Cryphonectriaceae (Diaporthales), a new family including Cryphonectria, Chrysoporthe, Endothia and allied genera

LITERATURE CITED

• Alexopoulus CJ, Mims CW. 1978. Introductory Mycology. 3rd ed. New York, U.S.A.: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostakis SL. 1987. Chestnut blight: the classical problem of an introduced pathogen. Mycologia 79:23–37.
   Google Scholar
• Barr ME. 1978. The Diaporthales in North America with emphasis on Gnomonia and its segregates. Mycol Mem 7:1–232.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon PF. 1995. Studies on fungi with isthmoid ascospores: the genus Vialaea, with the description of the new family Vialaeaceae. Mycol Res 99:367–373.
   Google Scholar
• Castlebury LA, Rossman AY, Jaklitsch WJ, Vasilyeva LN. 2002. A preliminary overview of the Diaporthales based on large subunit nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 94:1017–1031.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson OE. 2005a. Notes on ascomycete systematics. Nos. 3912–4298. Myconet 11:115–170.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2005b. Outline of Ascomycota—2005. Myconet 11:1–113.
   Google Scholar
• Farris JS, Källersjö M, Kluge AG, Bult C. 1994. Testing significance of incongruence. Cladistics 10:315–319.
   Google Scholar
• Gryzenhout M, Glen HF, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 2005b. Amphilogia gen. nov. for Cryphonectria-like fungi from Elaeocarpus spp. in New Zealand and Sri Lanka. Taxon 54:1009–1021.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———, ———. 2005c. Proposal to conserve the name Cryphonectria (Diaporthales) with a conserved type. Taxon 54:539–540.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Myburg H, van der Merwe NA, Wingfield BD,Wingfield MJ. 2004. Chrysoporthe, a new genus to accommodate Cryphonectria cubensis. Stud Mycol 50:119–142.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Wingfield BD, Montenegro F, Wingfield MJ. 2005a. Rostraureum tropicale gen. sp. nov. (Diaporthales) associated with dying Terminalia ivorensis in Ecuador. Mycol Res 109:1029–1044.
   Google Scholar
• Hawksworth DL, Kirk PM, Sutton BC, Pegler DN. 1995. Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi. 8th ed. reprinted. Oxford, U.K.: CAB International.
   Google Scholar
• Heiniger U, Rigling D. 1994. Biological control of chestnut blight in Europe. Ann Rev Phytopathol 32: 581–599.
   Google Scholar
• Hodges CS, Alfenas AC, Cordell CE. 1986. The conspecificity of Cryphonectria cubensis and Endothia eugeniae. Mycologia 78:334–350.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Bioinformatics 17:754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik MM. 1984. Symptomless infection, persistence, and production of pycnidia in host and non-host plants by Phomopsis batatae, Phomopsis phaseoli, and Phomopsis sojae, and the taxonomic implications. Mycologia 76: 274–291.
   Google Scholar
• Larget B, Simon DL. 1999. Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithms for the Bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 16:750–759.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S, Groenwald JZ, Crous PW. 2004. Phylogenetic reassessment of the coelomycete genus Harknessia and its teleomorph Wuestneia (Diaporthales), and the introduction of Apoharknessia gen. nov. Stud Mycol 50:235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Micales JA, Stipes RJ. 1987. A reexamination of the fungal genera Cryphonectria and Endothia. Phytopathology 77: 650–654.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, Bonde MR. 1987. On the conspecificity of Endothia eugeniae and Cryphonectria cubensis. Mycologia 79:70–720.
   Google Scholar
• Myburg H, Gryzenhout M, Wingfield BD, Milgroom MG, Shigeru K, Wingfield MJ. 2004b. DNA sequence data and morphology define Cryphonectria species in Europe, China, and Japan. Can J Bot 82:1730–1743.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———, Stipes RJ, Wingfield MJ. 2004a. Phylogenetic relationships of Cryphonectria and Endothia species, based on DNA sequence data and morphology. Mycologia 96:990–1001.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 2002. β-tubulin and Histone H3 gene sequences distinguish Cryphonectria cubensis from South Africa, Asia and South America. Can J Bot 80:590–596.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———, ———. 2003. Conspecificity of Endothia eugeniae and Cryphonectria cubensis: a reevaluation based on morphology and DNA sequence data. Mycoscience 104:187–196.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ. 1999. Phylogeny of Cryphonectria cubensis and allied species inferred from DNA analysis. Mycologia 91:243–250.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Réblová M, Mostert L, Gams W, Crous PW. 2004. New genera in the Calosphaeriales: Togniniella and its anamorph Phaeocrella, and Calosphaeriophora as anamorph of Calosphaeria. Stud Mycol 50:533–550.
   Google Scholar
• Redlin SC, Rossman AY. 1991. Cryptodiaporthe corni (Diaporthales), cause of Cryptodiaporthe canker of pagoda dogwood. Mycologia 83:200–209.
   Google Scholar
• Roane MK. 1986. Taxonomy of the genus Endothia. In: Roane MK, Griffin GJ, Elkins JR, eds. Chestnut blight, other Endothia diseases, and the genus Endothia. St Paul, Minnesota, U.S.A.: APS Press. p 28–39.
   Google Scholar
• Rodríguez F, Oliver JL, Marín A, Medina JR. 1990. The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution. J Theor Biol 142:485–501.
   Google Scholar
• Rossman AY, Samuels GJ, Rogerson CT, Lowen R. 1999. Genera of Bionectriaceae, Hypocreaceae, and Nectriaceae (Hypocreales, Ascomycetes). Stud Mycol 42:1–248.
   Google Scholar
• Shear CL, Stevens NE, Tiller RJ. 1917. Endothia parasitica and related species. USDA Bull 380:1–82.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), version 4.0b1. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526.
   Google Scholar
• van Niekerk JM, Groenewald JZ, Verkley GJM, Fourie PH, Wingfield MJ, Crous PW. 2004. Systematic reappraisal of Coniella and Pilidiella, with specific reference to species occurring on Eucalyptus and Vitis in South Africa. Mycol Res 108:283–303.
   Google Scholar
• Vasilyeva LN. 1998. Pyrenomycetidae et Loculoascomycetidae. Plantae non Vasculares, Fungi et Bryopsidae. Orientis extremi Rossica. Fungi 4:1–418. [Russian]
   Google Scholar
• Venter M, Myburg H, Wingfield BD, Coutinho TA, Wingfield MJ. 2002. A new species of Cryphonectria from South Africa and Australia, pathogenic on Eucalyptus. Sydowia 54:98–119.
   Google Scholar
• Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172: 4238–4246.
   Google Scholar
• White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J. 1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR protocols: a guide to methods and applications. San Diego, U.S.A.: Academic Press. p 315–322.
   Google Scholar
• Wingfield MJ. 2003. Daniel McAlpine Memorial Lecture. Increasing threat of diseases to exotic plantation forests in the Southern Hemisphere: lessons from Cryphonectria canker. Australas Plant Pathol 23:133–139.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Blackwell M. 2001. Molecular phylogeny of dogwood anthracnose fungus (Discula destructiva) and the Diaporthales. Mycologia 93:355–365.
   Google Scholar