Evaluating School Priorities for Equal Opportunity in Admission to Schools

References

• Abdulkadiroğlu, A. (2013). School choice. In M. N. Zvika Neeman, A. E. Roth, & N. Vulkan (Eds.), The handbook of market design (pp. 720). Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroglu, A., Che, Y,-A., Pathak, P.A., Roth, A.E., Tercieux, O., et al., Minimizing justified envy in school choice: The design of New Orleans’ OneApp. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper Series. Vol. No. 23265. 2017: NBER.
   Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroglu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Roth, A. E. (2009). Strategy-proofness versus efficiency in matching with indifferences: Redesigning the NYC high school match. The American Economic Review, 340(5), 1954. doi:10.1257/aer.99.5.1954
   Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroğlu, A., Pathak, P. A., & Roth, A. E. (2005). The New York City high school match. American Economic Review, 95(2), 364–367. doi:10.1257/000282805774670167
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdulkadiroglu, A., & Sönmez, T. (2003). School choice: A mechanism of design approach. American Economic Review, 93(3), 729–747. doi:10.1257/000282803322157061
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Agarwal, N., & Somaini, P. (2018). Demand analysis using strategic reports: An Application to a school choice mechanism. Econometrica, 86(2), 391–444. doi:10.3982/ECTA13615
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, R., Burgess, S., & McKenna, L. (2013). The short-run impact of using lotteries for school admissions: Early results from Brighton and Hove’s reforms. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 38(1), 149–166. doi:10.1111/j.1475-5661.2012.00511.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ansari, R. M. (2013). Chiara, NORM: Stata module to normalize variables, in statistical software components. Boston, USA: Boston College Department of Economics. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457698.html.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, J. P., Franco, S, Rubiano, E, Hoyos, A. HOI: Stata module to compute Human Opportunity Index. In: Statistical Software Components S457191, Boston College Department of Economics, Boston, USA. 2010. https://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457191.html.
   Google Scholar
• Barros, R., Ferreira, F.H.G., Vega, J.R.M., Chanduvi, J.S. Measuring inequality of opportunities in Latin America and the Caribbean. 2009. https://openknowledge.worldbank.org/handle/10986/2580, Washington, D.C.: World Bank. 1152.
   Google Scholar
• Basteck, C., Klaus, B., & Kübler, D., How lotteries in school choice help to level the playing field, Rationality and Competition Discussion Paper Series. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2016). Parental choice, neighbourhood segregation or cream skimming? An analysis of school segregation after a generalized choice reform. Journal of population economics: International research on the economics of population, household. and Human Resources, 29(4), 1155–1190.
   Google Scholar
• Borman, K. M., Eitle, T. M., Michael, D., Eitle, D. J., Lee, R., Johnson, L., Shircliffe, B. (2004). Accountability in a Postdesegregation era: The continuing significance of racial segregation in Florida’s schools. American Educational Research Journal, 41(3), 605–631. doi:10.3102/00028312041003605
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantillon, E. (2009). Regulating school choice in Brussels. DOI: 10.4000/brussels.725.
   Google Scholar
• Cantillon, E. (2017). Broadening the market design approach to school choice. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 33(4), 613–634. doi:10.1093/oxrep/grx046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coldron, J., Willis, B., & Wolstenholme, C. (2009). Selection by attainment and aptitude in English secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 57(3), 245–264. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2009.00435.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Days, D. S., The other desegregation story: Eradicating the dual school system in Hillsborough county, Florida. Fordham law review., 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Dur, U., Kominers, S. D., Pathak, P. A., & Sönmez, T. (2018). Reserve design: Unintended consequences and the demise of Boston’s Walk zones. Journal of Political Economy, 126(6), 2457–2479. doi:10.1086/699974
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eitle, D., & Eitle, T. M. (2003). Segregation and school violence. Social Forces, 82(2), 589–616. doi:10.1353/sof.2004.0007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FDOE. (2018). Guide to calculating school and district grades. FDOE. Florida, USA: Department of Education. Vol. 36.
   Google Scholar
• FDOE. (2002). Office of independent education and parental choice, Choosing a school for your child in Florida.
   Google Scholar
• Gale, D., & Shapley, L. S. (1962). College admissions and the stability of marriage. The American Mathematical Monthly, 69(1), 9. doi:10.1080/00029890.1962.11989827
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glazerman, S., & Dotter, D. (2017). Market signals: Evidence on the determinants and consequences of school choice from a citywide lottery. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 39(4), 593–619. doi:10.3102/0162373717702964
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gramberg, P. (1998). School segregation: The case of Amsterdam. Urban Studies (Routledge), 35(3), 547. doi:10.1080/0042098984907
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haan, M. D, Gautier, P., Oosterbeek, H., Klaauw, B. (2015). The performance of school assignment mechanisms in practice. London: Centre for Economic Policy Research. https://docs.iza.org/dp9118.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Hastings, J. S., Kane, T. J., & Staiger, D. O. (2009). Heterogeneous preferences and the efficacy of public school choice ( N.W.P. Series, Editor). Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Yale University, NBER. https://www.nber.org/system/files/working_papers/w12145/w12145.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• He, Y., Gaming the Boston school choice mechanism in Beijing, in Working papers/Toulouse school of economics 551. 2015, TSE: Toulouse. p. Online-Ressource (83 S.) graph. Darst.
   Google Scholar
• Janssen, R. (1992). Multiobjective decision support for environmental management. Environment & management; v. 2. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-2807-0.
   Google Scholar
• Jennings, J. (2010). School choice or school’s choice: Managing an era of accountability. Sociology of Education, 83(3), 227–247. doi:10.1177/0038040710375688
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kessel, D., & Olmez, E. (2018). School choice, admission rules and segregation in primary schools. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholms universitet, Nationalekonomiska institutionen.
   Google Scholar
• Kesten, O., & Ünver, M. U. (2015). A theory of school choice lotteries. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kimmel, E. (1992). Hillsborough county school desegregation busing and black high schools in Tampa, Florida April 1971- September 1971. Scholar Commons, University of South Florida, Sunland Tribune. 18, 7. https://digitalcommons.usf.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1240&context=sunlandtribune.
   Google Scholar
• Kloosterman, A., & Troyan, P. (2017). School choice with asymmetric information: Priority design and the curse of acceptance. New Jersey, USA: SSRN Electronic Journal. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.3982/TE3621.
   Google Scholar
• Koedel, C., Betts, J. R., Rice, L. A., & Zau, A. C. (2009). The integrating and segregating effects of school choice. Peabody Journal of Education, 84(2), 110–129. doi:10.1080/01619560902810096
   Google Scholar
• Kojima, F., & Troyan, P. (2011). Matching and market design: An introduction to selected topics. Japanese Economic Review -Oxford-, 62(1), 82–98. doi:10.1111/j.1468-5876.2010.00525.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J. (1999). GIS and multicriteria decision analysis. Hoboken, New Jersey, USA: J. Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J., & Jackson, M. (2000). Multicriteria spatial allocation of educational resources: An overview. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 34(3), 219–235. doi:10.1016/S0038-0121(99)00025-7
   Google Scholar
• Malczewski, J., & Rinner, C. (2015). Multicriteria decision analysis in geographic information science. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-74757-4.
   Google Scholar
• Martin van Maarseveen, J. M., & Flacke, J. (Editor). (2019). GIS in sustainable urban planning and management. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/27516.
   Google Scholar
• Merry, M. S., & Arum, R. (2018). Can schools fairly select their students? Theory and Research in Education, 16(3), 330–350. doi:10.1177/1477878518801752
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musset, P. (2012). School choice and equity: Current policies in OECD countries and a literature review. OECD Education Working Papers. 51. DOI: 10.1787/5k9fq23507vc-en.
   Google Scholar
• Noden, P, West, A., Hind, A., Banding and ballots: Secondary school admissions in England: Admissions in 2012/13 and the impact of growth of academies. 2014. https://www.suttontrust.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/12/banding-and-ballots-report.pdf. London, England: Sutton Trust.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2015). How do differences in social and cultural background influence access to higher education and the completion of studies?, in Education Indicators in Focus.
   Google Scholar
• OECD, Education at a Glance. (2018). OECD Indicators. 2018. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/eag-2018-en.
   Google Scholar
• Oosterbeek, H., Sóvágó, S. N., & Klaauw, B. V. D. DP13462 Why are schools segregated? Evidence from the secondary-school match in Amsterdam. CEPR Press Discussion Paper No. 13462. 2019. https://cepr.org/publications/dp13462. Centre for Economic Policy Research: London.
   Google Scholar
• D. Harvard Project on SchoolOrfield, G., & Eaton, S. E. (1996). Dismantling desegregation: The quiet reversal of Brown v. board of education. New York, USA: New Press. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED410363.
   Google Scholar
• Paes, D. B., Molinas Vega, R. J. R., & Saavedra, J. (2008). Measuring inequality of opportunities for children. Washington D.C., USA: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Paes, D. B., Molinas Vega, R. J. R., & Saavedra, J. (2010). Measuring progress toward basic opportunities for all. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 30(2), 335–367. doi:10.12660/bre.v30n22010.3687
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, P. A. (2017). What really matters in designing school choice mechanisms. Econometric Society Monographs, 58, 176–214.
   Google Scholar
• Pathak, P. A., & Sethuraman, J. (2010a). Lotteries in student assignment: An equivalence result. NBER working papers. 16140, DOI: 10.3386/w16140.
   Google Scholar
• Perez-Molina, E., Sliuzas, R., & Flacke, J. (2019). Simulating spatial patterns of urban growth in Kampala, Uganda, and its impact on flood risk, in GIS in sustainable urban planning and management: A global perspective, J.M. Martin van Maarseveen, Johannes Flacke, Editor. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, Taylor & Francis Group. https://library.oapen.org/handle/20.500.12657/27516.
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L. M., Aguero-Valverde, J, Zarrate-Cardenas, G, van Maarseveen, M. (2018). Parental preferences in the choice for a specialty school. Journal of School Choice, 1–30. doi:10.1080/15582159.2018.1442087
   Google Scholar
• Prieto, L. M., Flacke, J., Aguero-Valverde, J., & Van Maarseveen, M. (2018). Measuring inequality of opportunity in access to quality basic education: A case study in Florida, US. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information, 7(12), 465. doi:10.3390/ijgi7120465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reardon, S. (2016). School segregation and racial academic achievement gaps. RSF: The Russell Sage Foundation Journal of the Social Sciences, 2(5), 34–57. doi:10.7758/RSF.2016.2.5.03
   Google Scholar
• Riel, V., Parcel, T. L., Mickelson, R. A., & Smith, S. S. (2018). Do magnet and charter schools exacerbate or ameliorate inequality? Sociology Compass, 12(9). doi:10.1111/soc4.12617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roemer, J. E. (1998). Equality of Opportunity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Roth, A. E. (2008). Deferred acceptance algorithms: History, theory, practice, and open questions. International Journal of Game Theory, 36(3–4), 537. doi:10.1007/s00182-008-0117-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shi, P. (2015). Guiding school-Choice reform through novel applications of operations research. Interfaces, 45(2), 117–132. doi:10.1287/inte.2014.0781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shircliffe, B. J. (2002). Desegregation and the historically black high school: The establishment of Howard W. Blake in Tampa, Florida. The Urban Review: Issues and Ideas in Public Education, 34(2), 135–158. doi:10.1023/A:1015362316709
   Google Scholar
• Simon, H. A. (1962). Administrative behaviour: A study of decision-making processes in administrative organization (2nd ed.). New York, NY, USA: Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Smrekar, C., & Honey, N. (2015). The desegregation aims and demographic contexts of magnet schools: How parents choose and why siting policies matter. Peabody Journal of Education, 90(1), 128–155. doi:10.1080/0161956X.2015.988545
   Google Scholar
• Sönmez, T., & Ünver, M. (2009). Matching, allocation, and exchange of discrete resources. Working papers in economics 717. Boston College, Dept. of Economics: Chestnut Hill, Mass. p. Online-Ressource, (82 S.) graph. Darst.
   Google Scholar
• Stasz, C., & Von Stolk, C., The use of lottery systems in school admissions. RAND working papers. 2007, Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Steinitz, C. (2012). A framework for geodesign: Changing geography by design (1 ed.). Redlands, Calf: Esri.
   Google Scholar
• Stretesky, P. B., & Lynch, M. J. (2002). Environmental hazards and school segregation in Hillsborough county, Florida, 1987-1999. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(4), 553–573. doi:10.1111/j.1533-8525.2002.tb00066.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Supreme Court Of The United States. (2004). Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 (1954) (USSC+) 347 U.S. 483. Black Scholar, 34(Part 2), 21–23.
   Google Scholar
• USCCR. (2010). Public education funding inequality in an era of increasing concentration of poverty and resegregation, in Briefing report. Washington D.C. p. 158.
   Google Scholar
• Voogd, H. (1982). Multicriteria evaluation for urban and regional planning [PhD Thesis]. Delftsche Uitgevers Maatschappij: Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• West, A. (2006). School choice, equity and social justice: The case for more control. British Journal of Educational Studies, 54(1), 15–33. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8527.2006.00334.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West, A., Hind, A., & Pennell, H. (2004). School admissions and ‘selection’ in comprehensive schools: policy and practice. Oxford Review of Education, 30(3), 347–369. doi:10.1080/0305498042000260485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Bank. (2012). Monitoring basic opportunities throughout the Lifecycle with the human opportunity index in Chile. Washington, DC: District of Columbia.
   Google Scholar