Quantitative Evaluation Method of Structural Safety for the Great Wall Hollow Defensive Forts under Gravity Loads

References

• Aghabeigi, P., and S. Farahmand-Tabar. 2021. Seismic vulnerability assessment and retrofitting of historic masonry building of Malek Timche in Tabriz Grand Bazaar. Engineering Structures 240:112418. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112418.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cao, Y. C., and Y. K. Zhang. 2018. The fractal structure of the Ming Great Wall Military Defense System: A revised horizon over the relationship between the Great Wall and the military defense settlements. Journal of Cultural Heritage 33:159–69. doi:10.1016/j.culher.2018.03.010.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervera, M., J. Oliver, and O. Manzoli. 1996. A rate-dependent isotropic damage model for the seismic analysis of concrete dams. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 25:987–1010. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1096-9845(199609)25:9<987::AID-EQE599>3.0.CO;2-X.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clementi, F., V. Gazzani, M. Poiani, and S. Lenci. 2016. Assessment of seismic behaviour of heritage masonry buildings using numerical modelling. Journal of Building Engineering 8:29–47. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2016.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Code for design of masonry structures. China Northeast Architectural Design & Research Institute CO.,LTD, 2011. Beijing: China building industry press.
   Google Scholar
• Drucker, D. C., and W. Prager. 1952. Soil mechanics and plastic analysis or limit design. Quarterly of Applied Mathematics 10:157–65. doi:10.1090/qam/48291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y. M., W. W. Chen, K. Cui, S. Y. Gong, T. B. Pu, and X. L. Fu. 2017. A model characterizing deterioration at earthen sites of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai Province, China. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering 53:426–34. doi:10.1007/s11204-017-9423-y.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y. M., W. W. Chen, K. Cui, and K. W. Zhang. 2020b. Study on damage assessment of earthen sites of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai Province Based on Fuzzy-AHP and AHP-TOPSIS. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 14:903–16. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1576241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Du, Y. M., W. W. Chen, K. Cui, J. K. Zhang, Z. Chen, and Q. Y. Zhang. 2020a. Damage assessment of earthen sites of the Ming Great Wall in Qinghai Province: A comparison between Support Vector Machine (SVM) and BP neural network. ACM Journal on Computing and Cultural Heritage 13. doi:10.1145/3376120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, R., J. Oliver, and M. Cervera. 1998. A strain-based plastic viscous-damage model for massive concrete structures. International Journal of Solids and Structures 35:1533–58. doi:10.1016/S0020-7683(97)00119-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faria, R., J. Oliver, and M. Cervera. 2004. Modeling material failure in concrete structures under cyclic actions. Journal of Structural Engineering 130:1997–2005. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2004)130:12(1997).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., and S. Cattari. 2015. PERPETUATE guidelines for seismic performance-based assessment of cultural heritage masonry structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13:13–47. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9674-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, X. J., H. L. Gong, O. Zhang, W. G. Zhang, and Y. H. Sun. 2008. Research on the damage of the Great Wall of Ming Dynasty in Beijing by remote sensing. Science in China Series E-Technological Sciences 51:195–202. doi:10.1007/s11431-008-5001-x.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, Y., C. Lin, and X. Qiu. 2018. Fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method of masonry structure safety based on grey clustering theory. Mathematical Problems in Engineering 2018:1–15. doi:10.1155/2018/8710192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meng, Z. Y. 1998. Classification of the architectural form of the Great Wall defensive forts in Ming Dynasty. Cultural Relics 29–35.
   Google Scholar
• Mi, H. Z., J. M. Huang, and Y. N. Hu. 2014. Experiment on constitutive relation and strength properties of three-to-seven Lime-loess. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering 31 (02) 112–118 .
   Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1990. An exposition of the AHP in reply to the paper remarks on the analytic hierarchy process. Management Science 36:259–68. doi:10.1287/mnsc.36.3.259.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1994a. Highlights and critical-points in the theory and application of the analytic hierarchy process. European Journal of Operational Research 74:426–47. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(94)90222-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saaty, T. L. 1994b. How to make a decision - The analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces 24:19–43. doi:10.1016/0377-2217(90)90057-I.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Standard for appraisal of reliability of civil buildings. Sichuan Institute of Building Research, Sichuan No.6 Construction CO.,LTD, 2015. Beijing: China building industry press.
   Google Scholar
• Valente, M., and G. Milani. 2016. Seismic assessment of historical masonry towers by means of simplified approaches and standard FEM. Construction and Building Materials 108:74–104. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.01.025.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ye, L. P., X. C. Lin, Z. Qu, X. Z. Lu, and P. Pan. 2010. Component importance evaluation method based on generalized structural stiffness. Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering, Journal of Architecture and Civil Engineering 27:1–6+20.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, Y. M. 2019. A study on the types and stages of the Ming Great Wall hollow defensive forts – Centered on jizhou Town and Zhenbao Town. Palace Museum Journal 49–61+109.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, C. W., Q. Chun, Y. J. Lin, Y. D. Han, and X. H. Jia. 2021. Quantitative assessment method of structural safety for complex timber structures with decay diseases. Journal of Building Engineering 44:103355. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2021.103355.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar