Structural Performance Characteristics based Seismic Damage Gradation Schema for Single Storey URBM Buildings in India with a Rigid Diaphragm

References

• Abrams, D. P. 2001. Performance-based engineering concepts for unreinforced masonry building structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 3 (1):48–56. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1528-2716.
   Google Scholar
• Aguado, J. L. P., T. M. Ferreira, and P. B. Lourenço. 2018. The use of a large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment approach for masonry façade walls as an effective tool for evaluating, managing and mitigating seismic risk in historical centers. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12 (7–8):1259–75. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1503366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ASCE/SEI 41-13. 2013. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, VA, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• ATC-13. 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Applied Technology Council Report No. 13, Redwood City, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, S. R. 2016. Performance characteristics base seismic vulnerability analysis methodology for URBM buildings. PhD diss., Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, S. R., K. Balaji Rao, M. B. Anoop, J. Daniel Ronald Joseph, and R. I. Nagesh. 2010. Development of capacity curve for a typical two story reinforced brick masonry building. Proceedings of Institution of Engineers India, Journal Civil Engineering 90 (4):19–24.
   Google Scholar
• Balasubramanian, S. R., K. Balaji Rao, D. Basu, M. B. Anoop, and C. V. Vaidyanathan. 2011. An improved method for estimation of elastic lateral stiffness of brick masonry shear walls with openings. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 15 (2):281–93. doi:10.1007/s12205-011-0733-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bilgin, H. 2016. Generation of fragility curves for typical RC health care facilities: emphasis on hospitals in Turkey. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities (ASCE) 30 (3):04015056-1 - 04015056-16. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0000806.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brzev, S. 2007. Earthquake-resistant confined masonry construction. Kanpur, UP, India: National Information Center of Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Coburn, A., and R. Spence. 2002. Earthquake protection. 2nd ed. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Czarnecki, R. M., R. E. Scholl, and L. E. Malik. 1986. Techniques for estimating earthquake probable loss for buildings and contents. In Techniques for rapid assessment of seismic vulnerability, ed. C. Scawthorn, 67–78. New Orleans: American Society of Civil Engineers, Structures Congress ’86.
   Google Scholar
• Dowrick, D. J. 2003. Earthquake risk reduction. West Sussex, England: John Wiley and Sons Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1996-1-1:2005 (E). 2005. Design of masonry structures. Part 1–1: General rules for buildings - Reinforced and unreinforced masonry. Brussels: European Committee of Standardization (CEN).
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 356. 2000. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington D.C., USA: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Ghobarah, A. 2001. Performance-based design in earthquake engineering: state of development - Review article. Engineering Structures 23:878–84. doi:10.1016/S0141-0296(01)00036-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirschberg, J. C., P. Gordon, and W. J. Petak 1978. Natural hazards: Socio-economic impact assessment model. NSF/PRA-7509998/5, J H Wiggins and Co, Redondo Beach, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• IS: 1893 (Part 1). 2016. Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures, Part 1: General provisions and buildings (5th revision). New Delhi, India: Bureau of Indian Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, H. B., D. C. Rai, and S. K. Jain. 2007. Uniaxial compressive stress-strain model for clay brick masonry. Current Science 92 (4):497–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Giovinazzi. 2006. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4 (4):415–43. doi:10.1007/s10518-006-9024-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pujades, L. G., A. H. Barbat, R. Gonzalez-Drigo, J. Avila, and S. Lagomarsino. 2012. Seismic performance of a block of buildings representative of the typical construction in the eixample district in Barcelona (Spain). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10:331–49. doi:10.1007/s10518-010-9207-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rojahn, C. 1986. ATC methodology and data for rapid assessment for seismic vulnerability. In Techniques for rapid assessment of seismic vulnerability, ed. C. Scawthorn, 21–40. New Orleans: American Society of Civil Engineers, Structures Congress ’86.
   Google Scholar
• Sarangapani, G., B. V. V. Reddy, and K. S. Jagadish. 2005. Brick-mortar bond and masonry compressive strength. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (ASCE) 17 (2):229–37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(229).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SERC. 1991. Survey of dwellings in cyclone prone villages of Tamil Nadu, Andra Pradesh and Orissa. Project Report: SERC-UNDP Project (IND/91/011), CSIR-Structural Engineering Research Centre, Chennai, India.
   Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M. 1999. Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings. London, UK: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V., J. M. Biggs, J. E. Brennan, C. A. Cornell, R. L. de Neufville, and E. H. Vanmarcke. 1975. Seismic design decision analysis. Journal of the Structural Division ASCE. ST5:1067–84.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V., J. W. Reed, and S.-T. Hong 1973. Earthquake damage probability matrices. Proceedings of Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, 2: 2531–40.
   Google Scholar