Ranking the Seismic Vulnerability of Masonry School Buildings according to the EC8-3 by Using Performance Curves

References

• Alam, N., M. S. Alam, and S. Tesfamariam. 2012. Buildings’ seismic vulnerability assessment methods: A comparative study. Natural Hazards 62 (2):405–24. doi:10.1007/s11069-011-0082-4.8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberto, Y., M. Otsubo, H. Kyokawa, T. Kiyota, and I. Towhata. 2018. Reconnaissance of the 2017 Puebla, Mexico earthquake. Soils and Foundations 58 (5):1073–92. doi:10.1016/j.sandf.2018.06.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arêde, A., C. Almeida, C. Costa, and A. Costa. 2019. In-situ and lab tests for mechanical characterization of stone masonry historical structures. Construction and Building Materials 220:503–15. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.06.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ATC. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, Volume 1. Redwood City, California: Applied Technology Council.
   Google Scholar
• Augenti, N., E. Cosenza, M. Dolce, G. Manfredi, A. Masi, and L. Samela. 2004. Performance of school buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, Earthquake. Earthquake Spectra 20 (S1):S257–S270. doi:10.1193/1.1769374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azizi-Bondarabadi, H., N. Mendes, P. B. Lourenço, and N. H. Sadeghi. 2016. Empirical seismic vulnerability analysis for masonry buildings based on school buildings survey in Iran. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (11):3195–229. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9944-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bordogna, E., and T. Brighenti. 2020. Education as reconstruction. School typology in post-earthquake reconstruction in Central Italy. In Buildings for education: A multidisciplinary overview of the design of school buildings, ed. S. Della Torre, M. Bocciarelli, L. Daglio, and R. Neri, 127–37. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33687-5_12.45.
   Google Scholar
• Buforn, E., C. López-Sánchez, L. Lozano, J. M. Martínez-Solares, S. Cesca, C. S. Oliveira, and A. Udías. 2019. Re-evaluation of seismic intensities and relocation of 1969 Saint Vincent Cape seismic sequence: A comparison with the 1755 Lisbon Earthquake. Pure and Applied Geophysics. doi:10.1007/s00024-019-02336-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casapulla, C., L. U. Argiento, and A. Maione. 2018. Seismic safety assessment of a masonry building according to Italian guidelines on cultural heritage: Simplified mechanical-based approach and pushover analysis. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (7):2809–37. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0281-9.34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CEN. 2004. EN 1998–1:2004. Eurocode 8, design of structures for earthquake resistance-part 1: General rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2005. EN 1998–3: 2005. Eurocode 8, design of structures for earthquake resistance - part 3: Assessment and retrofitting of buildings. Brussels: Comité Européen de Normalisation.
   Google Scholar
• Ceroni, F., N. Caterino, and A. Vuoto. 2020. Simplified seismic vulnerability assessment methods: A comparative analysis with reference to regional school building stock in Italy. Applied Sciences 10:19. doi:10.3390/app10196771.
   Google Scholar
• Chao, Y.-F., and H.-M. Chen. 2016. Automatic modeling method for regional seismic damage assessment of school buildings in Taiwan. Journal of the Chinese Institute of Engineers 39 (5):606–14. doi:10.1080/02533839.2016.1146091.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen, H., Q. Xie, R. Lan, Z. Li, C. Xu, and S. Yu. 2017. Seismic damage to schools subjected to Nepal earthquakes, 2015. Natural Hazards 88 (1):247–84. doi:10.1007/s11069-017-2865-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chester, D. K., and O. K. Chester. 2010. The impact of eighteenth century earthquakes on the Algarve region, southern Portugal. The Geographical Journal 176 (4):350–70. doi:10.1111/j.1475-4959.2010.00367.x.
   Google Scholar
• Chrysostomou, C. Z., N. Kyriakides, V. K. Papanikolaou, A. J. Kappos, E. G. Dimitrakopoulos, and A. I. Giouvanidis. 2015. Vulnerability assessment and feasibility analysis of seismic strengthening of school buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (12):3809–40. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9791-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementi, F., V. Gazzani, M. Poiani, and S. Lenci. 2016. Assessment of seismic behaviour of heritage masonry buildings using numerical modelling. Journal of Building Engineering 8:29–47. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia Lopes, G., R. Vicente, T. M. Ferreira, M. Azenha, and J. Estêvão. 2020. Displacement-based seismic performance evaluation and vulnerability assessment of buildings: The N2 method revisited. Structures 24:41–49. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2019.12.028.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Ludovico, M., A. Digrisolo, C. Moroni, F. Graziotti, V. Manfredi, A. Prota, M. Dolce, and G. Manfredi. 2018. Remarks on damage and response of school buildings after the Central Italy earthquake sequence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0332-x.
   Google Scholar
• DRE. 2019. Portaria n.º 302/2019 de 12 de setembro (in Portuguese). Diário da República, 1.ª série, nº 175, XXI Governo Constitucional.
   Google Scholar
• Estêvão, J., Tomás, B., Laranja, R. and Braga, A. 2021. Seismic Retrofitting of an Existing Masonry School Building: A Case Study in Algarve. In Sustainability and Automation in Smart Constructions, ed. Rodrigues, H., Gaspar, F., Fernandes, P. and Mateus, A., 349–355. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-35533-3_42
   Google Scholar
• Estêvão, J. M. C. 2019. An integrated computational approach for seismic risk assessment of individual buildings. Applied Sciences 9 (23):5088. doi:10.3390/app9235088.
   Google Scholar
• Estêvão, J. M. C., and A. Carvalho. 2015. The role of source and site effects on structural failures due to Azores earthquakes. Engineering Failure Analysis 56:429–40. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.12.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estêvão, J. M. C., and C. S. Oliveira. 2015. A new analysis method for structural failure evaluation. Engineering Failure Analysis 56:573–84. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.08.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Estêvão, J. M. C., M. A. Ferreira, A. Morales-Esteban, F. Martínez-Álvarez, L. Fazendeiro-Sá, V. Requena-García-Cruz, M. L. Segovia-Verjel, and C. S. Oliveira 2018. Earthquake resilient schools in Algarve (Portugal) and Huelva (Spain). 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering (16ECEE), 1–11, Paper 11214. Thessaloniki, Greece
   Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P., and P. Gašperšič. 1996. The N2 method for the seismic damage analysis of RC buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25 (1):31–46. doi:10.1002/(sici)1096-9845(199601)25:1<31::aid-eqe534>3.0.co;2-v.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Figueroa, E. A. P., P. Malisan, and S. Grimaz. 2020. Implementation of seismic assessment of schools in El Salvador. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 45:101449. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gautam, D., R. Adhikari, R. Rupakhety, and P. Koirala. 2020. An empirical method for seismic vulnerability assessment of Nepali school buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (13):5965–82. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00922-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giordano, N., F. De Luca, and A. Sextos. 2020. Out-of-plane closed-form solution for the seismic assessment of unreinforced masonry schools in Nepal. Engineering Structures 203:109548. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109548.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IPQ. 2010. NP EN 1998–1. Eurocódigo 8: Projecto de estruturas para resistência aos sismos. Parte 1: Regras gerais, acções sísmicas e regras para edifícios (in Portuguese). Caparica, Portugal: Instituto Português da Qualidade.
   Google Scholar
• IPQ. 2017. NP EN 1998–3. Eurocódigo 8: Projecto de estruturas para resistência aos sismos. Parte 3: Avaliação e reabilitação de edifícios (in Portuguese). Caparica, Portugal: Instituto Português da Qualidade.
   Google Scholar
• Jaimes, M. A., and M. Niño. 2017. Cost-benefit analysis to assess seismic mitigation options in Mexican public school buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (9):3919–42. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0119-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kabeyasawa, T. 2017. Damages to RC school buildings and lessons from the 2011 East Japan earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (2):535–53. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9825-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korkmaz, M., M. A. Ozdemir, E. Kavali, and F. Cakir. 2018. Performance-based assessment of multi-story unreinforced masonry buildings: The case of historical Khatib School in Erzurum, Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis 94:195–213. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2018.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., A. Penna, A. Galasco, and S. Cattari. 2013. TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 56:1787–99. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maio, R., T. M. Ferreira, J. M. C. Estêvão, B. Pantò, I. Caliò, and R. Vicente. 2020. Seismic performance-based assessment of urban cultural heritage assets through different macroelement approaches. Journal of Building Engineering 29:101083. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.101083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marécos, J. A. E., and M. C. N. Castanheta 1970. Estudo do comportamento de estruturas sob a acção do sismo de 28 de Fevereiro de 1969 (in Portuguese). Report No. Memória 357. Laboratório Nacional de Engenharia Civil, Lisbon.
   Google Scholar
• Mutch, C. 2018. The role of schools in helping communities copes with earthquake disasters: The case of the 2010–2011 New Zealand earthquakes. Environmental Hazards 17 (4):331–51. doi:10.1080/17477891.2018.1485547.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NTC. 2018. Aggiornamento delle «Norme tecniche per le costruzioni» (in Italian). Roma: Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti.
   Google Scholar
• NTC. 2019. Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”» di cui al decreto ministeriale 17 gennaio 2018 (in Italian). Roma: Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti.
   Google Scholar
• O’Reilly, G. J., D. Perrone, M. Fox, R. Monteiro, and A. Filiatrault. 2018. Seismic assessment and loss estimation of existing school buildings in Italy. Engineering Structures 168:142–62. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.04.056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pavesi, A. S., G. Cia, C. Perego, and M. Morena. 2020. School building surveying: A support tool for school building registry office. In Buildings for education: A multidisciplinary overview of the design of school buildings, ed. S. Della Torre, M. Bocciarelli, L. Daglio, and R. Neri, 239–47. Cham: Springer International Publishing. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-33687-5_21.
   Google Scholar
• Perrone, D., G. J. O’Reilly, R. Monteiro, and A. Filiatrault. 2020. Assessing seismic risk in typical Italian school buildings: From in-situ survey to loss estimation. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 44:101448. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101448.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ribeiro, V. 2016. As escolas primárias dos Centenários: Subsídios para uma história das construções escolares no Algarve (in Portuguese). In Apontamentos para a história das culturas de escrita: Da idade do ferro à era digital, ed. CEPAC, 289–311. Faro: Universidade do Algarve.
   Google Scholar
• Rojas-Mercedes, N. J., L. Di Sarno, A. L. Simonelli, and A. Penna. 2019. Seismic risk of critical facilities in the Dominican Republic: Case study of school buildings. Soft Computing. doi:10.1007/s00500-019-04361-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teves-Costa, P., J. Batlló, L. Matias, C. Catita, M. J. Jiménez, and M. García-Fernández. 2019. Maximum intensity maps (MIM) for Portugal mainland. Journal of Seismology 23 (3):417–40. doi:10.1007/s10950-019-09814-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamboo, J. A., and M. Dhanasekar. 2019. Correlation between the performance of solid masonry prisms and wallettes under compression. Journal of Building Engineering 22:429–38. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar