Madras Terrace Construction: Seismic Upgrade of a Historic Composite Floor Slab System

References

• Bartoli, B. 2006. Pondicherry: Modern technologies approach in the message of the past. In Structural analysis of historical constructions New Delhi 2006. 1973–1980. (Macmillan India).
   Google Scholar
• Brignola, A., S. Pampanin, and S. Podesta. 2009. Evaluation and control of the in-plane stiffness of timber floors for the performance-based retrofit of URM buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 42 (3):204–21. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.42.3.204-221.
   Google Scholar
• Brignola, A., S. Pampanin, and S. Podesta. 2012. Experimental evaluation of the in-plane stiffness of timber diaphragms. Earthquake Spectra 28 (4):1687–709. doi:10.1193/1.4000088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 1984. IS 712: Specifications for building limes (BIS New Delhi, India).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 1986. IS 3068: Specification for Broken brick(burnt clay) Coarse aggregate for use in Lime concrete. BIS New Delhi, India
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 1987. IS 1905: Code of practice for structural use of unreinforced masonry. (BIS New Delhi, India).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 1988. IS 2119: Code of practice for construction of brick-cum-concrete composite (Madras Terrace) floor and roof (BIS New Delhi, India).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 2016a. IS 1893: Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures - part 1: General provisions and buildings (BIS New Delhi, India).
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Indian Standards. 2016b. IS 883: Design of structural timber in building -code of practice (BIS New Delhi, India).
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, G. L., R. E. Klingner, J. R. Hayes, and S. C. Sweeney. 2004. Seismic evaluation of low-rise reinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms: I. Seismic and quasi-static testing. Earthquake Spectra 20 (3):779–801. doi:10.1193/1.1776558.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costley, A. C., and D. P. Abrams. 1995. Dynamic response of unreinforced masonry buildings with flexible diaphragms. Civil Engineering Studies: Structural Research Series. No. 605. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. http://hdl.handle.net/2142/14227
   Google Scholar
• Derakhshan, H., M. C. Griffith, and J. M. Ingham. 2016. Out-of-plane seismic response of vertically spanning URM walls connected to flexible diaphragms. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 45 (4):563–80. doi:10.1002/eqe2671.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIANA. 2017. DIANA-10.2 user’s manual (DIANA FEA BV Delftechpark 19a, 2628 XJ Delft, The Netherlands.).
   Google Scholar
• Dias, A., J. Skinner, K. Crews, T. Tannert. 2016. Timber-concrete composites increasing the use of timber in construction. European Journal of Wood and Wood Products 74 (3):443–51. doi:10.1007/s00107-015-0975-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doudoumis, I. N. 2010. Analytical modelling of traditional composite timber-masonry walls. Advanced Materials Research 133–134:441–46. www.scientific.net/AMR.133-134.441.
   Google Scholar
• Fragiacomo, M., and E. Lukaszewska. 2011. Development of prefabricated timber–concrete composite floor systems. Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers - structures and buildings 164 (2):117–29. doi:10.1680/stbu.10.00010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gattesco, N., and L. L. Macorini. 2014. In-plane stiffening techniques with nail plates or CFRP strips for timber floors in historical masonry buildings. Construction and Building Materials 58:64–76. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.02.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giongo, I., D. Dizhur, R. Tomasi, and J. M. Ingham. 2013. In-plane assessment of existing timber diaphragms in URM buildings via quasi-static and dynamic in-situ tests Advanced Materials Research . 778:495–502. www.scientific.net/amr.
   Google Scholar
• Giongo, I., A. Wilson, D. Y. Dizhur, H. Derakhshan, R. Tomasi, M. Griffith, P. Quenneville, and J. Ingham. 2014. Detailed seismic assessment and improvement procedure for vintage flexible timber diaphragms. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 47 (2):97–118. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.47.2.97-118.
   Google Scholar
• Gnanasekaran, K., A. K. Sengupta, D. Menon, and A. M. Prasad. 2006. Seismic evaluation and strengthening of a heritage masonry building. In Structural analysis of historical constructions New Delhi 2006 (Macmillan India)1527–1535 .
   Google Scholar
• Government of Tamil Nadu. 2006. Guidelines for retrofitting of buildings. Tamil Nadu: UNDP India.
   Google Scholar
• Gubana, A., and M. Melotto. 2018. Experimental tests on wood-based in-plane strengthening solutions for the seismic retrofit of traditional timber floors. Construction and Building Materials 191:290–99. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HILTI. 2018. HILTI HRD plastic anchor: ETA-07/0219 (28.06.2018). Berlin: European Technical Assessment.
   Google Scholar
• Holschemacher, K., and U. Quapp. 2018 Revaluation of historical buildings with timber-concrete composite in compliance with fire resistance demands . Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions (Springer International 1706–1714). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3-183.
   Google Scholar
• Iyengar, R. N. 1972. Strength characteristics of surkhi-lime mortar and concrete. Master’s thesis, Mahatma Gandhi Central Library. Indian Institute of Technology Roorkee
   Google Scholar
• Kaushik,H.,B., D.C.Rai., and S.K.Jain.2007. Stress-Strain Characteristics of Clay Brick Masonry under Uniaxial Compression. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 19(9): 728–739. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0899-1561(2007)19:9(728)
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kollerathu, J., and A. A. Menon. 2017. Role of diaphragm flexibility modelling in seismic analysis of existing masonry structures. Structures 11:22–39. doi:10.1016/j.istruc.2017.04.001.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krishnachandran, S., and A. Menon. 2021. A normative framework for assessment and retrofit of existing unreinforced masonry buildings in India. Journal of the Institution of Engineers (India): Series A 102 (2):369–87. doi:10.1007/s40030-021-00512-5.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhlmann, U., and J. Schanzlin. 2008. A timber–concrete composite slab system for use in tall buildings. Structural Engineering International 18 (2):174178. doi:10.2749/101686608784218707.
   Google Scholar
• Lamothe, S., L. Sorelli, P. Blanchet, and P. Galimard. 2021. Lightweight and slender timber-concrete composite floors made of CLT-HPC and CLT-UHPC with ductile notch connectors. Engineering Structures 243:112409. 0141–0296. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madhumathi, A., S. Radhakrishnan, and R. S. Priya. 2014. Sustainable roofs for warm humid climates - A case study in residential buildings in Madurai, Tamil Nadu, India. World Applied Sciences Journal 32 (6):1167–80.
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., P. Morandi, and A. Penna. 2008. Test results on the behaviour of masonry under static cyclic in-plane lateral loads. Technical Report ESECMaSE work package 7. deliverable D7.1 c. Enhanced Safety Efficient Construction of Masonry Structures in Europe.
   Google Scholar
• Miglietta, M., N. Damiani, G. Guerrini, and F. Graziotti. 2021. Full‐scale shake‐table tests on two unreinforced masonry cavity‐wall buildings: Effect of an innovative timber retrofit. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (6):2561–96. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01057-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakamura, Y., H. Derakhshan, G. Magenes, and M. C. Griffith. 2017. Influence of diaphragm flexibility on seismic response of unreinforced masonry buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 21 (6):935–60. doi:10.1080/13632469.2016.1190799.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paquette, J., M. Bruneau, and S. Brzev. 2005. Seismic testing of repaired unreinforced masonry building having flexible diaphragm. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States) 130 (10):1487–96. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:10(1487).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penner, O. 2014. Out-of-plane dynamic stability of unreinforced masonry walls connected to flexible diaphragms. Electronic theses and dissertations (ETDs) 2008+T. Canada: University of British Columbia. doi: 10.14288/1.0165881.
   Google Scholar
• Peralta, D. F. 2003. Seismic performance of rehabilitated wood diaphragms. Ph. D thesis, Texas A&M University College Station Texas.
   Google Scholar
• Piazza, M., C. Baldessari, R. Tomasi, and E. Acler. 2008b. Behaviour of refurbished timber floors characterized by different in-plane stiffness. Proceedings of structural analysis of historic construction, Bath, UK, July 2–4.
   Google Scholar
• Rizzi, E., I. Giongo, J. M. Ingham, and D. Dizhur. 2020. Testing and modeling in-plane behavior of retrofitted timber diaphragms. Journal of Structural Engineering 146 (2):04019191. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0002473.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi, I., G. Magenes, A. Penna, A. Galasco, and M. Rota. 2014. The effect of stiffened floor and roof diaphragms on the experimental seismic response of a full-scale unreinforced stone masonry building. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 18 (3):407–43. doi:10.1080/13632469.2013.876946.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sharma, S., A. Menon, H. Haridasan, and S. Samson. 2019. Structural behaviour of gopurams in South Indian Temples. RILEM Bookseries 18:929–37. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-99441-3_100.
   Google Scholar
• Simsir, C. C., M. Aschheim, and D. Abrams. 2004. Out-of-plane dynamic response of unreinforced masonry bearing walls attached to flexible diaphragms. Proceedings of 13th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Vancouver, Canada, 2045
   Google Scholar
• Sivaraman, P.S 2017. Concepts from traditional Indian architecture to reduce energy consumption in modern Indian architecture. Master’s thesis, Harvard Extension School.
   Google Scholar
• Sivaraman, P.S 2017. Concepts from traditional Indian architecture to reduce energy consumption in modern Indian architecture. Master’s thesis, Harvard Extension School Master’s thesis
   Google Scholar
• Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessments New Zealand. 2017. The seismic assessment of existing buildings: Part A, Part B, Part C.
   Google Scholar
• Technical Guidelines for Engineering Assessments New Zealand. 2017. The seismic assessment of existing buildings: Part A, Part B, Part C (New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (NZSEE)).
   Google Scholar
• Tena-Colunga, A., and D. P. Abrams. 1996. Seismic behaviour of structures with flexible diaphragms. Journal of Structural Engineering 122 (4):439–45. doi:10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1996)122:4(439).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valluzzi, M. R., E. Garbin, M. Dalla Benetta, and C. Modena. 2010. In-plane strengthening of timber floors for the seismic improvement of masonry buildings. World Conference on Timber Engineering, Riva del Guarda, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Varatharajan, A., S. Vignesh, C. S. Prasanth, and A. Menon. 2012. Structural assessment and strengthening of multi-tiered masonry towers.8th International Conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Poland
   Google Scholar
• Vasulingam, V., and R. Vedamuthu. 2014. Structural strategy and construction system in the case of traditional Beri-Chettiar Dwellings in Chennai (1850-1950). 9th International Conference on structural analysis of historical constructions, Mexico
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., P. A. Kelly, P. J. H. Quenneville, and J. M. Ingham. 2014. Nonlinear in-plane deformation mechanics of timber floor diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings. Journal of Engineering Mechanics 140 (4):04013010. doi:10.1061/(asce)em.1943-7889.0000694.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, A., P. J. H. Quenneville, and J. M. Ingham. 2014. In-plane orthotropic behaviour of timber floor diaphragms in unreinforced masonry buildings. Journal of Structural Engineering (United States) 140. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0000819.
   Google Scholar