195
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Measuring the Impact of Using Daily Objectives to Provide Rapid Feedback in Construction Courses

, PhD, PE ORCID Icon & , PhD ORCID Icon

References

  • Acevedo, M. M. (2014). Collaborating with faculty to compose exemplary learning objectives. Internet Learning Journal, 3(1), 5–16.
  • Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21(1), 93–108. doi: 10.1080/03075079612331381487.
  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. (Eds.). (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy of educational objectives. New York: Longman.
  • Astin, A. (1975). Preventing students from dropping out. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Astin, A. (1977). What matters most in college: Four critical years. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Biggs, J. (2003). Aligning teaching and assessing to course objectives. Teaching and Learning in Higher Education: New Trends and Innovations, April, 13–17.
  • Chen, H. L., Lattuca, L. R., & Hamilton, E. R. (2008). Conceptualizing engagement: Contributions of faculty to student engagement in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 339–353.
  • Chen, J. C., Whittinghill, D. C., & Kadlowec, J. A. (2010). Classes that click: Fast, rich feedback to enhance student learning and satisfaction. Journal of Engineering Education, 99(2), 159–168.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Associates.
  • Crowe, A., Dirks, C., & Wenderoth, M. P. (2008). Biology in bloom: Implementing Bloom’s Taxonomy to enhance student learning in biology. Life Science Education, 7(4), 368–381. doi: 10.1187/cbe.08-05-0024.
  • Estes, A. C., Welch, R. W., & Meyer, F. (2005, June). Board notes and Questioning: Two time-tested techniques for effective teaching. Paper presented at the 2005 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Portland, OR. https://peer.asee.org/15262
  • Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (1997). Objectively speaking. Chemical Engineering Education, 31(3), 178–179.
  • Felder, R. M., Woods, D. R., Stice, J. E., & Rugarcia, A. (2000). The future of engineering education II: Teaching methods that work. Chemical Engineering Education, 34(1), 26–39.
  • Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2003). Designing and teaching courses to satisfy the ABET engineering criteria. Journal of Engineering Education, 92(1), 7–25.
  • Felder, R. M., & Brent, R. (2009). The 10 worst teaching mistakes II: Mistakes 1-4. Chemical Engineering Education, 43(1), 15–16.
  • Felder, R. M., Brent, R., Prince, M., & Reid, K. (2011, June). Atlanta, GA: National Effective Teaching Institute, American Society for Engineering Education.
  • Gezer, M., Sunker, M. O., & Sahin, I. F. (2014). An evaluation of the exam questions of social studies course according to revised Bloom’s taxonomy. Education Science and Psychology, 2(28), 3–17.
  • Gronlund, N. E. (2004). Writing instructional objectives for teaching and assessment, (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  • Jenkins, A., & Unwin, D. (1996). Writing learning outcomes for the core curriculum. Last modified June 27, 1996, accessed November 4, 2014, http://www.ncgia.ucsb.edu/giscc/units/format/outcomes.html.
  • Krathwohl, D. R. (2002). A revision of Bloom’s taxonomy: An overview. Theory Into Practice, 41 (4), 212–218. doi: 10.1207/s15430421tip4104_2.
  • Mager, R. F. (1997). Preparing instructional objectives: A critical tool in the development of effective instruction, (3rd ed.). Atlanta: The Center for Effective Performance, Inc.
  • Prince, M. (2004). Does active learning work? A review of the research. Journal of Engineering Education, 93(3). 223–231.
  • Prince, M. J., & Felder, R. M. (2006). Inductive teaching and learning methods: Definitions, comparisons, and research bases. Journal of Engineering Education, 95(2), 123–138.
  • Ramsden, P., & Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Effects of academic departments on students’ approaches to studying. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51(3), 368–383.
  • Rosenshine, B., & Meister, C. (1997). Cognitive strategy instruction in reading. In S. A. Stahl and D. A. Hayes (Eds.) Instructional models in reading. (pp. 85–107). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Schoenfeld-Tacher, R., & Sims, M. H. (2013). Course goals, competencies, and instructional objectives. Journal of Veterinary Medical Education, 40(2), 139–144. doi: 10.3138/jvme.0411-047R.
  • Schunk, D. H. (2004). Learning theories: An educational perspective (5th Ed.) Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
  • Seaman, M. (2011). Bloom’s taxonomy: It’s evolution, revision, and use in the field of education. Curriculum and Teaching Dialogue, 13(1–2), 29–43.
  • Sorby, S. A. (2009) Educational research in developing 3-D spatial skills for engineering students. International Journal of Science Education, 31(3). 459–480.
  • Sreedhar, P. (2013). Using Bloom’s taxonomy as a pedagogical tool for teaching written business communication. The IUP Journal of Soft Skills, 7(3), 51–55.
  • Talley, K., & Frazier, M. (2016). Objectives hard at work: Daily learning objectives as a feedback system. Journal of Engineering Technology, 33(1), 44–52.
  • Turning Technologies, LLC. (2014). ResponseCard RF LCD. Youngstown, Ohio accessed November 21, 2014. https://www.turningtechnologies.com/response-solutions/responsecard-rf-lcd?silo=he.
  • Turns, S. R., & Van Meter, P. N. (2011, June). Applying knowledge from educational psychology and cognitive science to a first course in thermodynamics. Paper presented at the 2011 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Vancouver, BC. https://peer.asee.org/17500
  • Welch, R., Baldwin, J., Bentler, D., Clarke, D., Gross, S., & Hitt, J. (2001, June). The ExCEED teaching workshop: Participants’ perspective and assessment. Paper presented at the 2001 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition, Albuquerque, NM. https://peer.asee.org/9249
  • Yamanaka, A., & Wu, L. Y. (2014). Rethinking trends in instructional objectives: Exploring the alignment of objectives with activities and assessment in higher education—a case study. International Journal of Instruction, 7(2), 75–88.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.