Seismic Behaviour of a 20th Century Heritage Structure Built of Welded Tuff Masonry and Timber Frames

References

• Abira town hall. 2022. List of designated cultural properties in Abira Town. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://www.town.abira.lg.jp/kosodate/s-guide/shisetsu/1393
   Google Scholar
• AIJ. 2006. AIJ standard for structural design of timber structures. Kyoto: Maruzen.
   Google Scholar
• Aktaş, Y. D. 2017. Seismic resistance of traditional timber-frame hımış structures in Turkey: A brief overview. International Wood Products Journal 8 (sup1):21–28. doi:10.1080/20426445.2016.1273683.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Almeida, C., J. P. Guedes, A. Arêde, C. Q. Costa, and A. Costa. 2012. Physical characterization and compression tests of one leaf stone masonry walls. Construction and Building Materials 30:188–97. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.043.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Araújo, A. S., D. V. Oliveira, and P. B. Lourenço. 2014. Numerical study on the performance of improved masonry-to-timber connections in traditional masonry buildings. Engineering Structures 80:501–13. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.027.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Architectural Institute of Japan (AIJ), Hokkaido branch. 1994. Historic buildings in Otaru. Otaru: Otaru city board of education.
   Google Scholar
• Borri, A., M. Corradi, G. Castori, and A. De Maria. 2015. A method for the analysis and classification of historic masonry. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (9):2647–65. doi:10.1007/s10518-015-9731-4.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borri, A., R. Sisti, M. Corradi, and C. Quintaliani. 2019. Reinforcement of Shear Walls with the Reticulatus method and CLT panels. In Reinforcement of Shear Walls with the Reticulatus method and CLT panels, 254–64. Ascoli Piceno, Italy: L'ingegneria sismica in Italia - XVIII convegno ANIDIS.
   Google Scholar
• Cao, J., H. Xiong, and J. Chen. 2021. Mechanical performance of timber-concrete bolted connections under cyclic loading. In Structures, Vol. 34, 3464–77. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Carvalho, E. P., and E. V. M. Carrasco. 2010. Influence of test specimen on experimental characterization of timber–concrete composite joints. Construction and Building Materials 24 (8):1313–22. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.12.036.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ceccotti, A., P. Faccio, M. Nart, C. Sandhaas, and P. Simeone. 2006. Seismic behaviour of historic timber-frame buildings in the Italian Dolomites. In ICOMOS International Wood Committee—15th International Symposium Istanbul and Rize (Turkey), Istanbul, Turkey.
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2005a. Eurocode 6—Design of masonry structures. General rules for reinforced and unreinforced masonry structures. (EN 1996–1–1). Brussel, Belgium, European Committee for Standardization, 2005
   Google Scholar
• CEN. 2005b. Eurocode 3—Design of steel structures. Design of joints (EN 1993–1–8). Brussel, Belgium, European Committee for Standardization, 2005
   Google Scholar
• Chang, W. S., and M. F. Hsu. 2007. Rotational performance of traditional Nuki joints with gap II: The behavior of butted Nuki joint and its comparison with continuous Nuki joint. Journal of Wood Science 53 (5):401–07. doi:10.1007/s10086-007-0880-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang, W. S., J. Shanks, A. Kitamori, and K. Komatsu. 2009. The structural behaviour of timber joints subjected to bi‐axial bending. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 38 (6):739–57. doi:10.1002/eqe.854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ching, F. D., M. M. Jarzombek, and V. Prakash. 2017. A global history of architecture. New York, United States: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Corradi, M., and A. Borri. 2018. A database of the structural behavior of masonry in shear. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 16 (9):3905–30. doi:10.1007/s10518-018-0328-6.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crayssac, E., X. Song, Y. Wu, and K. Li 2018. Lateral performance of mortise-tenon jointed traditional timber frames with wood panel infill. Engineering Structures 161:223–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czech technical standard (CSN). 2016. EN 338 Structural timber - Strength classes
   Google Scholar
• Deniz, B. E., and T. Topal. 2021. A new durability assessment method of the tuffs used in some historical buildings of Cappadocia (Turkey). Environmental Earth Sciences 80 (7):1–32. doi:10.1007/s12665-021-09546-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutu, A., M. Niste, I. Spatarelu, D. I. Dima, and S. Kishiki. 2018. Seismic evaluation of Romanian traditional buildings with timber frame and mud masonry infills by in-plane static cyclic tests. Engineering Structures 167:655–70. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.02.062.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutu, A., H. Sakata, Y. Yamazaki, and T. Shindo. 2016. In-plane behavior of timber frames with masonry infills under static cyclic loading. Journal of Structural Engineering 142 (2):04015140. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001405.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Engel, H. 2020. Measure and construction of the Japanese house. Vermont, United States: Tuttle Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Fazio, M. W., M. Moffett, and L. Wodehouse. 2019. Buildings across time: An introduction to world architecture. New York, United States: McGraw-Hill Education.
   Google Scholar
• FEMA 356. 2000. Pre-standard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Washington, D.C, United States: FEMA Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Gattesco, N., and I. Boem. 2018. Numerical study on the reduction of the seismic vulnerability of historical industrial buildings with wide timber roofs. Procedia Structural Integrity 11:298–305. doi:10.1016/j.prostr.2018.11.039.
   Google Scholar
• Germinario, L., and Á. Török. 2019. Variability of technical properties and durability in volcanic tuffs from the same quarry region–examples from Northern Hungary. Engineering Geology 262:105319. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2019.105319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guadagnuolo, M., M. Aurilio, A. Basile, and G. Faella. 2020. Modulus of elasticity and compressive strength of tuff masonry: Results of a wide set of flat-jack tests. Buildings 10 (5):84. doi:10.3390/buildings10050084.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guerrini, G., N. Damiani, M. Miglietta, and F. Graziotti. 2021. Cyclic response of masonry piers retrofitted with timber frames and boards. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Structures and Buildings 174 (5):372–88. doi:10.1680/jstbu.19.00134.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heap, M. J., J. I. Farquharson, A. R. Kushnir, Y. Lavallée, P. Baud, H. A. Gilg, and T. Reuschlé. 2018. The influence of water on the strength of Neapolitan Yellow Tuff, the most widely used building stone in Naples (Italy). Bulletin of Volcanology 80 (6):1–15. doi:10.1007/s00445-018-1225-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirose, W., Y. Kase, G. Kawakami, H. Koyasu, and A. Urabe 2018. Preliminary report of surface deformation and damages by strong ground motions of the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi Earthquake. Report of Hokkaido Research Center of Geology 90:15–32.
   Google Scholar
• Hosoya, T., I. Towhata, and M. Ikeda. 2021, September 26-29. Reconnaissance survey on earthquake-induced failures of ground composed of volcanic materials in Hokkaido, Japan, during the 2018 Hokkaido Eastern Iburi earthquake of Mw= 6.6. 6th International Conference on Geotechnical and Geophysical Site Characterization, Budapest, Hungary, 8.
   Google Scholar
• International Institute of Seismology and Earthquake Engineering (IISEE). 2022. Seismic design of building foundation. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://iisee.kenken.go.jp/net/seismic_design_code/japan/japan.htm
   Google Scholar
• International Organization for Standardization (ISO). 2019a. ISO 3129: 2019Wood — Sampling methods and general requirements for physical and mechanical testing of small clear wood specimens. Geneva: ISO central secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2014a. ISO 13061-3:2014 Physical and mechanical properties of wood — Test methods for small clear wood specimens — Part 3: Determination of ultimate strength in static bending. Geneva: ISO central secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2014b. ISO 13061-4:2014 Physical and mechanical properties of wood — Test methods for small clear wood specimens — Part 4: Determination of modulus of elasticity in static bending. Geneva: ISO central secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2019b. ISO 1920-3:2019 Testing of concrete — Part 3: Making and curing test specimens. Geneva: ISO central secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2019c. ISO 6892-1:2019(en) Metallic materials — Tensile testing — Part 1: Method of test at room temperature. Geneva: ISO central secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020a. 13061-5:2020 Physical and mechanical properties of wood — Test methods for small clear wood specimens — Part 5: Determination of strength in compression perpendicular to grain. Geneva: ISO central secretariat.
   Google Scholar
• ISO. 2020b. 1920-4:2020 Testing of concrete — Part 4: Strength of hardened concrete (Geneva: ISO central secretaria).
   Google Scholar
• Italian Ministry for Cultural Heritage and Activities (IMCHA). 2011. Guidelines for evaluation and mitigation of seismic risk to cultural heritage. Rome: Gangemi.
   Google Scholar
• Iuorio, O., J. A. Dauda, and P. B. Lourenço. 2021. Experimental evaluation of out-of-plane strength of masonry walls retrofitted with oriented strand board. Construction and Building Materials 269:121358. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121358.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Japan Meteorological Agency (JMA). 2019. Post earthquake damage survey, 2018 Iburi earthquake. Accessed April 21,2022 https://www.jma.go.jp/jma/kishou/books/saigaiji/saigaiji_201901.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Japan National Trust. 1979. Otaru canal and stone masonry warehouses. Tokyo: Hoei publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Japanese Association for Conservation of Architectural Monuments. 1987. Restoration report, Japan mail steamer office. Kyoto: Shinyosha.
   Google Scholar
• Kayen, R., B. Wham, A. R. Grant, M. Atsushi, D. Anderson, P. Zimmaro, P. Wang, Y. Tsai, J. Bachhuber, C. Madugo, et al. 2019. Seismological, geological, and geotechnical engineering aspects of the 2018 MW 6.6 Hokkaido eastern Iburi earthquake. California, United States: Geotechnical Extreme Events Reconnaissance Association (GEER).
   Google Scholar
• Khorsandnia, N., H. R. Valipour, and K. Crews. 2012. Experimental and analytical investigation of short-term behaviour of LVL–concrete composite connections and beams. Construction and Building Materials 37:229–38. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.07.022.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kržan, M., S. Gostič, S. Cattari, and V. Bosiljkov. 2015. Acquiring reference parameters of masonry for the structural performance analysis of historical buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (1):203–36. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9686-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langenbach, R. 2007. From “Opus Craticium” to the “Chicago Frame”: Earthquake-resistant traditional construction. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 1 (1):29–59. doi:10.1080/15583050601125998.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li, S., Z. Zhou, H. Luo, G. Milani, and D. Abruzzese. 2020. Behavior of traditional Chinese mortise-tenon joints: Experimental and numerical insight for coupled vertical and reversed cyclic horizontal loads. Journal of Building Engineering 30:101257. doi:10.1016/j.jobe.2020.101257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Longarini, N., P. Crespi, and M. Scamardo. 2020. Numerical approaches for cross-laminated timber roof structure optimization in seismic retrofitting of a historical masonry church. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 18 (2):487–512. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00661-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço, P. B., M. P. Ciocci, F. Greco, G. Karanikoloudis, C. Cancino, D. Torrealva, and K. Wong. 2019. Traditional techniques for the rehabilitation and protection of historic earthen structures: The seismic retrofitting project. International Journal of Architectural Heritage 13 (1):15–32. doi:10.1080/15583058.2018.1497232.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martínez-Martínez, J., A. Pola, L. García-Sánchez, A. G. Reyes, O. L. S. Osorio, V. J. L. Macías, and J. Robles-Camacho. 2018. Building stones used in the architectural heritage of Morelia (México): Quarries location, rock durability and stone compatibility in the monument. Environmental Earth Sciences 77 (5):1–16. doi:10.1007/s12665-018-7340-7.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meireles, H., R. Bento, S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2012. A hysteretic model for “frontal” walls in Pombalino buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 10 (5):1481–502. doi:10.1007/s10518-012-9360-0.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miglietta, M., N. Damiani, G. Guerrini, and F. Graziotti. 2021. Full‐scale shake‐table tests on two unreinforced masonry cavity‐wall buildings: Effect of an innovative timber retrofit. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 19 (6):2561–96. doi:10.1007/s10518-021-01057-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreira, S., L. F. Ramos, D. V. Oliveira, and P. B. Lourenço. 2014. Experimental behavior of masonry wall-to-timber elements connections strengthened with injection anchors. Engineering Structures 81:98–109. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.09.034.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nakumura, Y. 2008, October 12–17. On the H/V spectrum. The 14th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Beijing, China, 10.
   Google Scholar
• National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience (NIED). 2019. NIED K-NET, KiK-net, National Research Institute for Earth Science and Disaster Resilience. Accessed April 21, 2022. http://www.kyoshin.bosai.go.jp/kyoshin/docs/kyoshin_index.html
   Google Scholar
• Nishi, K., and K. Hozumi. 1985. What Is Japanese Architecture? Tokyo, Japan: Kodansha International. (Horton H Trans.).
   Google Scholar
• Otaru city council. 2022. Otaru-shi designated historic building. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://www.city.otaru.lg.jp.e.go.hp.transer.com/categories/bunya/gakushu_sports_bunka/rekiken/
   Google Scholar
• PIET 70. 1971. Obras de fábrica. Prescripciones del Instituto Eduardo Torroja. Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas Madrid: Instituto Eduardo Torroja.
   Google Scholar
• Poletti, E., and G. Vasconcelos. 2015. Seismic behaviour of traditional timber frame walls: Experimental results on unreinforced walls. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 13 (3):885–916. doi:10.1007/s10518-014-9650-9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Public Works Research Institute. 2008. National geotechnical information search engine. Accessed July 14, 2022, https://www.kunijiban.pwri.go.jp/viewer/
   Google Scholar
• Qu, Z., X. Fu, S. Kishiki, and Y. Cui. 2020. Behavior of masonry infilled Chuandou timber frames subjected to in-plane cyclic loading. Engineering Structures 211:110449. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.110449.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Riccadonna, D., I. Giongo, G. Schiro, E. Rizzi, and M. A. Parisi. 2019. Experimental shear testing of timber-masonry dry connections for the seismic retrofit of unreinforced masonry shear walls. Construction and Building Materials 211:52–72. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2019.03.145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shimadzu. 2022b. Universal /Tensile Testing Machine. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://www.shimadzu.com/an/products/materials-testing/uni-ttm/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Shimadzu Corporation. 2022a. Autograph AGS-X Series. Accessed April 21, 2022. https://www.shimadzu.com/an/products/materials-testing/uni-ttm/autograph-ags-x-series/index.html
   Google Scholar
• Soil Science Division Staff (SSDS). 2017. Examination and description of soil profiles. In Soil survey manual, USDA Handbook 18, ed. C. Ditzler, K. Scheffe, and H. C. Monger, 83–234, Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Taazount, M., S. Amziane, and D. Molard. 2013. Tangential behavior of nailed composite timber–concrete floor structures. Construction and Building Materials 40:506–13. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.09.092.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• TNODIAN. 2021. DIANA Documentation Release 10; DIANA FEA. Delft, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Tokyo Sokushin. 2022. Tokyo Sokushin. Accessed April 21, 2022. http://www.to-soku.co.jp/en/
   Google Scholar
• Torrealva, D. E., and E. F. Vicente. 2014 Experimental behaviour of traditional seismic retrofitting techniques in earthen buildings in Peru. In Proc., 9th international conference on structural analysis of historical constructions (SAHC2014), Mexico City, Mexico.
   Google Scholar
• Valluzzi, M. R., E. Saler, A. Vignato, M. Salvalaggio, G. Croatto, G. Dorigatti, and U. Turrini. 2021. Nested buildings: an innovative strategy for the integrated seismic and energy retrofit of existing masonry buildings with CLT panels. Sustainability 13 (3):1188. doi:10.3390/su13031188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanin, F., D. Zaganelli, A. Penna, and K. Beyer. 2017. Estimates for the stiffness, strength and drift capacity of stone masonry walls based on 123 quasi-static cyclic tests reported in the literature. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 15 (12):5435–79. doi:10.1007/s10518-017-0188-5.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vecchio, F. J., and M. P. Collins. 1986. The modified compression-field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear. ACI Journal 83 (2):219–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vieux-Champagne, F., Y. Sieffert, S. Grange, A. Polastri, A. Ceccotti, and L. Daudeville. 2014. Experimental analysis of seismic resistance of timber-framed structures with stones and earth infill. Engineering Structures 69:102–15. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.02.020.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vintzileou, E. 2008. Effect of timber ties on the behavior of historic masonry. Journal of Structural Engineering 134 (6):961–72. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:6(961).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar