Rapid Earthquake Loss Estimation Model for Algerian Urban Heritage: Case of Blida City

References

• Ahmad, N., H. Crowley, and R. Pinho. 2011. Analytical fragility functions for reinforced concrete and masonry buildings and buildings aggregates of Euro-Mediterranean regions – UPAV methodology. Internal Report, Syner-G Project 2009/2012.
   Google Scholar
• Allali, S. A., M. Abed, and A. A. Mebarki. 2018. Post-earthquake assessment of buildings damage using fuzzy logic. Engineering Structures 166:117–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Astoul, A., C. Filliter, E. Mason, A. Rau-Chaplin, K. Shridhar, B. Varghese, and N. Varshney. 2013. Developing and testing the automated post-event earthquake loss estimation and visualisation (APE-ELEV) technique. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11:1973–2005. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9495-7.
   Google Scholar
• ATC-13. 1985. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California, ATC-13 Report. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• ATC-40. 1996. Seismic evaluation and retrofit of concrete buildings, ATC-40 Report. Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, California, USA, November 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Athmani, A. E., A. Gouasmia, T. M. Ferreira, R. Vicente, and A. Khemis. 2015. Seismic vulnerability assessment of historical masonry buildings located in Annaba city (Algeria) using non ad-hoc data survey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:2283–307. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9717-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Athmani, A. 2020. A simplified mechanical approach for a large-scale seismic vulnerability assessment of the Algerian masonry buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2020.1777595.
   Google Scholar
• Ayadi, A., and M. Bezzeghoud. 2015. Seismicity of Algeria from 1365 to 2013: Maximum observed intensity map (MOI 2014). Seismological Research Letters 86 (1):236–44.
   Google Scholar
• Basaglia, A., A. Aprile, E. Spacone, and L. Pelà. 2020. Assessing community resilience, housing recovery and impact of mitigation strategies at the urban scale: A case study after the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquake. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18:6039–74. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00919-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beddington, J. 2012. Foresight reducing risks of future disasters: Priorities for decision makers. Final Project Report, the Government Office for Science, London, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Beghoul, N., J. L. Chatelain, M. S. Boughacha, H. Benhallou, R. Dadou, and A. Mezioud-Saich. 2010. Seismic empirical relations for the Tellian atlas, North Africa, and their usefulness for seismic risk assessment. Pure and Applied Geophysics 167:277–321.
   Google Scholar
• Belazougui, M. 2008. Boumerdès Algeria earthquake of May 21, 2003: Damage analysis and behavior of beam-column reinforced concrete structures. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, October 12-17.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti, D., and V. Petrini. 1984. Sulla vulnerabilita sismica di edifici in muratura: Un metodo di valutazione. A method for evaluating the seismic vulnerability of masonry buildings. L’industria delle Costruzioni 149:66–74.
   Google Scholar
• Benelhadj-Saïd, Z. 2010. Méthodes et outils pour la réduction de la vulnérabilité sismique à Blida: Étude pluridisciplinaire basée sur l’analyse des enjeux urbains et le bruit de fond sismique. PhD Thesis, Université Joseph Fourrier, Grenoble, France.
   Google Scholar
• Benfedda, A., K. Abbes, D. Bouziane, Y. Bouhadad, A. Slimani, S. Larbes, D. Haddouche, and M. Bezzeghoud. 2017. The August 1st, 2014 (Mw 5.3) moderate earthquake: Evidence for an active thrust fault in the bay of Algiers (Algeria). Pure and Applied Geophysics 174 (3):1503–11. doi:10.1007/s00024-017-1481-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bensalah, M. D., M. Bensaibi, and A. Modaressi. 2017. Uncertainties in seismic response of a torsional irregular structure. European Journal of Environmental and Civil Engineering. doi:10.1080/19648189.2017.1304271.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernardini, G., M. Lucesoli, and E. Quagliarini. 2020. Sustainable planning of seismic emergency in historic centres through semeiotic tools: Comparison of different existing methods through real case studies. Sustainable Cities and Society 52:101834. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101834.
   Google Scholar
• Bernardini, G., S. Santarelli, E. Quagliarini, and M. D’Orazio. 2017. Dynamic guidance tool for a safer earthquake pedestrian evacuation in urban systems. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 65:150–61. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2017.07.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bezzeghoud, M., A. Ayadi, A. Sebai, A. Ait Messaoud, A. Mokrane, and H. Benhallou. 1996. Seismicity of Algeria between 1365 and 1989: Map of maximum observed intensities (MOI). In Avances en Geofisica y Geodesia, Ministerio de Obras Publicas, Transportes y Medio Ambiante, Instituto Geografico National España, Pub. De IGN Madrid, 1: 107–114.
   Google Scholar
• Bloemen, P., T. Reeder, C. Zevenbergen, J. Rijke, and A. Kingsborough. 2018. Lessons learned from applying adaptation pathways in flood risk management and challenges for the further development of this approach. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change 23:1083–108. doi:10.1007/s11027-017-9773-9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booth, E. 2018. Dealing with earthquakes: The practice of seismic engineering ‘as if people mattered’. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16:1661–724. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0302-8.
   Google Scholar
• Borzi, B., M. Onida, M. Faravelli, D. Polli, M. Pagano, D. Quaroni, A. Cantoni, E. Speranza, and C. Moroni. 2020. IRMA platform for the calculation of damages and risks of Italian residential buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00924-x.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchelouh, A., R. Bensalem, N. Zaourar, D. Machane, H. Moulouel, and E. H. Oubaiche. 2018. The miocene roof mapping using microtremor recording and electrical survey method in Blida city, Algeria. Pure and Applied Geophysics 175 (1):287–301. doi:10.1007/s00024-017-1684-.
   Google Scholar
• Boudiaf, A. 1996. Etude sismotectonique de la région d’Alger et de la Kabylie (Algérie): Utilisation des modèles numériques de terrains (MNT) et de la télédétection pour la reconnaissance des structures tectoniques actives: Contribution à l’évaluation de l’aléa sismique. PhD Thesis, Université Montpellier II, Science et Techniques du Languedoc, 274p, France.
   Google Scholar
• Bouhadad, Y., A. Benhamouche, S. Maouche, and D. Belhai. 2009. Evidence for quaternary liquefaction-induced features in the epicentral area of the 21 May 2003 Zemmouri earthquake (Algeria, Mw=6.8). Journal of Seismology 13:161. doi:10.1007/s10950-008-9134-y.
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M. 2003. Vulnerability index method of Algiers Masonry buildings. Master Thesis, University of Blida, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M. 2014. Vulnérabilité sismique du bâti Algérien: Développement d’un outil d’aide à la décision. PhD Thesis, University of Blida1, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., and M. Bensaïbi. 2008. Vulnerability index Algiers masonry buildings. Proceedings of the 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China.
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., M. N. Farsi, A. Mebarki, and M. Belazougui. 2013. Development of an integrated approach for Algerian building seismic damage assessment. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 47 (4):471–93. doi:10.12989/sem.2013.47.4.471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., M. N. Farsi, A. Mebarki, and M. Belazougui. 2014b. Earthquake damage assessment: A theoretical framework and its application to Algerian buildings. WIT Transactions on Information and Communication Technologies 47:153–64. doi:10.2495/Risk140141.
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., M. N. Farsi, A. Mebarki, M. Belazougui, M. Ait-Belkacem, N. Yousfi, N. Guessoum, D. Ait-Benamar, M. Naili, N. Mezouar, et al. 2018. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale: Case of Algerian buildings. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 31:555–75. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.06.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., M. N. Farsi, A. Mebarki, M. Belazougui, O. Amellal, B. Mezazigh, N. Guessoum, H. Bourenane, and A. Benhamouche. 2014a. Seismic risk and damage prediction: Case of the buildings in Constantine city (Algeria). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (6):2683–704. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9594-0.
   Google Scholar
• Boukri, M., M. N. Farsi, A. Mebarki, M. Naili, M. Belazougui, O. Amellal, and N. B. Guessoum. 2017. Seismic vulnerability appraisal according to the Algerian building context. WIT Transactions on the Built Environment 172:109–17. doi:10.2495/ERES170101.
   Google Scholar
• Bousserak, M., and M. S. Zerouala. 2018. Inventaire du patrimoine urbain: Cas des villes médiévales du nord de l’Algérie et des villes restructurées au XIXe siècle. Cinq Continents 8 (17):23–38.
   Google Scholar
• Brando, G., A. Pagliaroli, G. Cocco, and F. Di Buccio. 2020. Site effects and damage scenarios: The case study of two historic centers following the 2016 Central Italy earthquake. Engineering Geology 272:105647. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2020.105647.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brando, G., G. De Matteis, and E. Spacone. 2017. Predictive model for the seismic vulnerability assessment of small historic centres: Application to the inner Abruzzi Region in Italy. Engineering Structures 153:81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burton, H., H. Kang, S. Miles, A. Nejat, and Z. Yi. 2019. A framework and case study for integrating household decision-making into post-earthquake recovery models. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 37:101167. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calvi, G., M. R. Pinho, G. Magenes, J. J. Bommer, L. F. Restrepo-Vélez, and H. Crowley. 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years. ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 43 (3):75–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cara, S., A. Aprile, L. Pelà, and P. Roca. 2018. Seismic risk assessment and mitigation at emergency limit condition of historical buildings along strategic urban roadways. Application to the “Antiga Esquerra de L’Eixample” neighborhood of Barcelona. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1503376.
   Google Scholar
• Cardona, O. D., M. G. Ordaz, E. Reinso, N. Yamin, and A. H. Barbat. 2012. CAPRA - comprehensive approach to probabilistic risk assessment: International initiative for risk management effectiveness. Proceedings of the 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon, Portugal, September 24-28, 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Cardone, D. 2007. Nonlinear static methods vs. Experimental shaking table test results’. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 11 (6):847–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cariolet, J. M., M. Vuillet, and Y. Y. Diab. 2019. Mapping urban resilience to disasters – A review. Sustainable Cities and Society 51:101746.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• CGS. 1998. Probabilistic hazard assessment of the Algiers region. Report, National Earthquake Engineering Research Center, CGS, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• CGS. 2003. Statistical study on the damaged buildings following the Boumerdès earthquake of May 21st, 2003. Report, National Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• CGS. 2013a. Vulnerability and seismic risk study of Blida. Report, National Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• CGS. 2013b. Seismic microzonation study of urban areas of the Wilaya of Blida. Report, National Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Chieffo, N., and A. Formisano. 2020. Induced seismic-site effects on the vulnerability assessment of a historical centre in the Molise region of Italy: Analysis method and real behaviour calibration based on 2002 earthquake. Geosciences 10 (1):21. doi:10.3390/geosciences10010021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieffo, N., F. Clementi, A. Formisano, and S. Lenci. 2019a. Comparative fragility methods for seismic assessment of masonry buildings located in Muccia (Italy). Journal of Building Engineering 25:100813. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.100813.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieffo, N., M. Mosoarca, A. Formisano, and I. Apostol. 2019b. Seismic vulnerability assessment and loss estimation of an urban district of Timisoara. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, Prague, Czech Republic, Vol. 471, Session 9. Accessed18-22 June 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., and R. K. Goël. 1999. Capacity Demand Diagram Methods Based on Inelastic Design Spectrum. Earthquake Spectra 15(4): 637–656.
   Google Scholar
• Comartin, C., R. Niewiarowski, S. A. Freeman, and F. Turner. 2000. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Concrete Buildings, A practical Overview of the ATC 40 Document. Earthquake Spectra 16(1):241–261.
   Google Scholar
• Cremen, G., E. Seville, and J. W. Baker. 2020. Modeling post-earthquake business recovery time: An analytical framework. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 42:101328. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2019.101328.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ayala, D., A. Meslem, D. Vamvatsikos, K. Porter, and T. Rossetto. 2015. GEM guidelines for analytical vulnerability assessment of low/mid-rise buildings. Vulnerability Global Component Project. doi:10.13117/GEM.VULN-MOD.TR2014.12.
   Google Scholar
• Deluz-Labruyère, J. 1988. Urbanisation en Algérie: Blida, Processus et Formes. Lyon – Alger: Editions Maison de l’Orient Méditerranéen et Office des Publications Universitaires d’Algérie.
   Google Scholar
• Di Meo, A., B. Borzi, M. Faravelli, M. Pagano, P. Ceresa, R. Monteiro, and J. Al-Dabbeek. 2018. Seismic vulnerability assessment of the urban building environment in Nablus, Palestine. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1503364.
   Google Scholar
• Dickson, E., J. L. Baker, D. Hoornweg, and A. Tiwari. 2012. Urban development series – urban risk assessments: Understanding disaster and climate risk in cities. Washington DC, USA: World Bank.
   Google Scholar
• Earle, P. S., D. J. Wald, K. S. Jaiswal, T. I. Allen, M. G. Hearne, K. D. Marano, A. J. Hotovec, and J. M. Fee. 2009. Prompt assessment of global earthquakes for response (PAGER) — A system for rapidly determining the impact of earthquakes worldwide, 15. U.S: Geological Survey Open-File Report.
   Google Scholar
• Eguchi, R., J. Goltz, H. Seligson, P. Flores, N. Blais, T. Heaton, and E. Bortugno. 1997. Realtime loss estimation as an emergency: The early post-earthquake damage assessment tool (EPEDAT). Earthquake Spectra 13 (4):815–32.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik, M., K. Sesetyan, M. B. Demircioglu, C. Zülfikar, U. Hancılar, C. Tüzün, and E. Harmandar. 2014. Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes. In Perspectives on European earthquake engineering and seismology, geotechnical, geological and earthquake engineering 34, ed. A. Ansal, 53–95. Springer, Cham, Copenhagen, Denmark. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-07118-3_2.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik, M., K. Sesetyan, M. B. Demircioglu, U. Hancılar, and C. Zülfikar. 2011. Rapid earthquake loss assessment after damaging earthquakes. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 31 (2):247–66.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erdik, M., and Y. Fahjan. 2006. Damage scenarios and damage evaluation. In Assessing and managing earthquake risk, ed. C. S. Oliveira, A. Roca, and X. Goula, 213–37. Netherlands: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Erdik, M. 2017. Earthquake risk assessment. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15:5055–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fajfar, P. 1999. Capacity Spectrum Methods Based on Inelastic Demand Spectra. Earthquake Engineering and Structral Dynamics 28(9): 979–993.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farsi, M. N., and P. Y. Bard. 2004. Estimation des périodes propres de bâtiments et vulnérabilité du bâti existant dans l’agglomération de Grenoble. Revue Française de Génie Civil 8 (2–3):149–79. doi:10.1080/12795119.2004.9692601.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA. 2002. HAZUS99: Earthquake Loss Estimation Methodology, Technical Manual, Washington, DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA. 2010. HAZUS-MH MR5: Technical Manual - Earthquake Model, Washington, DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Federal Emergency Management Agency, FEMA. 2018. HAZUS-MH 4.2: Multi-hazard Loss Estimation Methodology, Technical Manual, Washington, DC, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Formisano, A., F. M. Mazzolani, G. Florio, and R. Landolfo. 2010. A quick methodology for seismic vulnerability assessment of historical masonry aggregates. COST Action 26, Urban Habitat Constructions under Catastrophic Events, Final Conference, Naples, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Francini, M., S. Artese, S. Gaudio, A. Palermo, and M. F. Viapiana. 2018. To support urban emergency planning: A GIS instrument for the choice of optimal routes based on seismic hazards. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction. doi:10.1016/j.ijdrr.2018.04.020.
   Google Scholar
• Francini, M., S. Gaudio, A. Palermo, and M. F. Viapiana. 2019. A performance-based approach for innovative emergency planning. Sustainable Cities and Society. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2019.101906.
   Google Scholar
• Frolova, N. 2007. GIS-Based EXTREMUM system application for risk assessment in earthquake prone areas, analysis and synthesis of loss estimations and risk assessment methodologies for prediction and prevention of catastrophes. Workshop on Open-Source Risk Software, California, United States.
   Google Scholar
• Frolova, N., V. Larionov, J. Bonnin, S. Sushchev, and A. Ugarov. 2017. Seismic risk assessment and mapping at different levels. Natural Hazards 88: S43–S62. doi:10.1007/s11069-016-2654-9.
   Google Scholar
• Geomatrix Consultants and ME2i. 2006. Probabilistic analysis of the seismic hazard of the Wilaya of Algiers. Final Report, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Grigoratos, I., R. Monteiro, P. Ceresa, A. DiMeo, M. Faravelli, and B. Borzi. 2018. Crowdsourcing exposure data for seismic vulnerability assessment in developing countries. Journal of Earthquake Engineering. doi:10.1080/13632469.2018.1537901.
   Google Scholar
• Grünthal, G., and A. Levret. 2001. European Macroseismic Scale 1998, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 19, 103 pp., Luxembourg.
   Google Scholar
• Guerroudj, T. 2000. La question du patrimoine urbain et architectural en Algérie. Insaniyat-Revue algérienne d’anthropologie et de sciences sociales 12:34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Guo, Y. 2012. Urban resilience in post-disaster reconstruction: Towards a resilient development in Sichuan, China. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 3:45–55. doi:10.1007/s13753-012-0006-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harbi, A., A. Sebaï, Y. Rouchiche, and R. Kherchouche. 2020. Short note on the contribution of newspapers and periodicals of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries to the discovery of new historical earthquakes in Algeria. Journal of Seismology. doi:10.1007/s10950-020-09939-y.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Harbi, A., A. Sebaï, Y. Rouchiche, S. Maouche, F. Ousadou, K. Abbès, D. Ait Benamar, and M. Benmedjber. 2017. Reappraisal of the seismicity of the southern edge of the Mitidja basin (Blida region, North-Central Algeria). Seismological Research Letters 88 (4):1–15.
   Google Scholar
• Harrison, C. G., and P. R. Williams. 2016. A systems approach to natural disaster resilience. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory 65:11–31. doi:10.1016/j.simpat.2016.02.008.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jerez, S., and A. Mebarki. 2011. Seismic assessment of framed buildings: A Pseudo-adaptive uncoupled modal response analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (7):1015–35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• JICA and CGS. 2006. Study of seismic microzoning of the Wilaya of Algiers. Final Report, December 2006, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., S. Cattari, and C. Calderini. 2012. Deliverable D41 European guidelines for the seismic preservation of cultural heritage assets. https://cordis.europa.eu/project/rcn/93579_en.html.
   Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Giovinazzi. 2006. Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 4 (4):415–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantada, N., L. G. Pujades, and A. H. Barbat. 2018. Earthquake risk scenarios in urban areas: A review with applications to the Ciutat Vella district in Barcelona, Spain. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12:7–8,1112-1130. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1503367.
   Google Scholar
• Laouami, N., A. Slimani, and S. Larbes. 2018. Ground motion prediction equations for Algeria and surrounding region using site classification based H/V spectral ratio. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16:2653–84. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0310-3.
   Google Scholar
• Lestuzzi, P., S. Podesta, C. Luchini, A. Garofano, D. Kazantzidou-Firtinidou, C. Bozzano, P. Bischof, A. Haffter, and J. D. Rouiller. 2016. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale for two typical Swiss cities using Risk-UE methodology. Natural Hazards 84:249–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., Z. Li, B. Wei, X. Li, and B. Fu. 2019. Seismic vulnerability assessment at urban scale using data mining and GIScience technology: Application to Urumqi (China). Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk 10 (1):958–85.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahaney, J. A., F. P. Terrence, E. K. Bryan, and A. F. Sigmund. 1993. The Capacity Spectrum Method for Evaluating Structural Response during the Loma Prieta Earthquake. Proceedings of the 1993 United States National Earthquake Conference, Memphis, Tennessee, USA 2: 501–510.
   Google Scholar
• Maly, E., and A. Suppasri. 2020. The Sendai framework for disaster risk reduction at five: Lessons from the 2011 Great East Japan Earthquake and Tsunami. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 11:167–78. doi:10.1007/s13753-020-00268-9.
   Google Scholar
• Maouche, S., Y. Bouhadad, A. Harbi, Y. Rouchiche, F. Ousadou, and A. Ayadi. 2019. Active tectonics and seismic hazard in the tell Atlas (Northern Algeria): A review. In The geology of the Arab world-an overview, ed. A. Bendaoud, Z. Hamimi, M. Hamoudi, S. Djemai, and B. Zoheir. Cham: Springer Geology. Springer pp 381-400.
   Google Scholar
• Mazouz, F. 2015. Le renouvellement du patrimoine bâti vétuste en Algérie. Le Cas du Centre-Ville d’Oran. Droit et Société 89 (1):151–70.
   Google Scholar
• Mebarki, A., and A. Rachedi. 2021. Process and devices for guiding using connected objects in a building. European patent ref. [EP19306270].
   Google Scholar
• Mebarki, A., M. Boukri, A. Laribi, M. N. Farsi, M. Belazougui, and F. Kharchi. 2014. Seismic vulnerability: Theory and application to Algerian buildings seismic vulnerability: Theory and application to Algerian buildings. Journal of Seismology 18:331–43. doi:10.1007/s10950-013-9377-0.
   Google Scholar
• Mebarki, A., N. Valencia, J. L. Salagnac, and B. Barroca. 2012. Flood hazards and masonry constructions: A probabilistic framework for damage, risk and resilience at urban scale. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 12:1799–809. doi:10.5194/nhess-12-1799-2012.
   Google Scholar
• Meerow, S., and J. P. Newell. 2016. Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why? Urban Geography 1–21. doi:10.1080/02723638.2016.1206395.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meghraoui, M., S. Maouche, B. Chemaa, Z. Cakir, A. Aoudia, A. Harbi, P. J. Alasset, A. Ayadi, Y. Bouhadad, and F. Benhamouda. 2004. Coastal uplift and thrust faulting associated with the (Mw = 6.8) Zemmouri (Algeria) earthquake of 21 May, 2003. Geophysical Research Letters 31:L19605.
   Google Scholar
• Midorikawa, S., and S. Abe. 2000. Real-time assessment of earthquake disaster in Yokohama based on dense strong-motion network. Proceedings of the 12 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January 30-February 4.
   Google Scholar
• Milutinovic, Z. V., and G. S. Trendafiloski. 2003. RISK-UE An advanced approach to earthquake risk scenarios with applications to different European towns, WP4: Vulnerability of current buildings.
   Google Scholar
• Molina, S., D. H. Lang, and C. D. Lindholm. 2010. SELENA–An open source tool for seismic risk and loss assessment using a logic tree computation procedure. Computers & Geosciences 36 (3):257–69.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NOS. 2008. General Census of Population and Housing, National Office of Statistics, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Novelli, V. I., D. D’Ayala, N. Makhloufi, D. Benouar, and A. Zekagh. 2015. A procedure for the identification of the seismic vulnerability at territorial scale. Application to the Casbah of Algiers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:177–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Okasaki, K. and Radius Team. 2000. Radius initiative for IDNDR – How to reduce urban seismic risk. Proceedings of the 12 World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Auckland, New Zealand, January 30- February 4.
   Google Scholar
• Ordaz, M., E. Reinoso, M. A. Jaimes, L. Alcántara, and C. Pérez. 2017. High-resolution early earthquake damage assessment system for Mexico City based on a single-station. Geofísica Internacional 56 (1):117–35. doi:10.19155/geofint.2017.056.1.9.
   Google Scholar
• Pagani, M., D. Monelli, G. Weatherill, L. Danciu, H. Crowley, V. Silva, P. Henshaw, L. Butler, M. Nastasi, L. Panzeri, et al. 2014. OpenQuake engine: An open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismological Research Letters 85 (3):692–702. doi:10.1785/0220130087.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pitilakis, K., and S. Argyroudis. 2014. Seismic vulnerability assessment: Lifelines. In Beer, M., I. A. Kougioumtzoglou, E. Patelli, S. K. Au (eds.). Encyclopedia of earthquake engineering. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_255-1
   Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N. 2003. Myths and fallacies in earthquake engineering, revisited: The Mallet Milne Lecture. Pavia, Italy: IUSS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reza, H., Z. Nedovic´- Budic´, A. R. Akbar, N. Mohsen, and H. Hassan. 2013. Interactive approach for GIS-based earthquake scenario development and resource estimation (Karmania Hazard Model). Computers & Geosciences 51:324–38.
   Google Scholar
• Romão, X., and E. Paupério. 2019. An indicator for post-disaster economic loss valuation of impacts on cultural heritage. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1643948.
   Google Scholar
• Rossetto, T., and A. Elnashai. 2003. Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Engineering Structures 25 (10):1241–63.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roussel, J. 1973. L’activité sismique en Algérie de 1951 à 1970 inclus. Extrait du Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de l’Afrique du Nord 64 (3–4):185–210.
   Google Scholar
• RPA99 version 2003. 2004. Algerian Seismic Code, Ministry of Housing and Urban Planning, DTR-BC 2.48, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Sabetta, F., A. Lucantoni, H. Bungum, and J. Bommer. 2005. Sensitivity of PSHA results to ground motion prediction relations and logic-tree weights. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 25:317–29. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2005.02.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salgado-Galvez, M. A., G. A. Bernal, D. Zuloaga, M. C. Marulanda, O. D. Cardona, and S. Henao. 2017. Probabilistic seismic risk assessment in Manizales, Colombia: Quantifying losses for insurance purposes. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 8:296–307. doi:10.1007/s13753-017-0137-6.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider, P. J., and B. A. Schauer. 2006. HAZUS – Its development and its future. Natural Hazards Review 7 (2):40–44. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)1527-6988(2006)7:2(40).
   Google Scholar
• Shakhramanjyan, M. A., G. M. Nigmetov, V. I. Larionov, A. V. Nikolaev, N. I. Frolova, S. P. Sushchev, and A. N. Ugarov. 2001. Advanced procedures for risk assessment and management in Russia. International Journal of Risk Assessment and Management 2 (3/4):303–18. doi:10.1504/IJRAM.2001.001512.
   Google Scholar
• Silva, V., H. Crowley, M. Pagani, D. Monelli, and R. Pinho. 2014. Development of the openquake engine, the global earthquake model’s open-source software for seismic risk assessment. Natural Hazards 72 (3):1409–27. Springer. doi:10.1007/s11069-013-0618-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trendafiloski, G., M. Wyss, and P. Rosset. 2009. Loss estimation module in the second generation software QLARM. Proceedings of the Second International Workshop on Disaster Casualties, University of Cambridge, UK, June 15-16.
   Google Scholar
• Trumelet, C. 1887. Blida, Récits selon Légende, la Tradition et l’Histoire. Adolphe Jourdan, Libraire éditeur, Alger, Algeria.
   Google Scholar
• Vamvatsikos, D. 2014. Incremental Dynamic Analysis. In Encyclopedia of Earthquake Engineering, M. Beer, I. Kougioumtzoglou, E. Patelli, and I. K. Au. ed. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer 1–8. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-36197-5_136-1.
   Google Scholar
• Whitman, R. V., J. W. Reed, and S. T. Hong. 1973. Earthquake damage probability matrices. Proceedings of the Fifth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Rome, 2531–40.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. M., T. L. Teng, N. C. Hsiao, T. C. Shin, W. H. K. Lee, and Y. B. Tsai. 2004. Progress on earthquake rapid reporting and early warning systems in Taiwan. In Earthquake Hazard, risk, and strong ground motion, seismological press, ed. Y. T. Chen, G. F. Panza, and Z. L. Wu, 463–86. Beijing: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Xu, M., I. Hijazi, A. Mebarki, R. El Meouche, and M. Abune’meh. 2016. Indoor guided evacuation: TIN for graph generation and crowd evacuation. Geomatics, Natural Hazards and Risk, Taylor & Francis. doi:10.1080/19475705.2016.1181343.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yaoxian, Y. 1996. Decision-making for recovery and reconstruction following a strong earthquake. Post-Earthquake Rehabilitation and Reconstruction 59–68. doi:10.1016/b978-008042825-3/50009-0.
   Google Scholar
• Yousfi, N., M. Bensaibi, N. Guessoum, and M. Boukri. 2021. Seismic scenario of Algiers City: Case study of strengthened Masonry buildings. Structural Engineering International. doi:10.1080/10168664.2021.1872465.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y., and W. Dong. 2019. Determining minimum intervention in the preservation of heritage buildings. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1645237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, Z., Wang, L. & Wang, Y. 2018. An Emergency Decision Making Method Based on Prospect Theory for Different Emergency Situations. International Journal of Disaster Risk Science 9: 407–420. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13753-018-0173-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zülfikar, A. C., N. Ö. Z. Fercan, S. Tunç, and M. Erdik. 2017. Real-time earthquake shake, damage, and loss mapping for Istanbul metropolitan area. Earth Planets Space 69:9. doi:10.1186/s40623-016-0579-x.
   Google Scholar