Nonprofit Board Culture and the Public Trust: Reconciling Rival Ideals

Bibliography

• Argote, L., and J. E. McGrath. 1993. “Group Processes in Organizations: Continuity and Change.” International Review of Industrial and Social Psychology 8: 334–389.
   Google Scholar
• Barrett, D. W. 1996. “A Call for More Lenient Director Liability Standards for Small, Charitable Nonprofit Corporations.” Indiana Law Journal 71: 967–1001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bell, P. D. 1993. “Fulfilling the Public Trust: Ten Ways to Help Nonprofit Boards Maintain Accountability.” Washington, D.C.: National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
   Google Scholar
• Bettenhausen, K. L., and J. K. Mumighan. 1991. “The Development and Stability of Norms in Groups Facing Interpersonal and Structural Challenge.” Administrative Science Quarterly 36: 20–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourgeois, L. J. 1985. “Strategic Goals, Environmental Uncertainty, and Economic Performance in Volatile Environments.” Academy of Management Journal 28: 548–573.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradshaw, P, B. Stoops, B. Hayday, and R. Rykert Armstrong. 1998. “Nonprofit Governance Models: Problems and Prospects.” Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Seattle.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, J. 1997. Boards That Make a Difference: A New Design for Leadership in Nonprofit and Public Organizations. 2d ed. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Chait, R. P, T. P. Holland, and B. E. Taylor. 1993. The Effective Board of Trustees. Phoenix: Oryx.
   Google Scholar
• Chait, R. P., T. P. Holland, and B. E. Taylor. 1996. Improving the Performance of Governing Boards. Phoenix: Oryx.
   Google Scholar
• Clark, K. 1996. “Do We Have Enough Ethics in Government Yet? An Answer from Fiduciary Theory.” University of Illinois Law Review 1: 57–102.
   Google Scholar
• Dess, G. W, and W. Beard. 1984. “Dimensions of Organizational Task Environments.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 52–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, B. 1980. “The Common Good and the Public Interest.” Political Theory 8: 103–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duerst-Lahti, G., and R. M. Kelley, eds. 1995. Gender, Power, Leadership, and Governance. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenberg, M. A. 1997. “The Director’s Duty of Care in Negotiated Dispositions.” University of Miami Law Review 51: 579–604.
   Google Scholar
• Eisenhardt, K., and C. Schoonhoven. 1990. “Organizational Growth: Linking Founding Team, Strategy, Environment, and Growth Among U.S. Semiconductor Ventures.” Administrative Science Quarterly 35: 504–529.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, K. 1984. The Feminist Case Against Bureaucracy. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Forbes, D. P, and F. J. Milliken. 1999. “Cognition and Corporate Governance: Understanding Boards of Directors as Decisionmaking Groups.” Academy of Management Review 24: 489–505.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersick, C. 1988. “Time and Transition in Work Teams: Toward a New Model of Group Development.” Academy of Management Journal 31: 9–41.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibelman, M., S. R. Gelman, and D. Pollack. 1997. “The Credibility of Nonprofit Boards: A View from the 1990s and Beyond.” Administration in Social Work 212: 21–40.
   Google Scholar
• Gladstein, D. L. 1984. “A Model of Task Group Effectiveness.” Administrative Science Quarterly 29: 499–517.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Golden-Biddle, K., and H. Rao. 1997. “Breaches in the Boardroom: Organizational Identity and Conflicts of Commitment in a Nonprofit Organization.” Organization Science 8: 593–611.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Held, V. 1993. Feminist Morality: Transforming Culture, Society, and Politics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Herman, R. D., D. O. Renz, and R. D. Heimovics. 1997. “Board Practices and Board Effectiveness in Local Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 7: 373–385.
   Google Scholar
• Hogg, M. A., and D. Abrams. 1988. Social Identification: A Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations and Group Processes. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hopkins, B. R. 1996. The Legal Answer Book for Nonprofit Organizations. 2d ed. New York: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Houle, C. O. 1997. Governing Boards: Their Nature and Nurture. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, S. 1992. “Consequences of Group Composition for the Interpersonal Dynamics of Strategic Issue Processing.” In J. Dutton, A. Huff, and P. Shrivastava, eds. Advances in Strategic Management 8: 345–382. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Jeavons, T. H. 1992. “When Management Is the Message: Relating Values to Management Practice in Nonprofit Organizations.” Nonprofit Management and Leadership 2: 403–417.
   Google Scholar
• Jeavons, T. H. 1994. “Ethics in Nonprofit Management: Creating a Culture of Integrity.” In The Jossey-Bass Handbook of Nonprofit Leadership and Management, edited by R. D. Herman et al., 184–207. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Jehn, K. A. 1995. “A Multimethod Examination of the Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict.” Administrative Science Quarterly 40: 256–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones, K. B. 1993. Compassionate Authority: Democracy and the Representation of Women. New York: Routledge, Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Kanter, R. M., and D. V Summers. 1987. “Doing Well While Doing Good: Dilemmas of Performance Measurement in Nonprofit Organizations and the Need for a Multiple-Constituency Approach.” In The Nonprofit Sector: A Research Handbook, edited by W. Powell, 154–166. New Haven: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kearns, K. P. 1996. “Managing for Accountability: Preserving the Public Trust in Public and Nonprofit Organizations.” Public Administration Review 542: 185–192.
   Google Scholar
• Kurtz, D. L. 1988. Board Liability: Guide for Nonprofit Directors. Mt. Kisco, N.Y.: Moyer Bell.
   Google Scholar
• Leifer, J. C., and M. B. Glomb. 1997. The Legal Obligations of Nonprofit Boards. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
   Google Scholar
• Mace, M. 1971. Directors: Myth and Reality. 2d ed. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, J. 1996. “Morality in Investing: Fewer Colleges Let Ethical Concerns Control How They Place Their Funds.” Chronicle of Higher Education, March 29, A49–A51.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L. 1999. “Managing Board Diversity: The Importance of Differentiating Between Diversity and Representativeness.” In Perspectives on Nonprofit Board Diversity. Washington, D.C.: National Center for Nonprofit Boards.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, J. L., and B. M. Lakey. 1999. “The Nonprofit Board Self-Assessment Process: Lessons from the Field.” Paper presented at the national meeting of the Association for Research on Nonprofit Organizations and Voluntary Action, Washington, D.C.
   Google Scholar
• Odendahl, T., and M. O’Neill, eds. 1992. Women and Power in the Nonprofit Sector. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• O’Neill, M. 1994. “Ethical Dimensions of Nonprofit Administration.” In Handbook of Administrative Ethics. Edited by T. L. Cooper. New York: Marcel Dekker.
   Google Scholar
• Peregrine, M. W. 1995. “Doing ‘Big Deals’ and the Board’s Duty of Care.” Journal of Health and Hospital Law 28: 327–335.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Smith, D. H. 1995. Entrusted: The Moral Dimension of Trusteeship. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M. 1989. “Planning as Strategy in Nonprofit Organizations: An Exploratory Study.” Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 18: 297–315.
   Google Scholar
• Stone, M. M. 1996. “Competing Contexts: The Evolution of Nonprofit Organization’s Governance System in Multiple Environments.” Administration and Society 28: 61–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tajfel, H. 1982. “Social Psychology of Intergroup Relations.” Annual Review of Psychology 33: 1–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., and S. C. Shaw. 1995. Reinventing Fundraising: Realizing the Potential of Women’s Philanthropy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Tsui, A., T. D. Egan, and C. A. O’Reilly. 1992. “Being Different: Relational Demography and Organizational Attachment.” Administrative Science Quarterly 37: 549–579.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W. 1965. “Developmental Sequence in Small Groups.” Psychological Bulletin 63, no. 3: 384–399.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuckman, B. W., and M. A. Jensen. 1977. “Stages of Small-group Development Revisited.” Group and Organization Studies 2: 419–427.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. 1987. Rediscovering the Social Group: A Self-categorization Theory. Oxford: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Veasey, N. E. 1997. “The Defining Tension.” Business Lawyer 52: 393–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wall, V, and L. Nolan. 1986. “Perceptions of Inequity, Satisfaction, and Conflict in Task-Oriented Groups.” Human Relations 39: 1033–1052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watson, W., and L. Michaelsen. 1988. “Group Interaction Behaviors That Affect Group Performance on an Intellective Task.” Group and Organization Studies 13: 495–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar