An interactional approach to emergent interorganizational fields

References

• Aigner, S. M., Raymond, V. J., & Smidt, L. J. (2002). “Whole community organizing” for the 21st century. Community Development, 33, 86–106. doi:10.1080/15575330209490144
   Google Scholar
• Benson, J. K. (1975). The interorganizational network as a political economy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 20, 229–249. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2391696
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biermann, R. (2008). Towards a theory of inter-organizational networking: The Euro-Atlantic security institutions interacting. The Review of International Organizations, 3, 151–177. doi:10.1007/s11558-007-9027-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, T. K. (2008). The post-place community: Contributions to the debate about the definition of community. Community Development, 39, 5–16. doi:10.1080/15575330809489738
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A., & Israel, G. D. (2008). The power of community. Community Development, 39, 82–98. doi:10.1080/15575330809489743
   Google Scholar
• Brennan, M. A., & Luloff, A. E. (2007). Exploring rural community agency differences in Ireland and Pennsylvania. Journal of Rural Studies, 23, 52–61. doi:10.1016/j.jrurstud.2006.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bridger, J. C., & Alter, T. R. (2006). Place, community development, and social capital. Community Development, 37, 5–18. doi:10.1080/15575330609490151
   Google Scholar
• Bridger, J. C., & Alter, T. R. (2008). An interactional approach to place-based rural development. Community Development, 39, 99–111. doi:10.1080/15575330809489744
   Google Scholar
• Cigler, B. A. (1999). Pre-conditions for the emergence of multicommunity collaborative organizations. Policy Studies Review, 16, 86–102. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.1999.tb00842.x
   Google Scholar
• Cook, K. S. (1977). Exchange and power in networks of interorganizational relations. The Sociological Quarterly, 18, 62–82. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.1977.tb02162.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis, J. E. (1991). Contested ground: Collective action and the urban neighborhood. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, C. G., Luloff, A. E., & Theodori, G. L. (2010). Extending the concept of community interaction to explore regional community fields. Journal of Rural Social Sciences, 25, 22–36. Retrieved from http://www.ag.auburn.edu/auxiliary/srsa/pages/pastissues.html
   Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J. (1985). Interorganizational relations. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 281–304. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2083295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galaskiewicz, J., Bielefeld, W., & Dowell, M. (2006). Networks and organizational growth: A study of community based nonprofits. Administrative Science Quarterly, 51, 337–380. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/25426912
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guttman, L. (1945). A basis for analyzing test-retest reliability. Psychometrika, 10, 255–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hennart, J.-F. (2008). Transaction costs perspectives on inter-organizational relations. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. S. Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 339–365). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman, A. J., Withers, M. C., & Collins, B. J. (2009). Resource dependence theory: A review. Journal of Management, 35, 1404–1427. doi:10.1177/0149206309343469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husserl, E. (1954/1970). The crisis of European sciences and transcendental phenomenology. ( D. Carr, Trans.). Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. F. (1959). Toward an interactional conception of community. Social Forces, 38, 8–17. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2574010
   Google Scholar
• Kaufman, H. F. (1985). An action approach to community development. In F. A. Fear, & H. K. Schwarzweller (Eds.), Research in rural sociology and development: Focus on community, Vol. 2 (pp. 53–65). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kenis, P., & Knoke, D. (2002). How organizational field networks shape interorganizational tie-formation rates. Academy of Management Review, 27, 275–293. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4134355
   Google Scholar
• Korsching, P. F., & Allen, J. C. (2004). Local entrepreneurship: A development model based on community interaction field theory. Community Development, 35, 25–43. doi:10.1080/15575330409490120
   Google Scholar
• Loevinger, J. (1948). The technic of homogeneous tests compared with some aspects of “scale analysis” and factor analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 45, 507–529.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luloff, A. E. (1990). Community and social change: How do small communities act? In A. E. Luloff, & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), American rural communities (pp. 214–227). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
   Google Scholar
• Luloff, A. E., & Bridger, J. C. (2003). Community agency and local development. In D. L. Brown, & L. E. Swanson (Eds.), Challenges for rural America in the twenty-first century (pp. 203–213). University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mandell, M. P., & Keast, R. (2008). Voluntary and community sector partnerships: Current inter-organizational relations and future challenges. In S. Cropper, M. Ebers, C. Huxham, & P. S. Ring (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of inter-organizational relations (pp. 175–202). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Martin, J. L. (2003). What is field theory? American Journal of Sociology, 109, 1–49. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/3568324
   Google Scholar
• Miller, B. (1992). Collective action and rational choice: Place, community, and the limits to individual self-interest. Economic Geography, 68, 22–42. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/144039
   Google Scholar
• Milofsky, C. (2008). Remembering Warren’s interorganizational field. Community Development Journal, 43, 93–96. doi:10.1093/cdj/bsm052
   Google Scholar
• Mokken, R. J., & Lewis, C. (1982). A nonparametric approach to the analysis of dichotomous item responses. Applied Psychological Measurement, 6, 417–430. doi:10.1177/014662168200600404
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Molenaar, I. W., & Sijtsma, K. (2000). User’s manual MSP5 for Windows: A program for Mokken scale analysis for polytomous items. Groningen: IEC ProGAMMA.
   Google Scholar
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2008). Networks and institutions. In R. Greenwood, C. Oliver, R. Suddaby, & K. Sahlin (Eds.), The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 596–623). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, S. K., Klonglan, G. E., & Rogers, D. L. (1980). A model for the measurement of cooperative relationships among health related organizations. Management International Review, 20, 96–107. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/40227522
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, K. E. (1999). Community leadership and community theory: A practical synthesis. Community Development, 30, 196–212. doi:10.1080/15575339909489721
   Google Scholar
• Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences, 4, 155–169. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/4531523
   Google Scholar
• Rogers, D. L. (1974). Towards a scale of interorganizational relations among public agencies. Sociology and Social Research, 59, 61–70.
   Google Scholar
• Sampson, R. J., McAdam, D., MacIndoe, H., & Weffer-Elizondo, S. (2005). Civil society reconsidered: The durable nature and community structure of collective civic action. American Journal of Sociology, 111, 673–714. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/497351
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. S., Flora, J. L., & Killacky, J. (2003). Networks and fields: Corporate business leader involvement in voluntary organizations of a large nonmetropolitan city. Community Development, 34, 36–56. doi:10.1080/15575330309490102
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K., Debets, P., & Molenaar, I. W. (1990). Mokken scale analysis for polychotomous items: Theory, a computer program and an empirical application. Quality & Quantity, 24, 173–188. doi:10.1007/BF00209550
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K., & Molenaar, I. W.(2002). Introduction to nonparametric item response theory (Vol. 5). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Sijtsma, K., & Verweij, A. C. (1992). Mokken scale analysis: Theoretical considerations and an application to transitivity tasks. Applied Measurement in Education, 5, 355–373. doi:10.1207/s15324818ame0504_5
   Google Scholar
• Southwest Regional Development Corporation Zones. (n.d.). Retrieved from http://www.southwestrdc.mb.ca/index.php
   Google Scholar
• Sowa, J. E. (2009). The collaboration decision in nonprofit organizations: Views from the front line. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 38, 1003–1025. doi:10.1177/0899764008325247
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, M. R. (1960). The eclipse of community: An interpretation of American studies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Takahashi, L. M., & Smutny, G. (2001). Collaboration among small, community-based organizations: Strategies and challenges in turbulent environments. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 21, 141–153. doi:10.1177/0739456X0102100203
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L. (2004). Community attachment, satisfaction, and action. Community Development, 35, 73–86. doi:10.1080/15575330409490133
   Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L. (2005). Community and community development in resource-based areas: Operational definitions rooted in an interactional perspective. Society and Natural Resources, 18, 661–669. doi:10.1080/08941920590959640
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L. (2008). Constraints to the development of community. Community Development, 39, 91–110. doi:10.1080/15575330809489733
   Google Scholar
• Tilly, C. (1973). Do communities act? Sociological Inquiry, 43, 209–238. doi:10.1111/j.1475-682X.1973.tb00008.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tönnies, F. (1887/1957). Community and society: Gemeinschaft und gesellschaft. ( C. P. Loomis, Ed. & Trans.). New York, NY: Harper & Row, Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ulrich, D., & Barney, J. B. (1984). Perspectives in organizations: Resource dependence, efficiency, and population. Academy of Management Review, 9, 471–481. Retrieved from http://www/jstor.org/stable/258287
   Google Scholar
• van Schuur, W. H. (2003). Mokken scale analysis: Between the Guttman scale and parametric item response theory. Political Analysis, 11, 139–163. doi:10.1093/pan/mpg002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidich, A. J., & Bensman, J. (1958). Small town in mass society: Class, power and religion in a rural community. Garden City, NY: Anchor Books.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, R. L. (1978). The community in America (3rd ed.). Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. P. (1970a). Phases and roles in community action. Rural Sociology, 35, 54–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. P. (1970b). The community as a social field. Social Forces, 48, 311–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. P. (1986). In search of the community in the changing countryside. Rural Sociology, 51, 1–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, K. P. (1991). The community in rural America. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press.
   Google Scholar