Seismic vulnerability assessment and fragility analysis of stone masonry monastic temples in Sikkim Himalayas

References

• Agnihotri, P., V. Singhal, and D. C. Rai. 2013. Effect of in-plane damage on out-of-plane strength of unreinforced masonry walls. Engineering Structures 57:1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akhaveissy, A. H. 2012. The DSC model for the nonlinear analysis of in-plane loaded masonry structures. The Open Civil Engineering Journal 6:200–14. doi: 10.2174/1874149501206010200.
   Google Scholar
• Almeida, C., J. Guedes, A. Arêde, and A. Costa. 2012. Shear and compression experimental behaviour of one leaf stone masonry walls. 15th World Conference Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Arêde, A., P. Mendes, B. Silva, J. Guedes, J. Faria, and A. Costa. 2008. Experimental Assessment of a Seismic Strengthening Solution for Stone Masonry Walls Using a Wooden Structure. Proceedings of the 14th WCEE, Beijing.
   Google Scholar
• ATC, A-40. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings. Applied Technology Council, report ATC-40, Redwood City.
   Google Scholar
• Beolchini, G. 1992. Mechanical properties of old stone masonries. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering. (pp. 3499–504). Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• BIS. 2000. IS 456: Indian standard plain and reinforced concrete – Code of practice. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• BIS. 2016. IS 1893: Indian standard criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures: Part 1– General provisions and buildings. New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Cedolin, L., S. D. Poli, and I. Iori. 1987. Tensile behavior of concrete. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 113 (3):431–49. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1987)113:3(431).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. A., A. Arêde, A. Costa, and C. S. Oliveira. 2011. In situ cyclic tests on existing stone masonry walls and strengthening solutions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics, 40(4):449–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Porto, F., G. Tecchio, P. Zampieri, C. Modena, and A. Prota. 2016. Simplified seismic assessment of railway masonry arch bridges by limit analysis. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 12 (5):567–91. doi: 10.1080/15732479.2015.1031141.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• da Porto, F., M. R. Valluzzi, and C. Modena. 2003. Investigations for the knowledge of multi-leaf stone masonry walls. Proceedings of the First International Congress on Construction History (Vol. 20, p. 24). Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA. 2000. Prestandard and Commentary for the Seismic Rehabilitation of Buildings. Report No. FEMA-356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA-440. 2005. Improvement of nonlinear static seismic analysis procedures. FEMA-440, Redwood City.
   Google Scholar
• Gopalaratnam, V. S., and S. P. Shah. (1985, May). Softening response of plain concrete in direct tension. Journal Proceedings, 82(3), 310–23.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, H. B., K. Dasgupta, D. R. Sahoo, and G. Kharel. 2006. Performance of structures during the Sikkim earthquake of 14 February 2006. Current Science-Bangalore 91 (4):449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent, D. C., and R. Park. 1971. Flexural members with confined concrete. Journal of the Structural Division, 97(7), 1969–1990.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Cattari. 2015. PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (1):13–47. doi: 10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenco, P. B., A. O. Feio, and J. S. Machado. 2007. Chestnut wood in compression perpendicular to the grain: Non-destructive correlations for test results in new and old wood. Construction and Building Materials 21 (8):1617–27. doi: 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milosevic, J., M. Lopes, A. S. Gago, and R. Bento. 2015. In-plane seismic response of rubble stone masonry specimens by means of static cyclic tests. Construction and Building Materials, 82, 9–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morcos, S. S., and R. Bjorhovde. 1995. Fracture modeling of concrete and steel. Journal of Structural Engineering 121 (7):1125–33. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:7(1125).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Naraine, K., and S. Sinha. 1991. Cyclic behavior of brick masonry under biaxial compression. Journal of Structural Engineering 117 (5):1336–55. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1991)117:5(1336).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, D. C., G. Mondal, V. Singhal, N. Parool, T. Pradhan, and K. Mitra. 2012. Reconnaissance report of the M6. 9 Sikkim (India–Nepal border) earthquake of 18 September 2011. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 3 (2):99–111. doi: 10.1080/19475705.2011.647336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai, D. C., V. Singhal, T. Pradhan, and A. Tripathi. 2016. Seismic vulnerability of monastery temples of stone masonry in Sikkim Himalaya. Current Science 110(10):1947–1957.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Record, S. J. 1914. The mechanical properties of wood. Wiley, New York.
   Google Scholar
• Rota, M., A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2010. A methodology for deriving analytical fragility curves for masonry buildings based on stochastic nonlinear analyses. Engineering Structures 32 (5):1312–23. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2010.01.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinozuka, M., M. Q. Feng, H. K. Kim, and S. H. Kim. 2000. Nonlinear static procedure for fragility curve development. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 126 (12):1287–95. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(2000)126:12(1287).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B., J. M. Guedes, A. Arêde, and A. Costa. 2012. Calibration and application of a continuum damage model on the simulation of stone masonry structures: Gondar church as a case study. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (1):211–34. doi: 10.1007/s10518-010-9216-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B., M. D. Benetta, F. da Porto, and C. Modena. 2014. Experimental assessment of in-plane behaviour of three-leaf stone masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials, 53, 149–161.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simões, A., J. Milošević, H. Meireles, R. Bento, S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2015. Fragility curves for old masonry building types in Lisbon. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (10):3083–105. doi: 10.1007/s10518-015-9750-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M., M. Gams, and T. Berset. 2012. Seismic strengthening of stone masonry walls with polymer coating. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (15 WCEE), Lisbon, Portugal, September (pp. 24-28).
   Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M., and P. Sheppard. 1982. The strengthening of stone-masonry buildings for revitalization in seismic regions. Proceedings of the 7th European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens, Greece, vol. 5. pp. 275–82.
   Google Scholar
• Valluzzi, M. R., F. D. Porto, and C. Modena. 2001. Behaviour of multi-leaf stone masonry walls strengthened by different intervention techniques. Historical Constructions, 1023–1032.
   Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, G., and P. B. Lourenço. 2009. In-plane experimental behavior of stone masonry walls under cyclic loading. Journal of structural engineering, 135(10), 1269–1277.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintzileou, E., and A. Miltiadou-Fezans. 2008. Mechanical properties of three-leaf stone masonry grouted with ternary or hydraulic lime-based grouts. Engineering Structures 30 (8):2265–76. doi: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2007.11.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintzileou, E., and T. P. Tassios. 1995. Three-leaf stone masonry strengthened by injecting cement grouts. Journal of Structural Engineering 121 (5):848–56. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1995)121:5(848).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zampieri, P., M. A. Zanini, and F. Faleschini. 2016. Derivation of analytical seismic fragility functions for common masonry bridge types: Methodology and application to real cases. Engineering Failure Analysis 68:275–91. doi: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2016.05.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar