132
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Mapping Student’s Perspective of a Redesigned Curriculum in Construction Management Using Self-Determination Theory

ORCID Icon &

References

  • Adams, R. V., & Blair, E. (2019). Impact of time management behaviors on undergraduate engineering students’ performance. SAGE Open, 9(1) . https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244018824506
  • Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78, 227–236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.06.006
  • Benhart, B. L., Cabral, J. A., Ph, D., Hubbard, B. J., Ph, D., Metzinger, J. R., … Santon, S. D. (2017). Construction management curriculum transformation through project-based learning; Part 1 of a progressive case study. ASC Proceedings of the 53rd Annual Conference, 19–27.
  • Benhart, B. L., & Shaurette, M. (2012). Restructuring Purdue university’s construction management curriculum utilizing graduate competencies and American council for construction education standards. 48th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings.
  • Berk, R. A., & Theall, M. (2006). Thirteen strategies to measure college teaching: A consumer’s guide to rating scale construction, assessment, and decision making for faculty, administrators, and clinicians. Sterling, Virginia: Stylus Publishing.
  • Bombaerts, G., & Spahn, A. (2021). Simplify! using self-determination theory to prioritise the redesign of an ethics and history of technology course. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(2), 210–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1702924
  • Borrego, M., & Henderson, C. (2014). Increasing the use of evidence-based teaching in STEM higher education: A comparison of eight change strategies. Journal of Engineering Education, 103(2), 220–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jee.20040
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Chiu, T. K. F. (2022). Applying the self-determination theory (SDT) to explain student engagement in online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 54(S1), S14–S30. https://doi.org/10.1080/15391523.2021.1891998
  • Clayson, D. E. (2009). Student evaluations of teaching: Are they related to what students learn?: A meta-analysis and review of the literature. Journal of Marketing Education, 31(1), 16–30. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308324086
  • Dagenais, M. E., Hawley, D., & Lund, J. P. (2003). Assessing the effectiveness of a new curriculum: Part I. Journal of Dental Education, 67(1), 47–54. https://doi.org/10.1002/j.0022-0337.2003.67.1.tb03618.x
  • Diamond, M. R. (2004). The usefulness of structured mid-term feedback as a catalyst for change in higher education classes. Active Learning in Higher Education, 5(3), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1177/1469787404046845
  • Dowden, T., Pittaway, S., Yost, H., & McCarthy, R. (2013). Students’ perceptions of written feedback in teacher education: Ideally feedback is a continuing two-way communication that encourages progress. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 38(3), 349–362. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2011.632676
  • Fedesco, H. N., Cavin, D., & Henares, R. (2020). Field-based learning in higher education. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 20(1), 65–84. https://doi.org/10.14434/josotl.v20i1.24877
  • Filak, V. F., & Sheldon, K. M. (2003). Student psychological need satisfaction and college teacher-course evaluations. Educational Psychology, 23(3), 235–247. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144341032000060084
  • Forsey, M. G. (2010). Ethnography as participant listening. Ethnography, 11(4), 558–572. https://doi.org/10.1177/1466138110372587
  • Hansen, S. E., Defenbaugh, N., Mathieu, S. S., Garufi, L. C., & Dostal, J. A. (2021). A mixed-methods exploration of the developmental trajectory of autonomous motivation in graduate medical learners. Medical Science Educator, 31(6), 2017–2031. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-021-01396-7
  • Hartmann, A., & Gommer, L. (2021). To play or not to play: On the motivational effects of games in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 46(3), 319–343. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2019.1690430
  • Harvey, L. J., & Myers, M. D. (1995). Scholarship and practice: The contribution of ethnographic research methods to bridging the gap. Information Technology & People, 8(3), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/09593849510098244
  • Heffernan, J. M. (1973). The credibility of the credit hour: The history, use, and shortcomings of the credit system. The Journal of Higher Education, 44(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.2307/1980626
  • Henriques, P. L., Matos, P. V., Jerónimo, H. M., Mosquera, P., da Silva, F. P., & Bacalhau, J. (2018). University or polytechnic? A fuzzy-set approach of prospective students’ choice and its implications for higher education institutions’ managers. Journal of Business Research, 89, 435–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2017.12.024
  • Honkala, M., Heikkinen, S., Lehtovuori, A., & Leppävirta, J. (2015). Do autonomously motivated students benefit from collaborative learning methods? Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON), 2015 IEEE, 297–300.
  • Huchel, B. (2020). Purdue University using Lilly endowment grant to create innovation engine for transforming higher ed learning. https://www.purdue.edu/newsroom/releases/2020/Q4/purdue-using-lilly-endowment-grant-to-create-innovation-engine-for-transforming-higher-ed-learning.html
  • Jonker, G., Booij, E., Otte, W. R., Vlijm, C. M., Cate, O. T., & Hoff, R. G. (2018). An elective entrustable professional activity-based thematic final medical school year: An appreciative inquiry study among students, graduates, and supervisors. Advances in Medical Education and Practice, 9, 837–845. https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S176649
  • Jungert, T., Hubbard, K., Dedic, H., & Rosenfield, S. (2019). Systemizing and the gender gap: Examining academic achievement and perseverance in STEM. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 34(2), 479–500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10212-018-0390-0
  • Kandaswami, D. M., & Subbaiyan, A. (2020). Assessing the influence of teamwork in construction for large scale projects. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2240. https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0011068
  • Marsh, H. W. (1987). Students’ evaluations of university teaching: Research findings, methodological issues, and directions for future research. International Journal of Educational Research, 11(3), 253–388. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-0355(87)90001-2
  • Maurer, T. W., Allen, D., Gatch, D. B., Shankar, P., & Sturges, D. (2013). A comparison of student academic motivations across three course disciplines. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning, 13(5), 77–89. https://digitalcommons.georgiasouthern.edu/ecology-facpubs/16
  • McHugh, M. L. (2012). Lessons in biostatistics interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemica Medica, 22(3), 276–282. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2012.031
  • Niemiec, C. P., & Ryan, R. M. (2009). Autonomy, competence, and relatedness in the classroom:Applying self-determination theory to educational practice. Theory and Research in Education, 7(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/1477878509104318
  • Nodine, T. R. (2016). How did we get here? A brief history of competency-based higher education in the United States. The Journal of Competency-Based Education, 1(1), 5–11. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1004
  • Persky, A. M., Greene, J. M., Anksorus, H., Fuller, K. A., & McLaughlin, J. E. (2019). Developing a comprehensive first-year capstone to assess and inform student learning and curriculum effectiveness. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 83(5), 804–813. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6730
  • Reeve, J. (2002). Self-determination theory applied to educational settings. In Handbook of self-determination research (pp. 183–204). Rochester, New York: The University of Rochester Press.
  • Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2019). Brick by brick: The origins, development, and future of self-determination theory. In Advances in motivation science (Vol. 6, pp. 111–156). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2019.01.001
  • Santon, S. D., Metzinger, J. R., Cabral, J. A., Benhart, B. L., & Morgan, P. C. (2018). Construction management curriculum transformation through project-based learning: Part 2 of a progressive case study. 54th ASC Annual International Conference Proceedings, 23–31.
  • Saviz, C. M., Schulz, K. C., King, W. J., & Turpin, R. H. (2001). Assessment measures to enhance teaching and curriculum effectiveness. Proceedings - Frontiers in Education Conference, 1, 7–12.
  • Shedd, J. M. (2003). The history of the student credit hour. New Directions for Higher Education, 122(122), 5–12. https://doi.org/10.1002/he.106
  • Sherry, A. C., Fulford, C. P., & Zhang, S. (1998). Assessing distance learners’ satisfaction with instruction: A quantitative and a qualitative measure. American Journal of Distance Education, 21(3), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/08923649809527002
  • Simpson, P. M., & Siguaw, J. A. (2000). Student Evaluations of Teaching: An Exploratory Study of the Faculty Response. Journal of Marketing Education, 22(3), 199–213. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475300223004
  • Strimel, G. J., Krause, L., Bosman, L., Serban, S., & Harrell, S. (2020). The Next Generation for Manufacturing Competitiveness?: Investigating the Influence of Industry-Driven Outreach on Children Career Perceptions. Journal for STEM Education Research, 3(2), 232–258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-020-00028-w
  • Walkington, J. (2002). A process for curriculum change in engineering education. European Journal of Engineering Education, 27(2), 133–148. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043790210129603
  • Wang, K., & Zhu, C. (2019). MOOC-based flipped learning in higher education: Students’ participation, experience and learning performance. Int J Educ Technol High Educ, 16(1), 33. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-019-0163-0
  • Zabaleta, F. (2007). The use and misuse of student evaluations of teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 12(1), 55–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/13562510601102131

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.