774
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Who is responsible for the hockey rink? – A critical analysis of a citizen dialogue meeting in a small Mill town

, ORCID Icon &
Pages 445-459 | Received 04 Feb 2021, Accepted 21 Aug 2021, Published online: 01 Oct 2021

References

  • Abrahamsson, H. (2013). Makt och Dialog i Rättvisa och Socialt Hållbara Svenska Städer [Power and dialogue in just and socially sustainable Swedish cities]. Göteborgs Universitet.
  • Arora-Jonsson, S. (2017). The realm of freedom in new rural governance: Micro-politics of democracy in Sweden. Geoforum, 79, 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2016.12.010
  • Beierle, T., & Konisky, P. (2000). Values, conflict and trust in participatory environmental planning. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 19(4), 587–602. https://doi.org/10.1002/1520-6688(200023)19:4<587::AID-PAM4>3.0.CO;2-Q
  • Bergh, A. (2011). The rise, fall and revival of the Swedish Welfare State: What are the policy lessons from Sweden? IFN Working Paper no. 873, Stockholm.
  • Bevir, M. (2011). Governance and governmentality after neoliberalism. Policy & Politics, 39(4), 457–471. https://doi.org/10.1332/030557310X550141
  • Castell, P. (2013, June). Citizen dialogue in planning and the delicate balance of formality and informality [Paper presentation]. The International Conference on Changing Cities: Spatial, morphological, formal & socio-economic dimensions, Skiathos Island, Greece.
  • Drechsler, W. (2009). The rise and demise of the new public management: Lessons and opportunities for South East Europe. Uprava, Ietnik, 7(3), 7–27. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/280492347.pdf
  • Eriksen, E. O., & Fossum, J. E. (Eds.). (2000). Democracy in the European Union. Integration through deliberation? Routledge.
  • Foucau Foucault, M. (1978). The History of Sexuality. (Robert Hurley. Trans). New York: Pantheon
  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). University of Chicago Press.
  • Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso.
  • Harvey, D. (2012). Rebel cities. Verso.
  • Hooge, E., Theisens, H., & Waslander, S. (2017, April–May). Using foucault’s concept of governmentality [Paper presentation]. The 2017 AERA Conference, San Antonio, Texas.
  • Hopkins, D. (2010). The emancipatory limits of participation in planning: Equity and power in deliberative plan-making in Perth, Western Australia. The Town Planning Review, 81(1), 55–81. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.24
  • Li, T. (2007). Governmentality. Anthropologica, 49(2), 275–281.
  • Li, Y., Westlund, H., Zheng, X., & Liu, Y. (2016). Bottom-up initiatives and revival in the face of rural decline: Case studies from China and Sweden. Journal of Rural Studies, 47, 506–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2016.07.004
  • Lindholm, T., Oliveira e Costa, S., & Wieberg, S. (2015). Medborgardialog – Demokrati eller dekoration? Tolv röster om dialogens problem och potential i samhällsplaneringen [Citizen dialogue – democracy or decoration? Twelve voices on the dialogue’s problems and potential in comunity planning]. Arkus.
  • Lövgren, S. (2000). Att skapa ett framtidens folk: Governmentality och miljödiskurs i modern svensk bostadspolitik: Miljonprogramsområdet Navestad [To create the future people: Govermentality and environmental discourse in modern Swedish housing policy: the suburban area of Navestad] [Doctoral dissertation]. Linköping Studies in Arts and Sciences. Linköping University.
  • Micheletti, M. (2017). Samhällsplaneringens demokratiska utmaning. Samspelet mellan medborgare och staden i förnyelseprojekt som ombyggnaden av Slussenområdet [Community planning’s democratic challenge. The interplay between citizens and the city in renewal projects such as the remodeling of the Slussen area]. Statsvetenskaplig Tidskrift, 119(3), 465–498. https://journals.lub.lu.se/st/article/view/16973
  • Öberg, P. O., & Svensson, T. (2012). Civil society and deliberative democracy: Have voluntary organisations faded from national public politics? Scandinavian Political Studies, 35(3), 246–271. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9477.2012.00288.x
  • Olsson, U. (1997). Folkhälsa Som Pedagogiskt projekt: Bilden av hälsoupplysning i statens offentliga utredning [Public health as an educational project: The image of health information in the writings of governmental public health committees] [Doctoral dissertation]. Uppsala Studies in Education N. 72, Acta Universitatis Upsaliensis. Uppsala university.
  • Robertson, A. (2017). Narrative Analysis. In G. Bergström & K. Boréus (Eds.), Analysing text and discourse. Eight approaches for the social sciences (1st ed., pp. 122–145). Sage.
  • Rowe, G., & Frewer, L. J. (2000). Public participation methods: A framework for evaluation. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(1), 3–29. https://doi.org/10.1177/016224390002500101
  • Soneryd, L., & Lindh, E. (2019). Citizen dialogue for whom? Competing rationalities in urban planning, the case of Gothenburg, Sweden. Urban Research & Practice, 12(3), 230–246. https://doi.org/10.1080/17535069.2018.1436721
  • Steffek, J., & Nanz, P. (2008). Emergent patterns of civil society participation in global and European governance. In J. Steffek, C. Kissling, & P. Nanz (Eds.), Civil society participation in European and global governance: A cure for the democratic deficit? (pp. 1–29). Palgrave.
  • Stenson, K., & Watt, P. (1999). Governmentality and ‘the death of the social’? A discourse analysis of local government texts in South-east England. Urban Studies, 36(1), 189–201. https://doi.org/10.1080/0042098993817
  • Syssner, J., & Siebert, C. (2020). Local governments and the communication of demographic decline in Sweden and Germany: Who, what and why? Journal of Depopulation and Rural Development Studies, 29, (2) 79–105.
  • Tahvilzadeh, N. (2015). Understanding participatory governance arrangements in urban politics: Idealist and cynical perspectives on the politics of citizen dialogues in Göteborg. Urban Research & Practice, 8(2), 238–254. DOI:10.1080/17535069.2015.1050210