Geometry and Stability of a Double-shell Dome in Four Building Phases: The Case Study of Santa Maria Alla Sanità in Naples

References

• Angelillo, M. 2014. Practical applications of unilateral models to masonry equilibrium. Mechanics 551,109–210. doi: 10.1007/978-3-7091-1774-3_4
   Google Scholar
• Angelillo, M. 2019. The model of Heyman and the statical and kinematical problems for masonry structures. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation 4 (1–2):14–31. doi:10.1504/IJMRI.2019.096820.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelillo, M., E. Babilio, and A. Fortunato. 2013. Singular stress fields for masonry-like vaults. Continuum Mechanics and Thermodynamics 25 (2–4):423–41. doi:10.1007/s00161-012-0270-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelillo, M., and A. Fortunato. Springer, 2004. Equilibrium of masonry vaults. In Novel approaches in civil engineering, 105–11. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
   Google Scholar
• Angelillo, M., A. Fortunato, A. Gesualdo, A. Iannuzzo, and G. Zuccaro. 2018. Rigid block models for masonry structures. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation 3 (4):349–68. doi:10.1504/IJMRI.2018.095701.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angelillo, M., A. Montanino, and A. Pandolfi. 2020. On the connection between geometry and statically determined membrane stresses in the human cornea. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 142 (5). doi:10.1115/1.4044742.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, P., T. Ciblac, and J. Ochsendorf. 2006. Real-time limit analysis of vaulted masonry buildings. Computers & Structures 84 (29–30):1841–52. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2006.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, P., M. De Jong, and J. Ochsendorf. 2006. As hangs the flexible line: Equilibrium of masonry arches. Nexus Network Journal 8 (2):13–24. doi:10.1007/s00004-006-0015-9.
   Google Scholar
• Block, P., and J. Ochsendorf. 2008. Lower–bound analysis of masonry vaults. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historic Construction, Bath, UK, 593–600.
   Google Scholar
• Breymann, G. A. 1926. Trattato di costruzioni civili. Costruzioni in pietra. Milan: Vallardi.
   Google Scholar
• Ceci, G. 1920. La fondazione della chiesa e del convento di Santa maria della Sanità. In Napoli nobilissima: Rivista di topografia ed arte napoletana, (Arturo Berisio Editore) I, no. I, 9–13. Napoli.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., and C. Cusano. 2018. The gothic arcade of santa maria incoronata in Naples: Equilibrium of gothic arches. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation 3 (2):92–107. doi:10.1504/IJMRI.2018.092454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C.; Cusano, C.; Fortunato, A.; Angelillo, M. A study on form and seismic vulnerability of the dome of San Francesco di Paola in Naples. Ing. Sismica 2018, 35, 88–108
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., and C. Cusano. 2019. The role of geometry on stability of large domes: Roman Pantheon as cultural emblem and constructive reference. International Journal on Proceedings of Science and Technology 5, 12–19. doi: 10.21625/resourceedings.v2i3.620
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., and C. Cusano. 2020. The “baroque skyline” in Naples. Structural studies on 16th and 17th century domesamong form and stability. Architecture and Engineering 5 (2):8–16. doi:10.23968/2500-0055-2020-5-2-08-16.
   Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., C. Cusano, and M. Angelillo. 2019a. A limit analysis approach for masonry domes: The basilica of San Francesco di Paola in Naples. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation 4 (3):227–42. doi:10.1504/IJMRI.2019.100568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cennamo, C., and M. Di Fiore. 2013. Best practice of structural retrofit: The SS. Rosario Church in Gesualdo, Italy. International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 4 (2):215–35. doi:10.1108/IJDRBE-11-2010-0049.
   Google Scholar
• Zerlenga, O., Cirillo, V., Cennamo, and C. Cusano. 2021. The majolica dome of Santa Maria della Sanità in Naples. Geometric configuration and stability studies. Informes de la Construcción 73,562.
   Google Scholar
• Como, M. 1992. On the equilibrium and collapse of masonry structures. Meccanica 27(3), 185-194. doi10.1007/BF00430044
   Google Scholar
• Couplet, P. [1729] 1730. De la poussée des voûtes. Histoire de l’Académie Royale des Sciences 79–117:117–141.
   Google Scholar
• Cowan, H. J. 1977. A history of masonry and concrete Domes. Building and Environment (Pergamon Press 1977) 12 (1):1–24. doi:10.1016/0360-1323(77)90002-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusano, C., G. Angjeliu, A. Montanino, G. Zuccaro, and C. Cennamo. 2021a. Considerations about the static response of masonry domes: A comparison between limit analysis and finite element method. International Journal of Masonry Research and Innovation no. Special Issue: Simple Mechanical Models for Unreinforced Historic Masonry Constructions. accepted. doi: 10.1504/IJMRI.2021.10037898
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusano, C., C. Cennamo, and L. Guerriero. 2017. The slicing technique for the evaluation of the formal efficiency: A comparative study. AIMETA 2017 - Proceedings of the 23rd Conference of the Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics, 1544–54. Salerno, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Cusano, C., A. Montanino, C. Olivieri, V. Paris, and C. Cennamo. 2021b. Graphical and analytical quantitative comparison in the Domes assessment: The case of San Francesco di Paola. Applied Sciences 11 (8):3622. doi:10.3390/app11083622.
   Google Scholar
• De Chiara, E., C. Cennamo, A. Gesualdo, A. Montanino, C. Olivieri, and A. Fortunato. 2019. Automatic generation of statically admissible stress fields in masonry vaults. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 14 (5):719–37. doi:10.2140/jomms.2019.14.719.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Serio, F., M. Angelillo, A. Gesualdo, A. Iannuzzo, G. Zuccaro, and M. Pasquino. 2018. Masonry structures made of monolithic blocks with an application to spiral stairs. Meccanica 53 (8):2171–91. doi:10.1007/s11012-017-0808-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durm, J. 1902. Grofconstructionen der italienischen Renaissance. Zeitschrift Bauwesen 161–312.
   Google Scholar
• Ferraro, I. 2007. Napoli. Atlante della città storica. Stella, Vergini, Sanità. Naples: Oikos.
   Google Scholar
• Fraternali, F., M. Angelillo, and A. Fortunato. 2002. A lumped stress method for plane elastic problems and the discrete-continuum approximation. International Journal of Solids and Structures 39 (25):6211–40. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(02)00472-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraternali, F., M. Angelillo, and G. Rocchetta. 2002. On the stress skeleton of masonry vaults and domes. Seventh pan American congress of applied mechanics (PACAM VII), Temuco, Chile, 2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Gesualdo, A., G. Brandonisio, A. De Luca, A. Iannuzzo, A. Montanino, and C. Olivieri. 2019. Limit analysis of cloister vaults: The case study of Palazzo Caracciolo di Avellino. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 14 (5):739–50. doi:10.2140/jomms.2019.14.739.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giuffrè, A. 1991. Letture sulla Meccanica delle Murature Storiche. Bologna: Edizioni Kappa.
   Google Scholar
• Guerra, G. 1958. Statica e tecnica costruttiva delle cupole antiche e moderne. Naples, Ist. di architettura tecnica, Napoli.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. 1966. The stone skeleton. International Journal of Solids and Structures 2 (2):249–79. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(66)90018-7.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. 1967. On shell solutions of masonry domes. International Journal of Solids and Structures 3 (2):227–41. doi:10.1016/0020-7683(67)90072-8.
   Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. 1988. Poleni’s problem. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers Part 1 84:737–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heyman, J. 1997. The stone skeleton: Structural engineering of masonry architecture. Cambridge, United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, S. 2001. Mechanics of masonry vaults: The equilibrium approach. Guimarães: Proceedings of Historical Constructions, 47–69.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, S. 2004. Arcos bóveda y cúpulas. Geometría y equilibrio en el cálculo tradicional de estructuras de fábrica. Madrid: Instituto Juan de Herrera.
   Google Scholar
• Huerta, S. 2008. The analysis of masonry architecture: A historical approach. Architectural Science Review 51 (4):297–328. doi:10.3763/asre.2008.5136.
   Google Scholar
• Iannuzzo, A., A. De Luca, A. Fortunato, A. Gesualdo, and M. Angelillo. 2018a. Fractures detection in masonry constructions under horizontal seismic forces. Ing Sismica-Ital 35 (3):87–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannuzzo, A., C. Olivieri, and A. Fortunato. 2019. Displacement capacity of masonry structures under horizontal actions via PRD method. Journal of Mechanics of Materials and Structures 14 (5):703–18. doi:10.2140/jomms.2019.14.703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iannuzzo, A., A. Dell’Endice, T. Van Mele, and P. Block. 2021. Numerical limit analysis-based modelling of masonry structures subjected to large displacements. Computers & Structures 242:106372. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106372.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kooharian, A. 1952. Limit analysis of voussoir (segmental) and concrete arches. Journal of the American Concrete Institute 24 (4), 317–328.
   Google Scholar
• Lucchese, G. 1707. Parere circa il riparo da darsi alla Cupola della Cappella del Tesoro di S. Gennaro. ATSG (Archive of Treasure of St. Januarius), A/22.
   Google Scholar
• Mainstone, R. J. 1997. Structural analysis, structural insights, and historical interpretation. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 56 (3):316–40. doi:10.2307/991244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melaragno, M. 1991. Domes from the Romanesque to the present. In An introduction to shell structures, ed. M. Melaragno, 57–88. Boston, MA: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Minervini, M. T. 2013. Il restauro della cupola maiolicata di Santa Maria della Sanità. Naples: M. D’Auria.
   Google Scholar
• Ochsendorf, J. J., and L. De Lorenzis. 2008. Failure of rectangular masonry buttresses under concentrated loading. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings 161 (5):265–75. doi:10.1680/stbu.2008.161.5.265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olivieri, C., M. Angelillo, A. Gesualdo, A. Iannuzzo, and A. Fortunato. 2021. Parametric design of purely compressed shells. Mechanics of Materials 155:103782. doi:10.1016/j.mechmat.2021.103782.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penta, I. 1999. Gli embrici maiolicati. In Napoli versus coleum. La città e le sue cupole, ed. A. Di Luggo, R. Florio, and A. B. Giusti, 97–100. Naples: Electa.
   Google Scholar
• Picone, R. 2017. Construction art between restoration and structural safety. Religious complex aggregates in Naples’ historical city centre. In Construction art in campania between restoration and structural safety, ed. R. Picone, and V. Russo, 23–50. Naples: Clean.
   Google Scholar
• Poleni, G. 1748. Memorie istoriche della Gran Cupola del Tempio Vaticano. Padova: Nella Stamperia del Seminario.
   Google Scholar
• Rockafellar, R. T. 1970. Convex analysis. Princeton Mathematics Series 26, 28.
   Google Scholar
• Stegmann, C., and H. Geymüller. [1885] 1909. Die Architektur der Renaissance in Toscana. Munchen. F. Bruckmann A. G.
   Google Scholar
• Testi, L. 1891. L’arte di fabbricare. Milan, Rome, Naples, Milano: Vallardi.
   Google Scholar
• Venditti, A. 1977. Frà Nuvolo e l’architettura napoletana tra cinque e seicento. Atti del Congresso internazionale sul Barocco. Lecce.
   Google Scholar