Collaborative Workflow in an HBIM Project for the Restoration and Conservation of Cultural Heritage

References

• Angulo-Fornos, R., and M. Castellano-Román. 2020. HBIM as support of preventive conservation actions in heritage architecture. Experience of the renaissance quadrant façade of the Cathedral of Seville. Applied Sciences 10 (7):2428. doi:10.3390/app10072428.
   Google Scholar
• Antón, D., B. Medjdoub, R. Shrahily, and J. Moyano. 2018. Accuracy evaluation of the semi-automatic 3D modeling for historical building information models. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 12:790–805. doi:10.1080/15583058.2017.1415391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azkarate Garai-Olaun, A. 2010. Experiencia Metodológica En Arqueología de La Arquitectura de Un Grupo de Investigación: Instituto de Historia. CSIC. Madrid. In Arqueología Aplicada Al Estudio e Interpretación de Edificios Históricos: Últimas Tendencias Metodológicas, ed. C. M. Morales, and E. D. V. García, Vols. 103-120. Págs.
   Google Scholar
• Banfi, F., S. Fai, and R. Brumana. 2017. BIM automation: Advanced modeling generative process for complex structures. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 4 (2W2):9–16. doi:10.5194/isprs-annals-IV-2-W2-9-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Banfi, F., R. Brumana, A. Giuseppe Landi, M. Previtali, F. Roncoroni, and C. Stanga. 2022. Building archaeology informative modelling turned into 3D volume stratigraphy and extended reality time-lapse communication. Virtual Archaeology Review 13 (26):1–21. doi:10.4995/VAR.2022.15313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barazzetti, L., F. Banfi, R. Brumana, and M. Previtali. 2015. Creation of parametric BIM objects from point clouds using nurbs. The Photogrammetric Record 30 (152):339–62. doi:10.1111/phor.12122.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brogiolo, G. P. 1. 9. 4. 6., and A. 1. 9. 6. 3. Cagnana. 2012. Archeologia Dell’architettura : Metodi e Interpretazioni. In Archeologia Dell’architettura, ed. All‘Insegna del Giglio, Florencia, 1–195.
   Google Scholar
• Brumana, R., S. Della Torre, M. Previtali, L. Barazzetti, L. Cantini, D. Oreni, and F. Banfi. 2018. Generative HBIM modelling to embody complexity (LOD, LOG, LOA, LOI): Surveying, preservation, site intervention—the basilica Di Collemaggio (L’Aquila). Applied Geomatics 10 (4):545–67. doi:10.1007/s12518-018-0233-3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bruno, N., and R. Roncella. 2019. HBIM for conservation: A new proposal for information modeling. Remote Sensing 11 (15):1751. doi:10.3390/rs11151751.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Castellano-Román, M., and F. Pinto-Puerto. 2019. Dimensions and levels of knowledge in heritage building information modelling, HBIM: The model of the charterhouse of jerez (Cádiz, Spain). Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 14 (September):e00110. doi:10.1016/J.DAACH.2019.E00110.
   Google Scholar
• DOcPlayer. 2022. U.S. general services administration public buildings service office of the chief architect. January PDF free download . http://docplayer.net/5222245-U-s-general-services-administration-public-buildings-service-office-of-the-chief-architect-january-2009.html. (accessed Apr 27, 2020).
   Google Scholar
• Doglioni, F. 1988. La Ricerca Sulle Strutture Edilizie Tra Archeologia Stratigrafica e Restauro Architettonico. In Francovich y Parenti, 223–48.
   Google Scholar
• Dore, C., and M. Murphy. 2017. Current state of the art historic building information modelling. ISPRS - International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W5 (September):185–92. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-W5-185-2017.
   Google Scholar
• Fai, S., and J. Rafeiro. 2014. Establishing an appropriate level of detail (LoD) for a building information model (BIM). ISPRS - Int. Arch. Photogramm. Remote Sens. Spat. Inf. Sci II–5 (May):123–30. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-123-2014.
   Google Scholar
• Forum, B. I. M. 2020. BIMForum - LOD . https://bimforum.org/lod/. (Accessed Apr 04, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• García Valldecabres, J., M. C. López Gonzalez, and I. Jordán Palomar. 2016. El Estudio Del Patrimonio Arquitectónico a Partir de La Metodología HBIM: Un Caso Medieval. In El Arquitecto, de La Tradición Al Siglo XXI: Docencia e Investigación En Expresión Gráfica Arquitectónica, Vol. 2, 697–704. Págs.
   Google Scholar
• Graham, K., L. Chow, and S. Fai. 2018. Level of detail, information and accuracy in building information modelling of existing and heritage buildings. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development 8 (4):495–507. doi:10.1108/JCHMSD-09-2018-0067/FULL/PDF.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graphisoft, S. E. 2020. Introducción a BIMcloud. https://help.graphisoft.com/BC/SPA/_BIMcloud_/10_BIMcloudFeatureOverview/10_BIMcloudFeatureOverview-1.htm. (Accessed May 27, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Gray, J., and B. Rumpe. 2015. Models for digitalization. Software & Systems Modeling 14 (4):1319–20. doi:10.1007/S10270-015-0494-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris, E. C. 2014. Archaeological stratigraphy: A paradigm for the anthropocene. Journal of Contemporary Archaeology 1:105–09. doi:10.1558/jca.v1i1.73.
   Google Scholar
• Jordan-Palomar, I., P. Tzortzopoulos, J. García-Valldecabres, and E. Pellicer. 2018. Protocol to manage heritage-building interventions using heritage building information modelling (HBIM). Sustainability 10 (4):908. doi:10.3390/su10040908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jouan, P., and P. Hallot. 2020. Digital twin: Research framework to support preventive conservation policies. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 9 (4):228. doi:10.3390/IJGI9040228.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khodeir, L. M., D. Aly, and S. Tarek. 2016. Integrating HBIM (Heritage building information modeling) tools in the application of sustainable retrofitting of heritage buildings in Egypt. Procedia Environmental Sciences 34 (January):258–70. doi:10.1016/J.PROENV.2016.04.024.
   Google Scholar
• Lehtola, V. V., H. Kaartinen, A. Nüchter, R. Kaijaluoto, A. Kukko, P. Litkey, E. Honkavaara, T. Rosnell, M. Vaaja, J.-P. Virtanen, et al. 2017. Comparison of the selected state-of-the-art 3D indoor scanning and point cloud generation methods. Remote Sensing 9 (8):796. doi:10.3390/RS9080796.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Logothetis, S., A. Delinasiou, and E. Stylianidis. 2015. Building information modelling for cultural heritage: A review. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences II-5/W3 (September):177–83. doi:10.5194/isprsannals-II-5-W3-177-2015.
   Google Scholar
• López, F., P. Lerones, J. Llamas, J. Gómez-García-Bermejo, and E. Zalama. 2018. A review of heritage building information modeling (H-BIM). Multimodal Technologies and Interaction 2 (2):21. doi:10.3390/mti2020021.
   Google Scholar
• Magazine, L. I. D. A. R. 2019. USIBD’s version 3 of the level of accuracy (LOA) Specification version 3.0 publishes today - LIDAR magazine. https://lidarmag.com/2019/08/20/usibds-version-3-of-the-level-of-accuracy-loa-specification-version-3-0-publishes-today/. (Accessed Mar 17, 2022).
   Google Scholar
• Manferdini, A. M., F. Remondino, S. Baldissini, M. Gaiani, and B. Benedetti. 2008. 3D modeling and semantic classification of archaeological finds for management and visualization in 3D archaeological databases. In, 14th VSMM Proceedings, Lemessos, Chipre, 221–28.
   Google Scholar
• Merchán, P., S. Salamanca, M. José Merchán, E. Pérez, and D. Moreno. 2018. Pasado, Presente Y Futuro De Los Hbim (Heritage/Historic Building Information Models). XXXIX Jornadas de Automática 1:5–7.
   Google Scholar
• Moyano, J., J. E. Nieto-Julián, L. M. Lenin, and S. Bruno. 2021 March. Operability of point cloud data in an architectural heritage information model. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–20. doi:10.1080/15583058.2021.1900951.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murphy, M., E. McGovern, and S. Pavia. 2009. Historic building information modelling (HBIM). Structural Survey 27 (4):311–27. doi:10.1108/02630800910985108.
   Google Scholar
• Musicco, A., R. Alessia Galantucci, S. Bruno, C. Verdoscia, and F. Fatiguso. 2021. Automatic point cloud segmentation for the detection of alterations on historical buildings through AN unsupervised and clustering-based machine learning approach. ISPAn 52 (2):129–36. doi:10.5194/ISPRS-ANNALS-V-2-2021-129-2021.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto Julián, J. E., and J. J. Moyano Campos. 2014. El estudio paramental en el modelo de información del edificio histórico o ‘ proyecto HBIM ’ The paramental study on the model of information of historic building or “ HBIM project “. Virtual Archaeology Review 5:73–85. doi:10.4995/var.2014.4183.
   Google Scholar
• Nieto-Julian, J.E., M. Bouzas Cavada, and J. Moyano. 2021. Un proyecto de rehabilitación HBIM para la capilla de san antonio - san blais, o porriño, pontevedra. In XV Congreso Internacional de Expresión Gráfica Aplicada a La Edificación, España, 1–12.
   Google Scholar
• Oreni, D., R. Brumana, and F. Banfi . 2014. Beyond crude 3D models: From point clouds to historical building information modeling via NURBS. Cultural heritage: documentation, preservation, and protection: 5th international conference, November 3–8. EuroMed 2014, Limassol, Cyprus.
   Google Scholar
• Pocobelli, D., J. B. Ph, P. Bryan, J. Still, and J. Grau-Bové. 2018. Building information models for monitoring and simulation data in heritage buildings. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII–2 (2):909–16. doi:10.5194/isprs-archives-XLII-2-909-2018.
   Google Scholar
• Rebolj, D., Z. Pučko, N. Čuš Babič, M. Bizjak, and D. Mongus. 2017. Point cloud quality requirements for scan-vs-BIM based automated construction progress monitoring. Automation in Construction 84 (October):323–34. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2017.09.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Remondino, F. 2011. Heritage recording and 3D modeling with photogrammetry and 3D scanning. Remote Sensing 3 (6):1104–38. doi:10.3390/rs3061104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rua, H., and A. Gil. 2014. Automation in heritage – Parametric and associative design strategies to model inaccessible monuments: The case-study of eighteenth-century Lisbon águas livres aqueduct. Digital Applications in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage 1 (3–4):82–91. doi:10.1016/J.DAACH.2014.06.002.
   Google Scholar
• Santoni, A., R. Martín-Talaverano, R. Quattrini, and J. Ignacio Murillo-Fragero. 2021. HBIM approach to implement the historical and constructive knowledge. The case of the real colegiata of San Isidoro (León, Spain). Virtual Archaeology Review 12 (24):49–65. doi:10.4995/VAR.2021.13661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabales Rodríguez, M. A. 1997. Análisis Arqueológico de Paramentos. Aplicación En El Patrimonio Edificado Sevillano. SPAL. Revista de Prehistoria y Arqueología de La Universidad de Sevilla (6):263–95. doi:10.12795/SPAL.1997.I6.15.
   Google Scholar
• Talaverano, R. M., J. I. M. Fragero, and M. De Los Ángeles Utrero Agudo. 2021. Reflections and criteria related to the creation of BIM models of historical buildings. Arqueologia de La Arquitectura (18). April. doi:10.3989/ARQ.ARQT.2021.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tang, P., D. Huber, B. Akinci, R. Lipman, and A. Lytle. 2010. Automatic reconstruction of as-built building information models from laser-scanned point clouds: A review of related techniques. In Automation in Construction, Elsevier B.V. doi:10.1016/j.autcon.2010.06.007.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson, C., and J. Boehm. 2015. Automatic geometry generation from point clouds for BIM. Remote Sensing 7 (9):11753–75. doi:10.3390/rs70911753.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, W., X. Qiangeng, D. Ceylan, R. Mech, and U. Neumann . 2019. DISN: Deep implicit surface network for high-quality single-view 3D reconstruction. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 32 (NeurIPS 2019).
   Google Scholar