A Preliminary Study on Properties of A Weak Units–Strong Mortar Masonry: The Case Study of Matera Tufo Masonry (Italy)

References

• ASTM-C1314-03b. 2003. Standard Test Method for Compressive Strength of Masonry Prisms. s.l.: ASTM International.
   Google Scholar
• Atkinson, R. H., B. P. Amadei, S. Saeb, and S. Sture. 1989. Response of masonry bed joints in direct shear. Journal of Structural Engineering 115 (9):2277–96. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(1989)115:9(2276).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Augenti, N., F. Parisi, and E. Acconcia, 2012. MADA: Online experimental database for mechanical modelling of existing masonry assemblages. In Proc. 15th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon (Portugal) (pp. 24–28).
   Google Scholar
• Basha, S. H., and H. B. Kaushik. 2015. Non-linear Behavior of Weak Brick-Strong Mortar Masonry in Compression. In Advances in Structural Engineering, 2427–33. New Delhi: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Berto, L., A. Saetta, R. Scotta, and R. Vitaliani. 2005. Failure mechanism of masonry prism loaded in axial compression: Computational aspects. Materials and Structures 38 (2):249–56. doi:10.1007/BF02479350.
   Google Scholar
• Binda, L., A. Fontana, and G. Frigerio, 1988. Mechanical behaviour of brick masonries derived from unit and mortar characteristics. In Proceedings of the 8th International Brick and Block Masonry Conference, Dublin, Ireland, 1, 205–16
   Google Scholar
• Binda, L., A. Saisi, and C. Tiraboschi. 2000. Investigation procedures for the diagnosis of historic masonries. Construction and Building Materials 14 (4):199–233. doi:10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00018-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binda, L., C. Tiraboschi, and S. Abbaneo. 1997. Experimental research to characterize masonry materials. Masonry International 10 (3):92–101.
   Google Scholar
• Borri, A., M. Corradi, G. Castori, and A. De Maria. 2015. A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (9):2647–65. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9731-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosiljkov, V., A. Page, V. Bokan Bosiljkov, and R. Zarnic. 2003. Performance based studies of in-plane loaded unreinforced masonry walls. Masonry International 16 (2):39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Camassa, D., A. Castellano, A. Fraddosio, and M. D. Piccioni. 2020. A New Ultrasonic Amplitude Tomography Approach, with Validation on Masonry Tuff Blocks. Journal of Nondestructive Evaluation 39 (3):1–19. doi:10.1007/s10921-020-00693-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colla, C., F. Grüner, B. Dieruff, K. Fiedler, G. Pascale, E. Gabrielli, A. J. Fernandez, C. Gentilini, M. Lukomsky, M. Strojecki, et al. 2010. SMOOHS. Smart Monitoring of Historic Structures. D5.1-part1: Report on test methods and former test results. MPA Universität Stuttgart, Germany, Stuttgart, 402
   Google Scholar
• Commentary to the NTC-2018 - Circolare 21/01/2019 n. 7. 2019. Istruzioni per l’applicazione dell’«Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”» di cui al decreto ministeriale 17 gennaio 2011”. Suppl. O. n. 5 alla Gazzetta Ufficiale del 11 febbraio 2019. C.S.LL.PP. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• D’Amato, M., M. Laterza, and D. Diaz Fuentes. 2020. “Simplified Seismic Analyses of Ancient Churches in Matera’s Landscape,”. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (1):119–38. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1511000.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D’Amato, M., R. Gigliotti, and R. Laguardia. 2019. Comparative seismic assessment of ancient masonry churches. Front. Built Environ 5 (56):2019. doi:10.3389/fbuil.2019.00056.
   Google Scholar
• EC0. 2005. 2004. Eurocode 0 —Basis of structural design. London: British Standard Institution.
   Google Scholar
• EC6. 2005. 2005. Eurocode 6—Design of masonry structures. London: British Standard Institution.
   Google Scholar
• EN 1015–11. 1999. Methods of test for mortar for masonry–Part 11: Determination of flexural and compressive strength of hardened mortar. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 14579–4. 2005. Testing methods for natural stone. Determination of sonic propagation velocity. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 196–1. 2005 . Methods for testing cement-Part 1: Determination of compressive strength. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• EN 772–1. 2002. Methods of test for masonry units. Determination of compressive strength. Brussels: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Giuffrè, A., and C. Carocci, 1997. Codice di pratica per la sicurezza e la conservazione dei Sassi di Matera. Edizioni la Bautta. In Italian
   Google Scholar
• Hendry, A. W. 1998. Structural masonry. Basingstoke, UK: Macmillan International Higher Education.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, S., R. Esposito, and J. G. Rots. 2019. From brick to element: Investigating the mechanical properties of calcium silicate masonry. In Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions, 596–604. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, S. 2021. Material characterisation of existing masonry: A strategy to determine strength, stiffness and toughness properties for structural analysis. Delft University of Technology: TU Delft Applied Mechanics. https://repository.tudelft.nl
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik, H. B., D. C. Rai, and S. K. Jain. 2007. Stress-strain characteristics of clay brick masonry under uniaxial compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 19 (9):728–39. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krautkrämer, J., and H. Krautkrämer. 1990. . In Ultrasonic Testing of Materials . Heidelberg, Berlin: Springer-Verlag doi:10.1007/978-3-662-10680-8.
   Google Scholar
• Kržan, M., S. Gostič, S. Cattari, and V. Bosiljkov. 2015. Acquiring reference parameters of masonry for the structural performance analysis of historical buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (1):203–36. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9686-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehmann, B. 2007. Seismic traveltime tomography for engineering and exploration applications, Vols. 32–36. Netherlands: EAGE Publications bv, DB Houton.
   Google Scholar
• Liberatore, D., N. Masini, L. Sorrentino, V. Racina, M. Sileo, O. AlShawa, and L. Frezza. 2016. Static penetration test for historical masonry mortar. Construction and Building Materials 122:810–22. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.07.097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombillo, I., C. Thomas, L. Villegas, J. P. Fernández-Álvarez, and J. Norambuena-Contreras. 2013. Mechanical characterization of rubble stone masonry walls using non and minor destructive tests, 266–77. Construction and Building Materials.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., G. Milani, A. Tralli, and A. Zucchini. 2007. Analysis of masonry structures: Review of and recent trends in homogenization techniquesThis article is one of a selection of papers published in this Special Issue on Masonry. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering 34 (11):1443–57. doi:10.1139/L07-097.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B. 1996. Computational strategy for masonry structures. Delft, The Netherlands: Delft University Press. https://repository.tudelft.nl
   Google Scholar
• Luchin, G. Y., 2017. Characterization of “Tufo” masonry of the Sassi of Matera by means of destructive and non-destructive tests. Master´s Thesis, Heritage & Design: Protection, Conservation and Recovery of Architectural Heritage, University of Basilicata, Matera, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Luchin, G., L. F. Ramos, and M. D’Amato. 2020. Sonic Tomography for Masonry Walls Characterization. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14 (4):589–604. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1554723.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumantarna, R., D. T. Biggs, and J. M. Ingham. 2014. Uniaxial compressive strength and stiff- ness of field extracted and laboratory constructed masonry prisms. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 26 (4):567–75. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000731.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miranda, L., L. Cantini, J. Guedes, and A. Costa. 2016. Assessment of mechanical properties of full-scale masonry panels through sonic methods. Comparison with mechanical destructive tests. Structural Control & Health Monitoring 23 (3):503–16. doi:10.1002/stc.1783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mohr, H. A. 1940. Exploration of Soil Conditions and Sampling Operations (Soil Mechanics Series). Harvard University, Graduate School of Engineering 1940 (Bull):269.
   Google Scholar
• NTC. 2018. Ministerial Decree 17/01/2018. Aggiornamento delle “Norme tecniche per le costruzioni”, di cui al Decreto Ministeriale 17 gennaio 2011. Suppl. O. n. 8 alla Gazzetta Ufficiale del 20 febbraio 2018. C.S.LL.PP. In Italian.
   Google Scholar
• Pelà, L., P. Roca, and A. Benedetti. 2016. Mechanical characterization of historical masonry by core drilling and testing of cylindrical samples. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 10 (2–3):360–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravula, M. B., and K. V. Subramaniam. 2017. Experimental investigation of compressive failure in masonry brick assemblages made with soft brick. Materials and Structures 50 (1):1–11. doi:10.1617/s11527-016-0926-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravula, M. B., and K. V. Subramaniam. 2019. Cohesive-frictional interface fracture behavior in soft-brick masonry: Experimental investigation and theoretical development. Materials and Structures 52 (2):1–12. doi:10.1617/s11527-019-1333-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RILEM Recommendation TC127-MS. 1996. MS-D.1 Measurement of mechanical pulse velocity for masonry. Materials and Structures 29 (8):463–66. doi:10.1007/BF02486277.
   Google Scholar
• Roca, P., M. Cervera, G. Gariup, and L. Pelà. 2010. Structural Analysis of Masonry Historical Constructions. Classical and Advanced Approaches. Archives of Computational Methods in Engineering 17 (3):299–325. doi:10.1007/s11831-010-9046-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarangapani, G., B. V. Venkatarama Reddy, and K. S. Jagadish. 2005. Brick-mortar bond and masonry compressive strength. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering 17 (2):229–37. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2005)17:2(229).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singh, S. B., and M. Pankaj. 2017. Bond strength and compressive stress-strain characteristics of brick masonry. Journal of Building Engineering 9:10–16. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.11.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamboo, J. A., and M. Dhanasekar. 2015. Characterisation of thin layer polymer cement mortared concrete masonry bond. Construction and Building Materials 82:71–80. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.12.098.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamboo, J. A., and M. Dhanasekar. 2016. Behaviour of thin layer mortared concrete masonry under combined shear and compression. Australian Journal of Structural Engineering 17 (1):39–52. doi:10.1080/13287982.2015.1116181.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thamboo, J. A., and M. Dhanasekar. 2019. Correlation between the performance of solid masonry prisms and wallettes under compression. Journal of Building Engineering 22:429–38. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2019.01.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vasconcelos, G., and P. B. Lourenço. 2009. Experimental characterization of stone masonry in shear and compression. Construction and Building Materials 23 (11):3337–45. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.06.045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vemuri, J., S. Ehteshamuddin, and S. Kolluru. 2018. Numerical simulation of soft brick unreinforced masonry walls subjected to lateral loads. Cogent Engineering 5 (1):1551503. doi:10.1080/23311916.2018.1551503.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeltfoort, A. T., 2008. Mechanical properties and application features of CASIELS. Proceedings of the 14th IBMAC. Sydney, Australia, 88–97
   Google Scholar
• Vermeltfoort, A. T., and B. M. Ng’andu, 2005.The response of calcium silicate element wallettes to 2d compression loading. In Proceedings of the 10th Canadian Masonry Symposium. Banff, Alberta, Canada, 202–12.
   Google Scholar
• Zavalis, R., B. Jonaitis, and P. B. Lourenço. 2018. Experimental investigation of the bed joint influence on mechanical properties of hollow calcium silicate block masonry. Materials and Structures 51 (4):1–12. doi:10.1617/s11527-018-1215-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar