Influence of Bond Pattern on the in-plane Behavior of URM Piers

References

• Abrams, D. P. 1996. Effects of scale and loading rate with tests of concrete and masonry structures. Earthquake Spectra 12 (1):13–28. doi:10.1193/1.1585866.
   Google Scholar
• Addessi, D., E. Sacco, and A. Paolone. 2010. Cosserat model for periodic masonry deduced by nonlinear homogenization. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids 29 (4):724–37. doi:10.1016/j.euromechsol.2010.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthoine, A. 1995. Derivation of the in-plane elastic characteristics of masonry through homogenization theory. International Journal of Solids and Structures 32 (2):137–63. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(94)00140-R.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthoine, A., G. Magonette, and G. Magenes 1995. Shear-compression testing and analysis of brick masonry walls. Proceedings of the 10th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, 1657–62. Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Azevedo, J., G. Sincraian, and J. V. Lemos. 2000. Seismic behavior of blocky masonry structures. Earthquake Spectra 16 (2):337–65. doi:10.1193/1.1586116.
   Google Scholar
• Bacigalupo, A., A. Cavicchi, and L. Gambarotta. 2011. A simplified evaluation of the influence of the bond pattern on the brickwork limit strength. Advanced Materials Research 368–373:3495–508. doi:10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.368-373.3495.
   Google Scholar
• Brooks, J. J., and A. Baker. 1998. Modulus of elasticity of Masonry. Masonry International 12 (2):58–63.
   Google Scholar
• Bui, T. T., A. Limam, V. Sarhosis, and M. Hjiaj. 2017. Discrete element modelling of the in-plane and out-of-plane behaviour of dry-joint masonry wall constructions. Engineering Structures 136:277–94. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.01.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casapulla, C., F. Portioli, A. Maione, and R. Landolfo. 2013. A macro-block model for in-plane loaded masonry walls with non-associative Coulomb friction. Meccanica 48 (9):2107–26. doi:10.1007/s11012-013-9728-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchi, A., and G. Milani. 2008. A kinematic FE limit analysis model for thick English bond masonry walls. International Journal of Solids and Structures 45 (5):1302–31. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2007.09.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cecchi, A., and K. Sab. 2004. A comparison between a 3D discrete model and two homogenised plate models for periodic elastic brickwork. International Journal of Solids and Structures 41 (9–10):2259–76. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2003.12.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciesielski, R. 1999. The dynamic module of elasticity of brick walls. Proceedings of the Conference of the Committee of Civil Engineering, Lublin, Poland. .
   Google Scholar
• Costa, A. A., A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2011. Seismic performance of autoclaved aerated concrete (AAC) masonry: From experimental testing of the in-plane capacity of walls to building response simulation. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (1):1–31. doi:10.1080/13632461003642413.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Courant, R., K. Friedrichs, and H. Lewy. 1967. On the partial difference equations of mathematical physics. IBM Journal of Research and Development 11 (2):215–34. doi:10.1147/rd.112.0215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cundall, P. A. 1971. A computer model for simulating progressive large-scale movements in blocky rock systems. Proceedings of the Symposium of the International Society of Rock Mechanics, Nancy, France.
   Google Scholar
• De Buhan, P., and G. de Felice. 1997. A homogenization approach to the ultimate strength of brick masonry. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 45 (7):1085–104. doi:10.1016/S0022-5096(97)00002-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Felice, G. 2011. Out-of-plane seismic capacity of masonry depending on wall section morphology. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 5 (4–5):466–82. doi:10.1080/15583058.2010.530339.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong, M. J., and C. Vibert. 2012. Seismic response of stone masonry spires: Computational and experimental modeling. Engineering Structures 40:566–74. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.03.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dhanasekar, M., P. W. Kleeman, and A. W. Page. 1985. Biaxial stress-strain relations for brick masonry. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 111 (5):1085–100. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1985)111:5(1085).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drysdale, R., A. Hamid, and L. Baker. 1999. Masonry structures–behavior and design. Boulder, Colorado: The Masonry Society.
   Google Scholar
• Drysdale, R. G., and M. M. Khattab. 1995. In-plane behavior of grouted concrete masonry under biaxial tension-compression. ACI Structural Journal 92 (6):653–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dumova-Jovanoska, E., and S. Churilov. 2009. Calibration of a numerical model for masonry with application to experimental results. Protection of Historical Buildings: PROHITECH 09:1139–45.
   Google Scholar
• Eurocode 8 (EC8). 2005. Design of structures for earthquake resistance – Part 3: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, design code EN 1998-3. European Committee for Standardization, Brussels, Belgium
   Google Scholar
• FEMA-306. 1998. Evaluation of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings. Basic Procedures Manual, Applied Technology Council (ATC).
   Google Scholar
• Galvez, F., M. Giaretton, S. Abeling, J. Ingham, and D. Dizhur 2018. Discrete element modelling of a two-storey unreinforced masonry scaled model. Processdings of the 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Godio, M., and K. Beyer. 2019. Evaluation of force-based and displacement-based out-of-plane seismic assessment methods for unreinforced masonry walls through refined model simulations. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (4):454–75. doi:10.1002/eqe.v48.4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2019. A comprehensive in situ and laboratory testing programme supporting seismic risk analysis of URM buildings subjected to induced earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (8):4575–99. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0478-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., U. Tomassetti, A. Rossi, B. Marchesi, S. Kallioras, M. Mandirola, A. Fragomeli, E. Mellia, S. Peloso, F. Cuppari, et al. 2016. Experimental campaign on a clay URM full-scale specimen representative of the Groningen building stock - Report n. EUC128/2016U, Eucentre Foundation, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., U. Tomassetti, S. Kallioras, A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2017. Shaking table test on a full scale URM cavity wall building. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12):5329–64. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0185-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haach, V. G., G. Vasconcelos, and P. B. Lourenço. 2011. Parametrical study of masonry walls subjected to in-plane loading through numerical modeling. Engineering Structures 33 (4):1377–89. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.01.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itasca Consulting Group Inc. 2013. 3DEC. Three dimensional distinct element code.
   Google Scholar
• Jäger, W., H. Irmschler, and P. Schubert. 2004. Mauerwerk-Kalender. New York, NY: Ernst & Sohn, Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Kallioras, S., G. Guerrini, U. Tomassetti, B. Marchesi, A. Penna, F. Graziotti, and G. Magenes. 2018. Experimental seismic performance of a full-scale unreinforced clay-masonry building with flexible timber diaphragms. Engineering Structures 161:231–49. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaushik, H. B., D. C. Rai, and S. K. Jain. 2007. Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering (ASCE) 19 (9):728–39. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kikuchi, K., K. Yoshimura, A. Tanaka, and K. Yoshida 2003. Effect of wall aspect ratio on seismic behaviour of reinforced fully grouted concrete masonry walls. Proceedings of 9th North American Masonry Conference, 214–25. Clemson, South Carolina, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Lemos, J. V. 1997. Discrete element modelling of the seismic behaviour of stone masonry arches. Proceedings of the 4th International Symposium on Numerical Methods in Structural Masonry, 220–27. Florence, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., and J. G. Rots. 1997. Multisurface interface model for analysis of masonry structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 123 (7):660–68. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9399(1997)123:7(660).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., and G. M. Calvi 1992. Cyclic behaviour of brick masonry walls. Proceedings of the 10th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Madrid, Spain.
   Google Scholar
• Maheri, M. R., M. A. Najafgholipour, and A. R. Rajabi. 2008. The influence of mortar head joints on the in-plane and out-of-plane seismic strength of brick masonry walls. Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transaction 35 (C1):63–79.
   Google Scholar
• Malomo, D. 2019. Discrete element models for the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry structures. PhD Thesis, University of Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Malomo, D., M. J. DeJong, and A. Penna. 2019a. Distinct element modelling of the in-plane cyclic response of URM walls subjected to shear-compression. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42 (12):1322–44. doi:10.1002/eqe.3178.
   Google Scholar
• Malomo, D., R. Pinho, and A. Penna. 2018a. Using the applied element method for modelling calcium silicate brick masonry subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (7):1610–30. doi:10.1002/eqe.v47.7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malomo, D., R. Pinho, and A. Penna 2018b. The applied element method and the modelling of both in-plane and out-of-plane resposne of URM walls. Proceedings of the 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Malomo, D., R. Pinho, and A. Penna. 2019b. Simulating the shake-table response of URM cavity-wall structures tested to collapse or near-collapse conditions. Earthquake Spectra. in press. doi:10.1177/8755293019891715.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malomo, D., R. Pinho, and A. Penna. 2019c. Applied element modelling of the dynamic response of a full-scale clay brick masonry building specimen with flexible diaphragms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–18. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1616004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann, W., and H. Muller. 1982. Failure of shear-stressed masonry. An enlarged theory, tests and application to shear walls. Proceedings of the British Ceramic Society 30:223.
   Google Scholar
• Marti, J., and P. Cundall. 1982. Mixed discretization procedure for accurate modelling of plastic collapse. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics 6 (1):129–39. doi:10.1002/(ISSN)1096-9853.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matysek, P., and Z. Janowski 1996. Analysis of factors affecting the modulus of elasticity of the walls. Proceedings of the Conference of the Committee of Civil Engineering, Lublin, Poland.
   Google Scholar
• Messali, F., and J. G. Rots. 2018. In-plane drift capacity at near collapse of rocking unreinforced calcium silicate and clay masonry piers. Engineering Structures 164:183–94. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.050.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michalewicz, Z., and C. Z. Janikow. 1991. Genetic algorithms for numerical optimization. Statistics and Computing 1 (2):75–91. doi:10.1007/BF01889983.
   Google Scholar
• Milani, G., and A. Cecchi. 2013. Compatible model for herringbone bond masonry: Linear elastic homogenization, failure surfaces and structural implementation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 50 (20–21):3274–96. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2013.05.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milani, G., Y. W. Esquivel, P. B. Lourenço, B. Riveiro, and D. V. Oliveira. 2013. Characterization of the response of quasi-periodic masonry: Geometrical investigation, homogenization and application to the Guimarães castle, Portugal. Engineering Structures 56:621–41. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.05.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mojsilović, N. 2011. Strength of masonry subjected to in-plane loading: A contribution. International Journal of Solids and Structures 48 (6):865–73. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2010.11.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morandi, P., L. Albanesi, F. Graziotti, T. Li Piani, A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2018. Development of a dataset on the in-plane experimental response of URM piers with bricks and blocks. Construction and Building Materials 190:593–611. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC-2008. 2008. Decreto Ministeriale 14/1/2008: Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Ministry of Infrastructures and Transportations, G.U.S.O. n.30, 4/2/2008 [in Italian].
   Google Scholar
• NZSEE. 2006. Assessment and improvement of the structural performance of buildings in Earthquakes, 1–94. Recommendations of a NZSEE Study Group on Earthquake Risk Buildings. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering.
   Google Scholar
• Otter, J. R. H. 1966. Dynamic relaxation compared with other iterative finite difference methods. Nuclear Engineering and Design 3 (1):183–85. doi:10.1016/0029-5493(66)90157-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page, A. 1981. The biaxial compressive strength of brick masonry. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers (ICE), Newcastle, New South Wales, Australia, 893–906.
   Google Scholar
• Page, A. W. 1983. The strength of brick masonry under biaxial tension-compression. International Journal of Masonry Construction 3 (1):26–31.
   Google Scholar
• Paulay, T., and J. N. Priestley. 1992. Seismic design of reinforced concrete and masonry buildings. New York, NY: Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Paulson, T. J., and D. P. Abrams. 1990. Correlation between static and dynamic response of model masonry structures. Earthquake Spectra 6 (3):573–91. doi:10.1193/1.1585587.
   Google Scholar
• Petry, S., and K. Beyer. 2014. Influence of boundary conditions and size effect on the drift capacity of URM walls. Engineering Structures 65:76–88. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.01.048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portioli, F., L. Cascini, C. Casapulla, and M. D’Aniello. 2013. Limit analysis of masonry walls by rigid block modelling with cracking units and cohesive joints using linear programming. Engineering Structures 57:232–47. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.09.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulatsu, B., E. M. Bretas, and P. B. Lourenço. 2016. Discrete element modeling of masonry structures: Validation and application. Earthquake and Structures 11 (4):563–82. doi:10.12989/eas.2016.11.4.563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roca, P., M. Cervera, G. Gariup, and L. Pela’. 2010. Structural analysis of masonry historical constructions. Classical and advanced approaches. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 17 (3):299–325. doi:10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salerno, G., and G. de Felice. 2009. Continuum modeling of periodic brickwork. International Journal of Solids and Structures 46 (5):1251–67. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2008.10.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmanpour, A. H., N. Mojsilović, and J. Schwartz. 2015. Displacement capacity of contemporary unreinforced masonry walls: An experimental study. Engineering Structures 89:1–16. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schultz, A. E., R. S. Hutchinson, and G. S. Cheok 1998. Seismic performance of masonry walls with bed joint reinforcement. Structural Engineers World Congress, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Szakály, F., Z. Hortobágyi, and K. Bagi. 2016. Discrete element analysis of the shear resistance of planar walls with different bond patterns. The Open Construction and Building Technology Journal 10 (1):220–32. doi:10.2174/1874836801610010220.
   Google Scholar
• Thamboo, J. A., and M. Dhanasekar. 2016. Behaviour of thin layer mortared concrete masonry under combined shear and compression. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 17 (1):39–52. doi:10.1080/13287982.2015.1116181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M. 1999. Earthquake-resistant design of masonry buildings. London, UK: Imperial College Press.
   Google Scholar
• U.B.C. 1991. International conference of building officials. Uniform building code. International conference of building officials, USA, Whittier, Alaska.
   Google Scholar
• Vanin, F., D. Zaganelli, A. Penna, and K. Beyer. 2017. Estimates for the stiffness, strength and drift capacity of stone masonry walls based on 123 quasi-static cyclic tests reported in the literature. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12):5435–79. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, G., and P. B. Lourenço. 2009. In-plane experimental behavior of stone masonry walls under cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 135 (10):1269–77. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000053.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilding, B. V., and K. Beyer. 2018. The effective stiffness of modern unreinforced masonry walls. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 47 (8):1683–705. doi:10.1002/eqe.v47.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., and K. Beyer. 2019. Numerical investigation of the role of masonry typology on shear strength. Engineering Structures 192:86–102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar