Worth the Bargain? Collective Bargaining Agreements in Unionized Charter Schools

References

• Ableidinger, J., & Hassel, B. C. (2010). Free to lead: Autonomy in highly successful charter schools. Washington, DC: National Alliance of Public Charter Schools.
   Google Scholar
• Anzia, S. F., & Moe, T. M. (2014). Collective bargaining, transfer rights, and disadvantaged schools. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 36(1), 83–111. doi:10.3102/0162373713500524
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aragon, S. (2018). Policy snapshot: Teacher evaluation. The Education Commission of the States. Retrieved from https://www.ecs.org/wp-content/uploads/Teacher_Evaluations.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Carruthers, C. K. (2012). New schools, new students, new teachers: Evaluating the effectiveness of charter schools. Economics of Education Review, 31, 280–292. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.06.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., Feng, L., & Osborne-Lampkin, L. T. (2013). Seniority provisions in collective bargaining agreements and the “Teacher quality gap”. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 35(3), 324–343. doi:10.3102/0162373713482765
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen-Vogel, L., & Osborne-Lampkin, L. T. (2007). Allocating quality: Collective bargaining agreements and administrative discretion over teacher assignment. Educational Administration Quarterly, 43(4), 433–461. doi:10.1177/0013161X07306450
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldhaber, D., Lavery, L., & Theobald, R. (2016). Inconvenient truth? Do collective bargaining agreements help explain the mobility of teachers within school districts? Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 35(4), 848–880. doi:10.1002/pam.21914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, B. (2011). Inside charter schools: Unlocking doors to student success. Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Gross, B., & DeArmond, M. (2010). How do charter schools compete for teachers? A local perspective. Journal of School Choice, 4(3), 254–277. doi:10.1080/15582159.2010.504104
   Google Scholar
• Hess, F. M., & Loup, C. (2008). The leadership Limbo: Teacher labor agreements in America’s fifty largest school districts. Washington, DC: Thomas B Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Hoxby, C. M. (2002). Would school choice change the teaching profession? The Journal of Human Resources, 37(4), 846–891. doi:10.2307/3069619
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jabbar, H. (2018). Recruiting “talent”: School choice and teacher hiring in New Orleans. Educational Administration Quarterly, 54(1), 115–151. doi:10.1177/0013161X17721607
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jackson, C. K. (2013). Match quality, worker productivity, and worker mobility: Direct evidence from teachers. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 1096–1116. doi:10.1162/REST_a_00339
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jochim, A., & Lavery, L. (2019). “An unlikely bargain: Why charter school teachers unionize and what happens when they do.” Center on reinventing public education. Accessed on April 16, 2020. Retrirved from https://www.crpe.org/publications/unlikely-bargain-why-charter-school-teachers-unionize-and-what-happens-when-they-do.
   Google Scholar
• Kauffman, P. (2013, October). Unionized charter school contracts as a model for reform of public school job security. New York University Law Review, 88, 4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kerchner, C. T., & Koppich, J. E. (2007). Negotiating what matters most: Collective bargaining and student achievement. American Journal of Education, 113(3), 349–365. doi:10.1086/512736
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koski, W. S., & Horng, E. L. (2007). Facilitating the teacher quality gap? Collective bargaining agreements, teacher hiring and transfer rules, and teacher assignment among schools in California. Education Finance and Policy, 2(3), 262–300. doi:10.1162/edfp.2007.2.3.262
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lavery, L. (2020). A collective pursuit: Teachers unions and education reform. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levin, J., Mulhern, J., & Schunck, J. (2005). Unintended consequences: The case for reforming the staffing rules in urban teachers union contracts. The New Teacher Project, New York, NY.  Accessed on April 16, 2020. Available at:  https://tntp.org/publications/view/unintended-consequences-the-case-for-reforming-staffing-rules
   Google Scholar
• Lubienski, C. (2003). Innovation in education markets: Theory and evidence on the impact of competition and choice in charter schools. American Educational Research Journal, 40, 394–443. doi:10.3102/00028312040002395
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moe, T. M. (2009). Collective bargaining and the performance of the public schools. American Journal of Political Science, 53(1), 156–174. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5907.2008.00363.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podgursky, M. (2006). Teams versus bureaucracies: Personnel policy, wage-setting, and teacher quality in traditional public, charter, and private schools. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University National Center on School Choice.
   Google Scholar
• Podgursky, M., & Ballou, D. (2001). Personnel policy in charter schools. Washington, DC: Thomas B. Fordham Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Price, M. (2011). Are charter school unions worth the bargain? Seattle, WA: Center on Reinventing Public Education.
   Google Scholar
• Shen, F. X., & Wong, K. (2006). Beyond weak law, strong law: Political compromises and legal constraints on charter school laws. Paper presented for the 2006 annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Philadelphia, August 31-September 3.
   Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O. (2012). Policy poison or promise: Exploring the dual nature of California school district collective bargaining agreements. Educational Administration Quarterly, 48(3), 506–547. doi:10.1177/0013161X11432923
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strunk, K. O., & Reardon, S. (2010). Measuring union strength: A partial independence item response approach to measuring the restrictiveness of teachers’ unions contracts. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 35(6), 629–670. doi:10.3102/1076998609359790
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuit, D. A., & Smith, T. M. (2012). Explaining the gap in charter and traditional public school teacher turnover rates. Economics of Education Review, 31(2), 268–279. doi:10.1016/j.econedurev.2011.09.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomsen, J. (2014). 50-State comparison: Teacher tenure/continuing contract policies. The Education Commission of the States. Retrirved from https://www.ecs.org/teacher-tenure-continuing-contract-policies/
   Google Scholar
• TNTP, (2010). Teacher Evaluation 2.0. The New Teacher Project. Accessed on April 16, 2020.  Retrirved from https://tntp.org/assets/documents/Teacher-Evaluation-Oct10F.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TNTP. (2014). Shortchanged: The hidden costs of lockstep teacher pay. New York, NY.
   Google Scholar