An Analytical and Numerical Approach for Shear Failure of Pier-Wall Connections in Typical Dutch URM Buildings

References

• Addessi, D., S. Marfia, E. Sacco, and J. Toti. 2014. Modeling approaches for masonry structures. Open Civil Engineering Journal 8 (1):288–300. doi:10.2174/1874149501408010288.
   Google Scholar
• Benedetti, A., and E. Steli. 2008. Analytical models for shear–displacement curves of unreinforced and FRP reinforced masonry panel. Construction and Building Materials 22 (3):175–85. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2006.09.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini, C., S. Cattari, and S. Lagomarsino. 2008. In-plane strength of unreinforced masonry piers. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 38 (2):243–67. doi:10.1002/eqe.860.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Calderini, C., and S. Lagomarsino. 2008. Continuum model for in-plane anisotropic inelastic behavior of masonry. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 134 (2):209–20. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2008)134:2(209).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christopoulos, C., A. Filiatrault, C. M. Uang, and B. Folz. 2002. Post-tensioned energy dissipating connections for moment resisting steel frames. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 128 (9):1111–20. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2002)128:9(1111).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DIANA FEA User’s Manual. 2019. TNO building and construction research.
   Google Scholar
• Esposito, R., F. Messali, P. Ravenshorst, R. Schipper, and J. Rots. 2019. Seismic assessment of a lab-tested two-storey unreinforced masonry Dutch terraced house. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 17 (8):4601–23. doi:10.1007/s10518-019-00572-w.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esposito, R., K. Terwel, G. Ravenshorst, R. Schipper, F. Messali, and J. Rots. 2017. Cyclic pushover test on an unreinforced masonry structure resembling a typical Dutch terraced house. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Fusco, D., F. Messali, J. Rots, D. Addessi, and S. Pampanin. 2021. Numerical study of pier-wall connections in typical Dutch URM buildings. In 12th International Conference on Structural Analysis of Historical Constructions: SAHC 2021, Online event, 29 Sep - 1 Oct,2021, ed. P. Roca, L. Pelà, and C. Molins, International Centre for Numerical Methods in Engineering, CIMNE. 2217–28.
   Google Scholar
• Fusco, D., F. Messali, J. Rots, D. Addessi, and S. Pampanin. 2022. Numerical issues on brittle shear failure of pier-wall continuous vertical joints in URM Dutch buildings. Engineering Structures 258:114078. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Housner, W. G. 1963. The behavior of inverted pendulum structures during earthquakes. Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 53 (2):403–17. doi:10.1785/BSSA0530020403.
   Google Scholar
• Jafari, S., R. Esposito, and J. G. Rots. 2019. From brick to element: Investigating the mechanical properties of calcium silicate masonry Structural analysis of historical constructions, edied byAguilar, R., Torrealva, D., Moreira, S., Pando, M. A., and Ramos, L. F. Vol. 18, 596–604. Cham: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Kallioras, S., L. Grottoli, and F. Graziotti. 2020. Quasi-static cyclic tests on U-shaped unreinforced masonry walls made of calcium-silicate bricks and blocks. EUCENTRE Research Report EUC092/2020U, EUCENTRE, Pavia, Italy.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenco, P. B. 1996. Computational strategies for masonry structures. PhD Thesis., Delft University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Lourenco, P. B. 2002. Computations on historic masonry structures. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials 4 (3):301–19. doi:10.1002/pse.120.
   Google Scholar
• Magenes, G., and A. Penna. 2011. Seismic design and assessment of masonry buildings in Europe: recent research and code development issues. 9th Australasian Masonry Conference, Queenstown, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Mariani, V., F. Messali, M. Hendriks, and J. Rots. 2017. Numerical modelling and seismic analysis of Dutch masonry structural components and buildings. 16th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Santiago, Chile.
   Google Scholar
• Messali, F., M. Pari, R. Esposito, J. G. Rots, and D. Den Hertog. 2018. Blind predictions of a cyclic pushover test on a two-storey masonry assemblage: A comparative study. 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Thessaloniki, Greece.
   Google Scholar
• Newcombe, M., S. Pampanin, A. Buchanan, and A. Palermo. 2008. Section analysis and cyclic behavior of post-tensioned jointed ductile connections for multi-storey timber buildings. Journal of Earthquake Engineering Special Issue 83-110 12 (sup1):83–110. doi:10.1080/13632460801925632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NZCS. 2010. PRESSS design handbook. ed. S. Pampanin, Wellington: New Zealand Concrete Society.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, A. 2004. Use of controlled rocking in the seismic design of bridges. PhD Thesis., Technical Institute of Milan.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, A. Buchanan, and M. Newcombe. 2005. Seismic design of multi-storey buildings using Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL). NZSEE National Conference, Wairakei.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and A. Carr. 2005. Efficiency of simplified alternative modelling approaches to predict the seismic response of precast concrete hybrid systems. Fib Symposium Keep Concrete Attractive, Budapest.
   Google Scholar
• Palermo, A., S. Pampanin, and D. Marriott. 2007. Design, modeling and experimental investigation of seismic-resistant bridge piers with post-tensioned dissipating connections. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 133 (11):1648–61. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9445(2007)133:11(1648).
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pampanin, S. 2005. Emerging solutions for high seismic performance of precast/prestressed concrete buildings. Journal of Advanced Concrete Technology 3 (2):207–23. doi:10.3151/jact.3.207.
   Google Scholar
• Pampanin, S., M. J. N. Priestley, and S. Sritharan. 2001. Analytical modelling of the seismic behaviour of precast concrete frames Designed with ductile connections. Journal of Earthquake Engineering 5 (3):329–67. doi:10.1080/13632460109350397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, F., and N. Augenti. 2013a. Earthquake damages to cultural heritage constructions and simplified assessment of artworks. Engineering Failure Analysis 34:735–60. doi:10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.01.005.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, F., and N. Augenti. 2013b. Assessment of unreinforced masonry cross sections under eccentric compression accounting for strain softening. Construction and Building Materials 41:654–64. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.12.039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parisi, F., C. Balestrieri, and D. Asprone. 2016. Nonlinear micromechanical model for tuff stone masonry: Experimental validation and performance limit states. Construction and Building Materials 105:165–75. doi:10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.078.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petry, S., and K. Beyer. 2015. Force–displacement response of in-plane-loaded URM walls with a dominating flexural mode. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 44 (14):2551–73. doi:10.1002/eqe.2597.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Priestley, M. J. N., S. Sritharan, J. Conley, and S. Pampanin. 1999. Preliminary results and conclusions from the PRESSS precast 5-story test building. PCI Journal 44 (6):42–67. doi:10.15554/pcij.11011999.42.67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Raijmakers, T. M. J., and R. Van der Pluijm. 1992. Stability of the calcium silicate piers. TNOBouw Report BI-91-0219.
   Google Scholar
• Rots, J., R. Van der Pluijm, A. Th. Vermeltfoort, and H. J. M. Janssen. 1997. Structural masonry: An experimental-numerical basis for practical design rules. Rotterdam: A.A. Balkema.
   Google Scholar
• Sacco, E., D. Addessi, and K. Sab. 2018. New trends in mechanics of masonry. Meccanica 53 (7):1565–69. doi:10.1007/s11012-018-0839-x.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansoni, C. 2021. Seismic vulnerability assessment of exiting URM structures through a simplified analytical method. PhD Diss., Sapienza Universityof Rome.
   Google Scholar