Numerical Assessment of the Seismic Performance of a Timber Retrofit Solution for Unreinforced Masonry Buildings

References

• American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE). 2017. ASCE/SEI 41-17: Seismic evaluation and retrofit of existing buildings. Reston, Virginia, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.
   Google Scholar
• American Wood Council (AWC). 2015. ANSI/AF&PA SDPWS-2015: Special design provisions for wind and seismic. Leesburg, VA: American Wood Council.
   Google Scholar
• Babaeidarabad, S., D. Arboleda, G. Loreto, and A. Nanni. 2014. Shear strengthening of unreinforced concrete masonry walls with fabric-reinforced-cementitious-matrix. Construction and Building Materials 65:243–53. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2014.04.116.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, J. W. 2015. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthquake Spectra 31 (1):579–99. doi:10.1193/021113EQS025M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Binda, L., and A. Saisi. 2005. Research on historic structures in seismic areas in Italy. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 7 (2):71–85. doi:10.1002/pse.194.
   Google Scholar
• Bourne, S. J., S. J. Oates, J. J. Bommer, B. Dost, J. van Elk, and D. Doornhof. 2015. A Monte Carlo method for probabilistic hazard assessment of induced seismicity due to conventional natural gas production. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 105 (3):1721–38. doi:10.1785/0120140302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bracchi, S., M. Mandirola, M. Rota, and A. Penna. 2020. A new macroelement-based strategy for modelling reinforced masonry piers. Kubica, Kwiecień & Bednarz. In Brick and Block Masonry-From Historical to Sustainable Masonry, 900–907. London: CRC Press. doi:10.1201/9781003098508.
   Google Scholar
• Brandonisio, G., G. Lucibello, E. Mele, and A. De Luca. 2013. Damage and performance evaluation of masonry churches in the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:693–714. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.021.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brignola, A., S. Pampanin, and S. Podestà. 2009. Evaluation and control of the in-plane stiffness of timber floors for the performance-based retrofit of URM buildings. Bulletin of the New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering 42 (3):204–21. doi:10.5459/bnzsee.42.3.204-221.
   Google Scholar
• Brunesi, E., S. Peloso, R. Pinho, and R. Nascimbene. 2019. Shake-table testing of a full-scale two-story precast wall-slab-wall structure. Earthquake Spectra 35 (4):1583–609. doi:10.1193/072518EQS184M.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassol, D., I. Giongo, J. Ingham, and D. Dizhur. 2021. Seismic out-of-plane retrofit of URM walls using timber strong-backs. Construction and Building Materials 269:121237. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chrisp, D. J. 1980. Damping models for inelastic structures. Dissertation, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, H., R. Pinho, J. van Elk, and J. Uilenreef. 2019. Probabilistic damage assessment of buildings due to induced seismicity. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (8):4495–516. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0462-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crowley, H., and R. Pinho. 2020. Report on the v7 fragility and consequence models for the Groningen field. Technical report. https://www.nam.nl/over-nam/onderzoeksrapporten.html.
   Google Scholar
• Darbhanzi, A., M. S. Marefat, and M. Khanmohammadi. 2014. Investigation of in-plane seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry walls by means of vertical steel ties. Construction and Building Materials 52:122–29. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2013.11.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dizhur, D. Y., M. Giaretton, I. Giongo, and J. M. Ingham. 2017. Seismic retrofit of masonry walls using timber strong-backs. SESOC Journal 30 (2):30–44.
   Google Scholar
• Dolce, M. 1991. Schematizzazione e modellazione degli edifici in muratura soggetti ad azioni sismiche. L’industria Delle Costruzioni 25 (242):44–57. [in Italian].
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2004. Eurocode 5: Design of Timber Structures - Part 1.1: General - Common Rules and Rules for Buildings, EN 1995-1-1:2004. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2006. EN 300: Oriented Strand Boards (OSB) - definitions, classification and specifications. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• European Committee for Standardization (CEN). 2016. EN 14081-1: Timber structures. Strength graded structural timber with rectangular cross section - Part I: General requirements. Brussels, Belgium: European Committee for Standardization.
   Google Scholar
• Foulger, G. R., M. P. Wilson, J. G. Gluyas, B. R. Julian, and R. J. Davies. 2018. Global review of human-induced earthquakes. Earth-Science Reviews 178:438–514. doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2017.07.008.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Franchi, A., P. Napoli, P. Crespi, N. Giordano, and M. Zucca. 2021. Unloading and reloading process for the earthquake damage repair of ancient Masonry columns: The case of the Basilica di Collemaggio. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1–16. doi:10.1080/15583058.2021.1904056.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaretton, M., D. Dizhur, and J. M. Ingham. 2016. Shaking table testing of as-built and retrofitted clay brick URM cavity-walls. Engineering Structures 125:70–79. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.032.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giaretton, M., D. Dizhur, E. Garbin, J. M. Ingham, and F. da Porto. 2018. In-plane strengthening of clay brick and block masonry walls using textile-reinforced mortar. Journal of Composites for Construction 22 (5):04018028. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000866.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graziotti, F., U. Tomassetti, S. Kallioras, A. Penna, and G. Magenes. 2017. Shaking table test on a full scale URM cavity wall building. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12):5329–64. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0185-8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, G., I. Senaldi, F. Graziotti, G. Magenes, K. Beyer, and A. Penna. 2019. Shake-table test of a strengthened stone masonry building aggregate with flexible diaphragms. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (7):1078–97. doi:10.1080/15583058.2019.1635661.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, G., N. Damiani, M. Miglietta, and F. Graziotti. 2021. Cyclic response of masonry piers retrofitted with timber frames and boards. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers - Structures and Buildings 174 (5):372–88. doi:10.1680/jstbu.19.00134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horton, J. W., Jr., and R. A. Williams. 2012. The 2011 Virginia earthquake: What are scientists learning? EOS, Transactions American Geophysical Union 93 (33):317–18. doi:10.1029/2012EO330001.
   Google Scholar
• Jalayer, F., R. De Risi, and G. Manfredi. 2015. Bayesian Cloud Analysis: Efficient structural fragility assessment using linear regression. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (4):1183–203. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9692-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kallioras, S., F. Graziotti, and A. Penna. 2019. Numerical assessment of the dynamic response of a URM terraced house exposed to induced seismicity. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (3):1521–52. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0495-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagomarsino, S., A. Penna, A. Galasco, and S. Cattari. 2013. TREMURI program: An equivalent frame model for the nonlinear seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 56:1787–99. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2013.08.002.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ma, R., L. Jiang, M. He, C. Fang, and F. Liang. 2012. Experimental investigations on masonry structures using external prestressing techniques for improving seismic performance. Engineering Structures 42:297–307. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.04.029.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., A. Penna, and A. Galasco 2010. A full-scale shaking table test on a two-storey stone masonry building. 14th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. Ohrid, Republic of Macedonia.
   Google Scholar
• Malomo D., C. Morandini, H. Crowley, R. Pinho, and A. Penna. 2021. Impact of ground floor openings percentage on the dynamic response of typical Dutch URM cavity wall structures. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (1):403–428. doi:10.1007/s10518-020-00976-z.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, N., P. B. Lourenço, and A. Campos–Costa. 2014. Shaking table testing of an existing masonry building: Assessment and improvement of the seismic performance. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43 (2):247–66. doi:10.1002/eqe.2342.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglietta, M., N. Damiani, G. Guerrini, and F. Graziotti. 2021. Full‐scale shake‐table tests on two unreinforced masonry cavity‐wall buildings: Effect of an innovative timber retrofit. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (6):2561–96. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01057-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ministero delle infrastrutture e dei trasporti (MIT). 2018. Aggiornamento delle Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Rome, Italy: Gazzetta Ufficiale.
   Google Scholar
• Morandini, C., D. Malomo, R. Pinho, and A. Penna. 2022. Development and validation of a numerical strategy for the seismic assessment of a timber retrofitting solution for URM cavity-wall buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering (Accepted). doi:10.1080/13632469.2022.2104960.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penna, A., S. Lagomarsino, and A. Galasco. 2014. A nonlinear macroelement model for the seismic analysis of masonry buildings. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 43 (2):159–79. doi:10.1002/eqe.2335.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Podestà, S., and L. Scandolo. 2019. Earthquakes and Tie-Rods: Assessment, Design, and Ductility Issues. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (3):329–39. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1563239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter, K., R. Kennedy, and R. Bachman. 2007. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthquake Spectra 23 (2):471–89. doi:10.1193/1.2720892.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rayleigh, L. 1945. Theory of sound. Vol. 1. New York: Dover Publications. published originally in 1896.
   Google Scholar
• Riccadonna, D., I. Giongo, G. Schiro, E. Rizzi, and M. A. Parisi. 2019. Experimental shear testing of timber-masonry dry connections for the seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry shear walls. Construction and Building Materials 211:52–72. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Senaldi, I. E., G. Guerrini, P. Comini, F. Graziotti, A. Penna, K. Beyer, and G. Magenes. 2020. Experimental seismic performance of a half-scale stone masonry building aggregate. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 1–35. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00631-2.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomassetti, U., A. A. Correia, F. Graziotti, and A. Penna. 2019. Seismic vulnerability of roof systems combining URM gable walls and timber diaphragms. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 48 (11):1297–318. doi:10.1002/eqe.3187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaževič, M., M. Gams, and T. Berset. 2015. Strengthening of stone masonry walls with composite reinforced coatings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (7):2003–27. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9697-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar