Integrated Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Historical Masonry Churches Including Architectural and Artistic Assets Based on Macro-element Approach

References

• Aghataher, R., M. R. Delavar, M. H. Nami, and N. Samnay. 2008. A fuzzy-AHP decision support system for evaluation of cities vulnerability against earthquakes. World Applied Sciences Journal 3 (1):66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:693–714. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini, C., and S. Lagomarsino. 2010. The behaviour of S. Agostino church during 6th April 2009 earthquake in L’Aquila: Vulnerability and damage assessment. Advanced Materials Research 133:771–76.
   Google Scholar
• Canuti, C., S. Carbonari, A. Dall’Asta, L. Dezi, F. Gara, G. Leoni, M. Morici, E. Petrucci, A. Prota, and A. Zona. 2019. Post-earthquake damage and vulnerability assessment of churches in the Marche Region struck by the 2016 central Italy seismic sequence. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–22. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1653403.
   Google Scholar
• Cifani, G., A. Lemme, G. Cialone, and A. Martinelli. 2004. Linee guida preliminari per gli interventi di riparazione del danno e miglioramento sismico per gli edifici di culto e monumentali [Preliminary guidelines for damage repair and seismic improvement for religious and monumental buildings]. Supplemento straordinario n.1 al BURM del 1. 4.04 n.7, Pisa University Press, Pisa, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., G. Brando, and V. Corlito. 2019b. Simplified assessment of the seismic vulnerability of churches after the 2009 L’Aquila Earthquake. In Structural analysis of historical constructions, ed. R. Aguilar, D. Torrealva, S. Moreira, M. A. Pando, and L. F. Ramos, RILEM Bookseries, Vol. 18:1280-1289. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., E. Criber, and G. Brando. 2016. Damage probability matrices for three-nave masonry churches in Abruzzi after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3):120–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Matteis, G., G. Brando, and V. Corlito. 2019a. Predictive model for seismic vulnerability assessment of churches based on the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (9):4909–36. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00656-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doglioni, F. 2000. Codice di Pratica (Linee Guida) per la progettazione degli interventi di riparazione, miglioramento sismico e restauro dei beni architettonici danneggiati dal terremoto umbro marchigiano del 1997 [Code of practice (guidelines) for the design of repair interventions, seismic improvement and restoration of architectural assets damaged by the 1997 Umbria-Marche earthquake]. Bollettino Ufficiale Regione Marche 15. Ancona: Regione Marche editore
   Google Scholar
• Doglioni, F., A. Moretti, and V. Petrini. 1994. Le Chiese e il Terremoto [The churches and the earthquake]. Trieste, Italy: Lint press.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M., A. Kappos, A. Masi, G. Penelis, and M. Vona. 2006. Vulnerability assessment and earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) using Italian and Greek methodologies. Engineering Structures 28 (3):357–71. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghizzi, S. 1994. Aspetti economici del restauro archeolgoico, in Note di Economia dei Beni Culturali ed Ambientali [Economic aspects of archaeological restoration, in notes on the economics of cultural and environmental heritage]. Rivista di Analisi dei Problemi di Finanziamento, Valutazione e Gestione dei Progetti di Investimento per il Restauro e la Valorizzazione dei Beni Culturali, Anno II, Numero 1, Roma.
   Google Scholar
• Harker, P. T., and L. G. Vargas. 1987. The theory of ratio scale estimation: Saaty’s analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 33 (11):1383–403. doi:https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.33.11.1383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• İpekoğlu, B. 2006. An architectural evaluation method for conservation of traditional dwellings. Building and Environment 41 (3):386–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2005.02.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jokilehto, J. 2006. World heritage: Defining the outstanding universal value. City and Time 2 (2):1.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podesta. 2004a. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: I. Damage assessment and emergency planning. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2):377–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737735.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Podesta. 2004b. Seismic vulnerability of ancient churches: II. statistical analysis of surveyed data and methods for risk analysis. Earthquake Spectra 20 (2):395–412. doi:https://doi.org/10.1193/1.1737736.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., S. Podesta, G. Cifani, and A. Lemme. 2004. The 31st October 2002 earthquake in Molise (Italy): A new methodology for the damage and seismic vulnerability survey of churches. Proceeding of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Marotta, A., L. Sorrentino, D. Liberatore, and J. M. Ingham. 2017. Vulnerability assessment of unreinforced masonry churches following the 2010–2011 canterbury earthquake sequence. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (6):912–34. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13632469.2016.1206761.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministero per i Beni e le Attivita Culturali. 2011. Linee Guida per la valutazione e riduzione del rischio sismico del patrimonio culturale allineate alle nuove Norme tecniche per le costruzioni [Guidelines for the assessment and mitigation of Seismic Risk of the cultural heritage coherent with the Italian Seismic Code]. In Italian. Roma. Gangemi Editore spa.
   Google Scholar
• Noble, E. E., and P. P. Sanchez. 1993. A note on the information content of a consistent pairwise comparison judgment matrix of an AHP decision maker. Theory Decision 34 (2):99–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01074896.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palazzi, N. C., L. Rovero, J. C. De La Llera, and C. Sandoval. 2019. Preliminary assessment on seismic vulnerability of masonry churches in central Chile. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2019.1570388.
   Google Scholar
• Panahi, M., F. Rezaie, and S. A. Meshkani. 2014. Seismic vulnerability assessment of school buildings in Tehran city based on AHP and GIS. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 14 (4):969–79. doi:https://doi.org/10.5194/nhess-14-969-2014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, A., C. Calderini, L. Sorrentino, C. F. Carocci, E. Cescatti, R. Sisti, A. Borri, C. Modena, and A. Prota. 2019. Damage to churches in the 2016 central italy earthquakes. Bulletin Of Earthquake Engineering 17:1–28. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00594-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perrone, D., M. A. Aiello, M. Pecce, and F. Rossi. 2015. Rapid visual screening for seismic evaluation of RC hospital buildings. Structures 3:57–70. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.istruc.2015.03.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pittore, M., and M. Wieland. 2013. Toward a rapid probabilistic seismic vulnerability assessment using satellite and ground-based remote sensing. Natural Hazards 68 (1):115–45. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-012-0475-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porco, F., A. Fiore, G. Uva, and D. Raffaele. 2015. The influence of infilled panels in retrofitting interventions of existing reinforced concrete buildings: A case study. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 11 (2):162–75. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.862726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Regione Molise, G. N. D. T. 2001. Mitigazione del rischio sismico dei centri storici e degli edifici di culto dell’area del Matese nella Regione Molise [Mitigation of seismic risk in historic centers and churches in the Matese area in the Molise Region]. Pescara: Brandolini.
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, R. W. 1987. The analytic hierarchy process—What it is and how it is used. Mathematical Modelling 9 (3–5):161–76. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0270-0255(87)90473-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 2008. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences 1 (1):83–98. doi:https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.017590.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiorgio, V., G. Uva, and F. Fatiguso. 2017. Optimized AHP to overcome limits in weight calculation: A building performance application. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0001418.
   Google Scholar
• Sangiorgio, V., G. Uva, and F. Fatiguso. 2018. User-reporting based semeiotic assessment of existing building stock at the regional scale. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 32 (6):04018079. doi:https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001227.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sangiorgio, V., G. Uva, F. Fatiguso, and J. M. Adam. 2019. A new index to evaluate exposure and potential damage to RC building structures in coastal areas. Engineering Failure Analysis 100:439–55. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.02.052.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi, I., G. Magenes, and J. M. Ingham. 2015. Damage assessment of unreinforced stone masonry buildings after the 2010–2011 Canterbury earthquakes. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (5):605–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2013.840688.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terrizzi, A. R., M. Leone, D. Perrone, G. Uva, and M. A. Aiello. 2018. Valutazione del rischio sismico di edifici scolastici in calcestruzzo armato mediante una scheda di rapid visual screening [assessment of the seismic risk of school buildings in reinforced concrete using a rapid visual screening sheet]. Progettazione Sismica 2:35-48.
   Google Scholar
• Uva, G., C. A. Sanjust, S. Casolo, and M. Mezzina. 2016. ANTAEUS project for the regional vulnerability assessment of the current building stock in historical centers. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (1):20–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2014.935983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uva, G., V. Sangiorgio, S. Ruggieri, and F. Fatiguso. 2019. Structural vulnerability assessment of masonry churches supported by user-reported data and modern Internet of Things (IoT). Measurement 131:183–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.measurement.2018.08.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woessner, J., D. Laurentiu, D. Giardini, H. Crowley, F. Cotton, G. Grünthal, S. Hiemer, G. Valensise, R. Arvidsson, R. Basili, et al. 2015. The 2013 European seismic hazard model: Key components and results. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (12):3553–96. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-015-9795-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar