School Choice and Whose Choice: The Case of Direct Subsidy Scheme Schools in Hong Kong

References

• Alder, M. (1997). Looking backwards to the future: Parental choice and education policy. British Educational Research Journal, 23(3), 297–313. doi:10.1080/0141192970230304
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2003). Class strategies and the educational market: The middle classes and social advantage. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Ball, S. (2007). Education plc: Understanding private sector participation in public sector education. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Beach, D. (2010). Neoliberal restructuring in education and health professions in Europe. Current Sociology, 58(4), 551–569. doi:10.1177/0011392110367998
   Google Scholar
• Bernal, J. L. (2005). Parental choice, social class and market forces: The consequences of privatization of public services in education. Journal of Education Policy, 20(6), 779–792. doi:10.1080/02680930500293825
   Google Scholar
• Brain, J., & Klein, R. (1994). Parental choice: Myth or reality? Bath, UK: Centre for the Analysis of Social Policy.
   Google Scholar
• Bray, M. (1995). The quality of education in private schools: Historical patterns and the impact of recent policies. In P.-K. Siu & P. T.-K. Tam (Eds.), Quality in education: Insights from different perspectives (pp. 183–198). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Educational Research Association.
   Google Scholar
• Bulkley, K. E., Heniq, J. R., & Levin, H. (Eds.). (2010). Between public and private: Politics, governance, and the new portfolio models for Urban school reform. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burch, P. (2009). Hidden markets: The new education privatization. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D., & Mok, K.-H. (2001). Educational reforms and coping strategies under the tidal wave of marketisation: A comparative study of Hong Kong and the mainland. Comparative Education, 37(1), 21–41. doi:10.1080/03050060020020417
   Google Scholar
• Chan, D., & Tan, J. (2008). Privatization and the rise of direct subsidy scheme schools and independent schools in Hong Kong and Singapore. International Journal of Educational Management, 22(6), 464–487. doi:10.1108/09513540810895417
   Google Scholar
• Chubb, J., & Moe, T. (1990). What price democracy? Politics, markets, and America’s schools. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.
   Google Scholar
• Chune, W. H., & Witte, J. F. (Eds.). (1990). Choice and control in American education Vol.1: The theory of choice and control in education. London, UK: The Falmer Press.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson, P. W. (Ed.). (1992). The choice controversy. Newbury Park, Calif.: Corwin Press, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Cookson, P. W. (1994). School choice: The struggle for the soul of American education. New Haven, US: Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Corcoran, S. P., & Cordes, S. A. (2017). The economics of school choice. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.69-80). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Finance Committee, Hong Kong Legislative Council. (2019, April 11). https://www.legco.gov.hk/yr95-96/english/fc/fc/papers/fc240514.htm
   Google Scholar
• Fox, R. A., & Buchanan, N. K. (eds.). (2017). School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists. Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Gewirtz, S., Ball, S., & Bowe, R. (1995). Markets, choice and equity in education. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Census Statistics Department. (2016). Hong Kong 2016 population by-census summary results. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Government Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Education Bureau. (2011). Report of the working group on direct subsidy scheme. Hong Kong: Hong Kong Special Administrative Region.
   Google Scholar
• Hong Kong Education Bureau. http://www.edb.gov.hk/
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. L. (2011). School choice or schools’ choice? Managing in an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. doi:10.1177/0038040710375688
   Google Scholar
• Ladd, H. F. (2003). Introduction. In D. N. Plank & G. Sykes (Eds.), Choosing choice: School choice in international perspective (pp. 1–23). New York, NY: Teachers College Columbia University, Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Legislative Council Panel On Education, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region. (2000). Modifications to direct subsidy scheme (Paper No. CB(2)264/00-01(02)). Hong Kong: Hong Kong Legislative Council
   Google Scholar
• Luk, B. H.-K. (1990). Privatization and meritocracy: The real issue of the direct subsidy scheme. In A. Sweeting (Ed.), Differences and identities: Educational argument in late twentieth century Hong Kong (pp. 47–55). Hong Kong: Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.
   Google Scholar
• McTighe, J. (2017). The case for private schools. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.117-130). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Mendez, S. L., Yoo, M. S., & Rury, J. L. (2017). A brief history of public education in the United States. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Merrifield, J. (2008). School choice evidence and its significance. Journal of School Choice, 2(3), 223–259. doi:10.1080/15582150802371408
   Google Scholar
• Mok, K. H., & Welch, A. (2002). Globalization, managerialism and structural reform in education. In K. H. Mok & D. Chan (Eds.), Globalization and education: The question for quality education in Hong Kong. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nelson, F. H. (2017). The case against charter schools. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.23-40). Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Ni, Y. (2012). The sorting effect of charter schools on student composition in traditional public schools. Educational Policy, 26(2), 215–242. doi:10.1177/0895904810386598
   Google Scholar
• Orfield, G., & Frankenberg, E. (2013). Educational Delusions: Why choice can deepen inequality and how to make schools fair. Berkeley, US: University of California Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pack, G. (2017). The case for magnet schools. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.180-193). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Pendergrass, S. A., & Kern, N. (2017). The case for charters. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.237-251). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Powers, J. M., & Potterton, A. U. (2017). The case against private schooling. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.131-148). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Reay, D. (2004). Exclusivity, exclusion, and social class in urban education markets in the United Kingdom. Urban Education, 39(5), 537–560. doi:10.1177/0042085904266925
   Google Scholar
• Rossell, C. H. (2017). The case against magnet schools. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.194-214). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Rouse, C. E., & Barrow, L. (2009). School vouchers and student achievement: Recent evidence and remaining questions. Annual Review of Economics, 1(1), 17–42. doi:10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.143354
   Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, M. D. (Ed.). (1995). Concepts and issues in school choice. New York, NY: The Edwin Mellen Press.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, C. (2002). Geography of the ‘New’ education market: Secondary school choice in England and Wales. Aldershot, UK: Ashgate.
   Google Scholar
• Tse, K.-C. T. (2008). Choices for whom?: The rhetoric and reality of the direct subsidy scheme in Hong Kong (1988–2006). Education and Urban Society, 40(5), 628–652. doi:10.1177/0013124508316309
   Google Scholar
• Walford, G. (2006). Markets and Equity in Education. London, UK: Continuum.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. S. (2017). Philosophical understandings of American school choice. In R. A. Fox & N. K. Buchanan (Eds.), School choice: A Handbook for researchers, policy makers, practitioners, and journalists (pp.81-95). Hoboken, US: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. L. (2007). How middle-class parents help their children obtain in advantaged qualification: A study of strategies of teachers and managers for their children’s education in Hong Kong before the 1997 handover. Sociological Research Online, 12(6). Retrieved from http://www/socresonline.org.uk/12/6/5.html
   Google Scholar
• Wong, Y. L. (2017). Class differentials in getting parental assistance for seeking a second chance of getting into university: An illustration of community-college students in Hong Kong. Higher Education, 74, 163–178. doi:10.1007/s10734-016-0041-9
   Google Scholar
• Zhou, Y., Wong, Y. L., & Li, W. (2015). Educational choice and marketization in Hong Kong: The case of direct subsidy scheme schools. Asia Pacific Education Review, 16(4), 627–636. doi:10.1007/s12564-015-9402-9
   Google Scholar