The Influence of Salt on Handheld Electrical Moisture Meters: Can They Be Used to Detect Salt Problems in Porous Stone?

References

• Andriani, G. F., and N. Walsh. 2007. The effects of wetting and drying, and marine salt crystallization on calcarenite rocks used as building material in historic monuments. Geological Society of London Special Publications 271 (1):179–88. doi:10.1144/GSL.SP.2007.271.01.18.
   Google Scholar
• Arendt, C., and J. Seele. 2000. Feuchte und Salze in Gebäuden. Leinfelden-Echterdingen, Germany: Koch.
   Google Scholar
• Bayer, K., W. Köhler, H. Schuh, and E. Wendler. 2010. Vergleichsuntersuchungen mit unterschiedlichen zerstörungsfreien und zerstörungsarmen Feuchte- und Salzmessmethoden. In Zerstörungsfreie Oberflächenunter-suchungsmethoden: Stand der Technik, Grenzen und Ausblicke: Beiträge des 4. Konservierungswissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums in Berlin-Brandenburg am 29. Oktober in Potsdam, ed. B. Arnold. Worms, Germany: Werner.
   Google Scholar
• Bionda, D. 2004. Salt deterioration and microclimate in historical buildings. Intermediary report of the project “Sustained care of sensitive historical monuments”. Institut für Denkmalpflege, Forschungsstelle Technologie und Konservierung, ETH Zürich, Switzerland. http://e-collection.library.ethz.ch (accessed May 22, 2015)
   Google Scholar
• Blakemore, P., A. Morrow, W. Liew, M. Muruganathan, and R. Luff. 2005. Species and treatment corrections for hand-held moisture meters with radiata and slash pine. Victoria, Australia: Forest & Wood Products Research & Development Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute (BSI). Natural stone test methods—Determination of water absorption at atmospheric pressure. London, UK: BSI, BS EN 13755:2008 ( accessed 2012).
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute (BSI). Natural stone test methods – Determination of uniaxial compressive strength. London, UK: BSI, BS EN 1926:2006 ( accessed 2012).
   Google Scholar
• British Standards Institute (BSI). Natural stone test methods—Determination of real density and apparent density, and of total and open porosity. London, UK: BSI, BS EN 1936: 2006 ( accessed 2012).
   Google Scholar
• Building Research Establishment (BRE). 1997. Portland Whit Bed Limestone (Bowers Quarry): Technical Data Sheet. The BRE/British Stone Stone List. Accessed 6 May 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Burkinshaw, R. 2002. What is the moisture meter trying to tell us? Structural Survey 20 (5):162–72. doi:10.1108/02630800210456814.
   Google Scholar
• Burkinshaw, R. 2004. Which instruments should surveyors use to monitor moisture condition? Structural Survey 22 (1):7–19. doi:10.1108/02630800410530891.
   Google Scholar
• Burkinshaw, R., and M. Parrett. 2003. Diagnosing damp. Coventry, UK: RICS Books.
   Google Scholar
• Camuffo, D., and G. Sturaro. 2001. The climate of Rome and its action on monument decay. Climate Research 16 (2):145–55. doi:10.3354/cr016145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charola, A. E. 2000. Salts in the deterioration of porous materials: An Overview. Journal of the American Institute for Conservation 39 (3):327–43. doi:10.2307/3179977.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colston, B. J., D. S. Watt, and H. L. Munro. 2001. Environmentally-induced stone decay: The cumulative effects of crystallization–hydration cycles on a Lincolnshire oopelsparite limestone. Journal of Cultural Heritage 2 (4):297–307. doi:10.1016/S1296-2074(01)01129-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutler, N. A., H. Viles, S. Ahmad, S. McCabe, and B. J. Smith. 2013. Algal ‘greening’ and the conservation of stone heritage structures. Science of The Total Environment 442:152–64. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.10.050.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaz Gonçalves, T., and J. Delgado Rodrigues. 2006. Evaluating the salt content of salt-contaminated samples on the basis of their hygroscopic behavior. Part I: Fundamentals, scope and accuracy of the method. Journal of Cultural Heritage 7 (2):79–84. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2006.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doehne, E., and C. A. Price. 2010. Stone conservation – An overview of current research. Los Angeles, USA: Getty Conservation Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Dubelaar, C. W., S. Engering, R. Hees, R. Koch, and H.-G. Lorenz. 2003. Lithofacies and petrophysical properties of Portland Base Bed and Portland Whit Bed limestone as related to durability. Heron 48 (3):221–29.
   Google Scholar
• Eklund, J. A., H. Zhang, H. Viles, and T. Curteis. 2013. Using handheld moisture meters on limestone: Factors affecting performance and guidelines for best practice. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 7 (2):207–24. doi:10.1080/15583058.2011.626491.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erkal, A., D. D’Ayala, and V. Stephenson. 2013. Evaluation of environmental impact on historical stone masonry through on-site monitoring appraisal. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 46 (4):449–58. doi:10.1144/qjegh2012-060.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Filzmoser, P., and V. Todorov. 2013. Robust tools for the imperfect world. Statistics with Imperfect Data 245:4–20.
   Google Scholar
• Flint, R., P. Jackson, and D. McCann. 1999. Geophysical imaging inside masonry structures. NDT & E International 32 (8):469–79. doi:10.1016/S0963-8695(99)00024-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forsén, H., and V. Tarvainen. 2000. Accuracy and functionality of hand held wood moisture content meters. Espoo, Finland: Technical Research Centre of Finland.
   Google Scholar
• Franzen, C., and P. W. Mirwald. 2004. Moisture content of natural stone: Static and dynamic equilibrium with atmospheric humidity. Environmental Geology 46 (3–4):391–401. doi:10.1007/s00254-004-1040-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franzen, C., and P. W. Mirwald. 2009. Moisture sorption behaviour of salt mixtures in porous stone. Chemie der Erde - Geochemistry 69 (1):91–98. doi:10.1016/j.chemer.2008.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• General Electric Sensing. 2009. Surveymaster, Protimeter dual-function moisture meter – Instruction manual, INS5360, Rev.B. Billerica, US: General Electric Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gomez-Heras, M., and R. Fort. 2007. Patterns of halite (NaCl) crystallisation in building stone conditioned by laboratory heating regimes. Environmental Geology 52 (2):259–67. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0538-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell, J. 1995. Moisture measurement in masonry: Guidance for surveyors. COBRA 1995. London: Royal Institution of Chartered Surveyors Research.
   Google Scholar
• Kraska, S. 1998. Zerstörungsfreie Erfassung und Bewertung von Salzgehalten in Baustoffen mit Hilfe der Wenner Methode. Diplomarbeit (eq. Master thesis). Weimar, Germany: Bauhaus-Universität Weimar. Fakultät Bauingeni-eurwesen. Professur Bauchemie.
   Google Scholar
• Linnow, K., H. Juling, and M. Steiger. 2007. Investigation of NaCl deliquescence in porous substrates using RH-XRD. Environmental Geology 52 (2):317–27. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0590-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loke, M. H. 1999. Electrical imaging surveys for environmental and engineering studies—A practical guide to 2-D and 3-D surveys. Penang, Malaysia: Loke M.H.
   Google Scholar
• Martinez, A., and A. Byrnes. 2001. Modeling dielectric-constant values of geologic materials: An aid to ground-penetrating radar data collection and interpretation, 1–16. Kansas (USA): Current Research in Earth Sciences, Bulletin 247(Part1).
   Google Scholar
• McCann, D., and M. Forde. 2001. Review of NDT methods in the assessment of concrete and masonry structures. NDT & E International 34 (2):71–84. doi:10.1016/S0963-8695(00)00032-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meinhardt-Degen, J. 2005. Geologisch mineralogische und materialtechnische Untersuchungen zur Risikoabschätzung von Folgekonservierungen bei Sandsteinen am Bespiel von Regensburger Grünsandstein und Grünem Mainsandstein. Ph.D. Munich, Germany: Ludwig-Maximilians-University of Munich. Faculty of Geoscience.
   Google Scholar
• Mosch, S., and S. Siegesmund. 2007. Petrophysical and technical properties of dimensional stones: A statistical approach. Zeitschrift der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Geowissenschaften 158 (4):821–68. doi:10.1127/1860-1804/2007/0158-0821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer, T. 2008. Limestone petrography and durability in English Jurassic Freestones. In England’s heritage in stone: Proceedings of a conference, Tempest Anderson Hall, York, 15–17, March, 2005, ed. P. Doyle. Folkestone, Kent: English Stone Forum.
   Google Scholar
• Pinchin, S. E. 2008. Techniques for monitoring moisture in walls. Reviews in Conservation 9:33–45.
   Google Scholar
• Poschlod, K. 1990. Das Wasser im Porenraum kristalliner Naturwerksteine und sein Einfluss auf die Verwitterung. München, Germany: F. Pfeil.
   Google Scholar
• Price, C. A. 2007. Predicting environmental conditions to minimise salt damage at the Tower of London: A comparison of two approaches. Environmental Geology 52 (2):369–74. doi:10.1007/s00254-006-0477-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodriguez-Navarro, C., E. Doehne, and E. Sebastian. 2000. How does sodium sulfate crystallize? Implications for the decay and testing of building materials. Cement and Concrete Research 30 (10):1527–34. doi:10.1016/S0008-8846(00)00381-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuh, H., F. Grüner, W. Köhler, and E. Wendler. 2011. Vergleichsuntersuchungen mit unterschiedlichen zerstörungsfreien und zerstörungsarmen Feuchte- und Salzmessmethoden. In Einfache, zerstörungsfreie Prüfverfahren: Beiträge des 5. Konservierungs-wissenschaftlichen Kolloquiums in Berlin/Brandenburg am 18. November 2011 in Potsdam, ed. D. Karg. Petersberg, Germany: Imhof.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, B. J., and H. Viles. 2006. Rapid, catastrophic stone decay of building limestones: Thoughts and causes, effects and consequences. In Heritage, weathering and conservation, ed. R. Fort, M. Alvarez, M. de Buego, C. Gomez-Heras, and Vazquez-Calvo. London, UK: Taylor & Francis/Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, M. 2004. Influence of salts on the freezing temperature of water: implications on frost damage to porous materials. In Proceedings of the 10th International Congress on Deterioration and Conservation of Stone, Stockholm June 27 – July 2, 2004, Kwiatkowski D, Löfvendahl R (eds). ICOMOS, Sweden: Stockholm; 179–186.
   Google Scholar
• Steiger, M., A. E. Charola, and K. Sterflinger. 2010. Weathering and deterioration. In Stone in Architecture: Properties, Durability, ed. S. Siegesmund, R. Snethlage, and E. Winkler. Berlin, Germany: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Trotman, P. M., C. Sanders, and H. W. Harrison. 2004. Understanding dampness. Watford: BRE Bookshop.
   Google Scholar
• Viles, H. 2013. Durability and conservation of stone: Coping with complexity. Quarterly Journal of Engineering Geology and Hydrogeology 46 (4):367–75. doi:10.1144/qjegh2012-053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weber, H. 1988. Mauerfeuchtigkeit. Ehningen bei Böblingen: Expert. Germany.
   Google Scholar
• Wexler, A. S., and J. H. Seinfeld. 1991. Second-generation inorganic aerosol model. Atmospheric Environment. Part A. General Topics 25 (12):2731–48. doi:10.1016/0960-1686(91)90203-J.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu, S., and C. T. Oguchi. 2009. Complex relationships between salt type and rock properties in a durability experiment of multiple salt–rock treatments. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 34 (15):2096–110. doi:10.1002/esp.1904.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar