Who is More Free? A Comparison of the Decision-Making of Private and Public School Principals

References

• Abdulkadiroglu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Walters, C. R. (2015). School vouchers and student achievement: First-year evidence from the Louisiana Scholarship Program. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.
   Google Scholar
• Bettinger, E., & Slonim, R. (2006). Using experimental economics to measure the effects of a natural educational experiment on altruism Journal of Public Economics, 90(8), 1625–1648.
   Google Scholar
• Booker, K., Sass, T. R., Gill, B., & Zimmer, R. (2008). Going beyond test scores: Evaluating charter school impact on educational attainment in Chicago and Florida (Working Paper WR-610-BMG). Santa Monica, CA: Rand Education.
   Google Scholar
• Borooah, V. K. (2001). Logit and probit: Ordered and multinomial models (Vol. 138). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Branch, G. F., Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2013). School leaders matter. Education Next, 13(1). Retrieved from http://hanushek.stanford.edu/sites/default/files/publications/Branch%2BHanushek%2BRivkin%202013%20EdNext%2013(1).pdf
   Google Scholar
• Campbell, D. E. (2002). The civic side of school reform: How do school vouchers affect civic education? Education Next, 1(3), 55.
   Google Scholar
• Cheng, A. (2015). Do personnel policies matter for organizational mission coherence? A public school test. Review of Public Personnel Administration. doi:10.1177/0734371X15587981
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1986). No school is an island: Politics, markets, and education. The Brookings Review, 4(4), 21–28.
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J. E., & Moe, T. M. (1988). Politics, markets, and the organization of schools. American Political Science Review, 82(04), 1065–1087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple correlation/regression analysis for the behavioral sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cowen, J. M., Fleming, D. J., Witte, J. F., Wolf, P. J., & Kisida, B. (2013). School vouchers and student attainment: Evidence from a state-mandated study of Milwaukee’s Parental Choice Program. Policy Studies Journal, 41(1), 147–168.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeAngelis, C., & Wolf, P. J. (2016). The school choice voucher: A get out of jail card? (EDRE Working Paper 2016-03). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2743541
   Google Scholar
• Deming, D. J. (2011). Better schools, less crime? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 2063–2115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dobbie, W., & Fryer, R. G. (2015). The medium-term impacts of high-achieving charter schools. Journal of Political Economy, 123(5), 985–1037.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downs, A. (1967). Inside bureaucracy. Boston, MA: Little, Brown.
   Google Scholar
• Dynarski, M., Rui, N., Webber, A., Gutmann, B., & Bachman, M. (2017). Evaluation of the DC opportunity scholarship program: Impacts after one year (NCEE 2017-4022). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Egalite, A. J. (2013). Measuring competitive effects from school voucher programs: A systematic review. Journal of School Choice, 7(4), 443–464.
   Google Scholar
• Egalite, A. J. (2016). The competitive effects of the Louisiana scholarship program on public school performance. Available at SSRN 2739783.
   Google Scholar
• Figlio, D., & Hart, C. (2014). Competitive effects of means-tested school vouchers. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(1), 133–156.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Firestone, W. A., & Shipps, D. (2005). How do leaders interpret conflicting accountabilities to improve student learning. In William Firestone and Carolyn Riehl (Eds.) A new agenda for research in educational leadership (pp. 81–100). New York, NY: Teachers College Press, Columbia University.
   Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. J. (2014). Learning from schools: School choice, political learning, and policy feedback. Policy Studies Journal, 42(1), 55–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming, D. J., Mitchell, W., & McNally, M. (2014). Can markets make citizens? School vouchers, political tolerance, and civic engagement. Journal of School Choice, 8(2), 213–236.
   Google Scholar
• Forster, G. (2016). A win-win solution: The empirical evidence on school choice. Indianapolis, IN: Friedman Foundation for Educational Choice.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M. (1955). In Robert A. Solo (Ed.) The role of government in education. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, M., & Friedman, R. (1990). Free to choose: A personal statement. Orlando, FL: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.
   Google Scholar
• Goldring, R., Gray, L., & Bitterman, A. (2013). Characteristics of public and private elementary and secondary school teachers in the United States: Results from the 2011–12 Schools and Staffing Survey (NCES 2013-314). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. P. (2005). Education myths: What special interest groups want you to believe about our schools–and why it isn’t so. Oxford, UK: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Greene, J. P., & Winters, M. A. (2003). When schools compete: The effects of vouchers on Florida Public School achievement. New York, NY: Center for Civic Innovation, Manhattan Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Grissom, J. A., Loeb, S., & Master, B. (2013). Effective instructional time use for school leaders: Longitudinal evidence from observations of principals. Educational Researcher, 42(8), 433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M. (2013). Cage-busting leadership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, J., Ottem, R., DeRoche, J., & Owens, C. (2016). Trends in public and private school principal demographics and qualifications: 1987-88 to 2011-12. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Hill, P., Pierce, L. C., & Guthrie, J. W. (2009). Reinventing public education: How contracting can transform America’s schools. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. (Ed.). (2007). The economics of school choice. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Lerner, A. P. (1934). The concept of monopoly and the measurement of monopoly power. The Review of Economic Studies, 1(3), 157–175.
   Google Scholar
• Levenson, N. (2012). Smarter budgets, smarter schools. Cambridge: Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Maranto, R., McShane, M. Q., & Rhinesmith, E. (2016). Education reform in the Obama era: The second term and the 2016 election. New York, NY: Palgrave/Macmillan Pivot.
   Google Scholar
• Maranto, R., Teodoro, M., Cheng, A., & Carroll, K. (2016, September 3). Gender, career paths & bureaucratic ambition in public schools. Paper presented at annual American Political Science Association meeting, Philadelphia, PA.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, J. (2008). The twelve policy approaches to increased school choice. Journal of School Choice, 2(1), 4–19.
   Google Scholar
• Mills, J. N., & Wolf, P. J. (2016). The effects of the Louisiana scholarship program on student achievement after two years. Available at SSRN 2738805.
   Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (2011). Special interest: Teachers unions and America's public schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Murphy, B. G. (2017). Inside our schools: Teachers on the failure and future of education reform. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nadelstern, E. (2013). Ten lessons from New York City schools. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neal, D. (2002). How vouchers could change the market for education. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(4), 25–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niskanen, W. A. (1971). Bureaucracy and representative government. Piscataway, NJ: Transaction Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Ong-Dean, C. (2009). Distinguishing disability: Parents, privilege, and special education. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouchi, W. G. (2009). The secret of TSL: The revolutionary discovery that raises school performance. New York, NY: Simon and Schuster.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, C. M. (2008). So much reform, so little change: The persistence of failure in urban schools. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E. (1998). School choice: A report card. Virginia Journal of Social Policy & the Law, 6, 47.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson, P. E., & Hassel, B. C. (Eds.). (1998). Learning from school choice. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sandström, F. M., & Bergström, F. (2005). School vouchers in practice: Competition will not hurt you. Journal of Public Economics, 89(2), 351–380.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakeel, M. D., Anderson, K. P., & Wolf, P. J. (2016). The participant effects of private school vouchers across the globe: A meta-analytic and systematic review (EDRE Working Paper No. 2016-07). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2777633
   Google Scholar
• Shipps, D., & White, M. (2009). A new politics of the principalship? Accountability-driven change in New York City. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(3), 350–373.
   Google Scholar
• Tekleselassie, A. A., & Villarreal, P., III. (2011). Career mobility and departure intentions among school principals in the United States: Incentives and disincentives. Leadership and Policy in Schools, 10(3), 251–293.
   Google Scholar
• Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. The Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tooley, J. (2005). Reclaiming education. London, UK: Bloomsbury Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Tooley, J., Bao, Y., Dixon, P., & Merrifield, J. (2011). School choice and academic performance: Some evidence from developing countries. Journal of School Choice, 5(1), 1–39.
   Google Scholar
• West, E. G. (1981). Choice or monopoly in education. Policy Review, 15(Winter), 103.
   Google Scholar
• West, E. G. (1997). Education vouchers in principle and practice: A survey. The World Bank Research Observer, 12(1), 83–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. R., Kraft, M. A., Finn, A. S., Martin, R. E., Duckworth, A. L., Gabrieli, C. F., & Gabrieli, J. D. (2016). Promise and Paradox-measuring students’ non-cognitive skills and the impact of schooling. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis. doi:0162373715597298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, M. R., & Woessmann, L. (2010). Every Catholic child in a Catholic school: Historical resistance to state schooling, contemporary private competition and student achievement across countries. The Economic Journal, 120(546), F229–F255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, M. A. (2006). A case of New York City high school principals’ experiences with multiple accountability pressures and accompanying models for decision-making. New York, NY: Columbia University Teacher’s College.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, J. F. (2001). The market approach to education: An analysis of America’s first voucher program. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Witte, J. F., Wolf, P. J., Cowen, J. M., Carlson, D., & Fleming, D. F. (2014). High stakes choice: Achievement and accountability in the nation’s oldest urban voucher program. Education Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(4), 437–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, P., Kisida, B., Gutmann, B., Puma, M., Eissa, N., & Rizzo, L. (2013). School vouchers and student outcomes: Experimental evidence from Washington, DC. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 32(2), 246–270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf, P. J., & Hoople, D. S. (2006). Looking inside the black box: What school factors explain voucher gains in Washington, DC?. Peabody Journal of Education, 81(1), 7–26.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmer, R. (2009). Charter schools in eight states: Effects on achievement, attainment, integration, and competition. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation.
   Google Scholar