A Correlation of Allergic Contact Dermatitis with Allergen Type and Patient Categorical Variables

References

• JP Thyssen, A Linneberg, T Menne, and JD Johansen. 2007. The epidemiology of contact allergy in the general population: prevalence and main findings. Contact Dermatitis 57 (5):287–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Naca, Z Erbagci, and AS Aynaciouglu. 2006. Human arylamine N-acetyltransferase 2 polymorphism and susceptibility to allergic contact dermatitis. Int J Dermatol 45 (3):323–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BC Carlsen, KE Andersen, T Menné, and JD Johansen. 2008. Patients with multiple contact allergies: a review. Contact Dermatitis 58 (1):1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JP Thyssen, JD Johansen, and T Menne. 2007. Contact allergy epidemics and their controls. Contact Dermatitis 56 (4):185–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• I Kimber, GF Gerberick, and DA Basketter. 1999. Thresholds in contact sensitization: theoretical and practical considerations. Food Chem Toxicol 37 (5):553–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MK Robinson, GF Gerberick, CA Ryan, P McNamee, IR White, and DA Basketter. 2000. The importance of exposure estimation in the assessment of skin sensitization risk. Contact Dermatitis 42 (5):251–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LY Li, and PD Cruz. 2004. Allergic contact dermatitis: pathophysiology applied to future therapy. Dermatol Ther 17 (3):219–223.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• DL Kadyk, K McCarter, F Achen, and DV Belsito. 2003. Quality of life in patients with allergic contact dermatitis. J Am Acad Dermatol 49 (6):1037–1048.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• M Freireich-Astman, M David, and A Trattner. 2007. Standard patch test results in patients with contact dermatitis in Israel: age and sex differences. Contact Dermatitis 56 (2):103–107.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SI Ale, and HI Maibach. 2004. Reproducibility of patch test results: a concurrent right-versus-left study using TRUE TestTM. Contact Dermatitis 50 (5):304–312.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• WD James, LE Rosenthal, RR Brancaccio, and JG Marks. 1992. American Academy of Dermatology patch testing survey: use and effectiveness of this procedure. J Am Acad Dermatol 26:991–994.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• E Nettis, M Marcandrea, MC Colanardi, MT Paradiso, A Ferrannini, and A Tursi. 2003. Results of standard series patch testing in patients with occupational allergic contact dermatitis. Allergy 58 (12):1304–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LF Li, SA Sujan, and J Wang. 2003. Detection of occupational allergic contact dermatitis by patch testing. Contact Dermatitis 49 (4):189–193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PD Shenefelt. Clinical aspects of occupational allergic contact dermatitis. In: DJ Hogan. Occupational Skin Disorders; New York, NY: Igabu-Shoin. 1994: 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• SP Modjtahedi, and HI Maibach. 2002. Ethnicity as a possible endogenous factor in irritant contact dermatitis: comparing the irritant response among Caucasians, blacks, and Asians. Contact Dermatitis 47 (5):272–278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PD Shenefelt. 1996. Descriptive epidemiology of contact dermatitis in a university student population. Am J Contact Dermatol 7 (2):88–93.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Haz-map: balsam of Peru. http://hazmap.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed March 8, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Haz-map: potassium dichromate. http://hazmap.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed March 8, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• SH Nguyen, TP Dang, C MacPherson, H Maibach, and HI Maibach. 2008. Prevalence of patch test results from 1970 to 2002 in a multi-centre population in North America (NACDG). Contact Dermatitis 58 (2):101–106.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Institutes of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Haz-map: nickel and compounds. http://hazmap.nlm.nih.gov/ (accessed March 8, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• MJ Kucenic, and DV Belsito. 2002. Occupational allergic contact dermatitis is more prevalent than irritant contact dermatitis: a 5-year study. J Am Acad Dermatol 46 (5):695–699.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• J Brasch, A Schnuch, and W Uter. 2006. Strong allergic patch test reactions may indicate a general disposition for contact allergy. Allergy 61 (3):364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• L Bercovitch, and J Luo. 2008. Cell phone contact dermatitis with nickel allergy. Can Med Assoc J 178 (1):23–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• BS Modjtahedi, SP Modjtahedi, and HI Maibach. 2004. The sex of the individual as a factor in allergic contact dermatitis. Contact Dermatitis 50 (2):63–69.
   Google Scholar
• J Brasch, A Schnuch, and W Uter. 2008. The profile of patch test reactions to common contact allergens is related to sex. Contact Dermatitis 58 (1):37–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• H Dickel, JS Taylor, P Evey, and HF Merk. 2001. Comparison of patch test results with a standard series among white and black racial groups. Am J Contact Dermatitis 12 (2):77–82.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• VA Deleo, SC Taylor, DV Belsito, JF Fowler, AF Fransway, HI Maibach, JG Marks, CG Mathias, A Nethercott, MD Pratt, RR Reitschel, EF Sherertz, FJ Storrs, and JS Taylor. 2002. The effect of race and ethnicity on patch test results. J Am Acad Dermatol 46 (2 Suppl):S107–S112.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, American Factfinder. Hillsborough County: Florida fact sheet. http://factfinder.census.gov/ (accessed March 28, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, American Factfinder. Hernando County: Florida fact sheet. http://factfinder.census.gov/ (accessed March 28, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, American Factfinder. Pinellas County: Florida fact sheet. http://factfinder.census.gov/ (accessed March 28, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Census Bureau, American Factfinder. Polk County: Florida fact sheet. http://factfinder.census.gov/ (accessed March 28, 2008).
   Google Scholar
• LA Scalf, and PD Shenefelt. 2007. Contact dermatitis: diagnosing and treating skin conditions in the elderly. Geriatrics 62 (6):14–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NA Fenske, and CB Conard. 1988. Aging skin. Am Fam Physician 37 (2):219–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• S Fregert. 1985. Publication of allergens. Contact Dermatitis 12 (2):123–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RA El-Azhary, and JA Yiannias. 2004. A new patient education approach in contact allergic dermatitis: the Contact Allergen Replacement Database (CARD). Int J Dermatol 43 (4):278–280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NO Wesley, and HI Maibach. 2003. Decreasing allergic contact dermatitis frequency through dermatoxicologic and epidemiologic based intervention?. Food Chem Toxicol 41 (6):857–860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SP Felter, CA Ryan, DA Basketter, NJ Gilmour, and GF Gerberick. 2003. Application of the risk assessment paradigm to the induction of allergic contact dermatitis. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 37 (1):1–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DA Basketter, G Angelini, A Ingber, PS Kern, and T Menne. 2003. Nickel, chromium and cobalt in consumer products: revisiting safe levels in the new millennium. Contact Dermatitis 49 (1):1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Vermeulen, H Kromhout, DP Bruynzeel, EM de Boer, and B Brunekreef. 2001. Dermal exposure, hand washing, and hand dermatitis in the rubber manufacturing industry. Epidemiology 11 (3):350–354.
   Google Scholar