Encouraging Efficiency, Rewarding Quality: Lessons for School Choice Policy and Practice

REFERENCES

• A. P. (2013, May 10). The Peterbough principles. The Economist. Retrieved from http://www.economist.com/blogs/blighty/2013/05/prisoner-rehabilitation
   Google Scholar
• Aud, S. (2007). School choice by the numbers: The fiscal effect of school choice programs, 1990-2006. Indianapolis, IN: Indianapolis Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
   Google Scholar
• Aud, S., & Michos, L. (2006). Spreading freedom and saving money: The fiscal impact of the D.C. voucher program. Washington, DC: The Cato Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Barnard, J., Frangakis, C., Hill, J., & Rubin, D. (2003). Principal stratification approach to broken randomized experiments: A case study of school choice vouchers in New York City. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98(462), 299–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Batdorff, M., Maloney, L., May, J. F., Speakman, S. T., Wolf, P. J. & Cheng, A. (2014). Charter school funding: Inequality expands. Fayetteville, AR: School Choice Demonstration Project.
   Google Scholar
• Betts, J. (2005). The economic theory of school choice. In J. Betts & T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right (pp. 14–39). Washington DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Boroian, D., & Callaway, P. (2008). Franchising your business: An owner’s guide to franchising as a growth option. Olympia Fields, IL: Francorp, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cave, S., Williams, T., Jolliffee, D., & Hedderman, C. (2012). Peterborough social impact bond: An independent assessment. London, UK: Ministry of Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Chingos, M., & Peterson, P. (2012). The effects of school vouchers on college enrollment: Experimental evidence from New York City. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Costrell, R. (2010). The fiscal impact of the Milwaukee Parental Choice Program: 2010-2011 update and policy options (School Choice Demonstration Project, Report 20). Retrieved from http://www.uaedreform.org/the-fiscal-impact-of-the-milwaukee-parental-choice-program-2010-2011-update-and-policy-options/
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, J. (2008). School choice as a latent variable: Estimating the “complier average causal effect” of vouchers in Charlotte. Policy Studies Journal, 36(2), 301–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cristo Rey. (2014). History. Retrieved from available at http://www.cristoreynetwork.org
   Google Scholar
• Dixson, M. (2014). Public education finances: 2012 (Report G12-CG-ASPEF). Washington, DC: US Department of Commerce.
   Google Scholar
• Duncan, A. (2010, November 17). The new normal: Doing more with less remarks at the American Enterprise Institute. Retrieved from http://www.ed.gov/news/speeches/new-normal-doing-more-less-secretary-arne-duncans-remarks-american-enterprise-institute
   Google Scholar
• Education Week. (2013, June). High school graduation rate approaching milestone, reaches highest point in 40 years. Washington, DC: EPE Research Center. Retrieved from http://www.edweek.org/media/diplomascount2013_release.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Florida Legislative Office of Economic and Demographic Research. (2012). Revenue Estimating Conference. Retrieved from http://edr.state.fl.us/content/conferences/revenueimpact/index.cfm
   Google Scholar
• Florida Office of Program Policy Analysis and Government Accountability. (2008). The corporate tax credit scholarship program saves state dollars (Report 08-68). Retrieved from http://www.oppaga.state.fl.us/
   Google Scholar
• Forster, G. (2013). A win-win solution: The empirical evidence on school choice. Indianapolis, IN: The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1955). The role of government in education. In R. A. Solo (Ed.), Economics and the public interest (pp. 123–144). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gordon, T. (2012). State and local budgets and the great recession. Stanford Center on Poverty and Inequality (Working paper). Retrieved from https://web.stanford.edu/group/recessiontrends/cgi-bin/web/sites/all/themes/barron/pdf/StateBudgets_fact_sheet.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. P. (2001, Summer). Vouchers in Charlotte. Education Next, 1(2), 55–60.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. P., Peterson, P., & Du, J. (1998). School choice in Milwaukee: A randomized experiment. In P. Peterson & B. Hassel (Eds.), Learning from school choice (pp. 190–213). Washington DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Hamilton, L. S., & Guinn, K. (2005). Understanding how families choose schools. In J. R. Betts & T. Loveless (Eds.), Getting choice right: Ensuring equity and efficiency in education policy (pp. 40–60). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Heilbrun, J. (2013). Baumol’s cost disease. In R. Towse ( Ed), A handbook of cultural economics (2nd ed. , pp. 91–101). Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Herold, T. S. (2014, January). The 2014 Franchise 500. Entrepreneur Magazine, pp. 181–188.
   Google Scholar
• Howell, W., & Peterson, P. (2002). The education gap: Vouchers and urban schools. Washington DC: Brookings Institutions.
   Google Scholar
• Jin, H., Barnard, J., & Rubin, D. (2010). A modified general location model for noncompliance with missing data: Revisiting the New York City school choice scholarship program using principal stratification. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35, 154–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KIPP. (2014). The history of KIPP. Retrieved from http://www.kipp.org/about-kipp/history
   Google Scholar
• Krueger, A., & Zhu, P. (2004). Another look at the New York City school voucher experiment. American Behavioral Scientist, 47(5),658–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. (2002). School vouchers: A critical view. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ladner, M. (2014, January 30). Liberty, efficiency, and equity: Reformatting parental choice for the challenges of the 21st century. Conference Paper prepared for New and Better Schools. Washington DC: American Enterprise Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Ladner, M. (2015). Turn and face the strain: Age demographic change and the near future of American education. Tallahassee, FL: Foundation for Excellence in Education.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, J., Hardymon, F., & Leamon, A. (2012). Venture capital and private equity: A casebook. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Lochner, L., & Moretti, E. (2004). The effect of education on crime: Evidence from prison inmates, arrests, and self-reports. American Economic Review, 94(1), 155–189.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T., & Chubb, J. (2009). Liberating learning. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Muenning, P. (2007). Consequences in health status and costs. In C. R. Belfield & H. M. Levin (Ed.), The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of inadequate education (pp. 125–141). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2013). The nation’s report card: Trends in academic progress 2012 (NCES 2013 456). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Pennsylvania Department of Public Welfare. (2014). Fact sheet: Medicaid expansion and Pennsylvania. Retrieved from http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/.../aca-ma_expansion_sheet_pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pew Charitable Trust. (2014). The fiscal health of state pension plants: Funding gaps continue to grow. Washington, DC: Pew Charitable Trust.
   Google Scholar
• Public Impact. (2012). Redesigning schools: Models to reach every student with excellent teachers: Model summaries. Chapel Hill, NC: Author. Retrieved from http://opportunityculture.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/Model_Summaries-Public_Impact.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pudelek, J. (2013). HM prison Peterborough social impact bond has led to a fall in reconvictions, official figures show. ThirdSector. Retrieved from http://www.thirdsector.co.uk/news/1186265/
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, C. (1998). Private school vouchers and student achievement: An evaluation of the Milwaukee parental choice program. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113(2), 553–602.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouse, C. E. (2007). Consequences for the labor market. In C. R. Belfield & H. M. Levin (Eds.), The price we pay: Economic and social consequences of inadequate education (pp. 99–124). Washington, DC: Brookings.
   Google Scholar
• Scafidi, B. (2012). The school staffing surge: Decades of employment growth in America’s public schools. Indianapolis, IN: The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
   Google Scholar
• Shook, C., & Shook, R. (1993). Franchising: The business strategy that changed the world. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Simon & Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Smarick, A. (2014). What private school choice can learn from chartering. Washington, DC: AEI.
   Google Scholar
• Spaulding, J. (2014). The school voucher audit: Do publicly funded private school choice programs save money? Indianapolis, IN: The Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
   Google Scholar
• State of Illinois. (2014). State budget, fiscal year 2015. Retrieved from http://www2.illinois.gov/gov/budget/Documents/Budget%20Book/FY%202015%20Budget%20Book/FY%202015%20Illinois%20Operating%20Budget%20Book.pdf
   Google Scholar
• State of Pennsylvania. (2014). 2014-15 budget in brief. Retrieved from http://www.portal.state.pa.us/portal/server.pt/document/1393860/2014-15_budget_in_brief_web_pdf
   Google Scholar
• Stewart, T., & Wolf, P. J. (2014). The school choice journey. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• United States Census Bureau. (2012). 2012 national population projections. Retrieved from http://www.census.gov/population/projections/data/national/2012.html
   Google Scholar
• Vincent, G. K., & Velkoff, V. A. (2010). The next four decades: The older population in the United States: 2010 to 2050 (Report P25-1138). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Department.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, P., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Kisida, B., Rizzo, L., Eissa, N., & Carr, M. (2010). Evaluation of the DC opportunity scholarship program (Final Report NCEE report 2010-4018). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. J., & McShane, M. (2013). Is the juice worth the squeeze? A benefit/cost analysis of the District of Columbia Opportunity Scholarship Program. Education Finance and Policy, 8(1), 74–99.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wong, V. (2010, December 2). Are Americans as poor as they feel? Bloomberg Business. Retrieved from http://www.bloomberg.com/bw/lifestyle/content/dec2010/bw2010122_206420.htm
   Google Scholar