Citizen engagement in coproductive community services: examining the influence of community attachment, trust in the local government, and the leadership of local elected officials

References

• Apaliyah, G., & Martin, K. E. (2013). An analysis of the effects of community leadership education program content on six outcome indices of community leadership. Community Development, 44(4), 456–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2013.795991
   Google Scholar
• Bhattacharyya, J. (2004). Theorizing community development. Community Development, 34(2), 5–34. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490110
   Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T. (2007). Beyond engagement and participation: User and community coproduction of public services. Public Administration Review, 67(5), 846–860. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2007.00773.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bovaird, T., & Loeffler, E. (2012). From engagement to co-production: The contribution of users and communities to outcomes and public value. VOLUNTAS, 23(4), 1119–1138. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9309-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen, G. A. (2005). Local-level stakeholder collaboration: A substantive theory of community-driven development. Community Development, 36(2), 73–88. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330509490176
   Google Scholar
• Brehm, J. M., Eisenhauer, B. W., & Krannich, R. S. (2006). Community attachments as predictors of local environmental concern: The case for multiple dimensions of attachment. American Behavioral Scientist, 50(2), 142–165. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764206290630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brix, J., Krogstrup, H. K., & Mortensen, N. M. (2020). Evaluating the outcomes of co-production in local government. Local Government Studies, 46(2), 169–185. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1702530
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M. E., & Baker, B. L. (2019). “People first”: Factors that promote or inhibit community transformation. Community Development, 50(3), 297–314. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1597911
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, P. R., & Head, B. W. (2019). Navigating tensions in co‐production: A missing link in leadership for public value. Public Administration, 97(2), 250–263. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12394
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussu, S., & Tullia Galanti, M. (2018). Facilitating coproduction: The role of leadership in coproduction initiatives in the UK. Policy and Society, 37(3), 347–367. https://doi.org/10.1080/14494035.2018.1414355
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortina, J. M. (1993). What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78(1), 98–104. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dang, L., Seemann, A., Lindenmeier, J., & Saliterer, I. (2022). Explaining civic engagement: The role of neighborhood ties, place attachment, and civic responsibility. Journal of Community Psychology, 50(3), 1736–1755. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22751
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollery, B., Kinoshita, Y., & Yamazaki, K. (2020). Humanitarian co-production in local government: The case of natural disaster volunteering in Japan. Local Government Studies, 46(6), 959–978. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2019.1702531
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dubowitz, T., Nelson, C., Weilant, S., Sloan, J., Bogart, A., Miller, C., & Chandra, A. (2020). Factors related to health civic engagement: Results from the 2018 National Survey of Health Attitudes to understand progress towards a culture of health. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 635. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-020-08507-w
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, E. L., & Talmage, C. A. (2020). Perceived social capital and attitudes about liberals and conservatives: A political psychology and community development examination of politically polarized communities. Community Development, 51(3), 212–229. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1677733
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, J., Brandl, S. G., Worden, R. E., & Bynum, T. S. (1996). Citizen involvement in the coproduction of police outputs. Journal of Crime and Justice, 19(2), 1–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/0735648X.1996.9721544
   Google Scholar
• Fu, Q. (2019). How does the neighborhood inform activism? Civic engagement in urban transformation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 63, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.03.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung, A. (2015). Putting the public back into governance: The challenges of citizen participation and its future. Public Administration Review, 75(4), 513–522. https://doi.org/10.1111/puar.12361
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallup, Inc. (2014). Soul of the community [in 26 Knight Foundation communities in the United States], 2008-2010: Version 2 [Data set]. ICPSR - Interuniversity Consortium for Political and Social Research. https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR35532.V2
   Google Scholar
• Gearhart, M. C. (2020). Social cohesion, internal efficacy, and external efficacy: Studying voting behavior using collective efficacy theory. Community Development, 51(5), 593–608. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1825502
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gofen, A. (2012). Entrepreneurial exit response to dissatisfaction with public services. Public Administration, 90(4), 1088–1106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2011.02021.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grillo, M. C., Teixeira, M. A., & Wilson, D. C. (2010). Residential satisfaction and civic engagement: Understanding the causes of community participation. Social Indicators Research, 97(3), 451–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-009-9511-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, R. A. (2015). Neighborhood networks, social capital, and political participation: The relationships revisited. Journal of Urban Affairs, 37(2), 122–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/juaf.12137
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, R. A., & Kogl, A. M. (2007). Neighborhood attachment, social capital building, and political participation: A case study of low- and moderate-income residents of Waterloo, Iowa. Journal of Urban Affairs, 29(2), 181–205. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9906.2007.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Healey, P. (2015). Citizen-generated local development initiative: Recent English experience. International Journal of Urban Sciences, 19(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1080/12265934.2014.989892
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holum, M. (2022). Citizen participation: Linking government efforts, actual participation, and trust in local politicians. International Journal of Public Administration, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900692.2022.2048667
   Google Scholar
• Jakobsen, M. (2013). Can government initiatives increase citizen coproduction? Results of a randomized field experiment. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 23(1), 27–54. https://doi.org/10.1093/jopart/mus036
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang, J., Li, Q., Kang, R., & Wang, P. (2020). Social trust and health: A perspective of urban-rural comparison in China. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 15(3), 737–756. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-018-9686-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kao, Y.-H., & Sapp, S. G. (2020). Is social capital as a determinant of community attachment? Sociological Spectrum, 40(2), 136–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/02732173.2020.1748149
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King, S., & Cotterill, S. (2007). Transformational government? The role of information technology in delivering citizen-centric local public services. Local Government Studies, 33(3), 333–354. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930701289430
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koopmans, R., & Schaeffer, M. (2016). Statistical and perceived diversity and their impacts on neighborhood social cohesion in Germany, France and the Netherlands. Social Indicators Research, 125(3), 853–883. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-015-0863-3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lachapelle, P. (2008). A sense of ownership in community development: Understanding the potential for participation in community planning efforts. Community Development, 39(2), 52–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330809489730
   Google Scholar
• Lenzi, M., Vieno, A., Pastore, M., & Santinello, M. (2013). Neighborhood social connectedness and adolescent civic engagement: An integrative model. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2012.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levi, M., & Stoker, L. (2000). Political trust and trustworthiness. Annual Review of Political Science, 3(1), 475–507. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.polisci.3.1.475
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lim, C., & MacGregor, C. A. (2012). Religion and volunteering in context: Disentangling the contextual effects of religion on voluntary behavior. American Sociological Review, 77(5), 747–779. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003122412457875
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, G. (2021). Community attachment: Perceptions of context matter. Community Development, 52(1), 77–94. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1836009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Majee, W., & Hoyt, A. (2009). Building community trust through cooperatives: A case study of a worker-owned homecare cooperative. Journal of Community Practice, 17(4), 444–463. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705420903299995
   Google Scholar
• Miranti, R., & Evans, M. (2019). Trust, sense of community, and civic engagement: Lessons from Australia. Journal of Community Psychology, 47(2), 254–271. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22119
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mize, T. (2019). Best practices for estimating, interpreting, and presenting nonlinear interaction effects. Sociological Science, 6, 81–117. https://doi.org/10.15195/v6.a4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moomaw, S. M. (2016). Improving local results: Fusing community design and community development. Community Development, 47(5), 670–682. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2016.1228688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musick, M. A., Wilson, J., & Bynum, W. B. (2000). Race and formal volunteering: The differential effects of class and religion. Social Forces, 78(4), 1539–1570. https://doi.org/10.2307/3006184
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Newell, R., Picketts, I., & Dale, A. (2020). Community systems models and development scenarios for integrated planning: Lessons learned from a participatory approach. Community Development, 51(3), 261–282. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2020.1772334
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noda, Y. (2017). Trust in the leadership of governors and participatory governance in Tokyo Metropolitan Government. Local Government Studies, 43(5), 776–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2017.1333428
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Offe, C. (1999). How can we trust our fellow citizens? In M. E. Warren (Ed.), Democracy and trust (pp. 42–87). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Nasi, G. (2013). A new theory for public service management? Toward a (public) service-dominant approach. The American Review of Public Administration, 43(2), 135–158. https://doi.org/10.1177/0275074012466935
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osborne, S. P., Radnor, Z., & Strokosch, K. (2016). Co-production and the co-creation of value in public services: A suitable case for treatment? Public Management Review, 18(5), 639–653. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2015.1111927
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostrom, E. (1996). Crossing the great divide: Coproduction, synergy, and development. World Development, 24(6), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(96)00023-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paddock, S. (1996). Training municipal elected officials: Current practice and a developmental model. International Journal of Public Administration, 19(5), 689–709. https://doi.org/10.1080/01900699608525116
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, K. E. (1999). Community leadership and community theory: A practical synthesis. Community Development, 30(2), 196–212. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339909489721
   Google Scholar
• Pigg, K. E. (2002). Three faces of empowerment: Expanding the theory of empowerment in community development. Community Development, 33(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330209490145
   Google Scholar
• Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63(1), 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rice, T. W., & Steele, B. (2001). White ethnic diversity and community attachment in small Iowa towns. Social Science Quarterly, 82(2), 397–407. https://doi.org/10.1111/0038-4941.00031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robinson, J. W. (1994). Ten basic principles of leadership in community development organizations. Community Development, 25(1), 44–48. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339409489893
   Google Scholar
• Shelton, C., & Garkovich, L. (2013). Assessing factors influencing political engagement in local communities. Community Development, 44(4), 469–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2013.822401
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, E. B., & Della-Giustina, J.-A. (2001). Urban policing and the fear of crime. Urban Studies, 38(5–6), 941–957. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420980123458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoecker, R., & Witkovsky, B. (2022). Elder civic engagement and rural community development. Ageing International. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12126-022-09488-4
   Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L. (2004). Community attachment, satisfaction, and action. Community Development, 35(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490133
   Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L. (2018). Reexamining the associations among community attachment, community-oriented actions, and individual-level constraints to involvement. Community Development, 49(1), 101–115. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2017.1391307
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L., & Robinson, C. S. (2019). A note on religious participation and community involvement. Community Development, 50(4), 484–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2019.1642924
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodori, A. E., & Theodori, G. L. (2015). The influences of community attachment, sense of community, and educational aspirations upon the migration intentions of rural youth in Texas. Community Development, 46(4), 380–391. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1062035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theodori, G. L., Willits, F. K., & Fortunato, M. W.-P. (2022). The effect of the rural mystique on community attachment, community satisfaction, perceived influence in community decision-making, and self-reported engagement in community-oriented actions. Community Development, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2022.2028301
   Google Scholar
• Torfing, J., Bentzen, T. Ø., & Winsvold, M. S. (2020). How institutional designs condition perceived local political leadership. Local Government Studies, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/03003930.2020.1821664
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, R., & Gearhart, M. C. (2022). Social ties and collective efficacy as predictors of volunteering. Community Development. 53(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1943697
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uslaner, E. M. (2002). Religion and civic engagement in Canada and the United States. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 41(2), 239–254. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-5906.00114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Walle, S., & Bouckaert, G. (2003). Public service performance and trust in government: The problem of causality. International Journal of Public Administration, 26(8–9), 891–913. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-120019352
   Google Scholar
• van Eijk, C., & Steen, T. P. S. (2014). Why people co-produce: Analyzing citizens’ perceptions on co-planning engagement in health care services. Public Management Review, 16(3), 358–382. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2013.841458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanleene, D., Voets, J., & Verschuere, B. (2020). The co-production of public value in community development: Can street-level professionals make a difference? International Review of Administrative Sciences, 86(3), 582–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852318804040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verschuere, B., Brandsen, T., & Pestoff, V. (2012). Co-production: The state of the art in research and the future agenda. VOLUNTAS, 23(4), 1083–1101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-012-9307-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogelsang-Coombs, V., & Miller, M. (1999). Developing the governance capacity of local elected officials. Public Administration Review, 59(3), 199. https://doi.org/10.2307/3109949
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voorberg, W. H., Bekkers, V. J. J. M., & Tummers, L. G. (2015). A systematic review of co-creation and co-production: Embarking on the social innovation journey. Public Management Review, 17(9), 1333–1357. https://doi.org/10.1080/14719037.2014.930505
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wanous, J. P., & Reichers, A. E. (1996). Estimating the reliability of a single-item measure. Psychological Reports, 78(2), 631–634. https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1996.78.2.631
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, R., Crum, T., & Salinas, E. (2015). The civics of community development: Participatory budgeting in Chicago. Community Development, 46(3), 261–278. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1028081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar