83
Views
10
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Crinipellis brasiliensis, a new species based on morphological and molecular data

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1348-1361 | Accepted 13 Jun 2005, Published online: 27 Jan 2017

LITERATURE CITED

  • Andebrhan T, Figueira A, Yamada MM, Cascardo J, Furtek DB. 1999. Molecular fingerprinting suggests two primary outbreaks of witches’ broom disease (Crinipellis perniciosa) of Theobroma cacao in Bahia, Brazil. Eur J Plant Pathol 105:167–175.
  • ———, Furtek DB. 1994. Random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis of Crinipellis perniciosa isolates from different hosts. Plant Pathol 43:1020–1027.
  • Anderson JB, Bailey SS, Pukkila PJ. 1989. Variation in ribosomal DNA among biological species of Armillaria, a genus of root-infecting fungi. Evolution 43:1652–1662.
  • Arruda MCC de, Miller RNG, Ferreira MAS, Felipe MSS. 2003a. Comparison of Crinipellis perniciosa isolates from Brazil by ERIC repetitive element sequence-based PCR genomic fingerprinting. Plant Pathol 52:236–244.
  • ———, Ferreira MASV, Miller RNG, Resende MLV, Felipe MSS. 2003b. Nuclear and mitochondrial rDNA variability in Crinipellis perniciosa from different geographic origins and hosts. Mycol Res 107(1):25–37.
  • Bastos CN, Andebrhan T, Almeida LC de. 1988. Comparações morfológica e patológica de Crinipellis perniciosa. Fitopatol Bras 13:202–206.
  • ———, Evans HC. 1985. A new pathotype of Crinipellis perniciosa (witches’ broom disease) on solanaceous hosts. Plant Pathol 34:306–312.
  • ———, Fonseca SEA, Melo WF. 1998. Mascagania cf. sepium, cipó nativo da Amazônia Brasileiro, hospedeiro de Crinipellis perniciosa. Fitopatol Bras 23:504.
  • Coetzee MPA, Wingfield BD, Bloomer P, Ridley GS, Kile GA, Wingfield MJ. 2001. Phylogenetic relationships of Australian and New Zealand Armillaria species. Mycologia 93:887–896.
  • Evans HC. 1978. Witches’ broom disease of T. cacao (Crinipellis perniciosa) in Ecuador: 1. The fungus. Ann App Biol 89:185–192.
  • ———. 1981. Witches’ broom disease-a case study. Cocoa Grower’s Bulletin 32:5–19.
  • ———, Barreto RW. 1996. Crinipellis perniciosa: A much investigated but little understood fungus. Mycologist 10:58–61.
  • Gomes LMC, Melo GRP, Faleiro FG, Priovani CP, Silva SDM, Ahnert D, Moraes MG. 2000. Similaridade genética de isolados de Crinipellis perniciosa coletados na região cacaueira da Bahia, baseada no seqüenciamento da região ITS. Genet Mol Biol 23:197.
  • Gramacho KP, Lopes UV, Oliveira ML de, Pires JL, Niella GR, Faleiro FG. 2002. Estrutura genética de isolados de Crinipellis perniciosa em diferentes órgãos de um cacaueiro. Fitopatol Bras 27:289.
  • Griffith GW, Bravo-Velasquez E, Wilson FJ, Lewis DM, Hedger JN.1994. Autoecology and evolution of the witches’ broom pathogen (Crinipellis perniciosa) of cocoa. Blakeman JP, Williamson B. eds. Ecology of plant pathologens. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. p 245–267.
  • ———, Hedger JN. 1993. A novel method for producing basidiocarps of the T. cacao pathogen Crinipellis perniciosa using a bran-vermiculite medium. Neth J Plant Pathol 99:227–230.
  • ———, ———. 1994. The breeding biology of biotypes of the witches’ broom pathogen of cocoa, Crinipellis perniciosa. Heredity 71:278–289.
  • ———, Nicholson J, Nenninger A, Birch RN, Hedger JN. 2003. Witches’ brooms and frosty pods: two major pathogens of cacao. NZ Jour Bot 41:423–435.
  • Hedger JN, Pickering V, Arangundi J. 1987. Variability of population of the witches’ broom disease of cocoa (Crinipellis perniciosa). Trans Brit Mycol Soc 88:533–545.
  • Hibbett DS. 1992. Ribosomal RNA and fungal systematics. Trans Mycol Soc Japan 33:533–556.
  • ———, Pine EM, Langer E, Donoghue MJ. 1997. Evolution of gilled mushrooms and puffballs inferred from ribosomal DNA sequences. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:12002–12006.
  • Hughes KW, McGhee LL, Methven AS, Johnson JE, Petersen RH. 1999. Patterns of geographic speciation in the genus Flammulina based on sequences of the ribosomal ITS1-5.8S-ITS2 area. Mycologia 91:978–986.
  • ———, Toyohara TL, Petersen RH. 1998. DNA sequence and RFLP analysis of Pleurotopsis longinqua from three disjunct populations. Mycologia 90:595–600.
  • Kirk PM, Cannon PF, David JC, Stalpers JA.2001. Ainsworth & Bisby’s dictionary of the fungi. 9th ed. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. 665 p.
  • Lebel T, Castellano MA. 2002. Types studies of sequestrate Russulales II. Australia and New Zealand species related to Russula. Mycologia 94:327–354.
  • Kumar S, Tamura K, Jakobsen IB, Nei M.2001. MEGA2: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis software. Arizona, USA: Arizona State University, Tempe.
  • McGeary FM, Wheeler EJ. 1988. Growth rates of and mycelial interactions between isolates of Crinipellis perniciosa from cocoa. Plant Pathol 37:489–498.
  • Miller RNG, Quezado-Soares AM, Lopes CA. 1999. Molecular comparation of Fusarium populations causing eumartii wilt and dry rot of potato in Brazil. Fitopatol Bras 24:149–155.
  • Moncalvo J-M, Lutzoni FM, Rehner SA, Jonson J. Vilgalys R. 2000. Phylogenetic relationships of Agaric fungi based on nuclear large subunit ribosomal DNA sequences. Syst Biol 49:278–305.
  • Nicholson MS, Bunyard BA, Royse DJ. 1997. Phylogeny of the genus Lentinula based on ribosomal DNA restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Mycologia 89:400–407.
  • Niella GR, Resende ML, Castro HA, Figueira AR, Silva IS, Araújo LM, Gomes LMC, Faleiro FG. 2000. Diversidade genética de isolados monospóicos de Crinipellis perniciosa provenientes de diferentes estados do Brasil utilizando marcadores moleculares RAPD. Fitopatol Bras 25:400.
  • ———, ———, ———, Silva LHCP, Carvalho JA. 1999. Aperfeiçamento da metodologia de produção artificial de basidiocarpos de Crinipellis perniciosa. Fitopatol Bras 24:523–527.
  • Pegler DN. 1978. Crinipellis perniciosa (Agaricales). Kew Bull 32:731–736.
  • Pereira JL, Ram A, Figueiredo JM, Almeida LCC.1989. Primeira ocorrência de vassoura-de-bruxa na principal região produtora de cacau do Brasil. Revista Agrotrópica 1:79–81. (In Portuguese).
  • Purdy LH, Schmidt RA. 1996. Status of cacao witches’ broom: biology, epidemiology and management. Ann Rev Phytopatho 34:573–594.
  • Raeder U, Broda P. 1985. Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol 1:17–20.
  • Resende MLV, Gutemberg BAN, Silva LHCP, Niella GR, Carvalho GA, Santiago DVR, Bezerra JL. 2000. Crinipellis perniciosa proveniente de um novo hospedeiro, Heteropteys acutifolia, é patogênico ao cacaueiro. Fitopatol Bras 25:88–91.
  • Rocha HM, Wheeler BEJ. 1985. Factors influencing the production of basidiocarps and the deposition and germination of basidiospores of Crinipellis perniciosa, the causal fungus of witches’broom of cocoa (Theobroma cacao). Plant Pathol 34:319–328.
  • Saitou N, Nei M. 1987. The neighbor joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406–425.
  • Singer R. 1942. A monographic study of the genera Crinipellis and Chaetocalathus. Liloa 8:441–534.
  • ———. 1976. Marasmieae (Basidiomycetes-Tricholomataceae). Monograph No. 17. Flora Neotropica 17:1–347.
  • Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ. 1994. Clustal W: improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific gap penalties and weight matrix choices. Nucl Acid Res 22:4673–4680.
  • Viana Júnior CAC.2001. Compatibilidade Somática e Patogenicidade de Crinipellis perniciosa. [MSc dissertation]. Lavras, Minas Gerais, Brazil: Universidade Federal de Lavras. 60 p.
  • Vilgalys R, Gonzalez D. 1990. Organization of ribosomal DNA in the basidiomycete Thanatephorus praticola. Current Genetics 18:277–280.
  • Weiss M, Yang ZL, Oberwinkler F. 1998. Molecular phylogenetic studies in the genus Amanita. Can J Bot 76:1170–1179.
  • Wheeler BEJ, Mepsted R. 1988. Pathogenic variability amongst isolates of Crinipellis perniciosa from cocoa (Theobroma cacao). Plant Pathol 37:475–488.
  • White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor JW.1990. Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelgard DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ, eds. PCR Protocols. San Diego, California: Academic Press. p 315–322.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.