Publication Cover
International Journal of Architectural Heritage
Conservation, Analysis, and Restoration
Volume 15, 2021 - Issue 11
315
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Seismic Vulnerability and Expected Damage in “Ground Zero Area” in El Cabanyal (Valencia)

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 1623-1640 | Received 10 Oct 2019, Accepted 28 Dec 2019, Published online: 03 Jan 2020

References

  • Barbat, A. H., L. G. Pujades, and N. Lantada. 2008. Seismic damage evaluation in urban areas using a capacity-spectrum based method: Application to Barcelona. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 28 (10–11):851–65.
  • Barbat, A. H., M. L. Carreño, L. G. Pujades, N. Lantada, O. D. Cardona, and M. C. Marulanda. 2010. Seismic vulnerability and risk evaluation methods for urban areas. A review with application to a pilot area. Structure and Infrastructure Engineering 6:17–38. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15732470802663763.
  • Basset-Salom, L., and A. Guardiola-Víllora. 2013. Influence of the maintenance in seismic response of Lorca historic centre masonry residential buildings after 11 May Earthquake. Studies, Repairs and Maintenance of Heritage Architecture XIII. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment 131:343–54.
  • Basset-Salom, L., and A. Guardiola-Víllora. 2014. Seismic performance of masonry residential buildings in Lorca’s city centre, after the 11th May 2011 earthquake. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12:2027–48. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9559-8.
  • Benedetti, D., and V. Petrini. 1984. Sulla Vulnerabilità di Edifici in Muratura: Proposta di un Metodo di Valutazione. L’industria Delle Costruzioni 149 (1):66–74.
  • Calvi, G. M., R. Pinho, G. Magenes, J. J. Bommer, L. F. Restrepo-Vélez, and H. Crowley. 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 43 (3):75–104.
  • Chever, L. 2012. Use of seismic assessment methods for planning vulnerability reduction of existing building stock. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September 24–28.
  • D’Ayala, D., and E. Speranza. 2002. An integrated procedure for the assessment of seismic vulnerability of historic buildings. Proceedings of the 12th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, ed. Elsevier Science, Paper No. 561, London, UK.
  • Dolce, M., A. Masi, M. Marino, and M. Vona. 2003. Earthquake damage scenarios of the building stock of Potenza (Southern Italy) including site effects. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1 (1):115–40. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1024809511362.
  • FEMA-NIBS, Federal Emergency Management Agency, National Institute of Building Sciences. 2003. Hazus-mh mr3·technical manual multi-hazard loss estimation methodology. Earthquake model. Washington, DC: Federal Emergency Management Agency.
  • Feriche, M. 2012. Elaboración de escenarios de daños sísmicos en la ciudad de Granada. Ph.D. thesis, Instituto Andaluz de Geofísica y prevención de Desastres sísmicos. Universidad de Granada.
  • Feriche, M., F. Vidal, G. Alguacil, M. Navarro, and C. Aranda. 2012. Vulnerabilidad y daño en el terremoto de Lorca de 2011. Paper presented at the 7ª Asamblea Hispanoportuguesa de Geodesia y Geofísica, San Sebastián, Spain, June.
  • Ferreira, T. M., R. Maio, and R. Vicente. 2017. Seismic vulnerability assessment of the old city centre of Horta, Azores: Calibration and application of a seismic vulnerability index method. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15:2879–99. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0071-9.
  • Giner, J. J., S. Molina, and P. J. Jáuregui. 2003. Sismicidad en la comunidad valenciana. Física De La Tierra 15:163–87.
  • Giovinazzi, S. 2005. The vulnerability assessment and the damage scenario in seismic risk analysis. Ph.D Thesis, Technical University Carolo-Wilhelmina, Braunschweig, Germany and University of Florence, Italy
  • Giovinazzi, S., and S. Lagomarsino. 2002. WP04: Guidelines for the implementation of the 1 level methodology for the vulnerability assessment of current buildings: RISK-UE project. Italy: University of Genoa.
  • Giovinazzi, S., and S. Lagomarsino 2004. A macroseismic method for the vulnerability assessment of buildings. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, August 1–6, paper 896.
  • Grünthal, G. 1998. European macroseismic scale 1998. Cahiers Du Centre Européen De Géodynamique Et De Séismologie 15 (Luxembourg):99.
  • Guardiola-Víllora, A., and L. Basset-Salom. 2015. Escenarios de riesgo sísmico del distrito del Eixample de la ciudad de Valencia. Revista Internacional De Métodos Numéricos Para El Cálculo Y Diseño En Ingeniería 31 (2):81–90. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rimni.2014.01.002.
  • gvSIG association. 2009. gvSIG desktop, the open source geographic information system. http://www.gvsig.com/en/home.
  • Herrero García, L. F. 2016. El Cabanyal: Permanencias y transformación. PhD Thesis, Universitat Politècnica de València. doi:https://doi.org/10.4995/Thesis/10251/62201.
  • Hervás Más, J. 2017. El barrio del Cabanyal-Canyameral de Valencia: Historia y futuro. Ciudad Y Territorio Estudios Territoriales XLIX(191): 81-97. Min. Fomento.
  • Irizarry, J., A. Macau, S. Figueras, X. Goula, N. Lantada, S. Vendrell, L. G. Pujades, and A. Blázquez. 2012. Seismic risk assessment for the city of Girona, Spain. Paper presented at the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September 24–28.
  • Irizarry, J., N. Lantada, L. G. Pujades, A. H. Barbat, X. Goula, T. Susagna, and A. Roca. 2011. Ground-shaking scenarios and urban risk evaluation of Barcelona using the Risk-UE capacity spectrum-based method. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 9 (2):441–66. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-010-9222-6.
  • Kappos, A. J., G. Panagopoulos, C. Panagiotopoulos, and G. Penelis. 2006. A hybrid method for the vulnerability assessment of R/C and URM buildings. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4:391–413. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-006-9023-0.
  • Lamego, P., P. B. Lourenço, M. L. Sousa, and R. R. Marques. 2017. Seismic vulnerability and risk analysis of the old building stock at urban scale: Application to a neighbourhood in Lisbon. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15:2901–37. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-0072-8.
  • Lantada, N. 2007. Evaluación del riesgo sísmico mediante métodos avanzados y técnicas GIS. Aplicación a la ciudad de Barcelona. PhD Thesis, U.P. Cataluña, Barcelona.
  • Lantada, N., J. Irizarry, A. Barbat, X. Goula, A. Roca, T. Susagna, and L. G. Pujades. 2010. Seismic hazard and risk scenarios for Barcelona, Spain, using the Risk-UE vulnerability index method. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 8 (2):201–29. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-009-9148-z.
  • Lantada, N., L. G. Pujades, and A. H. Barbat. 2018. Earthquake risk scenarios in urban areas: A review with applications to the Ciutat Vella District in Barcelona, Spain. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12 (7–8):1112–30. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15583058.2018.1503367.
  • Llopis, A., L. Perdigón, and F. Taberner. 2004. Cartografía Histórica de la ciudad de Valencia, volumen 1, (1608-1929). Valencia: Facsimil editions Digitals.
  • Maio, R., T. M. Ferreira, R. Vicente, and J. Estêvão. 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical urban centres: Case study of the old city centre of Faro, Portugal. Journal of Risk Research 19 (5):551–80. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2014.988285.
  • Martínez-Cuevas, S., and J. M. Gaspar-Escribano. 2016. Reassessment of intensity estimates from vulnerability and damage distributions: The 2011 Lorca earthquake. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14:2679–703. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-016-9913-8.
  • Martínez-Cuevas, S., M. B. Benito, J. Cervera, M. C. Morillo, and M. Luna. 2017. Urban modifiers of seismic vulnerability aimed at Urban Zoning Regulations. The Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15:4719–50. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-017-0162-2.
  • Milutinovic, Z. V., and G. S. Trendafiloski. 2003. WP04. Vulnerability of current buildings. RISK-UE project: An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns. Skopje: Institute of Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Seismology (IZIIS).
  • Mouroux, P., E. Bertrand, M. Bour, B. Le Brun, S. Depinois, and P. Masure. 2004. The European RISK-UE project: An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios. Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering (13 WCEE), Vancouver, BC, August 1–6, paper 3329.
  • MV-101. 1962. Norma M.V.101-1962 Acciones en la edificación. Min. Vivienda. Decreto 195/1963 de 17 de enero. BOE 35, 9/02/1963: 2207-2225.
  • NCSE-02. 2002. Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente. Parte General y de Edificación. Comisión Permanente de Normas Sismorresistentes, Min. Fomento. Real Decreto 997/2002 de 27/10. BOE 244, 11/ 10/2002: 35898-35967.
  • NCSE-94. 1994. Norma de Construcción Sismorresistente, Parte General y de Edificación. Comisión Permanente de Normas Sismorresistentes, Min. Fomento. Real Decreto 2543/1994 de 29 de diciembre. BOE 33, 08/ 02/1995: 3935-3980.
  • Novelli, V. I. 2017. Hybrid method for the seismic vulnerability assessment of historic masonry city centres. Ph.D. Thesis, University College London.
  • Pastor Vila, R. 2012. El Cabanyal. Lectura de las estructuras de la edificación.» Ensayo tipológico residencial 1900-1936. PhD. Thesis, Universitat Politècnica València.
  • PDS-1. 1974. Norma Sismorresistente PDS-1 (1974), parte A. Comisión Interministerial. Min. Planificación del Desarrollo. Decreto 3209/1974 de 30 de agosto, BOE 279, 21/ 11/1974: 23585-23601.
  • PGS-1. 1968. Norma Sismorresistente PGS-1 (1968), parte A. Comisión Interministerial de Presidencia de Gobierno. Decreto 106/1969 de 16 de enero. BOE 30, 04/ 02/1969: 1658-1675.
  • Reglamento sobre las restricciones del hierro en la edificación. 1941. Gobierno de la Nación. Presidencia de Gobierno. Decreto de 22 de Julio de 1941.BOE 214, 02/ 08/1941:5848 a 5853.
  • Ródenas, J. L., A. Tomás, and S. García-Ayllón. 2018. Advances in seismic vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete buildings applied to the experience of Lorca (Spain) 2011 earthquake. International Journal of Computational Methods and Experimental Measurements 6 (5):887–98.
  • Silva, P. G., M. A. Rodríguez-Pascua, J. L. Giner Robles, J. Élez, P. Huerta, F. García-Tortosa, T. Bardají, M. Á. Perucha, P. Vicente Gómez, R. Pérez-López, et al. 2019. Catálogo de los Efectos Geológicos de los Terremotos en España, 2nd ed. Serie: Riesgos Geológicos/ Geotecnia, 6. Madrid: IGME.
  • Tarín, S. 2013. Un Cabanyal torturat. In Bens F., Las casas del Cabanyal. Modernismo valenciano para el siglo XXI. Valencia: L’Oronella, 8-25. ISBN: 978-8496472730.
  • URSUA. 2010. Unidad de Registro Sísmico Universidad de Alicante. Mapas de Intensidad sísmica esperada en la Comunidad Valenciana incluyendo efecto del sitio para 500 años. Accessed September 9, 2019. http://web.ua.es/ursua.
  • Whitman, R. V., J. W. Reed, and S. T. Hong. 1973. Earthquake damage probability matrices. Proceedings of the 5th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering 2:2531–40. Rome, Italy.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.