Systematics of the genus Chaetosphaeria and its allied genera: morphological and phylogenetic diversity in north temperate and neotropical taxa

LITERATURE CITED

• Barr ME. 1990. Prodomus to nonlichenized, pyrenomycetous members of class Hymenoascomycetes. Mycotaxon 39:43–184.
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharya D, Lutzoni F, Reeb V, Simon D, Nason J, Fernández F. 2000. Widespread occurrence of spliceosomal introns in the rDNA genes of Ascomycetes. Mol Biol Evol 17:1971–1984.
   Google Scholar
• Booth C. 1957. Studies of Pyrenomycetes. I.–Four species of Chaetosphaeria, two with Catenularia conidia. II. Melanopsamma pomiformis and its Stachybotrys conidia. Mycol Pap 68. 27 p.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 1958. The genera Chaetosphaeria and Thaxteria in Britain. The Naturalist, Hull 1958:83–90.
   Google Scholar
• Cannon PF. 1997. Two new genera of Ascomycota, and other new or interesting fungi from Slapton Ley National Nature Reserve and its environs. Systema Ascomycetum 15:121–133.
   Google Scholar
• Dennis RWG. 1978. British Ascomycetes. J. Cramer, Vaduz. 585 p.
   Google Scholar
• Fernández FA, Lutzoni FM, Huhndorf SM. 1998. Phylogenetic relationships in the genus Chaetosphaeria. Inoculum 49:19.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1999a. Teleomorphanamorph connections: the new pyrenomycetous genus Carpoligna and its Pleurothecium anamorph. Mycologia 91:251–262.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———, ———. 1999b. A multifaceted approach to determining phylogenetic relationships in the genus Chaetosphaeria. XVI International Botanical Congress. p 26 (addendum).
   Google Scholar
• ———, Huhndorf SM. 2005. New species of Chaetosphaeria, Melanopsammella and Tainosphaeria gen. nov. from the Americas. Fung Divers 18:15–57.
   Google Scholar
• Gams W, Holubová-Jechová V. 1976. Chloridium and some other dematiaceous hyphomycetes growing on decaying wood. Stud Mycol No. 13. 99 p.
   Google Scholar
• Glass NL, Donaldson GC. 1995. Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1323–1330.
   Google Scholar
• Höhnel F. 1919. Mycologische Fragmente. Annales Mycologici 17:35–174.
   Google Scholar
• Holubová-Jechová V. 1984. Lignicolous Hyphomycetes from Czechoslovakia 7. Chalara, Exochalara, Fusichalara and Dictyochaeta. Folia Geobot. Phytotax 19:387–438.
   Google Scholar
• Huelsenbeck JP, Ronquist F. 2001. MrBayes: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754–755. Program available from http://morphbank.ebc.uu.se/mrbayes3/info.php
   Google Scholar
• Hughes SJ. 1966. New Zealand Fungi 6. Sporoschisma Berk. & Br. New Zealand J Bot 4:77–85.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Kendrick WB. 1963. Microfungi IX. Menispora Persoon. Can J Bot 41:693–718.
   Google Scholar
• Huhndorf SM, Fernández FA. 1998. Neotropical ascomycetes 7. Caudatispora biapiculata sp. nov. from Puerto Rico. Sydowia 50:200–204.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Miller AN, Fernández FA. 2004. Molecular systematics of the Sordariales: the order and the family Lasiosphaeriaceae redefined. Mycologia 95:368–387.
   Google Scholar
• Jukes TH, Cantor CR. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Munro HM., ed. Mammalian protein metabolism. New York, NY: Academic Press. p 21–132.
   Google Scholar
• Kendrick B. 1980. The generic concept in hyphomycetes-a reappraisal. Mycotaxon XI:339–364.
   Google Scholar
• Kuthubutheen AJ, Nawawi A. 1991. Key to Dictyochaeta and Codinaea species. Mycol Res 95:1224–1229.
   Google Scholar
• Lumbsch HT. 2002. How objective are genera in Euascomycetes? Perspect Plant Ecol, Evo Syst 5:91–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lutzoni F, Wagner P, Reeb V, Zoller S. 2000. Integrating ambiguously aligned regions of DNA sequences in phylogenetic analyses without violating positional homology. Syst Biol 49:628–651.
   Google Scholar
• Miller AN, Huhndorf SM. 2004. A natural classification of Lasiosphaeria based on nuclear LSU rDNA sequences. Mycol Res 108:26–34.
   Google Scholar
• ———, ———. 2005. Multi-gene phylogenies indicate ascomal wall morphology is a better predictor of phylogenetic relationships than ascospore morphology in the Sordariales (Ascomycota, Fungi). Mol Phylo Evol 35:60–75.
   Google Scholar
• Moncalvo JM, Rehner SA, Vilgalys R. 1993. Systematics of Lyophyllum section Difformia based on evidence from culture studies and ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycologia 85:788–794.
   Google Scholar
• Morgan-Jones G. 1976. Notes on Hyphomycetes X. Codinaeopsis gen. nov. Mycotaxon 4:166–170.
   Google Scholar
• Müller E, von Arx JA. 1962. Die Gattungen der didymosporen Pyrenomyceten. Beiträge zur Kryptogamenflora der Schweiz 11(2):1–922.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Harr J, Sulmont P. 1969. Deux Ascomycetes dont le stade conidien presente des conidies phaeophragmiees endogenes. Rev Mycol (Paris) 33:369–378.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Samuels GJ. 1982. Anamorphs of pyrenomycetous ascomycetes III. The Sporochisma and Chalara anamorphs of Melanochaeta aoteroae. Sydowia 35:155–161.
   Google Scholar
• O’Donnell K, Cigelnik E. 1997. Two divergent intragenomic rDNA ITS2 types within a monophyletic lineage of the fungus Fusarium are nonorthologous. Molec Phylogenetics Evol 7:103–116.
   Google Scholar
• Posada D, Crandall KA. 1998. Modeltest: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817–818.
   Google Scholar
• Réblová M. 1999. Studies in Chaetosphaeria sensu lato III. Umbrinosphaeria gen. nov. and Miyoshiella with Sporidesmium anamorphs. Mycotaxon 71:13–43.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2000. The genus Chaetosphaeria and its anamorphs. Stud Mycol 45:149–168.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Barr ME, Samuels GJ. 1999. Chaetosphaeriaceae, a new family for Chaetosphaeria and its relatives. Sydowia 51:49–70.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Winka K. 2000. Phylogeny of Chaetosphaeria and its anamorphs based on morphological and molecular data. Mycologia 92:939–954.
   Google Scholar
• Rehner SA, Samuels GJ. 1994. Taxonomy and phylogeny of Gliocladium analysed from nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Mycol Res 98:625–634.
   Google Scholar
• Saccardo PA. 1883. Sylloge fungorum omnium hucusque cognitarum. Syll Fung 2:1–815.
   Google Scholar
• Seifert KA, Samuels GJ. 2000. How should we look at anamorphs? Stud Mycol 45:5–18.
   Google Scholar
• Sivichai S, Hywel-Jones NL, Somrithipol S. 2000. Lignicolous freshwater Ascomycota from Thailand: Melanochaeta and Sporoschisma anamorphs. Mycol Res 104:478–485.
   Google Scholar
• Swofford DL. 1998. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• ———. 2001. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and other methods). Version 4.0b10. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
   Google Scholar
• Tamura K, Nei M. 1993. Estimation of the number of nucleotide substitutions in the control region of mitochondrial DNA in humans and chimpanzees. Mol Biol Evol 10:512–526.
   Google Scholar
• Tavaré S. 1986. Some probabilistic and statistical problems in the analysis of DNA sequences. Lect Math Life Sci 17:57–86.
   Google Scholar
• Tulasne LR, Tulasne C. 1863. Selecta Fungorum Carpologica. Selecta Fungorum Carpologia 2:1–319.
   Google Scholar
• Vilgalys R, Hester M. 1990. Rapid genetic identification and mapping of enzymatically amplified ribosomal DNA from several Cryptococcus species. J Bacteriol 172:4238–4246.
   Google Scholar
• ———, Sun BL. 1994. Ancient and recent patterns of geographic speciation in the oyster mushroom Pleurotus revealed by phylogenetic analysis of ribosomal DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 91:4599–4603.
   Google Scholar