: where is the best place for electric vehicles? International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 14(3/4), 306. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJATM.2014.065295
  • Nicholas, M. A., Tal, G., & Ji, W. (2017). Lessons from in-use fast charging data: why are drivers staying close to home? Institute of Transportation Studies - University of California.
  • Plötz, P., Schneider, U., Globisch, J., & Dütschke, E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 67, 96–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2014.06.006
  • Quebec Electric Vehicle Association. (2019). L'électromobiliste québécois: portrait AVÉQ. https://www.aveq.ca/actualiteacutes/sondage-2019-aupres-des-membres-de-laveq
  • Quebec Electric Vehicle Association. (2020). Statistiques SAAQ-AVÉQ sur l‘électromobilité au Québec en date du 31 décembre 2020 [Infographie]. https://www.aveq.ca/actualiteacutes/statistiques-saaq-aveq-sur-lelectromobilite-au-quebec-en-date-du-31-decembre-2020-infographie
  • Quebec Electric Vehicle Association. (2022). Statistiques SAAQ-AVÉQ sur l’électromobilité au Québec en date du 31 décembre 2021. https://www.aveq.ca/actualiteacutes/statistiques-saaq-aveq-sur-lelectromobilite-au-quebec-en-date-du-31-decembre-2021-infographie
  • Schuitema, G., Anable, J., Skippon, S., & Kinnear, N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D, 48, 39–49.
  • Schulz, F., & Rode, J. (2022). Public charging infrastructure and electric vehicles in Norway. Energy Policy, 160, 112660. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112660
  • Sheldon, T., & DeShazo, J. (2017). How does the presence of HOV lanes affect plug-in electric vehicle adoption in California? A generalized propensity score approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 85, 146–170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2017.05.002
  • Sierzchula, W., Bakker, S., Maat, K., & Wee, B. v (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68, 183–194. [Database] https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2014.01.043
  • Silvia, C., & Krause, R. M. (2016). Assessing the impact of policy interventions on the adoption of plug-in electric vehicles: An agent-based model. Energy Policy, 96, 105–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2016.05.039
  • Skippon, S., & Garwood, M. (2011). Responses to battery electric vehicles: UK consumer attitudes and attributions of symbolic meaning following direct experience to reduce psychological distance. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 16(7), 525–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2011.05.005
  • Smith, B., Olaru, D., Jabeen, F., & Greaves, S. (2017). Electric vehicles adoption: Environmental enthusiast bias in discrete choice models. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 51, 290–303. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trd.2017.01.008
  • Statistics Canada. (2017). Montréal [Census metropolitan area], Quebec and Nova Scotia [Province] (table). Census Profile (Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 98-316-X2016001). https://www12.statcan.gc.ca/census-recensement/2016/dp-pd/prof/index.cfm?Lang=E
  • Statistics Canada. (2022). New motor vehicle registrations: Quarterly data visualization tool. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/n1/pub/71-607-x/71-607-x2021019-eng.htm
  • Tal, G., Nicholas, M. A., Davies, J., & Woodjack, J. (2014). Charging behavior impacts on electric vehicle miles traveled. Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2454(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.3141/2454-07
  • Thøgersen, J., & Ebsen, J. V. (2019). Perceptual and motivational reasons for the low adoption of electric cars in Denmark. Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 65, 89–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trf.2019.07.017
  • Tseng, H.-K., Wu, J., & Liu, X. (2013). Affordability of electric vehicles for a sustainable transport system: An economic and environmental analysis. Energy Policy, 61, 441–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2013.06.026
  • Wee, B. V. (2016). Accessible accesibility research challenges. Journal of Transport Geography, 51, 9–16.
  • Wee, S., Coffman, M., & Croix, S. (2018). Do electric vehicle incentices matter? Evidence from the 50 U.S. states. Research Policy, 47(9), 1601–1610. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2018.05.003
  • Westin, K., Jansson, J., & Nordlund, A. (2018). The importance of socio-demographic characteristics, geographic setting, and attitudes for adoption of electric vehicles in Sweden. Travel Behaviour and Society, 13, 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2018.07.004
  • White, L. V., Carrel, A. L., Shi, W., & Sintov, N. D. (2022). Why are charging stations associated with electric vehicle adoption? Untangling effects in three United States metropolitan areas. Energy Research & Social Science, 89, 102663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2022.102663
  • Whitmore, J., & Pineau, P.-O. (2022). État de l‘énergie au Québec 2022. Chaire de gestion du secteur de l‘énergie, HEC Montréal.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.