Using phylogenetic species recognition to delimit species boundaries within Lasiosphaeria

LITERATURE CITED

• Alfaro ME, Zoller S, Lutzoni F, 2003. Bayes or bootstrap? A simulation study comparing the performance of Bayesian Markov Chain Monte Carlo sampling and bootstrapping in assessing phylogenetic confidence. Mol Biol Evol 20:255–266.
   Google Scholar
• Avise JC, Ball RM. 1990. Principles of genealogical concordance in species concepts and biological taxonomy. Oxford Surveys Evol Biol 7:45–68.
   Google Scholar
• Barker FK, Lutzoni FM. 2002. The utility of the incongruence length difference test. Syst Biol 51:625–637.
   Google Scholar
• Baum DA, Donoghue MJ. 1995. Choosing among alternative “phylogenetic” species concepts. Syst Bot 20:560–573.
   Google Scholar
• Baum DA, Shaw KL. 1995. Genealogical perspectives on the species problem. In: Hoch PC, Stephenson AG, eds. Experimental and molecular approaches to plant bio-systematics. St Louis, Missouri: Botanical Garden. p 289–303.
   Google Scholar
• Breitenbach J, Kränzlin F. 1984. Fungi of Switzerland. Vol. 1. Ascomycetes. Lucerne, Switzerland: Verlag Mykologia. 310 p.
   Google Scholar
• Candoussau F, Fournier J, Magni J. 2001. New and rare species of Lasiosphaeria in southwestern France. Mycotaxon 80:201–240.
   Google Scholar
• Carroll G, Munk A. 1964. Studies on lignicolous Sordariaceae. Mycologia 56:77–98.
   Google Scholar
• Chaverri P, Castlebury LA, Samuels GJ, Geiser DM. 2003. Multilocus phylogenetic structure within the Trichoderma harzianum/Hypocrea lixii complex. Mol Phylo Evol 27:302–313.
   Google Scholar
• de Queiroz A. 1990. Phylogenetics systematics and species revisited. Cladistics 6:83–90.
   Google Scholar
• de Queiroz A. 1993. For consensus (sometimes). Syst Biol 42:368–372.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis RWG. 1977. British Ascomycetes. Vaduz, Germany: Strauss & Cramer. 585 p.
   Google Scholar
• Dettman JR, Harbinski FM, Taylor JW. 2001. Ascospore morphology is a poor predictor of the phylogenetic relationships of Neurospora and Gelasinospora. Fung Genet Biol 34:49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Ellis MB, Ellis JP. 1987. Microfungi on land plants: an identification handbook. New York: Macmillan. 818 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fairman CE. 1904. Some new fungi from western New York. J of Mycology 10:229–231.
   Google Scholar
• Fallah PM, Shearer CA. 2001. Freshwater ascomycetes: new or noteworthy species from north temperate lakes in Wisconsin. Mycologia 93:566–602.
   Google Scholar
• Felsenstein J. 1985. Confidence intervals on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39:783–791.
   Google Scholar
• Gams W. 1973. Phialides with solitary conidia? Persoonia 7: 161–169.
   Google Scholar
• Gams W. 2000. Phialophora and some similar morphologically little-differentiated anamorphs of divergent ascomycetes. Stud Mycol 45:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• Gams W, Holubová-Jechová V. 1976. Chloridium and some other dematiaceous hyphomycetes growing on decaying wood. Stud Mycol 13:1–99.
   Google Scholar
• Geiser DM, Pitt JL, Taylor JW. 1998. Cryptic speciation and recombination in the aflotoxin producing fungus Aspergillus flavus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 95:388–393.
   Google Scholar
• Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. App Envir Microbio 61:1323–1330.
   Google Scholar
• Gnanananthan K. 1972. Revision of the genera Lasiosphaeria and Bombardia. [Doctoral Dissertation]. University of Toronto. 254 p.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington TC, Rizzo DM. 1999. Defining species in the fungi. In: Worrall JJ, ed. Structure and dynamics of fungal populations. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic. p 43–70.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber O, Hilber R, Miller OK. 1987. Fungi of the Appalachian Mountains. Mycotaxon 30:269–288.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber R, Hilber O. 1979. Einige anmerkungen zu der gattung Cercophora Fuckel (Lasiosphaeriaceae). Z Mykol 45:209–233.
   Google Scholar
• Hilber R. 2002 The genus Lasiosphaeria and allied taxa. Kelheim, Germany: Publ. by the author. 9 p. 7 pl.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist FR. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Biometrics 17:754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Huhndorf SM. 1991. A method for sectioning ascomycete herbarium specimens for light microscopy. Mycologia 83:520–524.
   Google Scholar
• Huhndorf SM, Miller AN, Fernández FA. 2004. Molecular systematics of the Sordariales: the order and the family Lasiosphaeriaceae redefined. Mycologia 96(2):368–387.
   Google Scholar
• Kornerup, A, Wanscher JH. 1978. Methuen handbook of colour. 3rd ed. London: Eyre Methuen. 252 p.
   Google Scholar
• Koufopanou V, Burt A, Taylor JW. 1997. Concordance of gene genealogies reveals reproductive isolation in the pathogenic fungus Coccidioides immitis. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:5478–5482.
   Google Scholar
• Liu YJ, Whelen S, Hall BD. 1999. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetes: evidence from an RNA Polymerase II Subunit. Mol Biol Evol 16:1799–1808.
   Google Scholar
• Lucklow M. 1995. Species concepts: assumptions, methods and applications. Syst Bot 20:589–605.
   Google Scholar
• Lundqvist N. 1972. Nordic Sordariaceae s. lat. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 20:1–374.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzoni F, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst Biol 49:628–651.
   Google Scholar
• Mason-Gamer RJ, Kellogg EA. 1996. Testing for phylogenetic conflict among molecular datasets in the tribe Triticeae (Gramineae). Syst Biol 45:524–545.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AN, Huhndorf SM. 2001. Neotropical Ascomycetes 10. New and interesting Cercophora species. Sydowia 53: 211–226.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AN. 2004a. A natural classification of Lasiosphaeria based on nuclear LSU rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 108: 26–34.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AN. 2004b. Multi-gene phylogenies indicate ascomal wall morphology is a better predictor of phylogenetic relationships than ascospore morphology in the Sordariales. Mol Phylo Evol (In review).
   Google Scholar
• Miller AN, Læssøe T, Roberts P, Robinson K. 2003. Krieglsteinera lasiosphaeriae: a mycoparasite on Lasiosphaeria ovina new to Britain, Norway, Russia and the USA. Mycologist 17(1):12–13.
   Google Scholar
• Munk A. 1957. Danish pyrenomycetes. Dansk Bot Ark 17: 1–491.
   Google Scholar
• Nixon KC, Wheeler QD. 1990. An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6:211–223.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E, Nirenberg H. 1998. Molecular systematics and phylogeography of the Gibberella fujikuroi species complex. Mycologia 90:465–493.
   Google Scholar
• Penzig O, Saccardo PA. 1897. Diagnoses fungorum novorum in insula Java collectorum. Malpighia 11:491–530.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 49:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Réblová M, Barr ME, Samuels GJ. 1999. Chaetosphaeriaceae, a new family for Chaetosphaeria and its relatives. Sydowia 51:49–70.
   Google Scholar
• Seaver FJ. 1912. The genus Lasiosphaeria. Mycologia 4:115–124.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JW, Jacobson DJ, Kroken S, Kasuga T, Geiser DM, Hibbett DS, Fisher MC. 2000. Phylogenetic species recognition and species concepts in fungi. Fungal Genet Biol 31:21–32.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyeva LN. 1998. Pyrenomycetidae et Loculoascomycetidae. Plantae non vasculares fungi et Bryopsidae, orientis estremi Rossica. Fungi. Vol. 4. Petropoli “Nauka” (MCMXCVIII).
   Google Scholar
• van Hooff H. 1993. Waarnemingen aan Lasiosphaeria ovina. Coolia 36:105–108.
   Google Scholar
• van Hooff H. 1994. Een mooie vondst te Geldrop. Collia 38:126–127.
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler QD, Nixon KC. 1990. Another way of looking at the species problem: a reply to de Queiroz and Donoghue. Cladistics 6:77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Yoder AD, Irwin JA, Payseur BA. 2001. Failure of the ILD to determine data combinability for slow loris phylogeny. Syst Biol 50:408–424.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang XM, Zhuang WY. 2003. Re-examinations of Bionectriaceae and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales) from temperate China on deposit in HMAS. Nova Hedwigia 76:191–200.
   Google Scholar