Structural assessment of a lapped scarf joint applied to historical timber constructions in central Europe

References

• Aira, J. R., F. Arriaga, G. Íñiguez-González, and M. Guaita. 2015. Failure Modes in Halved and Tabled Tenoned Timber Scarf Joint by Tension Test. Construction and Building Materials 96 (October):360–67. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.08.107.
   Google Scholar
• ANSYS Mechanical products 17.2. 2016. ANSYS Inc.. www.ansys.com.
   Google Scholar
• Arciszewska-Kędzior, A., J. Kunecký, H. Hasníková, and V. Sebera. 2016. Lapped Scarf Joint with Inclined Faces and Wooden Dowels: Experimental and Numerical Analysis. Engineering Structures 94 (July):1–8. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.036.
   Google Scholar
• Blass, H. J., and P. Schädle. 2011. Ductility Aspects of Reinforced and Non-Reinforced Timber Joints. Engineering Structures 33 (11):3018–26. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.02.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodig, J., Jayne, B. A. 1993. Mechanics of Wood and Wood Composities. In Reprint ed. Malabar, Fla: Krieger Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Branco, J. M., and T. Descamps. 2015. Analysis and Strengthening of Carpentry Joints. Construction and Building Materials 97 (October):34–47. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.089.
   Google Scholar
• Cavalli, A., D. Cibecchini, M. Togni, and H. S. Sousa. 2016. A Review on the Mechanical Properties of Aged Wood and Salvaged Timber. Construction and Building Materials 114 (July):681–87. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.001.
   Google Scholar
• Church, J. R., and B. W. Tew. 1997. Characterization of bearing strength factors in pegged timber connections. Journal of Structural Engineering 123 (3):326–32. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1997)123:3(326).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIN 1052-1. German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung), 1988-04. Structural use of timber - Design and construction.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1991-1-1Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-1: General actions - Densities, self-weight, imposed loads for buildings. 2007. (including national amendments) Czech office for standards, metrology and testing. Prague.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1991-1-3Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-3: General actions - Snow loads. 2007. (including national amendments) Czech office for standards, metrology and testing. Prague.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1991-1-4Eurocode 1: Actions on structures - Part 1-4: General actions - Wind loads. 2007. (including national amendments) Czech office for standards, metrology and testing. Prague.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1995-1-1Design of timber structures - Part 1-1: General -Common rules and rules for buildings. 2006. (including national amendments). Czech office for standards, metrology and testing. Prague.
   Google Scholar
• EN 338 Structural timber - Strength classes. 2016. Czech office for standards, metrology and testing, Prague.
   Google Scholar
• EN 384 Structural timber – Determination of characteristic values of mechanical properties and density. 2010. Czech office for standards, metrology and testing. Prague.
   Google Scholar
• Fajman, P., and J. Maca. 2014. The effect of key stiffness on forces in a scarf joint. In Proceedings of the ninth international conference on engineering computational technology, P. Iványi, and B. H. V. Topping Editors. Civil-Comp Press: Stirlingshire, UK. Paper 40. doi:10.4203/ccp.105.40.
   Google Scholar
• Fajman, P., and J. Máca. 2015. Scarf joints with pins or keys and dovetails In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Structural Health Assessment of Timber Structures, SHATIS 15, Wroclaw, Wroclaw University of Technology, pp. 899–906. ISSN 0860-2395.
   Google Scholar
• Fajman, P., and J. Máca. 2017. Stiffness of scarf joints with dowels. Computers & Structures, March. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2017.03.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feio, A. O., P. B. Lourenço, and J. S. Machado. 2014. Testing and modeling of a traditional timber mortise and tenon joint. Materials and Structures 47 (1–2):213–25. doi:10.1617/s11527-013-0056-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukuyama, H., N. Ando, M. Inayama, and M. Takemura. 2008. Calculation model and yield process of single shear joint with wood dowel of various slenderness. Journal Structureal Construction Engineer, AIJ 73 (627, May):803–10. doi:10.3130/aijs.73.803.
   Google Scholar
• German Institute for Standardisation (Deutsches Institut für Normung), DIN 1052-1. 1988-04. Structural use of timber - Design and construction.
   Google Scholar
• Jorissen, A. J. M., J. Dorlijn, and H. H. Snijder. 2016. Strength and stability of traditional timber frames. In Proceedings of the World Conference on Timber Engineering, Vienna, Austria, 22-25 August 2016, 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Kloiber, M., M. Drdácký, J. S. Machado, M. Piazza, and N. Yamaguchi. 2015. Prediction of mechanical properties by means of semi-destructive methods: a review. Construction and Building Materials 101 (December):1215–34. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.05.134.
   Google Scholar
• Koch, H., L. Eisenhut, and W. Seim. 2013. Multi-Mode Failure of Form-Fitting Timber Connections – Experimental and Numerical Studies on the Tapered Tenon Joint. Engineering Structures 48 (March):727–38. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.12.002.
   Google Scholar
• Kunecký, J., M. Kloiber, J. Hrivnák, V. Sebera, J. Tippner, and J. Milch. 2017. Creep behavior of oak pegs under tension in dry and wet conditions. In Proceedings of ICTB2017. Luleå University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Kunecký, J., V. Sebera, H. Hasníková, A. Arciszewska-Kędzior, J. Tippner, and M. Kloiber. 2015. Experimental assessment of a full-scale lap scarf timber joint accompanied by a finite element analysis and digital image correlation. Construction and Building Materials 76 (February):24–33. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.11.034.
   Google Scholar
• Map of the snow load on the ground of the Czech Republic. VŠB-Technical University of Ostrava, Czech Hydrometeorological Institute. 2010. Accessed May 31, 2017. http://www.snehovamapa.cz.
   Google Scholar
• Milch, J., J. Tippner, V. Sebera, J. Kunecký, M. Kloiber, and M. Navrátil. 2016. The numerical assessment of a full-scale historical truss structure reconstructed with use of traditional all-wooden joints. Journal of Cultural Heritage 21 (September):759–66. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2016.04.006.
   Google Scholar
• Pizzo, B., M. Gavioli, and M. P. Lauriola. 2013. Evaluation of a design approach to the on-site structural repair of decayed old timber end beams. Engineering Structures 48 (March):611–22. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.036.
   Google Scholar
• Sandberg, L. B., W. M. Bulleit, and E. H. Reid. 2000. Strength and stiffness of oak pegs in traditional timber-frame joints. Journal of Structural Engineering 126 (6):717–23. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2000)126:6(717).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangree, R. H., and B. W. Schafer. 2009a. Experimental and numerical analysis of a stop-splayed traditional timber scarf joint with key. Construction and Building Materials 23 (1):376–85. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2007.11.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santos, C. L., A. M. P. De Jesus, J. J. L. Morais, and J. L. P. C. Lousada. 2009. Quasi-static mechanical behaviour of a double-shear single dowel wood connection. Construction and Building Materials 23 (1):171–82. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2008.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scia Engineer 16.1. 2016. www.scia.net.
   Google Scholar
• Sonderegger, W., K. Kránitz, C.-T. Bues, and P. Niemz. 2015. Aging effects on physical and mechanical properties of spruce, fir and oak wood. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16 (6):883–89. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2015.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar