Systematics of the Pezizomycetes—the operculate discomycetes

LITERATURE CITED

• Abbott SP, Currah RS. 1997. The Helvellaceae: systematic revision and occurrence in northern and northwestern North America. Mycotaxon 63:1–125.
   Google Scholar
• Arpin N. 1969. Les caroténoïdes des Discomycètes: essai chimiotaxinomique. Bull Mens Soc Linn Lyon 38(suppl.):1–169.
   Google Scholar
• Benedix EH. 1961. Zur polyphletischen Herkunst der Helvellaceen ss. lat. Zeit Pilzkunde 27:93–102.
   Google Scholar
• Berthet P. 1964. Essai Biotaxonomique sur les Discomycètes. Lyon: Joanny Lorge. 157 p.
   Google Scholar
• Bessey CE. 1907. A synopsis of plant phyla. University studies. Lincoln, Nebraska: University of Nebraska.
   Google Scholar
• Bessey EA. 1950. Morphology and taxonomy of fungi. Philadelphia, Toronto: Blakiston Co. 791 p.
   Google Scholar
• Boudier JLE. 1907. Histoire et classification des discomycètes d’Europe. Paris: Klincksieck. 221 p.
   Google Scholar
• Brummelen J van. 1967. A world-monograph of the genera Ascobolus and Saccobolus (Ascomycetes, Pezizales). Persoonia Suppl. 1:1–260.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1978. The operculate ascus and allied forms. Persoonia 10:113–128.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1981. The genus Ascodesmis (Pezizales, Ascomycetes). Persoonia 11:333–358.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1989. Ultrastructure of the ascus and the ascospore wall in Eleutherascus and Ascodesmis (Ascomycotina). Persoonia 14:1–17.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1994. Problems in the systematics of Pezizales. In: Hawksworth DL, ed. Ascomycete Systematics: problems and perspectives in the nineties. NATO ASI Series 269. New York: Plenum Press. 453 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998. Reconsideration of relationships within the Thelebolaceae based on ascus ultrastructure. Persoonia 16:425–469.
   Google Scholar
• Chadefaud M. 1946. Les asques paraoperculés et la position systématique de la pézize Sarcoscypha coccinea Fries ex Jacquin. Compt Rend Hebd Séances Acad Sci 222:753–755.
   Google Scholar
• Corner EJH. 1931. Studies in the morphology of discomycetes. IV. The evolution of the ascocarp. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 15:121–134.
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom JL, Smith JE, Weber NS. 2000. Mycorrhiza-like interaction by Morchella with species of the Pinaceae in pure culture synthesis. Mycorrhiza 9:279–285.
   Google Scholar
• Davidson RW. 1950. Urnula craterium is possibly the perfect state of Strumella coryneoidea. Mycologia 42:735–742.
   Google Scholar
• Dissing H. 1966. The genus Helvella in Europe with special emphasis on the species found in Norden. Dansk Bot Ark 25:1–172.
   Google Scholar
• Döbbeler P. 1979. Untersuchangen on moosparasitischen Pezizales aus der Verwandtschaft von Octospora. Nov Hedwig 31:817–864.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2004. Octosporella erythrostigma (Pezizales) and Pithyella frullaniae (Helotiales), two remarkable ascomycetes on Frullania dilatata. Feddes Repert 115:5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Eckblad F-E. 1968. The genera of operculate discomycetes. A re-evaluation of their taxonomy, phylogeny and nomenclature. Nytt Mag Bot 15:1–191.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson OE., ed. 2006. Outline of Ascomycota—2006. Myconet 12:1–82. http://www.umu.se/myconet/Myconet.html
   Google Scholar
• Gibson JL, Kimbrough JW, Benny GL. 1986. Ultrastructural observations on Endogonaceae (Zygomycetes). II. Glaziellales ord. nov. and Glaziellaceae fam. nov.: new taxa based upon light and electron microscopic observations of Glaziella aurantiaca. Mycologia 78: 941–954.
   Google Scholar
• Ginns JH. 1968. Rhizina undulata pathogenic on Douglas-fir seedlings in Western North America. Pl Dis Report 52:579–580.
   Google Scholar
• Hansen K, LoBuglio KF, Pfister DH. 2005a. Evolutionary relationships of the cup-fungus genus Peziza and Pezizaceae inferred from multiple nuclear genes: PRB2, β-tubulin, and LSU rDNA. Mol Phylogenet Evol 36:1–23.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Læssøe T, Pfister DH. 2001. Phylogenetics of Pezizaceae, with an emphasis on Peziza. Mycologia 93: 958–990.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Pfister DH. 2002. Phylogenetic diversity in the core group of Peziza inferred from ITS sequences and morphology. Mycol Res 106:879–902.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Perry BA, Pfister DH. 2005b [2006]. Phylogenetic origins of two cleistothecial fungi, Orbicula parietina and Lasiobolidium orbiculoides, within the operculate discomycetes. Mycologia 97:1023–1033.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Trappe JM. 2002. Terfeziaceae E. Fisch. In: Eriksson OE, Baral H-O, Currah RS, Hansen K, Kurtzman CP, Rambold G, Læssøe T, eds. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos 3303–3579. Myconet 8:1–54.
   Google Scholar
• Harmaja H. 1974. Observations on the presence of a cyanophilic perispore in the spores of the Pezizales. Karstenia 14:123–125.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2002. Caloscyphaceae, a new family of the Pezizales. Karstenia 42:27–28.
   Google Scholar
• Harrington FA, Pfister DH, Potter D, Donoghue MJ. 1999. Phylogenetic studies within the Pezizales. I. 18S rRNA sequence data and classification. Mycologia 91:41–50.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Jalaluddin M. 1967. Studies on Rhizina undulata. II. Observations and experiments in East Anglian plantations. Trans Brit Mycol Soc 50:461–472.
   Google Scholar
• Kimbrough JW. 1970. Current trends in the classification of Discomycetes. Bot Rev 36:91–161.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1989. Arguments toward restricting the limits of the Pyronemataceae (Ascomycetes, Pezizales). Mem New York Bot Gard 49:326–335.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1994. Septal ultrastructure and ascomycete systematics. In: Hawskworth DL, ed. Ascomycete systematics: problems and perspectives in the nineties. New York: Plenum Press. p 127–141.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Korf RP. 1967. A synopsis of the genera and species of the tribe Theleboleae (= Psuedoascoboleae). Am J Bot 54:9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA. 2001. Ainsworth and Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 655 p.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlmeyer J, Kohlmeyer E. 1979. Marine mycology: the higher fungi. New York: Academic Press. 690 p.
   Google Scholar
• Korf RP. 1954. A revision of the classification of operculate Discomycetes (Pezizales). Rapp Comm VIII Congr Int Bot I., 18–20, 80 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1958. Japanese Discomycete Notes I––VIII. Sci Rep Yokohama Nat Univ, Sec 2, Biol Sci 7:7–35.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1970. Nomenclatural notes. VII. Family and tribe names in the Sarcoscyphineae (Discomycetes) and a new taxonomic disposition of the genera. Taxon 19: 782–786.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1972. Synoptic key to the genera of the Pezizales. Mycologia 64:937–994.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1973. Discomycetes and Tuberales. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS, eds. The Fungi: an advanced treatise IV. New York: Academic Press. p 249–319.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Zhuang W-Y. 1991. A preliminary discomycete flora of macaronesia: part 15, Terfeziaceae, and Otideaceae, Otideoideae. Mycotaxon 40:413–433.
   Google Scholar
• Landvik S, Egger K, Schumacher T. 1997. Toward a subordinal classification of the Pezizales (Ascomycota): phylogenetic analyses SSU rDNA sequences. Nord J Bot 17:403–418.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Eriksson OE. 1994. Relationships of the genus Glaziella (Ascomycota) inferred from 18S rDNA sequences. Syst Ascomyc 13:13–23.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Kristiansen R, Schumacher T. 1998. Phylogenetic and structural studies in the Thelebolaceae (Ascomycota). Mycoscience 39:49–56.
   Google Scholar
• Le Gal M. 1946a. Mode de déhehiscence des asques chez les Cookeina et les Leotia, et ses conséquences du point de vue phylogénétique. Compt Rend Hebd Séances Acad Sci 222:755–757.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1946b. Les Discomycètes suboperculés. Bull Soc Mycol France 62:218–240.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1953. Les discomycètes de Madagascar. Prod Fl Mycol Madagascar 4:1–465.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1969. Position taxinomique de genre Phaedropezia Le Gal révision de la famille des Humariaceae. Bull Soc Mycol France 85:5–19.
   Google Scholar
• Merkus E. 1976. Ultrastructure of the ascospore wall in Pezizales (Ascomycetes)—IV. Morchellaceae, Helvellaceae, Rhizinaceae, Thelebolaceae, and Sarcoscyphaceae. General discussion. Persoonia 9:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Moore EJ, Korf RP. 1963. The genus Pyronema. Bull Torrey Bot Club 90:33–42.
   Google Scholar
• Nannfeldt JA. 1932. Studien über die morphologie und systematik der nicht-lichenisierten inoperculaten discomyceten. Nova Acta Reg Soc Sci Upsal Ser 8:1–368.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1937. Contributions to the mycoflora of Sweden. 4. On some species of Helvella, together with a discussion of the natural affinities within Helvellaceae and Pezizaceae trib. Acetabuleae. Svensk Bot Tidskr 31:47–66.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1949. Contributions to the mycoflora of Sweden. 7. A new winter Discomycete, Urnula hiemalis Nannf. n. sp., and a short account of the Swedish species of Sarcoscyphaceae. Sv Bot Tidskr 43:468–484.
   Google Scholar
• Norman JE, Egger KN. 1999. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of Peziza and related genera. Mycologia 91:820–829.
   Google Scholar
• Nylander JAA. 2004. MrModeltest 2.2. Program distributed by the author. Uppsala University: Evolutionary Biology Centre.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E, Weber NS, Trappe JM. 1997. Phylogenetic relationships among ascomycetous truffles and the true and false morels inferred from 18S and 28S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis. Mycologia 89:48–65.
   Google Scholar
• Paden JW, Sutherland JR, Woods TAD. 1978. Caloscypha fulgens (Ascomycetidae, Pezizales): the perfect state of the conifer seed pathogen Geniculodendron pyriforme (Deuteromycotina, Hyphomycetes). Can J Bot 56:2375–2379.
   Google Scholar
• Petersen PM. 1985. The ecology of Danish soil inhabiting Pezizales with emphasis on edaphic conditions. Opera Bot 77:1–38.
   Google Scholar
• Pfister DH. 1973a. The psilopezioid fungi. I. History, nomenclature and delimitation of the psilopezioid genera. Mycologia 65:321–328.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1973b. The psilopezioid fungi. III. The genus Psilopezia (Pezizales). Amer J Bot 60:355–365.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Kimbrough. 2001. Discomycetes. In: McLaughlin DJ, McLaughlin EG, Lemke PA, eds. The Mycota VII Part A. Systematics and Evolution. New York, Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag. p 257–281.
   Google Scholar
• Rifai MA. 1968. The Australasian Pezizales in the herbarium of the Royal Botanic Gardens Kew. Verh Kon Ned Akad Wetensch, Afd Natuurk, Tweede Sect 57:1–295.
   Google Scholar
• Samuelson DA. 1975. The apical apparatus of the sub-operculate ascus. Can J Bot 53:2660–2679.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Kimbrough JW. 1978. Asci of the Pezizales. IV. The apical apparatus of Thelebolus. Bot Gazet 139:346–361.
   Google Scholar
• Seaver FJ. 1928. North American cup-fungi (operculates). New York: Hafner Publishing Co. Inc. 377 p.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tedersoo L, Hansen K, Perry BA, Kjøller R. 2006. Molecular and morphological diversity of pezizalean ectomycorrhiza. New Phytol 170:581–596.
   Google Scholar
• Trappe JM. 1979. The orders, families, and genera of hypogeous Ascomycotina (truffles and their relatives). Mycotaxon 9:297–340.
   Google Scholar
• Verkley GJM. 1995. Ultrastructure of the ascus apical apparatus in species of Cenangium, Encoelia, Claussenomyces and Ascocoryne. Mycol Res 99:187–199.
   Google Scholar