Diagnosis and Monitoring of Historical Timber Velipaşa Han Building Prior to Restoration

References

• Accessed July  20, 2019 http://www.ajanscorum.com/yerel/veli-pasa-haninin-restorasyon-ihalesi-yapildi-h8751.html.
   Google Scholar
• Accessed July 10, 2019 https://www.cnnturk.com/turkiye/orduda-200-yillik-tarihi-konak-yandi?page=9.
   Google Scholar
• Accessed September 8, 2020a. https://corum.ktb.gov.tr/TR-58714/hanlar-hamamlar.html.
   Google Scholar
• Accessed September 08, 2020b. http://poleexpert.su/technology.html.
   Google Scholar
• Aka, İ., F. Keskinel, and T. S. Arda. 1973. Betonarme Yapı Elemanları. Mimarlık Fakültesi: İTÜ.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, Y. D. 2017. Seismic resistance of traditional timber-frame hımış structures in Turkey: A brief overview. International Wood Products Journal 8 (sup1):21–28. doi:10.1080/20426445.2016.1273683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunışık, A. C., O. Ş. Karahasan, F. Y. Okur, E. Kalkan, and K. Ozgan. 2019. Finite element model updating and dynamic analysis of a restored historical timber mosque based on ambient vibration tests. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 47 (5):20180122. doi:10.1520/JTE20180122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aras, F. 2013. Timber-framed buildings and structural restoration of a historic timber pavilion in Turkey. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 7 (4):403–15. doi:10.1080/15583058.2011.640738.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briseghella, B., V. Colasanti, L. Fenu, C. Nuti, E. Spacone, and H. Varum. Seismic analysis by macroelements of Fujian Hakka Tulous, Chinese circular earth constructions listed in the UNESCO World Heritage List. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. 14 (10). doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1618973.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cestari, C. B., and T. Marzi. 2018. Conservation of historic timber roof structures of Italian architectural heritage: Diagnosis, assessment, and intervention. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12 (4):632–65. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1442523.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cointe, A., P. Caste´ra, P. Morliear, and P. Galimard. 2007. Diagnosis and monitoring of timber buildings of cultural heritage. Structural Safety 29 (4):337–48. doi:10.1016/j.strusafe.2006.07.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corredor, A. G., G. Facelli, C. C. Gowda, E. Roldan-Zamarron, I. B. Valente, and J. M. Branco. 2016. Structural assessment of Companhia Aurífícia, a 19th century industrial building located in northern Portugal. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (6):777–96. doi:10.1080/15583058.2015.1136711.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğangün, A., Ö. İ. Taluk, R. Livaoğlu, and R. Acar. 2006. Traditional wooden buildings and their damages during earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis 13 (6):981–96. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2005.04.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ersoy, U. 2011. Betonarme: Döşeme ve Temeller, Cilt-II, Evrim Yayınevi ve Bilgisayar SAN. İstanbul: TİÇ. LDT.ŞTİ.
   Google Scholar
• Gezer, E. D., A. Temiz, and T. Yüksek. 2015. Inspection of wooden poles in electrical power distribution networks in Artvin, Turkey. Advances in Materials Science and Engineering 659818:1–11. doi:10.1155/2015/659818.
   Google Scholar
• Gulkan, P., and R. Langenbach. 2004. The earthquake resistance of traditional timber and masonry dwellings in Turkey. 13th World conference on earthquake engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada, August 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Halicioglu, F. H., F. Cakir, and S. Demirkesen. 2014. Structural assessment of traditional stone-timber houses in Turkey. Građevinar 66 (8):727–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamm, E. R. 1992. Inspection, maintenance and procurement procedures for wood poles, 1–13. (Attention: Code 1632). Alexandria, VA: Naval Facilities Engineering Command.
   Google Scholar
• ICOMOS. 2017. Principles for the Conservation of Wooden Built Heritage, Final draft for distribution to the ICOMOS membership in view of submission to the 19th ICOMOS General Assembly.
   Google Scholar
• Kouris, L. A. S., and A. J. Kappos. 2012. Detailed and simplified non-linear models for timber-framed masonry structures. Journal of Cultural Heritage 13:47–58. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2011.05.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liñán, C. R., M. J. M. Conde, P. R. D. Hita, and F. P. Gálvez. 2015. Application of non-destructive techniques in the inspection of wooden Structures of protected buildings: The case of Nuestra Señora de los Dolores Church (Isla Cristina, Huelva). International Journal of Architectural Heritage 9 (3):324–40. doi:10.1080/15583058.2013.771292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahini, S. S., A. Eslami, and H. R. Ronagh. 2012. Lateral performance and load carrying capacity of an unreinforced, CFRP-retrofitted historical masonry vault-A case study. Construction and Building Materials 28 (1):146–56. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Makarios, T., and M. Demosthenous. 2006. Seismic response of traditional buildings of Lefkas Island. Greece, Engineering Structures 28:364–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrell, J. J. 1996. Wood Pole maintenance manual. Forest Research Laboratory Oregon State University 9-10:21–31s.
   Google Scholar
• OMA. 2006. Release 4.0. Denmark: Structural Vibration Solution A/S.
   Google Scholar
• Örs, Y., and H. Keskin. 2001. Ağaç malzeme bilgisi, Atlas Yayın Dağıtım. ISBN: 975–6574–01–1.
   Google Scholar
• PULSE. 2006. Analyzers and solutions, release 11.2. Denmark: Bruel and Kjaer, Sound and Vibration Measurement A/S.
   Google Scholar
• SAP2000. 2015. Structural analysis program. Berkeley, CA: Computers and Structures Inc., Version: 17.1.1.
   Google Scholar
• Seavey, R., and T. Larson. 2002. Inspection of timber bridges final report, 1–21. Department of Wood and Paper Science, University of Minnesota, Minnesota Local Road Research Board, Minnesota, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Silveira, D., H. Varum, A. Costa, and J. Carvalho. 2015. Mechanical properties and behavior of traditional adobe wall panels of the Aveiro District. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 27 (9):04014253. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0001194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silveira, D., H. Varum, A. Costa, T. Martins, H. Pereira, and J. Almeida. 2012. Mechanical properties of adobe bricks in ancient constructions. Construction and Building Materials 28 (1):36–44. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.08.046.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TBEC. 2018. Turkish building earthquake code. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of Turkey, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• TS 498. 1997. Design loads for buildings. Ankara: Institute of Turkish Standards.
   Google Scholar
• TS 647. Building code for timber structures. Ankara: Institute of Turkish Standards.
   Google Scholar
• Tuluk, Ö. İ. 2009. Çorum’da sıradışı bir han yapısı üzerine gözlemler: Velipaşa Hanı-Anadolu Oteli. METU JFA 26 (1):101–21.
   Google Scholar
• Vicente, E. F., and D. E. Torrealva. 2014. Mechanical properties of adobe masonry of historical buildings in Peru. 9th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, F. Peña, and M. Chávez (eds.), Mexico City, Mexico, October 14–17.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, C., J. Xue, S. Zhou, and F. Zhang. Seismic performance evaluation for a traditional Chinese Timber-frame structure. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2020.1731626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, F., G. Li, H. N. Li, and J. Q. Jia. 2013. Strength and stress-strain characteristics of traditional adobe block and masonry. Materials and Structures 46 (9):1449–57. doi:10.1617/s11527-012-9987-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xue, J., D. Xu, and H. Xia. 2020. Experimental study on seismic performance of through-tenon joints with looseness in ancient timber structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (4):483–95. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1552996.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yamin, L. E., C. A. Phillips, J. C. Reyes, and D. M. Ruiz. 2004. Seismic behavior and rehabilitation alternatives for adobe and rammed earth buildings. 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, B.C., Canada, August 1–6.
   Google Scholar