Seismic Load Capacity of Historical Masonry Mosques by Rigid Body Kinetics

References

• ANSYS 16.1. 2015. Finite element analysis program. Canonsburg, PA, USA: ANSYS Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Bartoli, G., M. Betti, P. Biagini, A. Borghini, A. Ciavattone, M. Girardi, G. Lancioni, A. M. Marra, B. Ortolani, B. Pintucchi, et al. 2017. Epistemic uncertainties in structural modeling: A blind benchmark for seismic assessment of slender masonry towers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 31 (5):04017067. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli, G., M. Betti, and A. Vignoli. 2016. A numerical study on seismic risk assessment of historic masonry towers: A case study in San Gimignano. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14:14575–1518. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9892-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betti, M., L. Galano, and A. Vignoli. 2014. Comparative analysis on the seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Engineering Structures 61:195–208. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.12.038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betti, M., L. Galano, and A. Vignoli. 2016. Finite element modelling for seismic assessment of historic masonry buildings. Earthquakes and Their Impact on Society 377–415. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-21753-6_14.
   Google Scholar
• Bocciarelli, M., and G. A. Barbieri. 2017. A numerical procedure for the pushover analysis of masonry towers. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 93:162–71. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Candeias, P. X., A. Campos Costa, N. Mendes, A. A. Costa, and P. B. Lourenço. 2017. Experimental assessment of the out-of-plane performance of masonry buildings through shaking table tests. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (1):31–58. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1238975.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., B. M. Chiaia, S. D’Angelo, and D. Ferretti. 2011. Seismic assessment and rehabilitation of a historical theater based on a macro-element strategy. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (3):264–95. doi:10.1080/15583050903560256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costa, A. A. 2012. Seismic assessment of the out-of-plane performance of traditional stone masonry walls. PhD diss., Faculty of Engineering of the University of Porto.
   Google Scholar
• D’Ambrisi, A., V. Mariani, and M. Mezzi. 2012. Seismic assessment of a historical masonry tower with nonlinear static and dynamic analyses tuned on ambient vibration tests. Engineering Structures 36:210–19. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DBYBHY. 2007. Code on structures to build in earthquake regions. General Directorate of Disaster Affairs. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• de Felice, G. 2011. Out-of-plane seismic capacity of masonry depending on wall section morphology. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (4–5):466–82. doi:10.1080/15583058.2010.530339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, H., Y. Nakamura, J. M. Ingham, and M. C. Griffith. 2017. Simulation of shake table tests on out-of-plane masonry buildings. Part (I): Displacement-based approach using simple failure mechanisms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (1):72–78. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1237590.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doherty, K., M. C. Griffith, N. Lam, and J. Wilson. 2002. Displacement-based seismic analysis for out-of-plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31 (4):833–50. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9845.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo, Y., L. Pelà, and P. Roca. 2017. Review of different pushover analysis methods applied to masonry buildings and comparison with nonlinear dynamic Analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (8):1234–55. doi:10.1080/13632469.2016.1210055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erzurum Environmental Status Report. 2011. Erzurum Governorship. Erzurum: Environmental and Urban Planning Provincial Directorate.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 6: Design of masonry structures. 1995. Part 1.1: General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures, European Committee for Standardization, ENV 1996-1-1:1995.
   Google Scholar
• Ferreira, T. M., A. A. Costa, and A. Costa. 2015. Analysis of the out-of-plane seismic behavior of unreinforced masonry: A literature review. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (8):949–72. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.885996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galasco, A., S. Lamomardino, and A. Penna. 2006. On the use of pushover analysis for existing masonry buildings. Paper presented at the 1st European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva, Switzerland, September 3.
   Google Scholar
• Garofano, A., and P. Lestuzzi. 2016. Seismic assessment of a historical masonry building in Switzerland: The “Ancien Hôpital De Sion”. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (8):975–92. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1160303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kadas, K., A. Yakut, and I. Kazaz. 2011. Spectral ground motion intensity based on capacity and period elongation. Journal of Structural Engineering 137 (3):401–09. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kanıt, R., and M. S. Döndüren. 2010. Investıgatıon of using ANSYS software in the determınatıon of stress behaviors of masonry walls under out of plane cyclıng load. International Journal of the Physical Sciences 5 (2):97–108.
   Google Scholar
• Karimi, A. H., M. S. Karimi, A. Kheyroddin, and A. A. Shahkarami. 2016. Experimental and numerical study on seismic behavior of an infilled masonry wall compared to an arched masonry wall. Structures 8 (1):144–53. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2016.09.012.
   Google Scholar
• Kazaz, İ. 2016. Seismic deformation demands on rectangular structural walls in frame-wall systems. Earthquakes and Structures 10 (2):329–50. doi:10.12989/eas.2016.10.2.329.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazaz, İ. 2010. Dynamic characteristics and performance assessment of reinforced concrete structural walls. PhD diss., Middle East Technical University.
   Google Scholar
• Kazaz, İ., and İ. Kocaman. 2018. Seismic load capacity evaluation of stone masonry mosques. Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 33 (2):543–58. (in Turkish).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kazaz, İ., A. Yakut, and P. Gülkan. 2006. Numerical simulation of dynamic shear wall tests: A benchmark study. Computers & Structures 84 (8–9):549–62. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.11.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaman, İ. 2017. Determination of the necessary material properties for the calculation of dynamic behavior of historic masonry structures. MS diss., Erzurum Technical University. (In Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Kuban, D. 1958. Osmanlı dini mimarisinde iç mekan teşekkülü-rönesansla bir mukayese. İstanbul: Güven Basım ve Yayınevi. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., and A. Penna 2009. Existing masonry buildings: General code issues and methods of analysis and assessment. Eurocode 8 Perspectives from the Italian Standpoint Workshop, 185–98, Napoli, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Melis, G. 2002. Displacement-based seismic analysis for out of plane bending of unreinforced masonry walls. MS diss., University of Pavia.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, G., and M. Valente. 2015. Comparative pushover and limit analyses on seven masonry churches damaged by the 2012 Emilia-Romagna (Italy) seismic events: Possibilities of non-linear finite elements compared with pre-assigned failure mechanisms. Engineering Failure Analysis 47 (A):129–61. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.09.016.
   Google Scholar
• NEHRP. 2000. Guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. FEMA 356. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C. D. V. 2003. Experimental and numerical analysis of blocky masonry structures under cyclic loading. PhD diss., Minho University.
   Google Scholar
• Ordinance 3274. 2003. Technical rules for the design, evaluation and seismic retrofitting of buildings. Italy: Italian Prime Minister Ordinance.
   Google Scholar
• Ordinance 3431. 2005. Last modifications and integrations to the Ordinance 3274. 2003. Italy: Italian Prime Minister Ordinance.
   Google Scholar
• Özkaya, S. G., I. Kazaz, and D. Okuyucu. 2015. Investigation of seismic behavior of arched masonry bridges by finite elements method. Paper presented at the 5th International Symposium on Conservation and Consolidation of Historical Structures, Erzurum, Turkey November 1. (In Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Pavlovic, M., E. Reccia, and A. Cecchi. 2016. A Procedure to investigate the collapse behavior of masonry domes: Some meaningful cases. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (1):67–83. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.951797.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, B., M. D. Benetta, F. D. Porto, and C. Modena. 2014. Experimental assessment of in-plane behavior of three-leaf stone masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials 53:149–61. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SolidWorks. 2013. Modeling Software.
   Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, L., D. D’Ayala, G. de Felice, M. C. Griffith, S. Lagomarsino, and G. Magenes. 2017. Review of out-of-plane seismic assessment techniques applied to existing masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 11 (1):2–21. doi:10.1080/15583058.2016.1237586.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tuluk, Ö. İ. 2006. Variations on the square based baldachin in ottoman mosques for the concept of space (15th-17th Centuries). Journal of the Faculty of Engineering and Architecture of Gazi University 21 (2):275–84. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• TYDK. 2017. Management of Earthquake Risks for Historic Buildings. General Directorate of Foundations. (in Turkish).
   Google Scholar
• Vanin, F., D. Zaganelli, A. Penna, and K. Beyer. 2017. Estimates for the stiffness, strength and drift capacity of stone masonry walls based on 123 quasi-static cyclic tests reported in the literature. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12):5435–79. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, G., and P. B. Lourenço. 2006. Assessment of the in-plane shear strength of stone masonry walls by simplified models. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions 1:843–59.
   Google Scholar
• Willam, K. J., and E. D. Warnke. 1975. Constitutive model for the triaxial behavior of concrete. International Association for Bridge and Structural Engineering 19 (3):1–30.
   Google Scholar