Integration of Laser Scanning Technologies and 360º Photography for the Digital Documentation and Management of Cultural Heritage Buildings

References

• Agapiou, A., V. Lysandrou, D. D. Alexakis, K. Themistocleous, B. Cuca, A. Argyriou, A. Sarris, D. G. Hadjimitsis. 2015. Cultural heritage management and monitoring using remote sensing data and GIS: The case study of Paphos area, Cyprus. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems 54:230–39. doi:10.1016/j.compenvurbsys.2015.09.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alsadik, B., and L. K. Jasim. 2019. Active use of panoramic mobile mapping systems for as built surveying and heritage documentation. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (2):244–56. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1431733.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angjeliu, G., D. Coronelli, and G. Cardani. 2020. Development of the simulation model for digital Twin applications in historical masonry buildings: The integration between numerical and experimental reality. Computers & Structures 238:106282. doi:10.1016/j.compstruc.2020.106282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Angulo-Fornos, R., and M. Castellano-Román. 2020. HBIM as support of preventive conservation actions in heritage architecture. Experience of the renaissance quadrant facade of the cathedral of Seville. Applied Sciences 10 (7):2428. doi:10.3390/app10072428.
   Google Scholar
• Apollonio, F. I., V. Basilissi, M. Callieri, M. Dellepiane, M. Gaiani, F. Ponchio, F. Rizzo, A. R. Rubino, R. Scopigno, G. Sobra’. 2018. A 3D-centered information system for the documentation of a complex restoration intervention. Journal of Cultural Heritage 29:89–99. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.07.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balletti, C., B. Bertellini, C. Gottardi, and F. Guerra. 2019. Geomatics techniques for the enhancement and preservation of cultural heritage. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42:133–40. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W11-133-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Barontini, A., C. Alarcon, H. S. Sousa, D. V. Oliveira, M. G. Masciotta, and M. Azenha. 2021. Development and demonstration of a HBIM framework for the preventive conservation of cultural heritage. International Journal of Architectural Heritage. doi:10.1080/15583058.2021.1894502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bassier, M., T. Deloof, S. Vincke, and M. Vergauwen. 2018. Panoramic image application for cultural heritage. In Digital heritage. Progress in cultural heritage: Documentation, preservation, and protection. EuroMed 2018. Lecture notes in computer science, M. Ioannides, et al. ed., Vol. 11196, Cham: Springer 386- 395 . doi:10.1007/978-3-030-01762-0_33.
   Google Scholar
• Biason, A., G. Walsh, B. Walser, and T. Moerwald. (2019, April 22–26). A new approach to the Terrestrial Laser Scanner workflow: The RTC360 solution. FIG Working Week 2019, Geospatial information for a smarter life and environmental resilience Hanoi, Vietnam.
   Google Scholar
• Bitelli, G., G. Gatta, A. Guccini, and A. Zaffagnini. 2019. GIS and geomatics for archive documentation of an architectural project: The case of the big arc of entrance to the Vittorio Emanuele II Gallery of Milan, by Giuseppe Mengoni (1877). Journal of Cultural Heritage 38:204–12. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.01.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, M., and D. G. Lowe. 2007. Automatic panoramic image stitching using invariant features. International Journal of Computer Vision 74:59–73. doi:10.1007/s11263-006-0002-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cabo, C., S. Del Pozo, P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, C. Ordóñez, and D. González-Aguilera. 2018. Comparing terrestrial laser scanning (TLS) and wearable laser scanning (WLS) for individual tree modeling at plot level. Remote Sensing 10 (4):540. doi:10.3390/rs10040540.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conde, B., L. F. Ramos, D. V. Oliveira, B. Riveiro, and M. Solla. 2017. Structural assessment of masonry arch bridges by combination of non-destructive testing techniques and three-dimensional numerical modelling: Application to Vilanova bridge. Engineering Structures 148:621–38. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.07.011.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costamagna, E., M. Santana, B. Nicoletta, N. Mendes, P. B. Lourenco, S. Su, Y. M. Paik, and A. Mind. 2020. Advanced non-destructive techniques for the diagnosis of historic buildings: The Loka-Hteik-Pan temple in Bagan. Journal of Cultural Heritage 43:108–17. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.09.006.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Fino, M., S. Bruno, and F. Fatiguso. 2022. Dissemination, assessment and management of historic buildings by thematic virtual tours and 3d models. Virtual Archaeology Review 13 (26):88–102. doi:10.4995/var.2022.15426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Del Pozo, S., J. Herrero-Pascual, B. Felipe-García, D. Hernández-López, P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, and D. González-Aguilera. 2016. Multispectral radiometric analysis of façades to detect pathologies from active and passive remote sensing. Remote Sensing 8 (1):80. doi:10.3390/rs8010080.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewez, T. J., S. Yart, Y. Thuon, P. Pannet, and E. Plat. 2017. Towards cavity‐collapse hazard maps with Zeb‐Revo handheld laser scanner point clouds. The Photogrammetric Record 32:354–76. doi:10.1111/phor.12223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Filippo, A., L. J. Sánchez-Aparicio, S. Barba, J. A. Martín-Jiménez, R. Mora, and D. G. Aguilera. 2018. Use of a wearable mobile laser system in seamless indoor 3D mapping of a complex historical site. Remote Sensing 10 (12):1897. doi:10.3390/rs10121897.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Di Giulio, R., F. Maietti, E. Piaia, M. Medici, F. Ferrari, and B. Turillazzi. 2017. Integrated data capturing requirements for 3d semantic modelling of cultural heritage: The inception protocol. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W3-251-257. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W3-251-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Eyre, M., A. Wetherelt, and J. Coggan. 2016. Evaluation of automated underground mapping solutions for mining and civil engineering applications. Journal of Applied Remote Sensing 10 (4):046011. doi:10.1117/1.JRS.10.046011.
   Google Scholar
• Funari, M. F., A. E. Hajjat, M. G. Masciotta, D. V. Oliveira, and P. B. Lourenço. 2021. A parametric scan-to-FEM framework for the digital Twin generation of historic masonry structures. Sustainability 13:11088. doi:10.3390/su131911088.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Historic England. 2018. 3D laser scanning for heritage: Advice and guidance on the use of laser scanning in archaeology and architecture. Swindon: Historic England.
   Google Scholar
• Korumaz, M., M. Betti, A. Conti, G. Tucci, G. Bartoli, V. Bonora, A. G. Korumaz, L. Fiorini. 2017. An integrated terrestrial laser scanner (TLS), deviation analysis (DA) and finite element (FE) approach for health assessment of historical structures. A minaret case study. Engineering Structures 153:224–38. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.026.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kushwaha, S. K. P., K. R. Dayal, Sachchidanand, S. Raghavendra, H. Pande, P. S. Tiwari, S. Agrawal, and S. K. Srivastava. 2020. 3D digital documentation of a cultural heritage site using terrestrial laser scanner - A case study. Lecture Notes in Civil Engineering 33:49–58.
   Google Scholar
• Lagüela, S., I. Dorado, M. Gesto, P. Arias, D. González-Aguilera, H. Lorenzo. 2018. Behavior analysis of novel wearable indoor mapping system based on 3d-slam. Sensors 18 (3):766. doi:10.3390/s18030766.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lercari, N. 2019. Monitoring earthen archaeological heritage using multi-temporal terrestrial laser scanning and surface change detection. Journal of Cultural Heritage 39:152–65. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luo, L., X. Wang, H. Guo, R. Lasaponara, X. Zong, N. Masini, and Y. Yao. 2019. Airborne and spaceborne remote sensing for archaeological and cultural heritage applications: A review of the century (1907–2017). Remote Sensing of Environment 232:111280. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2019.111280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mah, O. B. P., Y. Yan, J. S. Y. Tan, Y.-X. Tan, G. Q. Y. Tay, D. J. Chiam, Y.-C. Wang, K. Dean, -C.-C. Feng, et al. 2019. Generating a virtual tour for the preservation of the (in)tangible cultural heritage of Tampines Chinese Temple in Singapore. Journal of Cultural Heritage 39:202–11. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2019.04.004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masciotta, M. G., M. J. Morais, L. F. Ramos, D. V. Oliveira, L. Sánchez-Aparicio, and D. Gonzalez-Aguilera. 2021. A digital-based integrated methodology for the preventive conservation of cultural heritage: The experience of HeritageCare project. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 15 (6):844–63. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1668985.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masciotta, M. G., L. F. Ramos, and P. B. Lourenço. 2017. The importance of structural monitoring as a diagnosis and control tool in the restoration process of heritage structures: A case-study in Portugal. Journal of Cultural Heritage 27:36–47. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.04.003.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masciotta, M. G., L. F. Ramos, P. B. Lourenço, and J. A. C. Matos. 2016. Development of key performance indicators for the structural assessment of heritage buildings, code 124064. In E-Journal of non-destructive testing - Proc. 8th European workshop on structural health monitoring (EWSHM 2016), ISBN: 978-151082793-6 Bilbao (Spain), vol. 1, 606–617, NDT.net.
   Google Scholar
• Matulionis, R. C., and J. C. Freitag. 1991. Preventive maintenance of buildings. 1st ed. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhod.
   Google Scholar
• Mokros, M., T. Mikita, A. Singh, J. Tomaštík, J. Chudá, P. Wężyk, K. Kuželka, P. Surový, M. Klimánek, K. Zięba-Kulawik, et al. 2021. Novel low-cost mobile mapping systems for forest inventories as terrestrial laser scanning alternatives. International Journal of Applied Earth Observations and Geoinformation 104:102512. doi:10.1016/j.jag.2021.102512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mora, R., L. J. Sánchez-Aparicio, M. Á. Maté-González, J. García-Álvarez, M. Sánchez-Aparicio, and D. González-Aguilera. 2021. An historical building information modelling approach for the preventive conservation of historical constructions: Application to the historical library of Salamanca. Automation in Construction 121:103449. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mukupa, W., G. W. Roberts, C. M. Hancock, and K. Al-Manasir. 2017. A review of the use of terrestrial laser scanning application for change detection and deformation monitoring of structures. Survey Review 49 (353):99–116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Napolitano, R. K., G. Scherer, and B. Glisic. 2018. Virtual tours and informational modeling for conservation of cultural heritage sites. Journal of Cultural Heritage 29:123–29. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2017.08.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nocerino, E., F. Menna, F. Remondino, I. Toschi, and P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez. 2017. Investigation of indoor and outdoor performance of two portable mobile mapping systems. Videometrics, Range Imaging, and Applications XIV. International Society for Optics and Photonics 10332.
   Google Scholar
• Nothegger, C., and P. Dorninger. 2009. 3D filtering of high-resolution terrestrial laser scanner point clouds for cultural heritage documentation. Journal of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Geoinformation Science 2009 (1):53–63.
   Google Scholar
• Ortiz, R., P. Ortiz, J. M. Martín, and M. A. Vázquez. 2016. A new approach to the assessment of flooding and dampness hazards in cultural heritage, applied to the historic centre of Seville (Spain). Science of the Total Environment 551:546–55. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.01.207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., B. Conde, M. A. Maté-González, R. Mora, M. Sánchez-Aparicio, J. García-Álvarez, D. González-Aguilera. 2019a. A comparative study between MMS and TLS for the stability analysis of the San Pedro Church barrel vault by means of the finite element method. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W15:1047–54. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-1047-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., S. Del Pozo, L. F. Ramos, A. Arce, and F. M. Fernandes. 2018. Heritage site preservation with combined radiometric and geometric analysis of TLS data. Automation in Construction 85:24–39. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.023.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., M. G. Masciotta, J. García-Alvarez, L. F. Ramos, D. V. Oliveira, J. A. Martín-Jiménez, D. A. González-Aguilera, and P. Monteiro. 2020. Web-GIS approach to preventive conservation of heritage buildings. Automation in Construction 118:103304. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2020.103304.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., R. Mora, B. Conde, M. Á. Maté-González, M. Sánchez-Aparicio, and D. González-Aguilera. 2021. Integration of a wearable mobile mapping solution and advance numerical simulations for the structural analysis of historical constructions: A case of study in San Pedro Church (Palencia, Spain). Remote Sensing 13 (7):1252. doi:10.3390/rs13071252.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., R. Moreno-Blanco, J. A. Martín-Jiménez, P. Rodríguez-Gonzálvez, A. L. Muñoz-Nieto, and D. González-Aguilera. 2019b. Smartwall: A new web-based platform for the valorization of the medieval wall of Avila. The International Archives of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 42:1055–62. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W15-1055-2019.
   Google Scholar
• Sánchez-Aparicio, L. J., B. Riveiro, D. González-Aguilera, and L. F. Ramos. 2014. The combination of geomatic approaches and operational modal analysis to improve calibration of finite element models: A case of study in Saint Torcato church (Guimarães, Portugal). Construction and Building Materials 70:118–29. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.07.106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanoer, M. M., and F. M. Abed. 2018. Evaluate 3D laser point clouds registration for cultural heritage documentation. The Egyptian Journal of Remote Sensing and Space Sciences 21 (3):295–304. doi:10.1016/j.ejrs.2017.11.007.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, G., M. Deidda, A. Dessi, and M. Marras. 2012. Laser scanner survey to cultural heritage conservation and restoration. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XXXIX-B5:589–94.
   Google Scholar
• Vacca, G., D. R. Fiorino, and D. Pili. 2018. A spatial information system (SIS) for the architectural and cultural heritage of Sardinia (Italy). ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 7 (2):49. doi:10.3390/ijgi7020049.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valero, E., A. Forster, F. Bosché, E. Hyslop, L. Wilson, and A. Turmel. 2019. Automated defect detection and classification in ashlar masonry walls using machine learning. Automation in Construction 106:102846. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2019.102846.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wojtkowska, M., M. Kedzierski, and P. Delis. 2021. Validation of terrestrial laser scanning and artificial intelligence for measuring deformations of cultural heritage structures. Measurement 167:108291. doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2020.108291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu, M., and B. van Laar. 2021. The Monumentenwacht model for preventive conservation of built heritage: A case study of Monumentenwacht Vlaanderen in Belgium. Frontiers of Architectural Research 10 (1):92–107. doi:10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang, G., P. A. Vela, P. Karasev, and I. Brilakis. 2015. A sparsity-inducing optimization-based algorithm for planar patches extraction from noisy point-cloud data. Computer-Aided Civil and Infrastructure Engineering 30 (2):85–102. doi:10.1111/mice.12063.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zlot, R., M. Bosse, K. Greenop, Z. Jarzab, E. Juckes, and J. Roberts. 2014. Efficiently capturing large, complex cultural heritage sites with a handheld mobile 3D laser mapping system. Journal of Cultural Heritage 15 (6):670–78. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2013.11.009.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar