Rethinking Land Rights: Divesting Ownership of Its Dominative Features

References

• Anstey, Thomas. [1632] 1978. The Lawes Resolutions of Women’s Rights. New York: Garland.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, Lawrence. 1980. “The Moral Basis of Property Rights.” In NOMOS XXII: Property, edited by J. Roland Pennock and John W. Chapman, 189–209. New York: New York University.
   Google Scholar
• Erickson, Amy Louise. 1993. Women and Property in Early Modern England. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Gaard, Greta. 1997. “Ecofeminism and Wilderness.” Environmental Ethics 19, no. 1: 5–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilligan, Carol. 1982. In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, Mass.: Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Goodall, Jane. 1986. The Chimpanzees of Gombe: Patterns of Behavior. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, Belnap Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hargrove, Eugene. 1980. “Anglo-American Land Use Attitudes.” Environmental Ethics 2 (Summer): 121–148.
   Google Scholar
• Hegel, Georg Wilhelm Friedrich. [1821] 1954. “The Philosophy of Right and Law, or Natural Law and Science Outlined.” In The Philosophy of Hegel. New York: Modem Library.
   Google Scholar
• Honoré, A. M. 1961. “Ownership.” In Oxford Essays in Jurisprudence. Edited by A. G. Guest. First Series. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Hume, David. [1751] 1989.Enquires Concerning Human Understanding and Concerning the Principles of Morals. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Jefferson, Thomas. [1784] 1984. “Notes on the State of Virginia.” Query XIV Thomas Jefferson: Writings. New York: Library of America.
   Google Scholar
• Leopold, Aldo. [1949] 1987. “The Land Ethic.” In A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Locke, John. [1690] 1967. Two Treatises of Government. Edited by Peter Laslett. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Marx, Karl. [1845-1846] 1978. “The German Ideology.” The Marx-Engels Reader. Edited by Robert C. Tucker. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Mech, David. 1970. Behavior of an Endangered Species. Garden City, N.Y.: Natural History Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murray, Mary. 1995. The Law of the Father? Patriarchy in the Transition from Feudalism to Capitalism. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Noddings, Nel. 1984. Caring: A Feminine Approach to Ethics and Moral Education. Berkeley: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pateman, Carol. 1988. The Sexual Contract. Cambridge: Polity.
   Google Scholar
• Penner, J. E. 1997. The Idea of Property in Law. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Plater, Zygmunt J.B., Robert H. Abrams, and William Goldfarb. 1992. Environmental Law and Policy: A Coursebook on Nature, Law, and Society. St. Paul: West.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, Val. 1991. “Nature, Self, and Gender: Feminism, Environmental Philosophy, and the Critique of Rationalism.” Hypatia 6, 1.
   Google Scholar
• Plumwood, Val. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Rhode, Deborah L. 1989. Justice and Gender: Sex Discrimination and the Law. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Snare, Frank. 1972. “The Concept of Property.” American Philosophical Quarterly 9, no. 2: 200–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sax, Joseph L. 1980. “Liberating the Public Trust Doctrine from Its Historical Shackles.” University of California-Davis Law Review 14, no. 185: 186–194.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, Charles. 1989. Sources of the Self: The Making of the Modern Identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tronto, Joan C. 1993. Moral Boundaries: A Political Argument for an Ethic of Care. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Waldron, Jeremy. 1988. The Right to Private Property. Oxford: Clarendon.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Karen, ed. 1996. Ecological Feminist Philosophies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Warren, Karen. 1990. “The Power and Promise of Ecological Feminism.” Environmental Ethics 12: 125–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar