Community, capabilities, and the social entrepreneurship ecosystem

References

• Abel, R. L. (1998). Speaking law to power: Occasions for cause lawyering. In A. Sarat & S. Scheingold (Eds.), Cause lawyering: Political commitments and professional responsibilities (pp. 69–117). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Achtenhagen, L., & Price Schultz, C. J. (2015). Invisible struggles: The representation of ethnic entrepreneurship in US newspapers. Community Development, 46(5), 499–515. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1083041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: Measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(3), 476–494. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2013.08.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allio, L. (2014). Design thinking for public service excellence. UNDP Global Centre for Public Service Excellence.
   Google Scholar
• Andreoni, A., Chang, H.-J., & Estevez, I. (2021). The missing dimensions of the human capabilities approach: Collective and productive. European Journal of Development Research, 33, 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41287-020-00356-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arabadzhieva, M., & Vutsova, A. (2021). Social enterprises’ ecosystem – Status quo and its auspicious development. REVESCO: Revista de Estudios Cooperativos, 137, 1–18. https://dx.doi.org/10.5209/REVE.71864
   Google Scholar
• Arnstein, S. R. (1969). A ladder of citizen participation. Journal of the American Institute of Planners, 35(4), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944366908977225
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATSDR (Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry) & CDC (Centers for Disease Control). (2011). Principles of community engagement (2nd ed.). NIH publication no. 11-7782. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/communityengagement/pdf/PCE_Report_508_FINAL.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Audhoe, R., Thompson, N., & Verduijn, K. (2018). Expanding entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable (EIS) ecosystems: A cultural historical activity theory perspective. In J. Leitão, H. Alves, N. Krueger, & J. Park (Eds.), Entrepreneurial, innovative and sustainable ecosystems: Applying quality of life research (pp. 67–89). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Bacq, S., Hertel, C., & Lumpkin, G. T. (2022). Communities at the nexus of entrepreneurship and societal impact: A cross-disciplinary literature review. Journal of Business Venturing, 37(5), 106231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2022.106231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balzac-Arroyo, J. (2021). Movement lawyering: A social innovation to achieve climate justice. Journal of Law and Social Deviance, 21, 1–66. http://lsd-journal.net/archives/Volume21/MovementLawyering.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnes, S. B., & Ramanarayanan, D. (2022). Global health & gender policy brief, 1 (April). Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars.
   Google Scholar
• Bhardwaj, R., Srivastava, S., Bindra, S., & Sangwan, S. 2022. An ecosystem view of social entrepreneurship through the perspective of systems thinking. Systems Research and Behavioral Science, March. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1002/sres.2835
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, S. D. (1989). Resource-poor farmer participation in research: A synthesis of experiences from nine National Agricultural Research Systems (OFCOR Comparative Study Paper). ISNAR, The Hague, pp. 3–37.
   Google Scholar
• Bloom, P. N., & Dees, G. (2008). Cultivate your ecosystem. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, 47–53. https://doi.org/10.48558/QWAW-VP62
   Google Scholar
• Borzaga, C., Fazzi, L., & Galera, G. (2016). Social enterprise as a bottom-up dynamic. Part 1: The reaction of civil society to unmet social needs in Italy, Sweden and Japan. International Review of Sociology, 26(1), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03906701.2016.1148332
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowles, C. (2020). Participatory monitoring case study: Communities take the lead with picture-based tools. OneVillage Partners.
   Google Scholar
• Breazeale, N., Fortunato, M. W.-P., Allen, J. E., IV, Hustedde, R. J., & Pushkarskaya, H. (2015). Constructing a multi-dimensional measure of local entrepreneurial culture. Community Development, 46(5), 516–540. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1080743
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Broad, G., & Ortiz, J. (2020). Social entrepreneurial ecosystem: Sparking social transformation. Canadian Journal of Nonprofit and Social Economy Research, 11(1), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.22230/anserj.2020v11n1a321
   Google Scholar
• Brown, T., & Wyatt, J. (2010). Design thinking for social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 30–35. Winter. https://doi.org/10.48558/58Z7-3J85
   Google Scholar
• Cao, Z., & Shi, X. (2021). A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial ecosystems in advanced and emerging economies. Small Business Economics, 57, 75–110. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00326-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandrasekhar, D. (2012). Digging deeper: Participation and nonparticipation in post-disaster community recovery. Community Development, 43(5), 614–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2012.730538
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, B. (2006). Sustainable valley entrepreneurial ecosystems. Business Strategy and the. Environment, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.428
   Google Scholar
• Cornwall, A. (2008). Unpacking ‘Participation’: Models, meanings and practices. Community Development Journal, 43(3), 269–283. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsn010
   Google Scholar
• Cummings, S. (2017). Movement lawyering. University of Illinois Law Review, 5, 1645–1732. http://illinoislawreview.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Cummings.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Dahlstrom, T. R., & Talmage, C. A. (2018). Entrepreneurial skills for sustainable small business: An exploratory study of SCORE, with comparison. Community Development, 49(4), 450–468. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2018.1491613
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Paz Nieves, C., & Muller, M. (2021). From data into action: the impact of gender analysis on policy and programming. Poverty & Equity Notes, 42, 1–16. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/36397
   Google Scholar
• De Ruyter, A., Singh, A., Warnecke, T., & Zammit, A. (2011). Labor standards, gender and decent work in newly industrialized countries: Promoting the good society. In J. Marangos (Ed.), Alternative Perspectives of a Good Society (pp. 121–146). Palgrave MacMillan.
   Google Scholar
• Diaz Gonzalez, A., & Dentchen, N. A. (2021). Ecosystems in support of social entrepreneurs: A literature review. Social Enterprise Journal, 17(3), 321–352. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-08-2020-0064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2002). India: Development and participation. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Elsesser, C. (2013). Community lawyering – The role of lawyers in the social justice movement. Loyola Journal of Public International Law, 14, 375–404.
   Google Scholar
• Emery, M., & Flora, C. (2006). Spiraling-up: Mapping community transformation with community capitals framework. Journal of the Community Development Society, 37(1), 19–35. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330609490152
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson, E., & Roy, M. J. (2019). Empowering communities? Exploring roles in facilitated social enterprise. Social Enterprise Journal, 15(1), 76–93. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-04-2018-0035
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortunato, M. W.-P., & Alter, T. (2015). Community entrepreneurship development: An introduction. Community Development, 46(5), 444–455. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1080742
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2012). Organizing entrepreneurial judgment: A new approach to the firm. Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Foundations of Success. (2019). Designing monitoring and evaluation approaches under the open standards: How-to guide.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A. (2015). Teaching for change: How the legal academy can prepare the next generation of social justice movement lawyers. Howard Law Journal, 59(9), 99–147.
   Google Scholar
• Freeman, A., & Freeman, J. (2016). It’s about power, not policy: Movement lawyering for large scale social change. Clinical Law Review, 23, 147–168.
   Google Scholar
• Frisk, J. E., & Holm, L. S. (2022). Increasing people’s capabilities by using design thinking in the decision-making process. In H. Falk Erhag, U. Lagerlof Nilsson, T. Rydberg Sterner, & I. Skoog (Eds.), A multidisciplinary approach to capability in age and aging (pp. 131–148). Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Gawell, M. (2019). Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe: Country Report Sweden. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, J. (2007). The lawyer is not the protagonist: Community campaigns, law, and social change. California Law Review, 95(5), 2133–2145. http://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/faculty_scholarship/349/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gyan, C. (2021). Community development participation scale: A development and validation study. Community Development, 52(4), 459–472. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2021.1885049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halcyon. (2019). A step forward: Social enterprise ecosystems in the U.S. Halcyon House.
   Google Scholar
• Harper, G., & Price, R. (2011). A framework for understanding the social impacts of policy and their effects on wellbeing. UK Department for Environment, Food, and Rural Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, J. (2015). School for Scaling. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Spring, 59–60. http://ssir.org/articles/entry/school_for_scaling
   Google Scholar
• Hazenberg, R., Bajwa-Patel, M., Roy, M. J., Mazzei, M., & Baglioni, S. (2016). The role of institutional and stakeholder networks in shaping social enterprise ecosystems in Europe. Social Enterprise Journal, 12(3), 302–321. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-10-2016-0044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horng, S.-M. (2016). A study of active and passive user participation in virtual communities. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research, 17(4), 289–311. http://www.jecr.org/sites/default/files/2016vol17no4_Paper2.pdf
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ibrahim, S. S. (2006). From individual to collective capabilities: The capability approach as a conceptual framework for self-help. Journal of Human Development, 7(3), 397–416. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649880600815982
   Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. J. (2010, June). How to start an entrepreneurial revolution. Harvard Business Review. http://hbr.org/2010/06/the-big-idea-how-to-start-an-entrepreneurial-revolution
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isenberg, D. J. (2011). The entrepreneurship ecosystem strategy as a new paradigm for economic policy: Principles for cultivating entrepreneurship. Institute of International European Affairs.
   Google Scholar
• Islam, S. M. (2020). Unintended consequences of scaling social impact through ecosystem growth strategy in social enterprise and social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 13, e00159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2020.e00159
   Google Scholar
• Jasek-Rysdahl, K. (2001). Applying Sen’s capabilities framework to neighborhoods: Using local asset maps to deepen our understanding of well-being. Review of Social Economy, 59(3), 313–329. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346760110053923
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman Foundation. (2019). Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Building Playbook 3.0. https://www.kauffman.org/ecosystem-playbook-draft-3/create/
   Google Scholar
• Kansheba, J. M. P., & Wald, A. E. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystems: A systematic literature review and research agenda. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 27(2), 943–964. https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-11-2019-0364
   Google Scholar
• Kelly, E. I. (2011). Public reason as a collective capability. Rutgers Law Journal, 43, 295–316.
   Google Scholar
• Kimhur, B. (2020). How to Apply the Capability Approach to Housing Policy? Concepts, Theories and Challenges. Housing, Theory and Society, 37(3), 257–277. https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2019.1706630
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, M. G., Ji-Hwan, L., Roh, T., & Son, H. (2020). Social entrepreneurship education as an innovation hub for building an entrepreneurial ecosystem: The case of the KAIST social entrepreneurship hub MBA program. Sustainability, 12(22), 9736. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12229736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg, I., & Jansson, B. (2022). The capability approach in social work research: A scoping review of research addressing practical social work. International Social Work, 65(2), 224–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020872819896849
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koh, J., Kim, Y.-G., Butter, B., & Bock, G.-W. (2007). Encouraging participation in virtual communities. Communications of the ACM, 50(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/1216016.1216023
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korsching, P. F., & Allen, J. C. (2004). Local entrepreneurship: A development model based on community interaction field theory. Journal of the Community Development Society, 35(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490120
   Google Scholar
• Krishen, A. S., Raschke, R., Kachroo, P., LaTour, M., & Verma, P. (2014). Promote me or protect us? The framing of policy for collective good. European Journal of Marketing, 48(3–4), 742–760. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-10-2011-0609
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuzhiparambil, A. (2017). Enhancing choices through collective capability: a study of invisible home-based cashew processors in Kerala, India. Community Development Journal, 52(4), 650–667. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsw001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langworthy, M., & Warnecke, T. (2020). Capabilities and (missed) opportunity for women’s entrepreneurship in Kuwait. Journal of Economic Issues, 54(2), 404–412. https://doi.org/10.1080/00213624.2020.1752105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebmann, O. (2020). Collectivity and the capability approach: Survey and discussion. Review of Social Economy. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2020.1774636
   Google Scholar
• Lichtenstein, G. A., Lyons, T. S., & Kutzhanova, N. (2004). Building entrepreneurial communities: The appropriate role of enterprise development activities. Journal of the Community Development Society, 35(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330409490119
   Google Scholar
• Lumpkin, G. T., & Bacq, S. (2019). Civic wealth creation: A new view of stakeholder engagement and societal impact. Academy of Management Perspectives, 33(4), 383–404. https://doi.org/10.5465/amp.2017.0060
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons, T. S., Alter, T. R., Audretsch, D., & Augustine, D. (2012). Entrepreneurship and community: The next frontier of entrepreneurship inquiry. Entrepreneurship Research Journal, 2(1), Article 1. https://doi.org/10.2202/2157-5665.1064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macke, D., Markley, D., & Fulwider, J. (2014). Energizing entrepreneurial communities: A pathway to prosperity. Center for Rural Entrepreneurship.
   Google Scholar
• MacQueen, K. M., Harlan, S. V., Slevin, K. W., Hannah, S., Bass, E., & Moffett, J. (2012). Stakeholder engagement toolkit. FHI 360. http://fhi360.org/sites/default/files/media/documents/Stakeholder_Engagement_Toolkit-FULL_0.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mahadevia, D., & Lathia, S. (2019). Women’s safety and public spaces: Lessons from the Sabarmati riverfront, India. Urban Planning, 4(2), 154–168. https://doi.org/10.17645/up.v4i2.2049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mamabolo, A., & Myres, K. (2020). Performance measurement in emerging market social enterprises using a balanced scorecard. Journal of Social Entrepreneurship, 11(1), 65–87. https://doi.org/10.1080/19420676.2018.1561499
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Markley, D. M., Lyons, T. S., & Macke, D. W. (2015). Creating entrepreneurial communities: Building community capacity for ecosystem development. Community Development, 46(5), 580–598. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1041539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMullen, J. S. (2018). Organizational hybrids as biological hybrids: Insights for research on the relationship between social enterprise and the entrepreneurial ecosystem. Journal of Business Venturing, 33(5), 575–590. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2018.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPherson, M. Q., Friesner, D., & Bozman, C. S. (2020). Mapping the interrelationships between community assets. International Journal of Social Economics, 47(10), 1299–1309. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJSE-04-2020-0206
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McPolin, N. (2020). Employee engagement from the bottom up. People Development Magazine, August 22. https://peopledevelopmentmagazine.com/2020/08/22/employee-engagement-from-the-bottom-up/
   Google Scholar
• Montgomery, A. W., Dacin, P. A., & Dacin, M. T. (2012). Collective social entrepreneurship: Collaboratively shaping social good. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 375–388. https://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1501-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morais, L. P., & Bacic, M. J. (2020). Social and solidarity economy and its need for an entrepreneuring ecosystem: Current challenges in Brazil. CIRIEC – Espana, 98, 5–30. https://doi.org/10.7203/CIRIEC-E.98.14138
   Google Scholar
• Murerwa, B., Mwali, A. K., & Radeny, S. (2022). Engaging communities to improve health care quality through the Citizen Voice and Action approach. IntraHealth International.
   Google Scholar
• Neef, A., & Neubert, D. (2011). Stakeholder participation in agricultural research projects: A conceptual framework for reflection and decision-making. Agriculture and Human Values, 28, 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-010-9272-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neves de Almeida, H., & Costa e Silva, A. M. (2017). Critical reflections concerning the concept of participation in social intervention and research. European Journal of Social Sciences (Education & Research), 11(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.26417/ejser.v11i2.p293-300
   Google Scholar
• Norad. (2013). A framework for analysing participation in development ( Report No. 1/2013). Norwegian Agency for Development Cooperation.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2011). Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nussbaum, M. (2019). The cosmopolitan tradition: A noble but flawed ideal. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nyssens, M., & Huybrechts, B. (2020). Social enterprises and their ecosystems in Europe: Country Report Belgium. European Union.
   Google Scholar
• O’Shea, G., Steffen, F., & Hakala, H. (2021). The buzz before business: A design science study of a sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystem. Small Business Economics, 56, 1097–1120. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00256-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okuneviciute Neverauskiene, L., & Pranskeviciute, I. (2021). Hybridity of social enterprise models and ecosystems. Journal of International Studies, 14(1), 41–59. https://doi.org/10.14254/2071-8330.2021/14-1/3
   Google Scholar
• Pagani, M., & Malacarne, G. (2017). Experiential engagement and active vs. passive behavior in mobile location-based social networks: The moderating role of privacy. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37(1), 133–148. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.intmar.2016.10.001
   Google Scholar
• Parwez, S. (2017). Community-based entrepreneurship: Evidences from a retail case study. Journal of Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 6(14), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13731-017-0074-z
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, S., & Mukherjee, S. (2020). Entrepreneurial ecosystem and social entrepreneurship: Case studies of community-based craft from Kutch, India. Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy, 15(3), 350–374. https://doi.org/10.1108/JEC-06-2020-0112
   Google Scholar
• Petiwala, A., Lanford, D., Landers, G., & Minyard, K. (2021). Community voice in cross-sector alignment: Concepts and strategies from a scoping review of the health collaboration literature. BMC Public Health, 21, 712–723. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10741-9
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pfeilstetter, R. (2020). Doing good and selling goods: Hybrid commodities in the social enterprise ecosystem. VOLUNTAS: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 31, 511–520. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-020-00194-w
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pham, T. (2018). The capability approach and evaluation of community-driven development programs. Journal of Human Development and Capabilities, 19(2), 166–180. https://doi.org/10.1080/19452829.2017.1412407
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinto, H., Ferreira, S., & Guerreiro, J. A. (2021). The emergence of a social innovation system in Portugal: An exploratory approach based on the perspective of strategic stakeholders. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 6(2), 15–34. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.21-2.2
   Google Scholar
• Pretty, J. (1995). Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development, 23(8), 1247–1263. https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-750X(95)00046-F
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purkayastha, D., Tripathy, T., & Das, B. (2020). Understanding the ecosystem of microfinance institutions in India. Social Enterprise Journal, 16(3), 243–261. https://doi.org/10.1108/SEJ-08-2019-0063
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Quigley, W. P., & Riley, J. M. (2012). Ten questions for social change lawyers. Loyola Public Interest Law Reporter, 17(3), 204–211. http://lawatthemargins.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Bills10Questions-1.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rehman Cheema, A., & Riaz, M. (2022). Community-based paralegals to build just societies: insights from a legal empowerment project in Pakistan. Community Development Journal, 57(4), 695–712. https://doi.org/10.1093/cdj/bsab041
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robeyns, I., & Byskov, M. F. (2021). The capability approach. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2021 Edition). The Metaphysics Research Lab. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2021/entries/capability-approach/
   Google Scholar
• Roundy, P. T. (2017). Social entrepreneurship and entrepreneurial ecosystems: Complementary or disjoint phenomena? International Journal of Social Economics, 44(9), 1252–1267. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2893165
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roundy, P. T. (2020). Regional differences in impact investment: A theory of impact investing ecosystems. Social Responsibility Journal, 16(4), 467–485. https://doi.org/10.1108/SRJ-11-2018-0302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roxas, H. B., & Azmat, F. (2014). Community social capital and entrepreneurship: Analyzing the links. Community Development, 45(2), 135–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2014.880495
   Google Scholar
• Roy, M. J., McHugh, N., Huckfield, L., Kay, A., & Donaldson, C. (2015). ‘The most supportive environment in the world’? Tracing the development of an institutional “ecosystem“ for social enterprise. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Relations, 26(3), 777–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11266-014-9459-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarma, S., & Sunny, S. A. (2017). Civic entrepreneurial ecosystems: Smart city emergence in Kansas City. Business Horizons, 60(6), 843–853. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bushor.2017.07.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scott, S., Hughes, M., & Ribeiro-Soriano, D. (2022). Towards a network-based view of effective entrepreneurial ecosystems. Review of Managerial Science, 16, 157–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-021-00440-5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sharp, J. S., & Flora, J. L. (1999). Entrepreneurial social infrastructure and growth machine characteristics associated with industrial-recruitment and self-development strategies in nonmetropolitan communities. Journal of the Community Development Society, 30(2), 131–153. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575339909489718
   Google Scholar
• Sifferlin, A. (2014). Here’s how the ALS ice bucket challenge actually started. TIME, August 18. https://time.com/3136507/als-ice-bucket-challenge-started/
   Google Scholar
• Somers, A. B. (2005). Shaping the balanced scorecard for use in UK social enterprises. Social Enterprise Journal, 1(1), 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1108/17508610580000706
   Google Scholar
• Spigel, B. (2017). The relational organization of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Entrepreneurial Theory and Practice, 41(1), 49–72. https://doi.org/10.1111/etap.12167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spigel, B., & Harrison, R. (2018). Toward a process theory of entrepreneurial ecosystems. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 12(1), 151–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.1268
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spilling, O. R. (1996). The entrepreneurial system: On entrepreneurship in the context of a mega-event. Journal of Business Research, 36(1), 91–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/0148-2963(95)00166-2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Underhill-Sem, Y., & Lewis, N. (2008). Asset mapping and Whanau action research: ‘New’ subjects negotiating the politics of knowledge in Te Rarawa. Asia Pacific Viewpoint, 49(3), 305–317. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8373.2008.00379.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN Women. (2018). Fourth UN Women safe cities and safe public spaces global leaders’ forum: Proceedings report.
   Google Scholar
• Varisa Patraporn, R. (2015). Complex transactions: Community development financial institutions lending to ethnic entrepreneurs in Los Angeles. Community Development, 46(5), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/15575330.2015.1079541
   Google Scholar
• Villegas-Mateos, A., & Vázquez-Maguirre, M. (2020). Social entrepreneurial ecosystems: A regional perspective of Mexico. International Journal of Entrepreneurship, 24(1), 1–19. https://www.abacademies.org/articles/social-entrepreneurial-ecosystems-a-regional-perspective-of-mexico-8976.html
   Google Scholar
• Volkmann, C., Fichter, K., Klofsten, M., & Audretsch, D. B. (2019). Sustainable entrepreneurial ecosystems: An emerging field of research. Small Business Economics, 56(3), 1047–1055. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-019-00253-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke, T. (2013). Entrepreneurship and gender: An institutional perspective. Journal of Economic Issues, 47(2), 455–463. https://doi.org/10.2753/JEI0021-3624470219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke, T. (2016a). Capabilities, human development, and design thinking: A framework for gender-sensitive entrepreneurship programs. Review of Social Economy, 74(4), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00346764.2016.1201136
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warnecke, T. (2016b). Informal sector entrepreneurship for women in China and India: Building networks, gaining recognition, and obtaining support. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 28(6), 479–491. https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2016.1202092
   Google Scholar
• Warner, M., & Daugherty, C. W. (2004). Promoting the ‘Civic’ in Entrepreneurship: The Case of Rural Slovakia. Journal of the Community Development Society, 35(1), 117–134.
   Google Scholar
• Weiler, M., Weiler, A., & McKenzie, D. (2015). Co-design: A powerful force for creativity and collaboration. Medium, October 15. https://medium.com/@thestratosgroup/co-design-a-powerful-force-for-creativity-and-collaboration-bed1e0f13d46
   Google Scholar
• Wells, R., Ward, A. J., Feinberg, M., & Alexander, J. A. (2008). What motivates people to participate more in community-based coalitions? American Journal of Community Psychology, 42(1–2), 94–104. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-008-9182-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, S. C. (1996). Depoliticising development: The uses and abuses of participation. Development in Practice, 6(1), 6–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/0961452961000157564
   Google Scholar
• Zafeiropoulou, F. A., & Koufopoulos, D. N. (2013). The influence of relational embeddedness on the formation and performance of social franchising. Journal of Marketing Channels, 20(1–2), 73–98. https://doi.org/10.1080/1046669X.2013.747861
   Google Scholar
• Zitcer, A., Hawkins, J., & Vakharia, N. (2016). A capabilities approach to arts and culture? Theorizing community development in West Philadelphia. Planning Theory & Practice, 17(1), 35–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/14649357.2015.1105284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar