Molecular systematics of Ceratostomella sensu lato and morphologically similar fungi

LITERATURE CITED

• Barr ME. 1978. The Diaporthales in North America with emphasis on Gnomonia and its segregates. Mycologia Mem 7:1–232.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1985. Notes on the Calosphaeriales. Mycologia 77: 509–565.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1990. Prodromus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon 39:43–184.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1998. Wegelina a reinstated genus in the Calosphaeriales. Cryptogamie, Bryol Lichénol 19:169–173.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Rogers JD, Yu YM. 1993. Revisionary studies in the Calosphaeriales. Mycotaxon 48:529–535.
   Google Scholar
• Berlese AN. 1900. Icones Fungorum ad usum Sylloges Saccardianae adcommodatae. 3. Sphaeriaceae allantosporae. Padova, 120 p.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Shearer CA. 2004. Annulusmagnus and Ascitendus, two new genera in the Annulatascaceae. Mycologia 96:822–833.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon PF. 1994. The newly recognized family Magnaporthaceae and its relationships. Syst Ascom 13:25–42.
   Google Scholar
• Clements FE, Shear CL. 1931. The genera of fungi. HW Wilson: New York, 496 p.
   Google Scholar
• Elliott JA. 1925. A cytological study of Ceratostomella fimbriata (E & H) Elliott. Phytopathology 16:417–422.
   Google Scholar
• Eriksson OE, Baral HO, Currah RS, Hanser K, Kurtzman CP, Rambold G, Laessøe T., eds. 2003. Outline of the Ascomycota 2003. Myconet 9:1–89.
   Google Scholar
• Fries EM. 1823. Systema Mycologicum. Vol 2., Lund, Sweden, 620 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gams W. 2000. Phialophora and some similar morphologically little-differentiated anamorphs of divergent Ascomycetes. Stud Mycol 45:187–199.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Hoekstra ES, Aptroot A. 1998. CBS Course of Mycology, Centraalbureau voor Schimmelcultures: Baarn, The Netherlands. 165 p.
   Google Scholar
• Gargas A, DePriest PT, Taylor JW. 1995. Positions of multiple insertions in SSU rDNA of lichen-forming fungi. Mol Biol Evol 12:208–218.
   Google Scholar
• Gilman JC, Tiffany LH, Lewis RM. 1959. Iowa ascomycetes III. Diaporthaceae. Iowa State Coll J Sci 33:325–393.
   Google Scholar
• Gutell RR. 1993. Collection of small subunit (16S- and 16S-like) ribosomal RNA structures. Nucl Acids Res 21: 3051–3054.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Gray MW, Schnare MN. 1993. A compilation of large subunit (23S and 23S-like ribosomal RNA structures. Nucl Acids Res 21:3055–3074.
   Google Scholar
• Hall TA. 1999. BioEdit 5.0.9: a user-friendly biological sequence alignment editor and analysis program for Windows 95/98/NT. Nucl Acids Symp Ser 41:95–98.
   Google Scholar
• Höhnel F von. 1905. Mykologishe Fragmente. Ann Mycol 3: 548–560.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1906. Revision von 292 der von J. Feltgen aufgestellen Ascomycetenformen auf Grund der Origi-nalexemplare. Sitz Kais Akad Wiss Wien, Math-Naturw Kl 1 115:1189–1327.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1918. Mykologische Fragmente. CXCV. Über die Gattung Parodiopsis Maublanc. Ann Mycol 7:1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Hoog GS de. 1974. The genera Blastobotrys, Sporothrix, Calcarisporium and Calcarisporiella gen. nov. Stud Mycol 7:1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17: 754–755.
   Google Scholar
• Huhndorf SM, Miller AN, Fernández FA. 2004. Molecular systematics of the Sordariales: the order and the family Lasiosphaeriaceae redefined. Mycologia 96:368–387.
   Google Scholar
• Hunt J. 1956. Taxonomy of the genus Ceratocystis. Loydia 19:1–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hyde KD, Read SJ, Jones EBG, Moss ST. 1997. Tropical Australian Freshwater Fungi. XII Rivulicola incrustata gen. et sp. nov. and notes on Ceratosphaeria lampadophora. Nova Hedw 64:185–196.
   Google Scholar
• Kickx J. 1847. Recherches pour servir à la flore cryptogamique des Flandres. Cent. 3:1–51. In: Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA, eds. (2001). Ainsworth and Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. CABI Publishing: Wallingford, U.K.
   Google Scholar
• Kirschstein W. 1938. Kryptogamenflora der Mark Brandenburg. Ascomycetes, Sphaeriales 7(2):164–304.
   Google Scholar
• Lanave C, Preparata G, Saccone C, Serio G. 1984. A new method for calculating evolutionary substitution rates. J Mol Evol 20:86–93.
   Google Scholar
• Landschoot PJ, Jackson N. 1989. Magnaporthe poae sp. nov., a hyphopodiate fungus with a Phialophora conidial state from grass roots in the United States. Mycol Res 93: 59–62.
   Google Scholar
• Moreau C. 1952. Coexistence des formes Thielaviopsis et Graphium chez une souche de Ceratocystis major (van Beyma) comb. nov. Rev Mycol Suppl Colon 17:17–25.
   Google Scholar
• Mostert L, Groenewald JZ, Summerbell RC, Robert V, Sutton DA, Padhye AA, Crous PW. 2004. Species of Phaeoacremonium associated with human infections and environmental reservoirs in infected woody plants. J Clinic Microbiol (In press).
   Google Scholar
• Müller E, Arx JA von. 1962. Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beitr Kryptogamenfl Schweiz 11(2):1–922.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 1973. Pyrenomycetes: Meliolales, Coronophorales, Sphaeriales. In: Ainsworth GC, Sparrow FK, Sussman AS, eds. The fungi, an advanced treatise. Vol. IVA Academic Press: New York, p 87–132.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Samuels GJ. 1982. Anamorphs of pyrenomycetous ascomycetes I. Rhamphoria Niessl and Trichosphaerella Bommer, Rousseau & Saccardo. Sydowia 35:143–149.
   Google Scholar
• Munk A. 1952. The system of Pyrenomycetes. Dansk Bot Ark 15(7):1–163.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1957. Danish Pyrenomycetes. Dansk Bot Ark 17(1):1–491.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1965. On some species of Endoxyla recently found in Denmark. Bot Tidsskr 61:56–70.
   Google Scholar
• Niessl G von. 1876. Notizen über neue und kritische Pyrenomyceten. Verh Naturf Ver Brünn 14:165–218.
   Google Scholar
• Persoon CH. 1800. Icones et descriptiones fungorum minus cognitorum. Fasc 2:27–60. Pl. 8–14.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1801. Synopis methodica Fungorum. Gottingae, 706 p.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Réblová M, Barr ME, Samuels GJ. 1999. Chaetosphaeriaceae, a new family for Chaetosphaeria and its allies. Sydowia 51:49–70.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Seifert KA. 2004. Cryptadelphia (Trichosphaeriales), a new genus for holomorphs with Brachysporium anamorphs, and clarification of the taxonomic status of Wallrothiella. Mycologia 96:343–367.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Winka K. 2001. Generic concepts and correlations in ascomycetes based on morphological and molecular data: Lecythothecium duriligni gen. et sp. nov. with Sporidesmium anamorph and Ascolacicola aquatica sp. nov. Mycologia 93:478–493.
   Google Scholar
• Romero A. 1999. Contribution al estudio los hongos xilofidos de la Argentina. VI. Ascomycotina en Eucalyptus viminalis (Myrtaceae). Bot Soc Argent Bot 34:75–83.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Samuels GJ. 1991. Studies on xylophilous fungi from Argentina. VI. Ascomycotina on Eucalyptus viminalis (Myrtaceae). Sydowia 43:228–248.
   Google Scholar
• Saccardo PA. 1874. Fungi Veneti novi vel critici. Nuovo Giorn Bot Ital 7:299–329.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1878. Fungi Veneti novi vel critici. Series IX. Michelia 1:361–445.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1882. Sylloge Fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 1. Padova, Italy, 768 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1883. Sylloge Fungorum omnium hucusque cognitorum. Vol. 2. Padova, Italy. 813 p.
   Google Scholar
• Samuels GJ, Candoussau F. 1993. Heterogeneity in the Calosphaeriales: a new Calosphaeria with Ramichloridium- and Sporothrix-like synanamorphs. Nova Hedw 62:47–60.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Müller E. 1979. Life-History Studies of Brazilian Ascomycetes 5. Two new species of Ophiostoma and their Sporothrix anamorphs. Sydowia 31:169–179.
   Google Scholar
• Scott DB, Deacon JW. 1983. Magnaporthe rhizophila sp. nov., a dark mycelial fungus with a Phialophora conidial state, from cereal roots in South Africa. Trans Br Mycol Soc 81:77–81.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Sydow H, Sydow P. 1919. Mykologische Mitteilungen. Sydowia 1:33–47.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor JE, Hyde KD. 1999. Cannonia gen. nov., from palms in the Southern Hemisphere. Mycol Res 103:1398–1402.
   Google Scholar
• Tode HJ. 1791. Fungi Mecklenburgenses selecti. Fasc. 2, 64 p., 17 pl.
   Google Scholar
• Tsuda M, Ueyama A. 1977. Studies on the descriptions and specimens of genus Ceratosphaeria Niessl. Trans Mycol Soc Jap 18:413–427.
   Google Scholar
• Untereiner WA. 1993. A taxonomic revision of the genus Endoxyla. Mycologia 85:294–310.
   Google Scholar
• von Arx JA. 1952. Über die Ascomycetengattung Ceratostomella Sacc., Ophiostoma Syd. und Rostrella Zimmermann. Antonie van Leuwenhoek 18:201–213.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Müller E. 1954. Die Gattungen der amerosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beitr Kryptogamenfl Schweiz 11(1): 1–434.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang N, Blackwell M. 2002. Molecular phylogeny of Melanospora and similar pyrenomycetous fungi. Mycol Res 106:148–155.
   Google Scholar