Post-Earthquake Damage Assessments of Historic Mosques and Effects of Near-Fault and Far-Fault Ground Motions on Seismic Responses

References

• Adanur, S., A. C. Altunişik, A. Bayraktar, and M. Akköse. 2012. Comparison of near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on geometrically nonlinear earthquake behavior of suspension bridges. Natural Hazards 64 (1):593–614. doi:10.1007/s11069-012-0259-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AFAD. 2011. Earthquake department of the disaster and emergency management presidency. Ankara, Turkey. http://www.afad.gov.tr/.
   Google Scholar
• AFAD. 2021. Earthquake department of the disaster and emergency management presidency. Ankara, Turkey. https://tadas.afad.gov.tr/map.
   Google Scholar
• Akköse, M., and E. Şimşek. 2010. Non-linear seismic response of concrete gravity dams to near-fault ground motions including dam-water-sediment-foundation interaction. Applied Mathematical Modelling 34 (11):3685–700. doi:10.1016/j.apm.2010.03.019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Akköse, M., and F. Sunca. 2016. Effects of near-fault ground motions on earthquake-induced pounding response of RC buildings with plan irregularity. Insights and Innovations in Structural Engineering, Mechanics and Computation 320–25. doi:10.1201/9781315641645-53.
   Google Scholar
• Aldea, A., S. Demetrıu, C. Neagu, E. Lozincă, and M. Ilıescu. 2018. Ambient vibration tests at ”Carol I” royal mosque in Constanţa, Romania. 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Aloisio, A., E. Antonacci, M. Fragiacomo, and R. Alaggio. 2020. The recorded seismic response of the Santa Maria Di Collemaggio Basilica to low-intensity earthquakes. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 15 (1):229–47. doi:10.1080/15583058.2020.1802533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunişik, A. C., O. Ş. Karahasan, F. Y. Okur, E. Kalkan, and K. Ozgan. 2018. Finite element model updating and dynamic analysis of a restored historical timber mosque based on ambient vibration tests. Journal of Testing and Evaluation 47 (5):20180122. doi:10.1520/jte20180122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunışık, A. C., A. Bayraktar, and A. F. Genc. 2016. A study on seismic behaviour of masonry mosques after restoration. Earthquakes and Structures 10 (6):1331–46. doi:10.12989/eas.2016.10.6.1331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Altunışık, A. C., and A. F. Genç. 2017. Earthquake response of heavily damaged historical masonry mosques after restoration. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences 17 (10):1811–21. doi:10.5194/nhess-17-1811-2017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonacci, E., A. Aloisio, D. Galeota, and R. Alaggio. 2020. The S. Maria di Collemaggio Basilica: From vulnerability assessment to first results of SHM. Journal of Architectural Engineering 26 (3):05020007. doi:10.1061/(asce)ae.1943-5568.0000426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias, A. 1969. Measure of earthquake intensity in seismic design for nuclear power plants, R. Hansen ed. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Aşıkoğlu, A., Ö. Avşar, P. B. Lourenço, and L. C. Silva. 2019. Effectiveness of seismic retrofitting of a historical masonry structure: Kütahya Kurşunlu Mosque, Turkey. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (6):3365–95. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00603-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris, P. G., and A. D. Tzamtzis. 2003. On the use of a regular yield surface for the analysis of unreinforced masonry walls. Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering 3:23–42.
   Google Scholar
• Asteris, P. G., D. M. Cotsovos, C. Z. Chrysostomou, A. Mohebkhah, and G. K. Al-Chaar. 2013. Mathematical micromodeling of infilled frames: State of the art. Engineering Structures 56:1905–21. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Asteris, P. G., and V. Plevris. 2015. Handbook of research on seismic assessment and rehabilitation of historic structures. PA, USA: IGI Global.
   Google Scholar
• Atmaca, B., S. Demir, M. Günaydin, A. C. Altunişik, M. Hüsem, Ş. Ateş, S. Adanur, and Z. Angin. 2020a. Field investigation on the performance of mosques and minarets during the Elazig-Sivrice Earthquake. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 34 (6):04020120. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001527.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atmaca, B., S. Demir, M. Günaydın, A. C. Altunışık, M. Hüsem, Ş. Ateş, S. Adanur, and Z. Angın. 2020b. Lessons learned from the past earthquakes on building performance in Turkey. Journal of Structural Engineering & Applied Mechanics 3 (2):61–84. doi:10.31462/jseam.2020.02061084.
   Google Scholar
• Aytekin, O. 2012. 2011 Van depreminin yöresindeki kültür varliklarina olan etkisi üzerine bir değerlendirme. Batman University Journal of Life Sciences 1 (1):1081–90.
   Google Scholar
• Azzara, R. M., M. Girardi, V. Iafolla, D. M. Lucchesi, C. Padovani, and D. Pellegrini. 2019. Ambient vibrations of age-old masonry towers: Results of long-term dynamic monitoring in the historic Centre of Lucca. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–17. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1695155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartoli, G., M. Betti, A. M. Marra, and S. Monchetti. 2017. Semiempirical formulations for estimating the main frequency of slender masonry towers. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 31 (4):04017025. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, A., A. C. Altunişik, B. Sevim, M. E. Kartal, T. Türker, and Y. Bilici. 2009. Comparison of near-and far-fault ground motion effect on the nonlinear response of dam–reservoir–foundation systems. Nonlinear Dynamics 58 (4):655–73. doi:10.1007/s11071-009-9508-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, A., A. C. Altunişik, B. Sevim, and T. Türker. 2011. Seismic response of a historical masonry minaret using a finite element model updated with operational modal testing. Journal of Vibration and Control 17 (1):129–49. doi:10.1177/1077546309353288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, A., A. C. Altunisik, and M. Muvafik. 2014. Damages of minarets during Erciş and Edremit Earthquakes, 2011 in Turkey. Smart Structures and Systems 14 (3):479–99. doi:10.12989/sss.2014.14.3.479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, A., A. C. Altunışık, and M. Muvafık. 2016. Field investigation of the performance of masonry buildings during the October 23 and November 9, 2011, Van earthquakes in Turkey. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 30 (2):04014209. doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000383.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bayraktar, A., E. Hökelekli, T. Türker, İ. Çalik, A. Ashour, and A. Mosallam. 2018. Window opening effects on structural behavior of historical masonry Fatih Mosque. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (4):585–99. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1447617.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:693–714. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cakir, F., E. Uckan, J. Shen, B. S. Seker, and B. Akbas. 2015. Seismic damage evaluation of historical structures during Van earthquake, October 23, 2011. Engineering Failure Analysis 58:249–66. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.030.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çaktı, E., Ö. Saygılı, J. V. Lemos, and C. S. Oliveira. 2020. Nonlinear dynamic response of stone masonry minarets under harmonic excitation. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (10):4813–38. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00888-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalik, İ., A. Bayraktar, T. Türker, and A. Ashour. 2019. Experimental dynamic behaviors and empirical frequency formulas for historical timber mosques. Structural Engineering International 29 (3):404–11. doi:10.1080/10168664.2019.1593070.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Çalik, İ., A. Bayraktar, T. Türker, and M. Akköse. 2020. Empirical formulation for estimating the fundamental frequency of historical stone mosques with masonry domes. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 29 (9). doi: 10.1002/tal.1732.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cattari, S., S. Degli Abbati, D. Ferretti, S. Lagomarsino, D. Ottonelli, and A. Tralli. 2014. Damage assessment of fortresses after the 2012 Emilia earthquake (Italy). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5):2333–65. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9520-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceroni, F., S. Sica, M. Rosaria Pecce, and A. Garofano. 2014. Evaluation of the natural vibration frequencies of a historical masonry building accounting for SSI. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 64:95–101. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.05.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chieffo, N., A. Formisano, M. Mosoarca, and P. B. Lourenço. 2020. Seismic vulnerability assessment of a Romanian historical building under near-field earthquake. XI International Conference on Structural Dynamics, Greece. doi:10.47964/1120.9402.20351.
   Google Scholar
• Chopra, A. K., and C. Chintanapakdee. 2001. Comparing response of SDF systems to near-fault and far-fault earthquake motions in the context of spectral regions. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 30 (12):1769–89. doi:10.1002/eqe.92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Ambrisi, A., V. Mariani, and M. Mezzi. 2012. Seismic assessment of a historical masonry tower with nonlinear static and dynamic analyses tuned on ambient vibration tests. Engineering Structures 36:210–19. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2011.12.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dal Cin, A., and S. Russo. 2014. Influence of the annex on seismic behavior of historic churches. Engineering Failure Analysis 45:300–13. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.07.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davoodi, M., M. K. Jafari, and N. Hadiani. 2013. Seismic response of embankment dams under near-fault and far-field ground motion excitation. Engineering Geology 158:66–76. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2013.02.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diaferio, M., D. Foti, and F. Potenza. 2018. Prediction of the fundamental frequencies and modal shapes of historic masonry towers by empirical equations based on experimental data. Engineering Structures 156:433–42. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.11.061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doğan, B., and A. Karakaş. 2013. Geometry of co-seismic surface ruptures and tectonic meaning of the 23 October 2011 Mw 7.1 Van earthquake (East Anatolian Region, Turkey). Journal of Structural Geology 46:99–114. doi:10.1016/j.jsg.2012.10.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dogangun, A., and H. Sezen. 2012. Seismic vulnerability and preservation of historical masonry monumental structures. Earthquakes and Structures 3 (1):83–95. doi:10.12989/eas.2012.3.1.083.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fahjan, Y. M. 2008. Selection and scaling of real earthquake accelerograms to fit the Turkish design spectra. Teknik Dergi 19 (3):4423–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fathi, A., A. Sadeghi, M. R. Emami Azadi, and N. Hoveidae. 2020. Assessing the soil-structure interaction effects by direct method on the out-of-plane behavior of masonry structures (case study: Arge-Tabriz). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (14):6429–43. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00933-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• FEMA 356. 2000. Prestandart and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, USA: FEMA-Federal Emergency Management Agency.
   Google Scholar
• García-Macías, E., and F. Ubertini. 2020. Automated operational modal analysis and ambient noise deconvolution interferometry for the full structural identification of historic towers: A case study of the Sciri Tower in Perugia, Italy. Engineering Structures 215:110615. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110615.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Genç, A. F., M. Ergün, M. Günaydin, A. C. Altunişik, Ş. Ateş, F. Y. Okur, and A. S. Mosallam. 2019. Dynamic analyses of experimentally-updated FE model of historical masonry clock towers using site-specific seismic characteristics and scaling parameters according to the 2018 Turkey building earthquake code. Engineering Failure Analysis 105:402–26. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2019.06.054.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, H., and F. Özel. 2020. Microtremor measurements and 3D dynamic soil–structure interaction analysis for a historical masonry arch bridge under the effects of near- and far-fault earthquakes. Environmental Earth Sciences 79 (13). doi: 10.1007/s12665-020-09086-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, H., and H. S. Jaf. 2016. Full 3D nonlinear time history analysis of dynamic soil–structure interaction for a historical masonry arch bridge. Environmental Earth Sciences 75 (21). doi: 10.1007/s12665-016-6230-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, H., and M. Karabekmez. 2017. Effect of near-fault and far-fault earthquakes on a historical masonry mosque through 3D dynamic soil-structure interaction. Engineering Structures 152:465–92. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.09.031.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, H., and M. Pala. 2014. On the resonance effect by dynamic soil–structure interaction: A revelation study. Natural Hazards 72 (2):827–47. doi:10.1007/s11069-014-1039-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güllü, H. 2013. On the prediction of shear wave velocity at local site of strong ground motion stations: An application using artificial intelligence. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 11 (4):969–97. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9425-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Güneş, N., and Z. Ç. Ulucan. 2019. Nonlinear dynamic response of a tall building to near-fault pulse-like ground motions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (6):2989–3013. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00570-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Habieb, A. B., M. Valente, and G. Milani. 2019. Effectiveness of different base isolation systems for seismic protection: Numerical insights into an existing masonry bell tower. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 125:105752. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.105752.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hökelekli, E., and A. Al‐Helwani. 2019. Effect of soil properties on the seismic damage assessment of historical masonry minaret–soil interaction systems. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 29 (2). doi: 10.1002/tal.1694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jäger, W., and T. Bakeer. 2010. Seismic vulnerability of historical masonry buildings for different earthquake characteristics: Case study of the mosque of Takiyya al‐Sulaymaniyya. Mauerwerk 14 (3):143–49. doi:10.1002/dama.201000466.
   Google Scholar
• Kalkan, E., and P. Gülkan. 2013. 2011 Depreminin ışığında Van ve çevresi için deprem hesabı parametrelerinin tayini. 2. Turkey: Türkiye Deprem Mühendisliği ve Sismoloji Konferansı.
   Google Scholar
• Karantoni, F. V., and D. Dimakopoulou. 2021. Displacement-based assessment of the Gazi Hasan Pasha mosque in Kos Island (GR) under the 2017 M6.6 earthquake and Eurocode 8, with proposals for upgrading. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (2):1213–30. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-01005-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karantoni, F. V. 2013. Seismic retrofitting of Fragavilla Monastery. Earthquakes and Structures 5 (2):207–23. doi:10.12989/eas.2013.5.2.207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karaton, M., and H. S. Aksoy. 2018. Seismic damage assessment of an 891 years old historic masonry mosque. Periodica Polytechnica Civil Engineering 62 (1):126–35. doi:10.3311/ppci.10270.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocaman, I., I. Kazaz, and E. Kazaz. 2020. Seismic load capacity of historical masonry mosques by rigid body kinetics. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (6):849–69. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1570389.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• KOERI. 2011. Kandilli observatory and earthquake research institute, Preliminary report, The November 09, 2011 Edremit-Van, Turkey Earthquake (ML=5.6), Department of Earthquake Engineering, Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Koseoglu, G. C., and E. Canbay. 2015. Assessment and rehabilitation of the damaged historic Cenabı Ahmet Pasha Mosque. Engineering Failure Analysis 57:389–98. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2015.08.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krstevska, L., L. Tashkov, K. Gramatikov, R. Landolfo, O. Mammana, F. Portioli, and F. Mazzolani. 2010. Large-scale experimental investigation on Mustafa Pasha Mosque. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 14 (6):842–73. doi:10.1080/13632460903338528.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S. 2012. Damage assessment of churches after L’Aquila earthquake (2009). Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (1):73–92. doi:10.1007/s10518-011-9307-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liao, W.-I., C.-H. Loh, and B.-H. Lee. 2004. Comparison of dynamic response of isolated and non-isolated continuous girder bridges subjected to near-fault ground motions. Engineering Structures 26 (14):2173–83. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2004.07.016.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livaoğlu, R., M. H. Baştürk, A. Doğangün, and C. Serhatoğlu. 2016. Effect of geometric properties on dynamic behavior of historic masonry minaret. KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering 20 (6):2392–402. doi:10.1007/s12205-016-0622-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B. 2002. Computations on historic masonry structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 4 (3):301–19. doi:10.1002/pse.120.
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., and A. Penna. 2009. Existing masonry buildings: General code issues and methodes of analysis and assessment. Eurocode 8 perspectives from the Italian standpoint workshop, 185–198, Napoli, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Mangia, L., B. Ghiassi, E. Sayın, O. Onat, and P. B. Lourenço. 2016. Pushover analysis of historical elti hatun mosque. 12th International Congress on Advances in Civil Engineering, İstanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Mortezaei, A., A. Kheyroddin, and H. R. Ronagh. 2012. Finite element analysis and seismic rehabilitation of a 1000‐year‐old heritage listed tall masonry mosque. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 21 (5):334–53. doi:10.1002/tal.599.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muvafik, M. 2014. Field investigation and seismic analysis of a historical brick masonry minaret damaged during the Van Earthquakes in 2011. Earthquakes and Structures 6 (5):457–72. doi:10.12989/eas.2014.6.5.457.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nohutcu, H., A. Demir, E. Ercan, E. Hokelekli, and G. Altintas. 2015. Investigation of a historic masonry structure by numerical and operational modal analyses. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings 24 (13):821–34. doi:10.1002/tal.1213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira, C. S., E. Çaktı, D. Stengel, and M. Branco. 2011. Minaret behavior under earthquake loading: The case of historical Istanbul. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 41 (1):19–39. doi:10.1002/eqe.1115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oyguc, R., and E. Oyguc. 2017. 2011 Van earthquakes: Lessons from damaged masonry structures. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 31 (5):04017062. doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0001057.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• PEER. 2021. Pacific earthquake engineering research center, University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Portioli, F., O. Mammana, R. Landolfo, F. M. Mazzolani, L. Krstevska, L. Tashkov, and K. Gramatikov. 2011. Seismic retrofitting of Mustafa Pasha Mosque in Skopje: Finite element analysis. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 15 (4):620–39. doi:10.1080/13632469.2010.532580.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ramírez, E., P. B. Lourenço, and M. D’Amato. 2019. Seismic assessment of the Matera Cathedral. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions 1346–54. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_144.
   Google Scholar
• Ramos, L. F. 2007. Damage identification on masonry structures based on vibration signatures. Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho, Portugal.
   Google Scholar
• Romão, X., A. A. Costa, E. Paupério, H. Rodrigues, R. Vicente, H. Varum, and A. Costa. 2013. Field observations and interpretation of the structural performance of constructions after the 11 May 2011 Lorca earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:670–92. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.040.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rossi, M., S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2015. Performance-based assessment of the Great Mosque of Algiers. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (1):369–88. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9682-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saisi, A., and C. Gentile. 2015. Post-earthquake diagnostic investigation of a historic masonry tower. Journal of Cultural Heritage 16 (4):602–09. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2014.09.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloustros, S., L. Pelà, P. Roca, and J. Portal. 2015. Numerical analysis of structural damage in the church of the Poblet Monastery. Engineering Failure Analysis 48:41–61. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2014.10.015.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAP2000. 2015. Structural analysis program, computers and structures inc., Version: 17.1.1, Berkeley, California, USA.
   Google Scholar
• Sayin, E., B. Yon, Y. Calayir, and M. Gor. 2014. Construction failures of masonry and adobe buildings during the 2011 Van earthquakes in Turkey. Structural Engineering and Mechanics 51 (3):503–18. doi:10.12989/sem.2014.51.3.503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seker, B. S., F. Cakir, A. Dogangun, and H. Uysal. 2014. Investigation of the structural performance of a masonry domed mosque by experimental tests and numerical analysis. Earthquakes and Structures 6 (4):335–50. doi:10.12989/eas.2014.6.4.335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serhatoğlu, C., and R. Livaoğlu. 2019. A fast and practical approximations for fundamental period of historical Ottoman minarets. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 120:320–31. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2019.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sesigur, H., G. Erol, S. Soyoz, K. Kaynardag, and S. Gonen. 2016. Repair and retrofit of Ketchaoua Mosque in Algeria. Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions. doi:10.1201/9781315616995-267.
   Google Scholar
• Sevim, B., S. Atamturktur, A. C. Altunişik, and A. Bayraktar. 2016. Ambient vibration testing and seismic behavior of historical arch bridges under near and far fault ground motions. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 14 (1):241–59. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9810-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shakya, M., H. Varum, R. Vicente, and A. Costa. 2016. Empirical formulation for estimating the fundamental frequency of slender masonry structures. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (1):55–66. doi:10.1080/15583058.2014.951796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simos, N., G. C. Manos, and E. Kozikopoulos. 2018. Near- and far-field earthquake damage study of the Konitsa stone arch bridge. Engineering Structures 177:256–67. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.09.072.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sorrentino, L., L. Liberatore, L. D. Decanini, and D. Liberatore. 2014. The performance of churches in the 2012 Emilia earthquakes. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 12 (5):2299–331. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9519-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Soyluk, K., and H. Karaca. 2017. Near-fault and far-fault ground motion effects on cable-supported bridges. Procedia Engineering 199:3077–82. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2017.09.421.
   Google Scholar
• Tapan, M., M. Comert, C. Demir, Y. Sayan, K. Orakcal, and A. Ilki. 2013. Failures of structures during the October 23, 2011 Tabanlı (Van) and November 9, 2011 Edremit (Van) earthquakes in Turkey. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:606–28. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.02.013.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TEC 2007. 2007. Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones, Ministry of Public Works and Settlement of Republic of Turkey, TEC-Turkish Earthquake Code, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• TEC-2018. 2018. Specification for buildings to be built in seismic zones, Disaster and Emergency Management Authority, TEC-Turkish Earthquake Code, Ankara, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• Teomete, E., and E. Aktaş. 2010. Structural analyses and assessment of historical Kamanlı Mosque in Izmir, Turkey. Journal of Performance of Constructed Facilities 24 (4):353–64. doi:10.1061/(asce)cf.1943-5509.0000111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trifunac, M. D., and A. G. Brady. 1975. A study on the duration of strong earthquake ground motion. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 65 (3):581–626.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• URL-1. 2021. https://www.kulturportali.gov.tr/turkiye/van/gezilecekyer/husrev-pasa-cam955058.
   Google Scholar
• Usta, P., Ö. Bozdağ, and A. I. Çarhoğlu. 2020. Appraisal of structural behavior of Afyon Sandıklı Ulu Mosque. El-Cezeri Journal of Science and Engineering 7 (2):871–81. doi:10.31202/ecjse.710887.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, M., and G. Milani. 2016. Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Construction and Building Materials 108:74–104. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yön, B., O. Onat, M. Emin Öncü, and A. Karasin. 2020. Failures of masonry dwelling triggered by East Anatolian Fault earthquakes in Turkey. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 133:106126. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, S., and G. Wang. 2013. Effects of near-fault and far-fault ground motions on nonlinear dynamic response and seismic damage of concrete gravity dams. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering 53:217–29. doi:10.1016/j.soildyn.2013.07.014.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar