Shaking table tests on a stone masonry building: modeling and identification of dynamic properties including soil-foundation-structure interaction

References

• Adami, C. E., L. Karapitta, C. Mouzakis, and E. Vintzileou. 2012. Seismic response of historical buildings made of three-leaf masonry: behaviour enhancement with grouting and improvement of box-action. Proceedings of the Meeting of the Hellenic Society of Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece, December 7. (in Greek).
   Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI 41-13. 2014. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. ASCE standard ASCE/SEI 41-13. Reston, VA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• Braga, F., and D. Liberatore. 1990. A finite element for the analysis of the response of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 5th North American Masonry Conference, Urbana, 201–12.
   Google Scholar
• Calderini, C., S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2009. In-plane strength of unreinforced masonry piers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 38 (2):243–67. doi:10.1002/eqe.860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., S. Lagomarsino, A. Karatzetzou, and D. Pitilakis. 2015. Vulnerability assessment of Hassan Bey’s Mansion in Rhodes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:347–68. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9613-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 1998-1:2004. 2004. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 1998-3:2005. 2005. Eurocode 8: Design of structures for earthquake resistance, part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels, Belgium: CEN.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. EN 338:2016. 2016. Structural timber – Strength classes. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Chacara, C., N. Mendes, and P. B. Lourenco. 2017. Simulation of shake table tests on out-of-plane masonry buildings. Part (IV): Macro and Micro FEM based approaches. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (1):1558–3058. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CSI. 2010. Analysis reference manual for SAP2000®, ETABS® and SAFE®. Berkeley CA: CSI (Computers and Structures Inc.).
   Google Scholar
• D’Asdia, P., and A. Viskovic. 1994. L’analisi sismica degli edifici in muratura. Ingegneria Sismica XI (1):32–42. (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• De Felice, G., S. De Santis, P. B. Lourenco, and N. Mendes. 2017. Methods and challenges for the seismic assessment of historic masonry structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (1):1558–3058. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1238976.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Douglas, J., D. M. Seyedi, T. Ulrich, H. Modaressi, E. Foerster, K. Pitilakis, D. Pitilakis, A. Karatzetzou, G. Gazetas, E. Garini, and M. Loli. 2015. Evaluation of seismic hazard for the assessment of historical elements at risk: Description of input and selection of intensity. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. 13(1):49–65. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9606-0.
   Google Scholar
• Gambarotta, L., and S. Lagomarsino. 1997. Damage models for the seismic response of brick masonry shear walls. Part II: The continuum model and its applications. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 26:441–62. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199704)26:4<441::AID-EQE651>3.0.CO;2-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gazetas, G. 1991. Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering 117 (9):1363–81. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1991)117:9(1363).
   Google Scholar
• Italian Ministry of Infrastructure. NTC:2008 (Norme tecniche per le costruzioni). Decreto Ministeriale 14 1. G.U. S.O. n.30 on 4/2/2008; (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Karapitta, L., C. Mouzakis, C. E. Adami, and E. Vintzileou. 2012. Non linear seismic response of three-leaf masonry structures. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Wroclaw, Poland, October 15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Karatzetzou, A., C. Negulescu, M. Manakou, B. François, D. M. Seyedi, D. Pitilakis, and K. Pitilakis. 2015a. Ambient vibration measurements on monuments in the Medieval City of Rhodes, Greece. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:331–45. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9649-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karatzetzou, A., D. Pitilakis, M. Kržan, and V. Bosiljkov. 2015b. Soil–Foundation–Structure interaction and vulnerability assessment of the Neoclassical School in Rhodes, Greece. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:411–28. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9637-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S. 2015. Seismic assessment of rocking masonry structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:97–128. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9609-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Cattari. 2015. PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:13–47. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., A. Penna, A. Galasco, and S. Cattari. 2009. Seismic analysis program for 3D masonry buildings - TREMURI user guide. Genova/Pavia, Italy: TREMURI Program.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., A. Penna, A. Galasco, and S. Cattari. 2013. TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 56:1787–99. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lestuzzi, P., and M. Badoux. 2013. Evaluation parasismique des constructions existantes: Bâtiments en maçonnerie et en béton arme. Lausanne, Switzerland: Presses Polytechniques et Universitaires Romandes. (in French).
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., and A. Della Fontana. 1998. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 5th International Masonry Conference of the British Masonry Society, 8, 190–95.
   Google Scholar
• Marques, R., and P. B. Lourenço. 2011. Possibilities and comparison of structural component models for the seismic assessment of modern unreinforced masonry buildings. Computers & Structures 89 (21–22):2079–91. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2011.05.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, R., and P. B. Lourenço. 2014. Unreinforced and confined masonry buildings in seismic regions: Validation of macro-element models and cost analysis. Engineering Structures 64:52–67. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marques, R., J. M. Pereira, P. B. Lourenco, W. Parker, and U. Masako. 2013. Study of the seismic behavior of the “Old Municipal Chambers” building in Christchurch, New Zealand. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 17 (3):350–77. doi:10.1080/13632469.2012.738283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maugeri, M., G. Abate, and M. R. Massimino. 2012. Soil-structure interaction for seismic improvement of Noto Cathedral (Italy). Special Topics in Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering in Geotechnical, Geotechnical, Geological and Earthquake Engineering. Springer. Volume Editors: Sakr M.A., Ansal A ISSN: 15736059. ISBN: 978-940072059-6 (Print) 978-94-007-2060-2 (Online). Vol. 16, pp. 217–39. DOI: 10.1007/978-94-007-2060-2_8.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer, P., J. Ochsendorf, J. Germaine, and E. Kausel. 2007. The impact of high frequency/low energy seismic waves on unreinforced masonry. Earthquake Spectra 23 (1):77–94. doi:10.1193/1.2431211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mouzakis, C., E. Vintzileou, C. E. Adami, and L. Karapitta. 2012. Dynamic tests on three leaf stone masonry building model before and after interventions. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, Wroclaw, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Mylonakis, G., S. Nikolaou, and G. Gazetas. 2006. Footings under seismic loading: Analysis and design issues with emphasis on bridge foundations. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 26 (9):824–53. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.12.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, A., S. Lagomarsino, and A. Galasco. 2013. A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43 (2):159–79. doi:10.1002/eqe.2335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, A., I. E. Senaldi, A. Galasco, and G. Magenes. 2016. Numerical simulation of shaking table tests on full-scale stone masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3):146–63. doi:10.1080/15583058.2015.1113338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, D., and A. Karatzetzou. 2015. Dynamic stiffness of monumental flexible masonry foundations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:67–82. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9611-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rinaldin, G., C. Amadio, and L. Macorini. 2016. A macro-model with nonlinear springs for seismic analysis of URM buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 45 (14):2261–81. doi:10.1002/eqe.2759.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M. 1987. Dynamic modelling of masonry buildings: Storey mechanism model as a simple alternative. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 15 (6):731–49. doi:10.1002/eqe.4290150606.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M. 1999. Earthquake resistant design of masonry buildings. London, UK: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vintzileou, E. 2007. Iniezione di miscela fluida in muratura a sacco: Risultati sperimentali e previsione delle caratteristiche meccaniche. Seminar CIAS Evoluzione nella sperimentazione per le costruzioni, 191–211 (in Italian).
   Google Scholar
• Vintzileou, E., C. Mouzakis, C. E. Adami, and L. Karapitta. 2015. Seismic behavior of three-leaf stone masonry buildings before and after interventions: Shaking table tests on a two storey masonry model. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:3107–33. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9746-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar