THE QUEST FOR PERMISSIBLE LIMITATIONS ON FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION: PUBLIC ORDER AND PUBLIC MORALITY EXCEPTIONS

References

• ARTICLE 19. 2010. “Towards an Interpretation of Article 20 of the ICCPR: Thresholds for the Prohibition of Incitement to Hatred.” A study prepared for the regional expert meeting on article 20, Organized by the Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights, Vienna, February 8–9. http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/Issues/Expression/ICCPR/Vienna/CRP7Callamard.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Bakircioglu, Onder. 2007. “The Application of Margin of Appreciation Doctrine in Freedom of Expression and Public Morality Cases.” German Law Journal 8 (7): 711–733.
   Google Scholar
• Bossuyt, M. J. 1987. Guide to the Travaux Preparatories of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Boyle, Kevin. 2001. “Hate Speech—The United States versus the Rest of the World.” Maine Law Review 53 (2): 488–502.
   Google Scholar
• Brink, David O. 2001. “Millian Principles, Freedom of Expression and Hate Speech.” Legal Theory 7: 119–157. doi: 10.1017/S1352325201072019
   Google Scholar
• Catlin, Scott J. 1994. “A Proposal for Regulating Hate Speech in the United States: Balancing Rights under the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights.” Notre Dame Law Review 69 (4): 771–813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coliver, Sandra, ed. 1992. “Striking a Balance: Hate Speech, Freedom of Expression, and Non-discrimination.” Article 19, International Centre Against Censorship/Human Rights Centre, University of Essex. http://www.article19.org/data/files/pdfs/publications/striking-a-balance.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Daes, Erica-Irene A. 1990. “Freedom of the Individual under Law: Study on the Individual's Duties to the Community and the Limitations on Human Rights and Freedoms under Article 29 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.” United Nations Study Series No. 3, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Defeis, Elizabeth F. 1992–1993. “Freedom of Speech and International Norms: A Response to Hate Speech.” Stanford Journal of International Law 29: 57–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eltayeb, Mohamed S. M. 2010. “The Limitations on Critical Thinking on Religious Issues under Article 20 of ICCPR and Its Relation to Freedom of Expression.” Religion and Human Rights 5: 119–135. doi: 10.1163/187103210X528147
   Google Scholar
• Eltayeb, Mohamed S. M. 2012. “The Prohibition of Incitement to National, Racial, or Religious Hatred: The Case of West Asian Arab Countries.” Religion and Human Rights 7: 95–108. doi: 10.1163/187103212X650068
   Google Scholar
• Eltayeb, Mohamed S. M. Forthcoming. From Rabat to Istanbul: Combating Advocacy of Religious Hatred that Constitutes Incitement to Discrimination, Hostility, or Violence.
   Google Scholar
• Farrior, Stephanie. 1996. “Molding the Matrix: The Historical and Theoretical Foundations of International Law Concerning Hate Speech.” Berkeley Journal of International Law 14 (1): 1–98.
   Google Scholar
• Fish, Stanley. 1997. “Boutique Multiculturalism, or Why Liberals Are Incapable of Thinking about Hate Speech.” Critical Inquiry 23 (2): 378–395. doi: 10.1086/448833
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howard-Hassmann, Rhoda E. 2000. “Canadians Discuss Freedom of Speech: Individual Rights versus Group Protection.” International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 7 (2): 109–138.
   Google Scholar
• Limon, Marc, Nazila Ghanea, and Hilary Power. 2014. Combating Global Religious Intolerance: The Implementation of Human Rights Council 16/18. Policy Report, December. Universal Rights Group.
   Google Scholar
• Nowak, Manfred. 2005. UN Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, CCPR Commentary. 2nd ed. Kehl: N.P. Engel Publisher.
   Google Scholar
• Opsahl, Törkel. 1992. “Articles 29 and 30.” In The Universal Declaration of Human Rights: A Commentary, edited by Asbjørn Eide, Gudmundur Afredsson, and Göran Melander, 449–470. Oslo: Scandinavian University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ostrovsky, Aaron A. 2005. “What's So Funny About Peace, Love, and Understanding: How the Margin of Appreciation Doctrine Preserves Core Human Rights within Cultural Diversity and Legitimizes International Human Rights Tribunals.” International Law 47 (1): 47–64.
   Google Scholar
• Prebensen, Soren C. 1998. “The Margin of Appreciation and Articles 9, 10, and 11 of the Convention.” Human Rights Law Journal 19 (1): 13–17.
   Google Scholar
• Schabas, William A. 2000. “Hate Speech in Rwanda: The Road to Genocide.” McGill Law Journal 46: 141–171.
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Committee. 1983a. General Comment No. 10 on Article 19 of the ICCPR: Freedom of Opinion and Expression. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Committee. 1983b. General Comment No. 11: Prohibition of propaganda for war and inciting national, racial, or religious hatred (Article. 20). Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar
• UN Human Rights Committee. 2011. General Comment No. 34 on Article 19 of the ICCPR: Freedom of Opinion and Expression. Geneva: United Nations.
   Google Scholar