Structural Health Assessment of Historical Buildings via Ambient Vibrations: The SMAV Methodology for “Palazzo delle Laudi” at Sansepolcro (AR)

References

• Acunzo, G., N. Fiorini, F. Mori, and D. Spina. 2015. VaSCO-smav: The software developed for the SMAV methodology application (in Italian). Paper presented at the XVI Conference of Italian National Association of Earthquake Engineering (ANIDIS), L’Aquila.
   Google Scholar
• Acunzo, G., N. Fiorini, F. Mori, and D. Spina. 2018. Modal mass estimation from ambient vibrations measurement: A method for civil buildings. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 98C:580–93. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.05.014.
   Google Scholar
• Adhikari, S. 2004. Optimal complex modes and an index of damping non-proportionality. Mechanical System and Signal Processing 18:1–27. doi:10.1016/S0888-3270(03)00048-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Celebi, M., 2007. On the variation of fundamental frequency (period) of an undamaged building - a continuing discussion. Paper presented at the Proceeding of the conference on Experimental Vibration Analysis for Civil Engineering Structures (EVACES ’07), 317–26. Porto, Portugal, October 24-26
   Google Scholar
• Ceravolo, R., E. Matta, A. Quattrone, and L. Zanotti Fragonara. 2017. Amplitude dependence of equivalent modal parameters in monitored buildings during earthquake swarms. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 46:2399–417. doi:10.1002/eqe.2910.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cimellaro, G. P., and A. De Stefano. 2012. Ambient vibration test of XV century renaissance palace after 2012 Emilia earthquake in Northern Italy. Structural Monitoring and Maintenance 1:231–47. doi:10.12989/smm.2014.1.2.231.
   Google Scholar
• Clinton, J. 2006. The observed wander of the natural frequencies in a structure. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 96:237–57. doi:10.1785/0120050052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Endo, Y., L. Pelà, and P. Roca. 2017. Review of different push over analysis methods applied to masonry buildings and comparison with nonlinear dynamic analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (8):643–61. doi:10.1080/13632469.2016.1210055.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ewins, D. J. 2000. Modal testing: Theory, practice and application. 2nd ed. Baldock, Hertfordshire, England: Research Studies Press Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Grunthal, G. 1998. European macroseismic scale, Vol. 15. Luxembourg: Chaiers du Centre Europeen de Geodynamique et de Seismologie.
   Google Scholar
• Guéguen, P. 2013. Seismic vulnerability of structures. Croydon: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Michel, C., B. Zapico, P. Lestuzzi, F. J. Molina, and F. Weber. 2011. Quantification of fundamental frequency drop for unreinforced masonry buildings from dynamic tests. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 40 (11):1283–96. doi:10.1002/eqe.1088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mottershead, J. E., M. Link, and M. I. Friswell. 2011. The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 25 (7):2275–96. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.10.012.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negolescu, C., T. Ulrich, A. Baills, and D. M. Seyed. 2014. Fragility curves for masonry structures submitted to permanent ground displacements and earthquakes. Natural Hazards 74 (3):1461–74. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1253-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norme Tecniche per le costruzioni. 2018. Technical code for construction (in Italian). G.U. n. 42 del 20/2/2018. Rome, Italy: Gazzetta Ufficiale (G.U.).
   Google Scholar
• Pappa, R. S., K. B. Elliot, and A. Schenk. 1993. A consistent mode indicator for the eigensystem realization algorithm. Journal of Guidance, Control and Dynamics 16 (5):852–58. doi:10.2514/3.21092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, B., and G. De Roeck. 2001. Stochastic system identification for operational modal analysis. A Review, Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 123:659–67. doi:10.1115/1.1410370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peeters, B., and H. Van der Auweraer. 2005. PolyMAX: A revolution in operational modal analysis. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 1st IOMAC, Copenaghen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, L. F., L. Marquesa, P. B. Lourenço, G. De Roeck, A. Campos-Costa, and J. Roque. 2010. Monitoring historical masonry structures with operational modal analysis: Two case studies. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 24:1291–305. doi:10.1016/j.ymssp.2010.01.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spina, D., G. Acunzo, N. Fiorini, F. Mori, and M. Dolce. 2018. A probabilistic simplified seismic model of masonry buildings based on ambient vibrations. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1107/s10518-018-0481-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spina, D., and B. G. Lamonaca. 1998. Strengthening assessment of building using ambient vibration tests. Paper presented at the Proceeding of XI Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rotterdam: Balkema
   Google Scholar
• Todorovska, M. 2009. Seismic interferometry of a soil structure interaction model with coupled horizontal and rocking response. Bullettin of the Seismological Society of America 99:611–25. doi:10.1785/0120080191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., R. Brincker, and P. Andersen. 2005. An overview of operational modal analysis: Major development and issues. Paper presented at Proceedings of the 1st IOMAC Conference, 707–16. Copenhagen, Denmark.
   Google Scholar